Life Year Saved Research Articles

A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies on Gastric Cancer Screening.

Gastric cancer (GC) poses notable economic and health burdens in settings where the incidence of disease is prevalent. Some countries have established early screening and treatment programs to address these challenges. The objectives of this systematic review were to summarize the cost-effectiveness of gastric cancer screening presented in the literature and to identify the critical factors that influence the cost-effectiveness of screening. This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Economic evaluation studies of gastric cancer screening were reviewed from SCOPUS and PubMed. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) was used to assess the quality of reporting presented in the selected articles. Only primary economic evaluation studies addressing the cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and cost-benefit of gastric cancer screening were selected. Two reviewers scrutinized the selected articles (title, abstract, and full text) to determine suitability for the systematic review based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Authors' consensus was relied on where disagreements arose. The main outcome measures of concern in the systematic review were cost, effectiveness (as measured by either quality-adjusted life years (QALY) or life-years saved (LYS)), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of screening versus either no screening or an alternative screening method. Thirty-one studies were selected for the final review. These studies investigated the cost-effectiveness of GC screening based on either primary, secondary, or a combination of primary and secondary interventions. The main primary intervention was Helicobacter pylori (Hp) screening with eradication, while the main secondary intervention was endoscopic screening. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated against no screening or screening using an alternative method in both observational and model-based studies. Screening was mainly cost-effective in Asian countries or their diasporas where the prevalence of GC was high. GC screening was generally not cost-effective among Western countries. GC screening can be cost-effective, but cost-effectiveness is dependent on context-specific factors, including geographical location, the prevalence of GC in the local population, and the screening tool adopted. However, there is benefit in targeting high-risk population groups in Asian countries and their diaspora for GC screening.

Cost-effectiveness evaluation of routine histoplasmosis screening among people living with advanced HIV disease in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Histoplasma antigen can be detected in people with advanced HIV disease (AHD), allowing for early and accurate diagnosis of histoplasmosis. The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine histoplasmosis screening using antigen detection, among people with AHD. We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate Histoplasma antigen screening among people with AHD. The model estimated the costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Histoplasma antigen compared to the current practice of no routine Histoplasma antigen screening. The model includes stratification by symptoms of histoplasmosis, severity of presentation, and estimates of 30-day mortality. Data sources were taken from the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) Strategic Fund databases on public purchases of medicines, and published literature on treatment outcomes. Outcome measures are life years saved (LYS), costs (US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Routine Histoplasma antigen screening avoids an estimated 17% of deaths in persons with advanced HIV disease, and is cost-effective compared to no histoplasmosis screening, with an ICER of $26/LYS. In sensitivity analysis assuming treatment for histoplasmosis with liposomal amphotericin, Histoplasma antigen screening remains cost-effective with an ICER of $607/LYS. Histoplasma antigen screening among people with AHD is a cost-effective strategy and could potentially avert 17% of AIDS-related deaths. Prospective evaluation of histoplasmosis screening is warranted to determine effectiveness and treatment outcomes with this strategy.

Cost-effectiveness of routine versus indicated antibiotic therapy in the management of severe wasting in children

BackgroundIn the outpatient management of severe wasting, routine antibiotic therapy is recommended for all children upon admission regardless of whether clinical signs of infection are present. Indicated antibiotic therapy, where antibiotics are provided only upon presentation of clinical signs of infection, may be considered for its potential to allow for more prudent antibiotic use and greater program coverage, reducing the risk of antibiotic resistance as well as costs and logistical burdens associated with treatment. We therefore conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to measure the effects of indicated antibiotic therapy compared to routine antibiotic therapy in terms of incremental cost-per-life-year saved in Niger.MethodsWe used a cohort model to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare system perspective to project and weigh the lifetime discounted costs and effects of indicated antibiotic therapy compared to routine antibiotic therapy in the treatment of uncomplicated severe wasting in children in Niger. We calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in terms of treatment-related healthcare costs per discounted life-years saved (LYS), and conducted program coverage scenario and sensitivity analyses to assess model uncertainty.ResultsThe ICER for indicated antibiotic therapy compared to routine antibiotic therapy was $8.5/LYS, which is under the cost-effectiveness threshold for Niger. The probability of the indicated strategy being optimal was 76.1% when program coverage was equal to coverage associated with routine therapy but was 100% likely to be optimal in probabilistic sensitivity analysis scenarios where indicated program coverage improved 5 percentage points.ConclusionsIndicated antibiotic therapy likely represents a cost-effective strategy, particularly if indicated treatment can result in expanded coverage. With the risk of increasing antibiotic resistance worldwide, antibiotic stewardship and simplified treatment protocols for severe wasting using indicated antibiotic therapy may represent good value for money in some low risk populations.

