Lifetime Risk Of Endometrial Cancer Research Articles

Yield of annual endometrial cancer surveillance in women with PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome

ObjectiveExpert-opinion based guidelines state that endometrial cancer surveillance (ECS) might be considered for patients with PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome (PHTS) based on an elevated lifetime risk of endometrial cancer. We aimed to evaluate the yield of ECS by annual transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and endometrial biopsy (EMB) in PHTS patients. MethodsPHTS patients who visited our PHTS expert center between August 2012 and September 2020 and opted for annual ECS were included. Data on surveillance visits, diagnostics, reports of abnormal uterine bleeding and pathology results were retrospectively gathered and analyzed. ResultsSurveillance was initiated in 25 women with a total of 93 gynecological surveillance visits during 76 surveillance years. The median age at first visit was 39 years (range 31–60) with a median follow-up duration of 38 months (range 6–96). Hyperplasia with and without atypia was detected six and three times, respectively, in seven (28%) women. The median age at hyperplasia detection was 40 years (range 31–50). In six asymptomatic women hyperplasia was detected during annual surveillance visits, while in one patient hyperplasia with atypia was detected during an additional visit due to abnormal uterine bleeding. In seven out of nine hyperplasias detected with EMB, TVUS beforehand showed no abnormalities. No (interval) carcinomas occurred. ConclusionsECS in women with PHTS enables detection of a substantial number of asymptomatic premalignancies, such as hyperplasia with and without atypia, suggesting that ECS may be beneficial with regard to cancer prevention. The addition of EMB to TVUS likely improves the detection of premalignancies.

Abstract P015: Mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction in development of mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer

Abstract Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome carrying roughly 60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC) development. LS-EC is caused by mutations in mismatch repair genes (most commonly MSH2), which lead to DNA repair deficiency and hypermutability. Identifying mechanisms that impact cancer development could provide novel opportunities for EC prevention. Our recent studies in Msh2-deficient mice identified mitochondrial dysfunction in EC pathogenesis. The objective of this study is to define the impact of MSH2 loss on mitochondrial function and oxidative DNA damage to identify targets for EC prevention. We hypothesized that MSH2 loss disrupts mitochondrial function and increases oxidative DNA damage in EC cells. Methods: The effects of MSH2 loss on EC pathogenesis were evaluated using our novel mouse model for EC development (PR-Cre+Msh2flox/flox, abbreviated Msh2KO) and primary cell lines derived from this model. Mitochondrial stress tests (MSTs) compared mitochondrial function in murine and human MSH2-deficient and -intact EC cell lines. Western blots compared mitochondrial protein expression between cell lines. Transcriptomic data of human ECs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were probed using cBioPortal. To examine direct effects of MSH2 loss on oxidative stress and mitochondrial function, we performed lentiviral shRNA knockdown (KD) of MSH2 in two human EC cell lines (KLE, Hec1a) and MSH2 overexpression (MSH2++) in MFE280 cells. MSTs and Western blots were utilized as above. Immunofluorescent staining compared oxidative DNA damage in MSH2-KD, MSH2++, and control cell lines after pharmacologically induced oxidative stress via H2O2. RESULTS Transcriptomic signatures of histologically normal endometrium and EC from Msh2KO mice versus control mice reveal mitochondrial dysfunction as a key aberrant pathway. MSTs show reduced baseline and induced mitochondrial function in murine and human MSH2-deficient EC cells compared to MSH2-intact (p<0.0001). Western blots show that MSH2-deficient EC cells exhibit loss of mitochondrial complex II compared to MSH2-intact cells (p<0.05). TCGA data confirm MSH2-deficient human ECs have reduced complex II subunits (p<0.05). Isogenic in vitro studies show MSH2-KD reduces complex II expression yet has variable effects on mitochondrial function. MSH2 overexpression increases complex II expression and mitochondrial function. Oxidative DNA damage did not differ at baseline, but H2O2-induced DNA damage increased after MSH2-KD in one of two cell lines. Conclusions: MSH2 and complex II loss are strongly associated in EC. Further studies on the downstream effects of complex II loss are necessary to determine the contribution to LS-EC development. Complex II loss could result in disruptions to oxidative phosphorylation, the citric acid cycle, metabolic reprogramming, and oncometabolite production. Defining direct effects of MSH2 loss on these potential cancer susceptibility mechanisms will open new avenues for LS-associated EC prevention. Citation Format: Diana L. Moreno, Mikayla S. Borthwick, Leah Peralta, Wai Kin Chan, Brenda Melendez, Qian Zhang, Nisha Gokul, Melinda S. Yates. Mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction in development of mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Precision Prevention, Early Detection, and Interception of Cancer; 2022 Nov 17-19; Austin, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2023;16(1 Suppl): Abstract nr P015.

