Ligament Balancing Research Articles

Medial soft tissue release is also related to the anterior stability of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Medial soft tissue release is occasionally performed to achieve mediolateral ligament balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whose sequential effect on mediolateral and anteroposterior stability remains unclear. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the difference in mediolateral and anteroposterior stability according to a sequential medial soft tissue release in TKA. Cruciate-retaining TKA was performed in six cadaveric knees. Medial and lateral joint gaps, varus-valgus angle, and tibial anterior and posterior translations relative to the femur with pulling and pushing forces, respectively, were measured. All measurements were performed at full extension and 45° and 90° flexion after release of the deep medial collateral ligament (MCL) (stage 1), the posteromedial capsule (stage 2), and the superficial MCL (stage 3). Mediolateral and anteroposterior stability were compared between stages, and correlations between mediolateral and anteroposterior stability were analyzed. Medial joint gap significantly increased from stages 1 to 3 by 3.2mm, 6.8mm, and 7.2mm at extension, 45° flexion, and 90° flexion, respectively, and from stages 2 to 3 by 3.5mm at extension. Varus-valgus angle was varus at stage 2, which turned to valgus at stage 3 (-2.7° to 0.8°, -2.2° to 4.3°, and -5.5° to 2.5° at extension, 45° flexion, and 90° flexion, respectively). Anterior translation at 90° flexion significantly increased from stages 1 and 2 to stage 3 by 11.5mm and 8.2mm, respectively, which was significantly correlated with medial gap (r = 0.681) and varus-valgus angle (r = 0.495). Medial soft tissue release also increased tibial anterior translation as well as medial joint gap, and medial joint gap and tibial anterior translation were significantly correlated. Surgeons should be careful not to create too large medial joint gap and tibial anterior translation in flexion by excessive medial release up to the superficial MCL for achieving an equal mediolateral joint gap in extension.

High accuracy of component positioning and restoration of lower limb alignment using robotic medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Unicondylar arthroplasty was performed using robotic medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-mUKA) and gap-balancing instrumentation. Our hypothesis was that robotic unicondylar knee arthroplasty accurately restores component positioning and lower limb alignment when compared to preoperative planning with actual implantation throughout the range of knee motion due to proper knee balancing. Data were collected prospectively and were analysed for patients undergoing RM-UKA. A cemented UKA was implanted using the MAKO® robotic system. Lower limb alignment at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of flexion was recorded of the native knee, with the trial components in place and finally after component implantation. A spacer according to the femorotibial gap was introduced and the alignment was measured. The position of the final component was planned based on three-dimensional computed tomography images before making the bone cuts. The positioning of the femoral and tibial components was analysed in all three planes. A total of 52 patients were included (mean age 66.3 ± 6.7 years; 34 males, 18 females). The difference in femoral component position after planning and final implantation was 0.04° ± 0.58° more valgus in the coronal plane (p = 0.326) and 0.6° ± 1.4° more flexion relative to the sagittal plane (p = 0.034). The tibial component was placed in the coronal plane in 0.3° ± 0.8° of more varus (p = 0.113) and in the sagittal plane in 0.6° ± 1.2° of more posterior tibial slope (p = 0.001). Lower limb alignment of the native knee in extension was 5.8° ± 2.6° of varus and changed to 3° ± 2.1° varus after UKA (p ≤ 0.01). R-mUKA helps to achieve the target of alignment and component position without any significant differences to the planning. Ligament balancing causes non-significant changes in component position. It allows optimal component position even for off-the-shelf implants respecting the patient's specific anatomy. II.

UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL ALIGNMENT CORRECTION TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS? THE ROLE OF KINEMATIC ALIGNMENT. STATE OFF THE ART REVIEW