Cost-effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at primary cytoreduction of epithelial ovarian cancer based on residual disease status

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with cisplatin when used at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery (ICS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been shown to provide a survival advantage compared to interval cytoreduction alone for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in a cost-effective manner. A recent large multi-center retrospective cohort study showed a survival advantage with HIPEC given during primary debulking surgery compared to surgery alone. While there is an ongoing randomized controlled trial examining HIPEC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) before chemotherapy (OVHIPEC-2), there is currently no study of this practice in the United States or cost data to inform incorporation of this practice. To help guide the use of HIPEC in the upfront setting until the results of the OVHIPEC-2 are available in 2026, a decision-analytic cost-effectiveness model of the US healthcare sector was developed for patients undergoing PCS with or without HIPEC. Effectiveness inputs were extracted from a Chinese retrospective cohort study of 425 patients who underwent PCS with HIPEC and 159 patients who underwent PCS alone. We found incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICER) of $9,789 per life year saved (LYS) for optimal PCS, $18,164/LYS for suboptimal PCS, and $7,854/LYS for all patients. Our findings provide preliminary data to support that HIPEC at the time of primary cytoreductive surgery can be considered cost-effective regardless of residual disease status when using a standard willingness to pay threshold.

Cost-Utility Analysis of STN1013001, a Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion, versus Other Latanoprost Formulations (Latanoprost) in Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension and Ocular Surface Disease in France.

Purpose To investigate the cost utility of STN1013001, a latanoprost cationic emulsion, versus Latanoprost in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OAG/OHT) and concomitant ocular surface disease (OSD) in France. Methods An early Markov model, including 7 health states and a 1-year cycle length, was developed to estimate the cost utility of STN1013001 versus Latanoprost from the French health system perspective over a 5-year time horizon. The model was populated with pooled data (treatment adherence, quality of life, disease progression, and resource utilization) collected, via a questionnaire, from a convenience sample of 5 French glaucoma specialists. Remaining data were retrieved from published sources. Half-cycle correction and 2.5% real social discount rate were applied to costs (in €2020), life years saved (LYS), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was contrasted against the informal willingness-to-pay (WTP) range for incremental LYS or QALY gained (€30,000–€50,000) suggested for France. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the baseline ICUR. Results Over a 5-year time horizon, STN1013001 resulted in an incremental 0.35 QALYs gained at an incremental cost of €7.39 compared to Latanoprost, resulting in an ICUR of €21.26. This is well below the lower limit of the unofficial WTP range proposed for France. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the baseline results. Conclusion Once on the market, STN1013001 will provide the French health system with a cost-effective treatment versus Latanoprost for OAG/OHT + OSD patients. These results should be confirmed by future economic evaluations carried out alongside empirical trials.

Cost-Utility Analysis of a Latanoprost Cationic Emulsion (STN1013001) versus Other Latanoprost in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension and Concomitant Ocular Surface Disease in Germany.