Utility of germline multi-gene panel testing in patients with endometrial cancer

ObjectivesPatients with germline mutations in mismatch repair genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) associated with Lynch syndrome (LS) have an increased lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). Multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) is a recent hereditary cancer risk tool enabling next-generation sequencing of numerous genes in parallel. We determined the prevalence of actionable cancer predisposition gene mutations identified through MGPT in an EC patient cohort. MethodsA single center retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients with EC who had a clinical indication for genetic testing and who underwent MGPT as part of standard of care treatment between 2012 and 2021. Pathogenic mutations were identified and actionable mutations were defined as those with clinical management implications. Additionally, the number of individuals identified with LS was compared between MGPT and tumor-based screening. ResultsThe study included a total of 224 patients. Thirty-three patients [14.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.4–20.1] had actionable mutations. Twenty-one patients (9.4%, 95% CI = 5.9–14.0) had mutations in LS genes (4 MLH1, 5 MSH2, 7 MSH6, 4 PMS2, 1 Epcam-MSH2). MGPT revealed two patients with LS (9.5% of LS cases) not identified through routine tumor-based screening. Thirteen patients (5.8%, 95% CI = 3.1–9.7) had at least one actionable mutation in a non-Lynch syndrome gene (6 CHEK2, 2 BRCA2, 2 ATM, 2 APC, 1 RAD51C, 1 BRCA1). ConclusionsGermline MGPT is both feasible and informative as it identifies LS cases not found on tumor testing as well as additional actionable mutations in patients with EC.

Lynch Syndrome in Thai Endometrial Cancer Patients.

Background:Lynch syndrome increases lifetime risk of endometrial cancer to 40-60%. Screening with molecular tumor testing for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins have been recommended. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of MMR deficiency and germline mutation in endometrial cancer Thai patients. Methods:Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins, including MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 were tested in 166 surgical specimens. Patients who had MMR deficiencies were offered genetic counseling and a germline testing using gene-panel next generation sequencing. Results:Fifty-eight of 166 patients (34.9%) had one or more MMR deficiencies which were: MLH1 and PMS2 in 42 patients (25.3%), MSH2 and MSH6 in 11 patients (6.6%), and MSH6 in 5 patients (3.0%). Of the 40 patients (24.1%) who met the revised Bethesda guidelines, 19 patients (47.5%) had MMR deficiency. In contrast, MMR deficiency was found in 39 of the 126 patients (31.0%) who did not meet the revised Bethesda guidelines. A total of 27 patients with MMR deficiencies agreed to have germline genetic testing. Germline MMR mutations were detected in 5 patients (18.5%) including MSH6 (n=2), PMS2 (n=2), and MLH1 mutations (n=1). Incidental germline mutations in other genes were detected in 3 patients (1 BRCA1, 1 PTEN, and 1 BARD1). Among 5 Lynch syndrome patients, 2 patients (40%) did not meet the revised Bethesda guidelines. Eight patients who met the revised Bethesda Guidelines but having MMR proficiency had genetic testing, but no germline mutation was detected. Conclusion:MMR deficiencies were detected in 34.9% of the endometrial cancer patients. Germline mutations were diagnosed in 3.0% of this cohort (5/166 patients). Lynch syndrome screening with MMR immunohistochemistry should be considered in all patients regardless of personal or family history of Lynch syndrome-related cancers.

Universal Endometrial Cancer Tumor Typing: How Much Has Immunohistochemistry, Microsatellite Instability, and MLH1 Methylation Improved the Diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome Across the Population?