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is in many ways the ultimate kinematic operation as the express aim is to resurface the diseased side of the joint and restore pre-arthritic alignment and balance while maintaining integrity of both cruciate ligaments. An increasing body of knowledge relates the outcomes of UKA to pre-arthritic anatomy rather than an arbitrarily defined neutral. The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification provides a validated technique for calculating pre-arthritic limb alignment (the Arithmetic Hip-Knee-Ankle Ankle (aHKA)) and Joint Line Obliquity (JLO) and will enable a greater understanding of the interactions between pre-arthritic anatomy, choice of prosthetic position and outcomes. When pre-arthritic alignment is not taken into consideration a post-operative limb alignment of mild to moderate varus for medial UKA and moderate valgus for lateral UKA appears produces the best outcomes. When pre-arthritic anatomy is taken into account superior results have been reported with restoration of pre-arthritic limb alignment and joint line obliquity. Restriction boundaries have yet to be clearly defined for tibial component coronal and Hip-Knee-Ankle (HKA) angles when applying this new paradigm, but existing evidence would suggest a 60 varus limit for the tibial coronal angle may be a reasonable starting point. Lateral UKA has inherent differences in terms of tibial component positioning and ligament balance targets. Mobile bearing UKA demands a three-dimensional understanding of the effect of implant position on bearing stability. Modification of technique is necessary to produce anatomic tibia component angles with equipment designed for mechanical alignment. Robotic technology allows accurate understanding of pre-arthritic anatomy, precise reproduction of patient specific virtual planning, equally precise manipulation of soft tissue balance and future research using these platforms likely to further clarify in terms of ideal patient specific component and limb alignment targets.

Effect of tibia-first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

This study aims to quantitatively assess the predictability of post-resection gap dimensions and the attainment of balanced gaps using robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA for knee osteoarthritis using a restricted functional alignment (FA) technique. Tibial cuts were performed based on preoperative tibial anatomy within predefined boundaries, followed by femoral component adjustments according to tensioned soft tissues to optimise gap balance. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps, defined as differential laxities of ≤2 mm, across extension, flexion, lateral, and medial gap measurements. Ligament balancing in lateral and medial compartments was assessed using a robotic system at 10° and 90° flexion to evaluate if restricted FA facilitated a balanced knee. Secondary outcomes included implant alignment, resection depth, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Significant increases in both lateral and medial gaps at 10° and 90° flexion were observed following tibial and femoral bone resections (p < 0.001). At extension, average gap changes were 0.9 mm (lateral) and 1.6 mm (medial) after tibial cuts, and 0.5 mm (lateral) and 1.2 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. At 90° flexion, changes were 0.3 mm (lateral) and 1.7 mm (medial) following tibial cuts, and 1.0 mm (lateral) and 1.4 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. Despite these variations, the tibia-first, gap-balancing technique achieved overall balance in 98% of gap measurements. The tibial component was placed at an average of 2.1° varus, while the femoral component was positioned at 0.3° varus and 1.3° external rotation relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Significant improvements in PROMs were noted between preoperative and one-year postoperative evaluations (all p < 0.05). The tibia-first, restricted FA technique achieved a well-balanced knee in 98% of cases, despite inconsistent gap increments observed between initial assessments and post-resection. Therapeutic Level IV.

An Insert Goniometer Can Help Select the Optimal Insert Thickness When Performing Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Medial 1:1 Ball-in-Socket and Lateral Flat Surface Insert and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention.

Current surgical practices in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have advanced and include significant changes and improvements in alignment philosophies, femorotibial implant conformities, and ligament management to replicate in vivo knee kinematics. While corrective measures have emphasized sagittal plane alignment to restore normal flexion-extension (F-E) motion and coronal plane ligament balance, internal-external (I-E) rotation kinematics in the axial plane have been largely neglected. Recent in vivo evidence indicates that the combination of factors necessary to closely restore native tibial rotation as the knee flexes and extends is kinematic alignment (KA), which resurfaces the patient's pre-arthritic knee without releasing ligaments, an insert with medial 1:1 ball-in-socket conformity and a lateral flat surface, and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) retention. However, the inherent anterior-posterior (A-P) stability provided by the medial 1:1 ball-in-socket limits the surgeon's ability to select the correct insert thickness using manual laxity testing. Accordingly, this review presents the design and validation of an instrument called an insert goniometer that measures I-E tibial rotation for inserts that differ in thickness by 1 mm and uses rotation limits at extension and 90° flexion to select the optimal insert thickness. The optimal thickness is the one that provides the greatest external tibial orientation in extension and internal tibial orientation at 90° flexion without lift-off of the insert.