PurposeThis study aimed to estimate the cost–utility and economic value of STN1013001, a latanoprost cationic emulsion vs other latanoprost formulations (henceforth latanoprost) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) and concomitant ocular surface disease (OSD) in Germany.MethodsAn early 5-year Markov model-supported cost–utility analysis was performed to estimate costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years saved (LYS) for STN1013001 vs latanoprost from the German health system perspective. The model included seven mutually exclusive health states and adopted a 1-year cycle length. The model was populated with pooled data derived, by means of a questionnaire, from a convenience sample of five German glaucoma specialists. Remaining data were derived from published sources. Data provided by the ophthalmologists included annual treatment adherence probabilities, utility values and resource utilization. The half-cycle correction as well as a discount rate of 3.0% per year were applied to costs (expressed in €2020), life-year saved (LYS) and QALYs. The incremental cost–utility ratio (ICUR) was contrasted against the informal willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for incremental LYS saved or QALY gained (€30,000) proposed for Germany. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (OWSA; PSA) tested the robustness of the base case ICUR.ResultsOver the 5-year time horizon, STN1013001 strongly dominates latanoprost as it is less costly (€1003.65 vs €1145.37; −12.37%) and produces more QALYs (2.612 vs 2.365; +10.44%) per notional patient. Baseline findings were robust against all the variations included in OWSA. PSA shows that STN1013001 has a 100% probability of being cost-effective vs Latanoprost at each WTP threshold for incremental QALY gained.ConclusionOnce on the market, STN1013001 will provide a cost-effective and possibly strongly dominant therapy vs latanoprost for OAG/OHT+OSD patients from a German health system perspective. Future empirical research should confirm these findings.

Cost-effectiveness of the safe childbirth checklist program to improve birth outcomes in India

The WHO endorsed safe childbirth checklist (SCC) intervention was implemented in Rajasthan state of India to support delivery of essential maternal and newborn care practices. As part of the evaluation study we assessed the cost-effectiveness of the SCC program in reducing facility-based stillbirths (SBs) and very early neonatal deaths (vENDs, deaths within three-days after birth) and assessed the cost per life-years saved (LYS). For a cohort of 100,000 births, the incremental provider cost of the SCC intervention was US $ 1.03 million and the intervention would avert 274 deaths and will save 16,456 life years (assuming a life expectancy of 60 years). This translates to a unit cost of USD 3,783 per death averted or US $63 per LYS. This is a highly cost-effective intervention in averting facility-based stillbirths and very early neonatal deaths.

Cost-effectiveness of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at primary cytoreduction of epithelial ovarian cancer based on residual disease status

<h3>Objectives:</h3> Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to confer an overall survival (OS) benefit in a cost-effective manner when used at interval cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Regarding the use of HIPEC at primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS), a recent multicenter retrospective cohort study demonstrated an OS advantage compared to PCS alone in women with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HIPEC in this setting. <h3>Methods:</h3> A decision analytic cost-effectiveness model of the US health care sector using simulated patients with stage III primary epithelial ovarian cancer was developed for three scenarios: 1) patients with optimal cytoreduction, 2) patients with suboptimal cytoreduction, and 3) all patients regardless of residual disease status. The base case for each model compared two surgical strategies: 1) PCS versus 2) PCS with HIPEC. Model inputs including median survival time, Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, and costs were obtained from published studies. The time horizon was three years. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in US dollars per life-year saved (LYS). <h3>Results:</h3> Assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per LYS, PCS with HIPEC could be considered cost-effective in all three scenarios compared with PCS alone. The ICER was $9,789/LYS in optimally cytoreduced patients, $18,164/LYS in suboptimally cytoreduced patients, and $7,854/LYS for all patients regardless of residual disease burden. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> PCS with HIPEC appears to be a cost-effective strategy for patients with advanced epithelial cancer with all ICERs far below the willingness-to-pay threshold. This warrants further investigation of HIPEC in these clinical settings.

The cost effectiveness and optimal configuration of HIV self-test distribution in South Africa: a model analysis

BackgroundHIV self-testing (HIVST) has been shown to be acceptable, feasible and effective in increasing HIV testing uptake. Novel testing strategies are critical to achieving the UNAIDS target of 95% HIV-positive...