(Abstracted from Cancer 2019;125(18):3172–3183) Lynch syndrome caused by germline mutations in several DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins is the most common cause of hereditary and endometrial cancers. Lynch syndrome accounts for approximately 2% to 3% of all endometrial cancers, although the lifetime risk of endometrial cancer for patients with Lynch syndrome varies depending on the specific mutation.

Lynch syndrome screening in thai endometrial cancer patients

Objective: Lynch syndrome (LS) increases the lifetime risk of endometrial cancer by about 40%–60%. Universal screening with microsatellite instability (MSI) and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins have been recommended. However, IHC for MMR proteins is less expensive and more available in most centers. If expression of any MMR proteins is absent, the patients should be offered genetic counseling and genetic testing. MMR IHC screening is not yet recommended in all endometrial cancer patients in Thailand. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of MMR-deficient and germline MMR mutation in Thai endometrial cancer patients.

Utility of multi-gene panel testing with next generation sequencing in women with endometrial cancer.

5588 Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for 2-6% of all endometrial cancers (EC), and women with a germline mutation in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes ( MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) have an average lifetime risk of EC of 40%. As with breast and ovarian cancer syndromes, there are likely other genes implicated in the development of EC outside of the MMR genes. Multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) with next generation sequencing (NGS) allows for simultaneous analysis of numerous genes.We sought to evaluate the characteristics and incidence of gene mutations in women with newly diagnosed EC. Methods: We conducted a review of EC patients diagnosed from 6/2013 to 12/2016 who had MGPT at our institution. Demographics, family history, genetic testing results, and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed using χ2 tests. Results: Of the 129 patients who had MGPT, 13 (10%) had a mutation and only 5 (38%) were in patients < 50 years old. The median age of EC diagnosis is 55 (31-100) years and median BMI = 27.5 (21-59). Majority were stage 1, 76 (59%) and grade 1, 50 (39%). Patients with additional primary cancers, breast or colon were not more likely to have a mutation. However, patients with a family history of gynecologic cancer were more likely to have a mutation identified, 10 (77%) mutation vs no mutation 34 (29%), p = 0.003. Among all patients tested, 8 (6%) had a mutation in LS genes, and 6 (5%) had mutations in other genes ( BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, MUTYH, CHEK2); 1 (0.8%) had both MSH2 and CHEK2 mutation. Three patients had prior testing for breast cancer; 2 were found to have a BRCA1/ 2 mutation and the other was on Tamoxifen and BRCA negative. IHC was performed on 7 of 13 patients, and 5 (71%) had a loss of MMR protein expression. Variants of uncertain significance were noted in 35/129 (27%) of patients tested. Conclusions: Majority of EC patients with a mutation detected with NGS were > age 50. We identified additional new mutations in non-LS genes including, CHEK2, RAD51C, and MUYTH with MGPT. These accounted for 29% of the mutations and would have not been not detected using classic LS gene testing. These genes are implicated in breast, ovary or colon cancer. MGPT testing is feasible and useful in identifying additional actionable gene mutations.

Endometrial cancer risk factors among Lynch syndrome women: a retrospective cohort study.

Background:Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with a significant lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). There are limited data on factors modifying the EC risk in LS patients.Methods:The study cohort included 136 LS mutation-positive women. Exposure data were collected by postal questionnaires. Cox regression model was used to estimate the associations between lifestyle, hormonal, reproductive and medical factors and the risk of EC.Results:Increased EC risk was associated with type II diabetes and hypercholesterolaemia in univariable (HR 3.21, (95% CI 1.34–7.78), P=0.009 and HR 2.08, (95% CI 1.11–3.90), P=0.02; respectively) and with diabetes and duration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in multivariable analysis (HR 4.18 (95% CI 1.52–11.52), P=0.006 and HR 1.07 (95% CI 1.02–1.13), P=0.010; respectively).Conclusions:Prevention of diabetes and avoiding long-duration HRT are potential targets for reduction of EC risk in women with LS.