Optimizing the patellofemoral compartment in total knee arthroplasty: Is it time for dynamic assessment?

Despite improvements in implant design, surgical techniques and assistive technologies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), anterior knee pain (AKP) remains frequently reported, even by satisfied patients. This persistent problem calls for better understanding and management of the patellofemoral or anterior compartment during surgery, just as the techniques and strategies deployed to optimize the flexion and extension spaces through personalized alignment, bone cuts and ligament balancing. Assistive technologies such as navigation and robotics provide new tools to manage this 'third space' through precise pre-operative planning and dynamic intra-operative assessment. Such endeavors must start with clear definitions of the 'third space', how it should be measured, what constitutes its 'safe zone', and how it affects outcomes. There are yet no established methods to evaluate the patellofemoral compartment, and no clear thresholds to define over- or under-stuffing. Static assessment using lateral radiographs provides a limited understanding and depends considerably on flexion angle, while dynamic evaluation at multiple flexion angles or using intra-operative computer or robotic-assistance enables a broader perspective and solutions to manage patellar tracking and anterior offset. Future studies should investigate the impact of variations in anterior offset in TKA, define its safe zone, and understand the effects of of thresholds for over- or under-stuffing. Experimental methods such as in-vivo motion analysis and force sensors could elucidate the influence of anterior offset on flexion and extension biomechanics.

Optimal Implant Positioning Following Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Predictive Dynamic Simulation.

In this paper, a novel method is proposed for the determination of the optimal subject-specific placement of knee implants based on predictive dynamic simulations of human movement following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two knee implant models are introduced. The first model is a comprehensive 12-degree-of-freedom (DoF) representation that incorporates volumetric contact between femoral and tibial implants, as well as patellofemoral contact. The second model employs a single-degree-of-freedom equivalent kinematic (SEK) approach for the knee joint. A cosimulation framework is proposed to leverage both knee models in our simulations. The knee model is calibrated and validated using patient-specific data, including knee kinematics and ground reaction forces. Additionally, quantitative indices are introduced to evaluate the optimality of implant positioning based on three criteria: balancing medial and lateral load distributions, ligament balancing, and varus/valgus alignment. The knee implant placement is optimized by minimizing the deviation of the indices from their user-defined desired values during predicted sit-to-stand motion. The method presented in this paper has the potential to enhance the results of knee arthroplasty and serve as a valuable instrument for surgeons when planning and performing this procedure.

An Advanced Knee Simulator Model Can Reproducibly Be Used for Ligament Balancing Training during Total Knee Arthroplasty.

A critical and difficult aspect of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is ligamentous balancing for which cadavers and models have played a large role in the education and training of new arthroplasty surgeons, although they both have several shortcomings including cost, scarcity, and dissimilarity to in vivo ligament properties. An advanced knee simulator (AKS) model based on computed tomography (CT) scans was developed in the setting of these challenges with cadavers and previous models. In this study, we compared the ligament balancing between AKS and human cadaveric knees to assess the validity of using the AKS for ligament balancing training during TKA. A CT scan of a TKA patient with varus deformity was used to design the AKS model with modular components, using three-dimensional printing. Three fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons used technology-assisted TKA procedure to plan and balance three cadaver knees and the AKS model. Medial and lateral laxity data were captured using manual varus and valgus stress assessments for cadavers and the model in an extension pose (10 degrees of flexion from terminal extension) and between 90 and 95 degrees for flexion. After preresection assessments, surgeons planned a balanced cruciate-retaining TKA. Following bony cuts and trialing, extension and flexion ligament laxity values were recorded in a similar manner. Descriptive statistics and Student's t-tests were performed to compare the cadavers and model with a p-value set at 0.05. Preresection medial/lateral laxity data for both extension and flexion were plotted and showed that the highest standard deviation (SD) for the cadavers was 0.67 mm, whereas the highest SD for the AKS was 1.25 mm. A similar plot for trialing demonstrated that the highest SD for the cadavers was 0.6 mm, whereas the highest SD for the AKS was 0.61 mm. The AKS trialing data were highly reproducible when compared with cadaveric data, demonstrating the value of the AKS model as a tool to teach ligament balancing for TKA and for future research endeavors.

Total knee arthroplasty after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a narrative review.