PCN2 Recurrences Avoided and Life Years Saved Attributable to Trastuzumab Use in HER2+ Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer in the United States

We estimated the cumulative life years saved and recurrences avoided after incorporating trastuzumab as therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in 1999 and early breast cancer (EBC) in 2006 in the United States. We constructed a model to estimate population survival and recurrence among patients who received trastuzumab each year, and compared it to a counterfactual model in which trastuzumab treatment was not available. We incorporated US population counts, the age-, year-, and nodal status-specific incidence rates of HER2+ EBC, the age- and year-specific rates of de novo MBC, recurrence rates in HER2+ EBC, and year-specific trastuzumab utilization rates in EBC and MBC. Women with low-risk, node-negative EBC were excluded. The risk of recurrence with and without trastuzumab were based on 10-year trial data. Recurrences were estimated for 15 years after diagnosis by carrying the year 10 rate forward. Survival after local and regional recurrences was estimated using the 5-year relative survival for HER2+ EBC. In MBC, the survival estimates with and without trastuzumab were pooled across seven studies. Uncertainty intervals (UI) were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation with 500 replicates. We estimate that between 2006-2019, trastuzumab use in HER2+ EBC led to the avoidance of 4,500 (95% UI 2,900-6,200) loco-regional and 10,100 (95% UI 6,400-13,800) distant recurrences. This in turn resulted in an incremental 407,900 (95% UI 291,800-528,500) life years saved compared to projected survival with chemotherapy alone. In HER2+ MBC from 1999-2019, there were 72,300 (95% UI 68,300-76,900) women with de novo or recurrent metastatic cancer treated with trastuzumab, leading to an additional 155,200 (95% UI 144,900-166,100) life years relative to projected survival with chemotherapy alone. Trastuzumab has substantially increased the years lived, and reduced recurrences for women with HER2+ MBC and EBC in the United States.

Pairing smoking cessation with lung cancer screening may save lives

Pairing smoking cessation with lung cancer screening may save lives

Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim-sndz as primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in breast cancer patients at intermediate risk.

73 Background: According to clinical practice guidelines, the threshold for routine myeloid growth factor (MGF) PP is a high risk (&gt;20%) of developing FN. However, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a recent recommendation expands this threshold for using MGF PP to include patients at intermediate risk (10-20%) of developing FN, with the goal of reducing emergency room and hospital visits. Patients with breast cancer receiving potentially curative chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel or paclitaxel (every 21 days) are at an intermediate risk (10-20%) of developing FN. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of PP vs. SP using a biosimilar MGF, filgrastim-sndz, in early-stage breast cancer patients at intermediate risk of FN. Methods: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was constructed to evaluate the total costs and clinical outcomes when using filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP in 56 year old early-stage breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant docetaxel (following doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Patients had ≥1 FN risk factor (i.e., recent surgery) without the receipt of anti-HER2 therapy, representing a 16% baseline FN risk. Average Sales Price (ASP) calculated from the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services July 2020 ASP Drug Pricing File was used as the filgrastim-sndz cost. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from a United States payer perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Results: Filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP provided an additional 0.102 FN events avoided, 0.065 LYS, and 0.056 QALYs at an incremental cost of $2,106. The ICERs were $20,656, $32,624 and $37,333 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. In the PSA, the likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained was 71.3%. Conclusions: For early-stage breast cancer patients at intermediate risk of FN receiving adjuvant docetaxel with 1 or more risk factors, PP with filgrastim-sndz compared to SP is cost-effective based on a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY. [Table: see text]

Long‐term clinical benefits of Sofosbuvir‐based direct antiviral regimens for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Central and West Africa