Evaluation of factors modifying endometrial cancer risk among women with Lynch syndrome: A cohort study.

e17113Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with a significant lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC) among mutation carrier women. Data are limited concerning the effect of the establish...

Genetic counseling and cascade genetic testing in Lynch syndrome.

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of inherited colorectal and endometrial cancers. Individuals with Lynch syndrome have a 10-80% lifetime risk for colorectal cancer and a 15-60% lifetime risk for endometrial cancer. Both cancers are preventable through chemoprevention, intensive cancer surveillance, and risk-reducing surgery options. Efforts to identify as many individuals with Lynch syndrome as possible will prevent cancers and save lives. This includes the traditional cancer genetic counseling model whereby individuals with and without cancer are evaluated for a possible Lynch syndrome diagnosis based on their personal and family history of colon polyps and cancers. It also includes universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome whereby all individuals with colorectal or endometrial cancer are screened for tumor features of Lynch syndrome at the time of diagnosis. Those with tumors suspicious for Lynch syndrome are referred for cancer genetic counseling regardless of their family history of cancer. This two approaches must be maximized to attain high patient reach. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, cascade testing among the at-risk relatives of those diagnosed with Lynch syndrome is critically important to maximize the diagnosis of individuals with Lynch syndrome. In fact, the cost-effectiveness of universal tumor screening for Lynch syndrome relies entirely on counseling and testing as many at-risk individuals as possible since young unaffected individuals stand to benefit the most from an early diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. This approach must be optimized to achieve high family reach. It will take a concerted effort from patients, clinicians and public health officials to improve current approaches to the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome and the prevention and treatment of Lynch syndrome-associated cancer but these lessons can be applied to other conditions as the ultimate example of personalized medicine.

Is endometrial ablation protective against endometrial cancer? A retrospective observational study.

Endometrial ablation has been increasingly used over the last 30 years to manage patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Of primary concern, however, is the potential of the procedure to mask the presence or delay the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term effects of endometrial ablation and its association with the development of endometrial cancer. This is a retrospective observational study that was conducted at Bradford Teaching Hospitals in the United Kingdom. The study included all women who had different types of endometrial ablative procedures in the period of January 1994 to December 2011. Analysis of the data was performed using SPSS for windows (V9) software package. Over 18 years period, 1521 women had endometrial ablative procedures for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. During their long-term follow-up, none of the women developed endometrial cancer later in life. This incidence is much lower than the lifetime risk of endometrial cancer in the general population (RR 0.0135; 95 % CI 0.0007-0.2801; P = 0.0054). To our knowledge, this is the largest study to examine the long-term incidence of endometrial cancer in women who had endometrial ablative procedures. It shows that the development of endometrial cancer does not seem to be associated with endometrial ablative procedures.

The gynecological surveillance of women with Lynch syndrome in Sweden

ObjectiveWomen with Lynch syndrome (LS) have up to a 60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC) and up to a 24% risk of ovarian cancer (OC). Gynecological surveillance is recommended, but the benefit and how it should be performed remain unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess diagnostic modalities for gynecological screening of LS patients in Sweden and clinical outcome. MethodsA retrospective nationwide study of 170 women with molecularly confirmed LS. Data including gynecological LS screening history, biopsy results (if any), genetic records, number of screening visits, results from screening including transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), endometrial biopsy (EB), blood test for tumor marker cancer antigen (CA) 125, prophylactic surgery including age at procedure, and setting from which screening data were obtained from medical records. ResultsA total of 117 women were eligible for gynecological screening and of these, 86 patients attended screening visits. Of these, 41 underwent prophylactic hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Two patients (4.9%) were diagnosed with EC and two (4.9%) with precancerous lesions in conjunction with prophylactic surgery. Total incidence of gynecological cancer in the surveillance group (45 women) was 20% EC, 4% OC. Five patients had endometrial cancer or complex hyperplasia with atypia (n=2) detected by endometrial biopsy. Four additional cases were detected due to interval bleeding. Both cases of ovarian cancer were detected by transvaginal ultrasound in patients with ovarian cysts under surveillance. The youngest woman with endometrial cancer was diagnosed at 35years of age, before she was aware of her diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. ConclusionsGynecological surveillance of women with Lynch syndrome may lead to earlier detection of precancerous lesions, which might have some impact on the morbidity from endometrial cancer although further studies are needed to prove this. Prophylactic hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy reduces the cancer incidence. A practical approach to surveillance in Lynch syndrome women would be to offer annual surveillance beginning at age 30years including probably both TVUS and EB in order to increase diagnostic yield with prospective data registry for follow-up studies. Prophylactic surgery could be performed at a suitable age after childbearing to obtain a balance between reducing the risk of cancer and minimizing long-term complications from premature menopause.