Knee replacement following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be demanding due to altered anatomy, soft tissue scars, bone loss, extensor mechanism complications, and knee instability. This narrative review summarizes the strategies and approaches to managing operative challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following ACL reconstruction. Studies reporting outcomes of patients who underwent TKA after ACL reconstruction were retrieved and assessed to be included in this review that synthesizes the available evidence highlighting the pitfalls encountered during surgery, the intraoperative challenges posed by ligament balancing and exposure, and the leading role of modular and retained implants. TKA following ACL reconstruction has a high rate of intra-operative complications such as instability, bone loss, difficult exposure and demanding soft tissue balancing, representing a revision surgery rather than routine primary knee arthroplasty and a revision-oriented skill set and modular components are recommended to significantly optimize both surgical strategy and patient outcomes. With a rising incidence of ACL injuries and growing reconstructions, anticipating an increase in TKA procedures, this review aims to provide a call for rethinking clinical approaches to ensure effective and patient-centric care. This narrative review seems to indicate that TKA after ACL reconstruction should be considered as revision surgery and modular components should be used. However, future prospective and high-quality studies are required to better clarify risk factors and give strong recommendations for this complex surgery.

Intraoperative lateral laxity greater than 4° is associated with inferior functional improvement in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty.

The study aimed to determine the impact of intraoperative lateral laxity at extension on clinical and functional outcomes 1 year after posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA). In total, 91 varus-type osteoarthritic knees that underwent PS-TKA using the medial preservation gap technique were included. After the femoral trial component placement and patellofemoral joint reduction, the soft-tissue balance was assessed using an offset-type tensor with a 40-lb joint-distraction force. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to the intraoperative lateral laxity at extension (i.e., varus ligament balance) using the mean ± 1 standard deviation: Groups A, ≤0°; B, 0-4°; and C, >4°. The 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and 3-m timed up-and-go test (TUG) time 1-year postoperatively, and their improvements were compared among the groups. While significant improvements were observed in all subscales of the 2011 KSS and TUG post-TKA (p < 0.05), the improvement of functional activities and TUG time were significantly lower in Group C than in Group B (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in symptom improvement, patient satisfaction or patient expectation scores among the groups. An excessive lateral laxity (varus angle) >4° at extension was associated with lower improvement in functional ability 1-year postoperatively. Therefore, excessive intraoperative lateral laxity should be avoided in PS-TKA. Level IV.

Prediction of Distal Femoral and Posterior Articular Surfaces in Total Knee Arthroplasty With Severe Bone Defects Using Computed Tomography-Based Templating Software.

Introduction Optimal repair of the joint line (JL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is critical for knee joint motion reconstruction and ligament balance. Identification of JL may be difficult, particularly in revision or primary cases of severe femoral condylar bone loss. We aimed to define the relationship between the epicondyles and the articular surface (AS) of the femur using computed tomography-based three-dimensional digital templating software. Methods The study included 127 knees with osteoarthritis of the knee below grade 2 on the Kellgren-Lawrence index. A perpendicular line was drawn from the medial and lateral femoral epicondylar processes to the most distal point of the AS, and the distance was measured in the axial and coronal planes. Femoral width was measured as the distance between the medial and lateral epicondyles. All distances described above were converted to a ratio by division with femoral width. Results On the axial plane, the distance from epicondyles to the posterior ASs was 29.4 ± 2.2 mm medially and 21.3 ± 2.1 mm laterally. The width of the distal femur was 75.2 ± 4.2 mm. On the coronal plane, the distances from epicondyles to the distal ASs were 25.2 ± 2.9 mm on the medial side and 21.3 ± 2.5 mm on the lateral side. The ratio of the distance from epicondyles to the distal and posterior ASs divided by the width of the femur was 0.39 ± 0.02, 0.28 ± 0.03, 0.34 ± 0.03, and 0.28 ± 0.03. Conclusions The distance from the epicondyles to the distal and posterior JLs correlates with the distal femur width. These findings may be useful in determining an appropriate JL.

Enhancing soft tissue balance: Evaluating robotic-assisted functional positioning in varus knees across flexion and extension with quantitative sensor-guided technology.