In Sub-Saharan Africa, chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is a major public health issue. We estimated the long-term clinical benefits of treating CHC with sofosbuvir-based regimens in Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire and Senegal using Markov model combining data from the literature with estimates of direct-acting antiviral (DAAs) effectiveness in West and Central Africa. Disease progression was simulated with and without treatment in fictive cohorts of patients "diagnosed" with CHC in Cameroon (n=3224), Côte d'Ivoire (n=9748) and Senegal (n=6358). Lifetime treatment benefits were assessed using (a) life-years saved (LYS); (b) life-years (LY) avoided in compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DC) and hepatocellular carcinoma; and (c) comparison of the proportions of patients at each disease stage with and without treatment. Probabilistic and determinist sensitivity analyses were performed to address uncertainty. Sofosbuvir-based treatment would save [mean, 95% confidence intervals] 3.3 (2.5; 5.7) LY per patient in Cameroon, 2.7 (2.1; 4.8) in Côte d'Ivoire and 3.6 (2.8; 6.3) in Senegal. With treatment, approximately 6% (1%) of the patients still alive in each of the study countries would be in the CC (DC) health state 11 (15) years after CHC diagnosis, vs 15% (5%) without treatment. Scenario analysis showed earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation would dramatically improve LYS and morbidity. Sofosbuvir-based treatment could significantly reduce CHC-related mortality and help control CHC-related liver disease progression in West and Central Africa. However, the goal of disease elimination necessitates a substantial decrease in DAAs prices, greater political commitment and increases in both national and external health expenditures.

Clinical relevance of cancer stem cell chemotherapeutic assay for recurrent ovarian cancer.

IntroductionDisease recurrence and progression of ovarian cancer is common with the development of platinum-resistant or refractory disease. This is due in large part to the presence of chemo-resistant cancer stem cells (CSCs) that contribute to tumor propagation, maintenance, and treatment resistance. We developed a CSCs drug cytotoxicity assay (ChemoID) to identify the most effective chemotherapy treatment from a panel of FDA approved chemotherapies.MethodsAscites and pleural fluid samples were collected under physician order from 45 consecutive patients affected by 3rd-5th relapsed ovarian cancer. Test results from the assay were used to treat patients with the highest cell kill drugs, taking into consideration their health status and using dose reductions, as needed. A retrospective chart review of CT and PET scans was used to determine patients' outcomes for tumor response, time to recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsWe observed that recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with high-cell kill chemotherapy agents guided by the CSCs drug response assay had an improvement in the median PFS corresponding to 5.4 months (3rd relapse), 3.6 months (4th relapse), and 3.9 months (5th relapse) when compared to historical data. Additionally, we observed that ovarian cancer patients identified as non-responders by the CSC drug response assay had 30 times the hazard of death compared to those women that were identified as responders with respective median survivals of 6 months vs. 13 months. We also found that ChemoID treated patients on average had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) between -$18,421 and $7,241 per life-year saved (LYS).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated improved PFS and OS for recurrent ovarian cancer patients treated with assay-guided chemotherapies while decreasing the cost of treatment.

A Magic Bullet? The Potential Impact of E-Cigarettes on the Toll of Cigarette Smoking.

We examine the proportion of US smoking-produced mortality that e-cigarettes might eliminate under assumptions regarding vaping's ability to increase smoking cessation, vaping's health risks, and the possibility that vaping will increase smoking among young people. We employ a dynamic population simulation model that tracks individuals from ages 0 to 110, differentiated by gender and smoking status. Using data from the US Census, the National Vital Statistics Reports, Cancer Prevention Study II, and the National Health Interview Survey, we estimate the number of smoking-related life-years lost (LYL) from 2018 to 2100 in a no-vaping scenario. We then compare results for model runs that assess the impact of vaping under a variety of assumptions. The combination of assumptions produces 360 possible scenarios. 357 (99%) yield positive estimates of life-years saved (LYS) due to vaping by 2100, from 143 000 to 65 million. Most scenarios result in millions of individuals quitting smoking due to vaping. On average, vaping-induced quitters gain an extra 1.2-2.0 years of life compared to smokers who quit without vaping. The impact of vaping is greatest when it most helps smokers who otherwise have the greatest difficulty quitting smoking. While the numbers of LYS are generally large across all scenarios, they often represent a small fraction of the toll of smoking. Vaping is highly likely to reduce smoking-produced mortality. Still, vaping is not "the" answer to the public health crisis created by smoking. Rather, it may well be a tool to add to the armamentarium of effective tobacco control measures. E-cigarettes hold the potential to reduce cigarette smoking's enormous toll. By itself, however, tobacco harm reduction, as embodied in vaping, is no magic bullet. Going forward, tobacco control will require vigilant application of the evidence-based measures that have brought us so much success in combatting smoking. It will require, as well, the search for and adoption of novel means of attacking the remaining problem. Harm reduction can, and many would say should, be a part of the complex formula that will eventually bring about the demise of smoking.