Association of specific PTEN/10q haplotypes with endometrial cancer phenotypes in African-American and European American women

ObjectiveEndometrial carcinoma (EC), the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States, affects European American (EA) women more frequently than African-American (AA) women. Yet, AA women are more likely to die from EC. Proposed etiologies for this racial disparity, such as socioeconomic status, aggressive, non-endometrioid tumor histology, and comorbid conditions, do not account for the entire disparity experienced by AA women, suggesting an unexplored genetic component. Germline mutations in PTEN cause Cowden syndrome (CS), which increases lifetime risk of endometrial cancer. In addition, somatic PTEN silencing is one of the most common initiating events in sporadic EC. Therefore, we hypothesized that specific PTEN haplotypes in the AA population may directly predispose AA women to unfavorable tumor characteristics when diagnosed with EC. MethodsWe conducted a case–control association study of germline variations in and around the PTEN/10q region between 53 EA and 51 AA EC cases and ethnic controls. ResultsEighteen tag SNPs with minor allele frequency ≥0.1, were genotyped and used to reconstruct haplotypes. Forty-eight ancestry informative markers were genotyped control for population stratification. Two haplotypes were overrepresented in AA, and there was a trend towards tumors with higher stage and grade in patients with these haplotypes. One haplotype was overrepresented in the EA population with a trend towards more endometrioid tumors. ConclusionsWe show that specific PTEN/10q haplotypes are significantly different between EA and AA individuals (p≤0.02), and specific haplotypes may increase the risk of unfavorable tumor phenotypes in AA women diagnosed with EC.

The impact of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery in premenopausal women at high risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer due to Lynch syndrome.

Women with Lynch syndrome (LS) have a significantly increased lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (40-60%) and ovarian cancer (7-12%). Currently there is little evidence to support the efficacy of screening for the early detection of these cancers. Another option is risk-reducing hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). Research on the impact of BSO in premenopausal women with a non-LS associated family history cancer has generally shown that women have a high level of satisfaction about their decision to undergo surgery. However, debilitating menopausal symptoms and sexual dysfunction are common post-surgical problems. We used a mixed methods study to explore the impact of risk-reducing gynaecological surgery in women with LS: 24 women were invited to take part; 15 (62.5%) completed validated questionnaires and 12 (50%) participated in semi-structured interviews. Our results suggest that risk reducing surgery does not lead to significant psychological distress and the women tend not to think or worry much about developing cancer. However, they tend to be distressed about the physical and somatic symptoms associated with menopause; their social well-being is somewhat affected, but sexual difficulties are minimal. The women reported being overwhelmingly satisfied with their decision to have surgery and with the quality of information they received prior to the operation. However, they felt underprepared for menopausal symptoms and received conflicting advice about whether or not to use HRT. Recommendations from the study include that professionals discuss the menopause, its side effects and HRT in detail prior to surgery.

Endometrial and ovarian cancer in women with Lynch syndrome: update in screening and prevention

Women with Lynch syndrome have an additional need to address the substantial increased lifetime risk of endometrial and ovarian cancer. Endometrial or ovarian cancer can be the presenting cancer in individuals with Lynch syndrome, or can be a second cancer. Lifetime risk of endometrial cancer in women with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations is approximately 40%, with a median age of 49. Women with MSH6 mutations have a similar risk of endometrial cancer but a later age of diagnosis. Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancers are primarily endometrioid, although non-endometrioid subtypes including clear cell, papillary serous and MMMT have been reported. In addition, endometrial cancers arising in the lower uterine segment, while rare in the general population, are enriched in women with Lynch syndrome. Ovarian cancer risk in women with Lynch syndrome is 6-8%, and Lynch syndrome-associated ovarian cancers exhibit a variety of histopathological subtypes. Studies of endometrial cancer screening in Lynch syndrome have been small, and more recently have focused on the use of office endometrial biopsy to identify pre-malignant and early stage cancers. Prevention options include the use of oral contraceptives, which are known to be highly effective for decreasing risk of both endometrial and ovarian cancer in the general population, and prophylactic surgery to remove the uterus and ovaries.