Functional implant positioning (FIP) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an evolution of kinematic alignment based on preoperative CT scan and robotic-assisted technology. This study aimed to assess the ligament balancing of image-based robotic-assisted TKA in extension, mid-flexion and flexion with an FIP using intraoperative sensor-guided technology. The hypothesis was that image-based robotic-assisted TKA performed by FIP would achieve ligament balancing all along the arc of knee flexion. This prospective monocentric study included 47 consecutive patients with varus knees undergoing image-based robotic-assisted TKA performed with FIP. After robotic-assisted bone cuts, trial components were inserted, and soft tissue balance was assessed using sensor-guided technology at 10°, 45° and 90° of knee flexion. A mediolateral balanced knee was defined by an intercompartmental pressure difference (ICPD) ≤ 15 lbf and medial and lateral compartment pressure ≤60 lbf. The mean age was 71.6 years old ±6.7, the mean BMI was 29.0 kg/m2 ± 4.9 and the mean preoperative HKA was 174° ± 5 [159; 183]. The mean postoperative knee alignment was 177.0° ± 2.2° [172; 181]. There were 93.6% of balanced knees (n = 44) at 10 and 90° of knee flexion versus 76.6% (n = 36) at 45° of knee flexion with a significant difference (p = 0.014). Median ICPD at 10, 45 and 90° of knee flexion were, respectively, 7.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 9), 11.0 (IQR: 9.5) and 8.0 (IQR: 9.0). Pairwise analyses revealed differences for ICPD at 45° versus ICPD at 10° (p = 0.003) and ICPD at 90° versus ICPD at 45° (p = 0.007). FIP with an image-based robotic-assisted system allowed the restoration of a well-balanced knee at 10° and 90° of flexion in varus knees. Nevertheless, some discrepancies occurred in midflexion, and more work is needed to understand ligament behaviour all along the arc of knee flexion. Level II.

Outcomes of Image-Free Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Valgus Knee Deformities

BackgroundValgus knee deformities pose a unique challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to the complexity of achieving ligamentous balance and satisfactory alignment compared to varus or neutral deformities. Robotic-assisted (RA) TKA could aid in achieving improved component alignment and balance. MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated a matched cohort of patients to compare image-free RA-TKA (n = 44) versus conventional manual (CM) TKA (n = 30) techniques in patients who have valgus deformity of 5 to 15 degrees, including radiographic and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) over a 3-year period. The patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) studied to determine outcomes were: Western Ontario McMaster University Arthritis Index, Knee Society Score-Function Score, and Short Form 12-item Survey. ResultsOverall, the RA-TKA cohort showed faster improvement in PROMs (37.16 ± 1 8.8 versus 25.74 ± 17.7, P = .02), shorter length of stay (1.41 versus 2.29 days, P = .02), and shorter operating room times (120.79 versus 123.67 minutes, P = .02) than CM-TK). Additionally, there was no difference in the use of primary versus varus-valgus constrained polyethylene liners between the cohorts. ConclusionsIn this investigation, RA-TKA yielded a slightly faster patient recovery, more objective measurements of ligamentous balance, and proved noninferior PROMs compared to CM-TKA for preoperative valgus knee deformities.

Robotic Total Knee Replacement: Our Experience with First 200 Knees

Total knee replacement (TKR) is a commonly done surgery in cases of high-grade arthritis of knee affecting activity of daily living in patients. Conventional zig based TKR (CTKR) with manual instruments provides a balanced knee according to the surgeons’ subjective assessment of ligament balance, still some percentages of patients are found to have dissatisfaction in regards to persistent pain, lack of range of motion and walking unaided. In this study we are sharing our experience in a consecutive series of 200 Robotic-Assisted Primary TKRs. Robotic assisted TKR (RATKR) has multiple advantages over conventional jig based TKR (CTKR), such as it improves the accuracy of implant positioning and reduces outliers in achieving the planned limb alignment, minimal soft tissue dissection, thus reducing pain and need of analgesia, early recovery and giving a natural arc of motion postoperatively. Robotic assisted TKR is associated with reduced iatrogenic injury to the periarticular soft tissue envelope compared to conventional jig-based TKR. A clear advantage of robot-assisted TKR seems to be the ability to execute a highly precise preoperative plan based on computed tomography (CT) scans, minor modification up to submillimetre accuracy in implant positioning can be done which is impossible to differentiate with human eyes. Due to improved alignment of the prosthetic components and improved boneimplant fit, implant loosening is anticipated to be reduced. Limitations of robotic TKR include high installation costs, increased surgical time, implant specificity of the robots and nonavailability of long-term literature due to being a recently evolved technology.