Relative survival and quality of life benefits of pancreas–kidney transplantation, deceased kidney transplantation and dialysis in type 1 diabetes mellitus—a probabilistic simulation model

For patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus who progress to the point of requiring renal replacement therapy, the relative benefits of simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and deceased donor kidney transplantation across different age categories compared to dialysis are uncertain. Using Australian and New Zealand registry data from 2006 to 2016, a probabilistic Markov model (n=10000) was built comparing patient survival between SPK and deceased donor kidney transplantation with dialysis. Compared to dialysis, the average life years saved (LYS) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for SPK and deceased donor kidney transplantation were 5.48 [95% CI 5.47, 5.49] LYS and 6.48 [6.47, 6.49] QALY, and 3.38 [3.36, 3.40] LYS and 2.46 [2.45, 2.47] QALY, respectively. For recipients aged 50years or younger, receiving a deceased donor kidney, the average incremental gains compared to dialysis were 4.13 [4.10, 4.16] LYS and 2.99 [2.97, 3.01] QALY, and for recipients older than 50years, 3.05 [3.02, 3.08] LYS and 2.25 [2.23, 2.27] QALY. Compared to dialysis, SPK transplantation incurs the greatest benefits in LYS and QALY for patients with type 1 diabetes requiring renal replacement therapy. Patients older than 50years still experience survival benefits from deceased donor kidney transplantation compared to dialysis.

Cost-effectiveness of filgrastim-sndz as primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) to prevent chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at intermediate risk.

e19401 Background: Patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC receiving platinum-based chemotherapy are at an intermediate risk (10-20%) of developing FN; clinical practice guidelines recommend assessing whether these patients have FN risk factors before considering myeloid growth factor (MGF) prophylaxis. Most NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy have ≥1 FN risk factors, and while PP leads to lower rates of FN across all cycles, it is more costly compared to SP. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of PP vs. SP using a biosimilar MGF, filgrastim-sndz, in NSCLC patients at intermediate risk of FN. Methods: A Markov model with a lifetime horizon was constructed to evaluate the total costs and clinical outcomes of using filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP in NSCLC patients 61 years old receiving adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Separate analyses were conducted for patients with 0 FN risk factors (0RF) and with ≥1 FN risk factors (1+RF), representing 11.3% and 18% baseline FN risk, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from a United States payer perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. Results: For patients with 0RF, use of filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP provided an additional 0.056 QALYs (0.079 LYS) at an incremental cost of $3,266. The ICERs were $46,815, $41,555, and $58,531 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. For patients with 1+RF, PP vs. SP added 0.090 QALYs (0.127 LYS) at an incremental cost of $1,605. The ICERs were $13,970, $12,644, and $17,805 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. In the PSA, the likelihood of cost-effectiveness at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 per QALY gained was 31.7% for patients with 0RF and 96.6% for 1+RF. Conclusions: For NSCLC patients at intermediate risk of FN receiving adjuvant carboplatin/paclitaxel with 1+RF, PP with filgrastim-sndz compared to SP is cost-effective based on a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY. [Table: see text]

Cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive immunization program serving high-risk, uninsured adults