Hereditary Endometrial Cancer: Lynch Syndrome

Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colo- rectal cancer (HNPCC)), Cowden syndrome (CS), and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) are hereditary diseases with an increased risk for endometrial cancer. Lynch syndrome is the most frequent disease associated with hereditary endo- metrial cancer. Lynch syndrome is autosomal dominant disorder caused by germ-cell mutation of DNA mismatch repair genes. Patients with Lynch syndrome have a higher risk of endometrial cancer compared with the general pop- ulation. Thus, these patients and their families may develop malignant tumors, including colon and endometrial cancers. The lifetime risk of endometrial cancer in females with Lynch syndrome is particularly high (28-60 %). Lynch syndrome is a typical hereditary tumor associated with en- dometrial cancer, and elucidation of the oncogenic mecha- nism is important to understand the characteristics of endometrial cancer, including sporadic endometrial cancer. The Amsterdam II Criteria are used for screening for Lynch syndrome, but some cases of hereditary endometrial cancer do not meet these criteria (masked Lynch syndrome); there- fore, patients with a suspected hereditary predisposition, including juvenile-onset and double cancer, should undergo genetic tests in addition to taking of a family history.

Risk Factors for Developing Endometrial Cancer After Benign Endometrial Sampling

To identify risk factors for endometrial cancer after benign results of endometrial biopsy or dilation and curettage (D&C). Nested case-control study from Rochester Epidemiology Project data. Among 370 Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents who received an endometrial cancer diagnosis between 1970 and 2008, we identified 90 patients (24.5%) who had previous benign endometrial biopsy or D&C results (no atypical hyperplasia). We compared them with 172 matched control group participants who had benign endometrial biopsy or D&C results without subsequent endometrial cancer. Using a multivariable conditional logistic regression model, we found that oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use was protective (odds ratio [OR] 0.18, 95% CI [CI] 0.08-0.45; P<.001), and personal history of colorectal cancer (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.02-19.31; P<.05), endometrial polyp (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.40-12.17; P=.01), and morbid obesity (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.18-9.78; P<.03) were independently associated with subsequent endometrial cancer. Compared with the presence of no risk factor, presence of one and two or more risk factors increased the risk of endometrial cancer by 8.12 (95% CI 3.08-21.44) and 17.87 (95% CI 5.57-57.39) times, respectively. Assuming a 2.6% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer, ORs of 8.12 and 17.87 for one and two or more of the four aforementioned risk factors confer a lifetime risk of approximately 18% and 32%, respectively. One fourth of patients with endometrial cancer had previous benign endometrial biopsy or D&C results. Personal history of colorectal cancer, presence of endometrial polyps, and morbid obesity are the strongest risk factors for having endometrial cancer after a benign endometrial biopsy or D&C result, and OCP use is the strongest protective factor. II.

Awareness of Endometrial Cancer Risk and Compliance With Screening in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

Women with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) have a 40-60% lifetime risk for endometrial cancer. Guidelines in Denmark recommend gynecologic screening for female members of families with HNPCC. We estimated the knowledge of endometrial cancer risk and identified possible predictors of compliance with the screening among women from families with HNPCC. A questionnaire exploring the knowledge of endometrial cancer risk and compliance with screening was sent to 707 women from families with HNPCC who had been recommended endometrial cancer surveillance. The response rate after one reminder was 86% (606 of 707). Data were analyzed by simple and multivariable logistic regression models. Four hundred seventy-one women were included in the final analyses; 65% reported being aware of the increased risk of endometrial cancer. The awareness was significantly greater among women with high educational level (81%; P<.001), women who had received genetic counseling (75%; P<.001), women with family history of gynecologic cancer (76%; P<.001), and those with high perceived endometrial cancer risk (77%; P<.001). Overall, 67% had participated in gynecologic screening. No significant differences were found in compliance regarding women's educational level or their family risk classification. Analyses of data in a multivariable logistic regression model showed that knowledge of endometrial cancer risk was the most important predictor for positive compliance with the gynecologic screening (odds ratio 4.86, 95% confidence interval 3.05-7.74). Women's awareness of endometrial cancer risk is the most important predictor of their compliance with gynecologic screening in families with HNPCC. II.