Short-term functional outcomes of robotic-assisted TKA are better with functional alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment.

Ligament balancing is essential to the functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of alignment remains a controversial issue. The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of TKA between functional and adjusted mechanical alignment techniques. The secondary objectives were to compare bone resection, robotic alignment, and radiological assessment. This was a retrospective case-control series comparing TKA performed with functional alignment (FA) and adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Sixty-four FA subjects were matched with 64 aMA controls. These two groups were matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), surgeon, and type of frontal deformity. Both surgical procedures were performed using the MAKO® haptic robotic system. Functional scores (Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS)) were measured at the final postoperative follow-up. A radiographic evaluation was performed at the same time. Mean FJS were respectively 63.4±25.1 [0-100] and 51.2±31.8 [0-100] in FA versus aMA group (p=0.034). Mean OKS were respectively 40.8±6.3 [21-48] and 34.9±11.8 [3-48] in FA versus aMA group (p=0.027). Mean KSS were respectively 184.9±17.0 [126-200] and 175.6±23.1 [102-200] in FA versus aMA group (p=0.02). The main residual symptom was "none" for 73.0% versus 57.8%, "instability" for 6.4% versus 21.9%, "Pain" for 19.1% versus 12.5%, and "effusion" for 1.6% and 7.8% respectively for FA and aMA group (p=0.016). There were 4 complications in the FA group versus 5 in the aMA group (p>0.999). Mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) robotic assessment were respectively 177.3°±2.0 [172-180] and 178.2°±2.0 [173-180] for FA and aMA group (p=0.018). The median difference between HKA robotic and HKA radiological was -3.0° (IQR=3.0; p<0.001). With greater residual deformity and without release, functional alignment showed a statistically significantly better short-term clinical outcome than adjusted mechanical alignment. This difference may not be clinically significant.

LATERAL EPICONDYLE SLIDING OSTEOTOMY IN KNEE ARTHROPLASTIES WITH VALGUS DEFORMITY.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sliding osteotomy of the lateral epicondyle in correcting rigid valgus deformity in knee arthroplasty. A retrospective study of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with lateral epicondyle sliding osteotomy between 2006 and 2018. The main outcome was the incidence of complications and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were Visual Analog Scale for Pain, varus stress test, and varus knee thrust during gait. 19 knees (19 participants) were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 4.2 years. There were no cases of infection or reoperation due to instability. Two participants (10.5%) had mild or moderate knee pain (VAS pain = 4.6 ± 1.9). Two arthroplasties (10.5%) had mild varus stress. No participant presented varus thrust. Sliding osteotomy of the lateral epicondyle allows fast and safe ligament balance of knee valgus deformities. Level of Evidence I, Case series.

Modern robotics platform associated with reduced 90-day complications in hospital setting

BACKGROUND: Early complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) associated with modern robotics platforms integrated with digital balancing technology have not been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare 90-day complication rates between a manual technique and a modern robotic-assisted ligament balancing TKA platform. METHODS: 895 primary TKA procedures from a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed (614 manual TKA, 281 using a modern robotics platform with an integrated digitally controlled ligament balancing device). Post-operative complications within the 90-day episode of care were recorded by the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Differences in complication rates between techniques were further divided into inpatient hospital, outpatient hospital, and ambulatory surgery center (ASC) cohorts. RESULTS: In the pooled hospital cohort and inpatient hospital cohort, ‘Return to OR’ was significantly lower for the robotic assisted group (1.3% vs 5.2% and 0% vs 4.9%, respectively, p&lt; 0.0370). Specifically, the need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) was reduced for the robotics group (0.0% vs 2.5%, p= 0.0352). No differences in overall complication rate or cause of complication was found between manual and robotics cases for the hospital outpatient and ASC cohorts (p⩾ 0.68). CONCLUSION: Within the hospital setting, robotic assisted ligament balancing technology was associated with reduced 90-day postoperative complications for ‘Return to OR’ and MUA.