Despite the numerous social and economic benefits of vaccination, adult immunization rates fall far short of recommended levels costing the United States $9 billion annually in health care expenditures and reduced productivity. While it is well recognized that childhood immunization is highly cost-effective, the economic impact of adult immunization programs varies by disease and is influenced by population demographics.This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a comprehensive adult immunization program serving high-need populations delivered by a local health department (LHD) in partnership with community organizations.We modeled incremental cost-effectiveness taking the payer perspective of each vaccine separately in simulated cohorts of 100,000 over a 20-year horizon using data provided by the LHD and data from the published literature. We adjusted the results to align with actual program delivery and used them to estimate an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for the entire program. We assessed the effects of varying our base model parameters in univariate sensitivity analyses. We discounted benefits and life years saved (LYS) at 3% and adjusted results to 2016 US$.Four of seven disease models were cost-effective (using a $100,000 CE threshold) with ICERS ranging from $14,260 to $79,022/LYS. Sensitivity analyses did not substantially impact the results. The ICER for program as a whole was $67,940/LYS. A community-delivered comprehensive immunization program serving uninsured, low income, high-risk adults is a cost-effective investment even when most do not receive the full regimen of some vaccines.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal adult immunization with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) versus current practice in Brazil

BackgroundA pertussis outbreak occurred in Brazil from 2011 to 2014, despite high coverage of whole-cell pertussis containing vaccines in early childhood. Infants were the most affected. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing universal adult vaccination with Tdap into the National Immunization Program in Brazil. MethodsEconomic evaluation using a dynamic model to compare two strategies: (1) universal vaccination with single dose of Tdap at 20 years of age and (2) current practice (only pregnant women pertussis vaccination). The health system perspective was adopted. Temporal horizon was 10 years. Discount rate of 5% was applied to costs and benefits. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was obtained from a population-based observational study. Epidemiological, resource utilization and cost estimates were obtained from the Brazilian Health Information Systems. The primary outcome was cost per life year saved (LYS), based on life expectancy at birth in Brazil in 2015. Univariate and multivariate sensitivity analysis were performed. ResultsAdult vaccination with VE of 82.6% and coverage of 40%, at price of US$7.01 per dose, and assuming herd protection would avoid 167 infant deaths by pertussis, saving 12,325 years of life and costing a total of US$105495891.61, from the health system perspective. The universal immunization would result in ICER of US$8459.13. The results were highly sensitive to disease incidence. ConclusionsThe results suggest that universal adult vaccination with Tdap would not be a cost-effective intervention for preventing pertussis cases and deaths in infants in Brazil.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of primary prophylaxis (PP) versus secondary prophylaxis (SP) with biosimilar myeloid growth factors (MGFs) for preventing chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN) in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients at intermediate risk.

107 Background: Historically, PP with a MGF was recommended in patients with a ≥40% risk for developing chemotherapy-induced FN, based on clinical and regimen-related factors. Previous economic studies provided evidence to lower the threshold to 20%, the current high-risk threshold listed by practice guidelines. Biosimilar MGFs, such as filgrastim-sndz or LA-EP2006 (a proposed pegfilgrastim biosimilar), offer an opportunity to evaluate whether it is cost-effective to further lower the threshold for intermediate-risk regimens (i.e., 10-20% FN risk). Methods: A Markov model was constructed to evaluate the total costs and clinical outcomes of biosimilar or reference MGFs when used as PP vs. SP in patients 55 years old with NHL receiving 6 cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with no additional FN risk factors. Model inputs, including MGF efficacy and acquisition costs, were estimated from publically available data and literature, as were FN hospitalization costs and clinical utilities. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for cost per FN event avoided, life-year saved (LYS), and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained from a payer perspective within the United States. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: Use of filgrastim-sndz as PP vs. SP provided an additional 0.130 QALYs (0.144 LYS) at an incremental cost of $5,999. The ICERs were $50,676, $41,761, and $46,207 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. Using LA-EP2006 as PP vs. SP provided an additional 0.166 QALYs (0.184 LYS) at an incremental cost of $17,648. The ICERs were $123,840, $95,963, and $106,265 for cost per FN event avoided, cost per LYS, and cost per QALY gained, respectively. Conclusions: Within NHL patients receiving R-CHOP at an intermediate risk for FN, PP with filgrastim-sndz and LA-EP2006 are cost-effective compared to their respective use as SP based on a cost-effectiveness threshold of $150,000/QALY.