Impact of genetic testing on endometrial cancer risk-reducing practices in women at risk for Lynch syndrome

ObjectiveDue to the increased lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC), guidelines recommend that women with Lynch syndrome (LS) age≥35 undergo annual EC surveillance or prophylactic hysterectomy (PH). The aim of this study was to examine the uptake of these risk-reducing strategies. MethodsThe study population included women meeting clinical criteria for genetic evaluation for LS. Data on cancer risk-reducing behaviors were collected from subjects enrolled in two distinct studies: (1) a multicenter cross-sectional study involving completion of a one-time questionnaire, or (2) a single-center longitudinal study in which subjects completed questionnaires before and after undergoing genetic testing. The main outcome was uptake of EC risk-reducing practices. ResultsIn the cross-sectional cohort, 58/77 (75%) women at risk for LS-associated EC reported engaging in EC risk-reduction. Personal history of genetic testing was associated with uptake of EC surveillance or PH (OR 17.1; 95% CI 4.1–70.9). Prior to genetic testing for LS, 26/40 (65%) women in the longitudinal cohort reported engaging in EC risk-reduction. At one-year follow-up, 16/16 (100%) mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation carriers were adherent to guidelines for EC risk-reduction, 9 (56%) of whom had undergone PH. By three-year follow-up, 11/16 (69%) MMR mutation carriers had undergone PH. Among women with negative or uninformative genetic test results, none underwent PH after testing. ConclusionsGenetic testing for LS is strongly associated with uptake of EC risk-reducing practices. Women found to have LS in this study underwent prophylactic gynecologic surgery at rates comparable to those published for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.

Annual outpatient hysteroscopy and endometrial sampling (OHES) in HNPCC/Lynch syndrome (LS)

LS women have a 40-60% lifetime risk of endometrial cancer (EC). Most international guidelines recommend screening. However, data on efficacy are limited. To assess the performance of OHES for EC screening in LS and compare it with transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) alone. A prospective observational cohort study of LS women attending a tertiary high-risk familial gynaecological cancer clinic was conducted. LS women opting for EC screening underwent annual OHES and TVS. Histopathological specimens were processed using a strict protocol. Data of women screened between October 2007 and March 2010 were analysed from a bespoke database. Histology was used as the gold standard. Diagnostic accuracy of OHES was compared with TVS using specificity, and positive (PLR) and negative (NLR) likelihood ratios. Forty-one LS women underwent 69 screens (41 prevalent, 28 incident). Four (three prevalent, one incident) women were detected to have EC/atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), five had endometrial polyps and two had endometrial hyperplasia (EH) on OHES. TVS detected two of four EC/AEH. OHES had similar specificity of 89.8% (CI 79.2, 96.2%), but higher PLR 9.8 (CI 4.6, 21) and lower NLR (zero) compared to TVS: specificity 84.75%(CI 73, 92.8%), PLR 3.28 (CI 1.04, 10.35) and NLR 0.59 (CI 0.22, 1.58). No interval cancers occurred over a median follow-up of 22 months. The annual incidence was 3.57% (CI 0.09, 18.35) for EC, 10.71% (CI 2.27, 28.23) for polyps and 21.4% (CI 8.3, 40.1) for any endometrial pathology. Our findings suggest that in LS, annual OHES is acceptable and has high diagnostic accuracy for EC/AEH screening. Larger international studies are needed for confirmation, given the relatively small numbers of LS women at individual centres. It reinforces the current recommendation that endometrial sampling is crucial when screening these women.