Constitutional alignment predicts medial ligament balancing in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty for varus knees.

The aim of this study was to identify if constitutional alignment and preoperative radiologic parameters determined whether medial gap balancing was required in mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two hundred and sixty three patients with 394 consecutive knees who underwent primary TKAs were retrospectively analysed in this study. Selective sequential multiple needle puncturing (MNP) was performed for medial ligament balancing when required. Constitutional alignment, which was determined using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification, as well as preoperative and postoperative radiologic parameters was evaluated to identify factors which predicted the need for MNP. One hundred and fifty eight (40.1%) knees required medial ligament balancing with MNP. Patients who required MNP during surgery had significantly more constitutional varus, more varus preoperative mechanical Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (mHKA), smaller preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and a larger change in mHKA and MPTA after surgery than those who did not. Patients with constitutional varus also had a higher incidence of having had MNP to both anterior and posterior superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) fibres. There was no significant difference in preoperative lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and varus-valgus difference (VVD) between groups. Ligament balancing using MNP was determined by constitutional alignment rather than medial soft tissue contracture. Patients with constitutional varus who had a larger medio-lateral gap difference in extension also had a higher incidence of having had MNP to both anterior and posterior sMCL fibres. Retrospective comparative study, level IV.

The Impact of Patellar Position on Mediolateral Joint Gap in Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study

BackgroundThis prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of patellar position (ie, eversion, lateralization, and reduction) on medial and lateral gap measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA designs. MethodsThe present work analyzed 50 knees with primary osteoarthritis that underwent TKA between July and November 2019. Medial and lateral gaps were measured at different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and 120°) in 3 patellar positions after sequentially inserting CR type and PS type trial component in the same knee. ResultsIn CR TKA, medial gaps in patellar reduction showed significantly smaller gaps at 90° and 120° of knee flexion compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). Lateral gaps in patellar reduction were also significantly larger than those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). The mediolateral gap difference in patellar reduction was significantly greater at all flexion angles compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). In PS TKA, similar patterns were observed for medial gaps, lateral gaps, and mediolateral gap differences (P < .001). ConclusionsThe ligament balancing with the patella everted or subluxed may lead to an overly tight medial gap and/or loose lateral gap in the knee with a closed arthrotomy, which has potential consequences for knee function in both CR and PS TKA designs. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering patellar position to ensure optimal soft-tissue balance and joint stability in TKA.

Sensitivity of Model-Based Predictions of Post-TKA Kinematic Behavior to Residual Errors in Ultrasound-Based Knee Collateral Ligament Strain Assessment.

Ultrasound-based ligament strain estimation shows promise in non-invasively assessing knee joint collateral ligament behavior and improving ligament balancing procedures. However, the impact of ultrasound-based strain estimation residual errors on in-silico arthroplasty predictions remains unexplored. We investigated the sensitivity of post-arthroplasty kinematic predictions to ultrasound-based strain estimation errors compared to clinical inaccuracies in implant positioning.Two cadaveric legs were submitted to active squatting, and specimen-specific rigid computer models were formulated. Mechanical properties of the ligament model were optimized to reproduce experimentally obtained tibiofemoral kinematics and loads with minimal error. Resulting remaining errors were comparable to the current state-of-the-art. Ultrasound-derived strain residual errors were then introduced by perturbing lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) stiffness. Afterwards, the implant position was perturbed to match with the current clinical inaccuracies reported in the literature. Finally, the impact on simulated post-arthroplasty tibiofemoral kinematics was compared for both perturbation scenarios. Ultrasound-based errors minimally affected kinematic outcomes (mean differences < 0.73° in rotations, 0.1 mm in translations). Greatest differences occurred in external tibial rotations (-0.61° to 0.73° for MCL, -0.28° to 0.27° for LCL). Comparatively, changes in implant position had larger effects, with mean differences up to 1.95° in external tibial rotation and 0.7 mm in mediolateral translation. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the ultrasound-based assessment of collateral ligament strains has the potential to enhance current computer-based pre-operative knee arthroplasty planning.