Reviewed by: Constantine and the Christian Empire Elizabeth Digeser Charles Matson Odahl Constantine and the Christian Empire New York/London: Routledge, 2004 Pp. xviii + 400. $104.95. In Constantine and the Christian Empire, Charles Odahl sets out to integrate material evidence for Constantine's reign (primarily public works and coinage together with details about his military campaigns and his itinerary) into a biographical account of the first Christian emperor. With so much recent interest in the social and cultural implications of public works and warfare, the author's goal is a worthy one with the potential to deepen our understanding of this perennially fascinating figure. He has chosen to do this in a "reader friendly" style (ix), clearly perceiving that the inauguration of a Christian Empire may have a certain appeal to contemporary readers. After an initial chapter on the ancient sources, Odahl proceeds chronologically, first addressing the third-century "crisis" and the rise of the Illyrian emperors and then discussing the first tetrarchy and Constantine's role in it. His effort to settle Constantine's accomplishments within the context of the third and fourth centuries is commendable. Older scholarship so often viewed this emperor as causing such a rupture in the fabric of Roman life that the many ways in which he built on the innovations of his forebears, the tetrarchy in particular, were often neglected. The next three chapters address Constantine's accession as a member of the second tetrarchy, his campaign against the usurper Maxentius in Italy, and the relationship between his conversion experience and support of the church in Rome. The second half of the book moves east with the emperor, describing his achievement of sole rule by conquest in 324, the scandal surrounding Constantine's execution of his son and wife, the establishment of Constantinople, the last campaigns, and Constantine's legacy. The book is replete with detailed descriptions of Constantine's public works. However, had Odahl drawn on the work of Paul Zanker and Jas; Elsner, his analysis of Constantine's building program in Rome, Constantinople, and Jerusalem might have pushed beyond recounting the number of churches built and the styles deployed to discussing the relationship between these structures and the citizens' perceptions of their emperor. A more serious problem, however, is Odahl's use of his sources. Any historian who wants to understand Constantine must directly confront both the paradoxes in his religious policy and the ambiguities in all of the ancient sources. Different portraits of Constantine result from different approaches to these problems, and [End Page 527] one can easily see this by comparing two of the more recent studies of Constantine, T. D. Barnes's Constantine and Eusebius (1981) and H. A. Drake's Constantine and the Bishops (2000). In the first Constantine is a religious reformer; in the second he is a pragmatic politician who unleashed religious forces he was subsequently hard pressed to control. Along this spectrum, Odahl's study is closer to Barnes's in perspective and in its deep reliance on Eusebius as a source. Barnes, however, saw that coming to grips with Eusebius' motivations, both in the Ecclesiastical History and the Life of Constantine, was a necessary prerequisite to his analysis of Constantine. Odahl almost always takes Eusebius at his word, never exploring the hagiographic elements of the Life nor addressing the possibility that the bishop intended his biography, published after Constantine died, more to craft a portrait of the ideal Christian emperor for Constantius II than to present an objective, factual narrative. The author has also overlooked recent developments that bear directly on how Constantine could reign as a Christian sovereign so shortly after the tetrachy's attempt to repress the faith through the Great Persecution. For the most part, Odahl treats paganism as synonymous with polytheism (even when discussing Iamblichus' potential influence on Licinius' court [170]) and thus naturally antithetical and abhorrent to Christianity. Yet a number of recent works, such as Pagan Monotheism, edited by P. Athanassiadi and M. Frede (1999), confirm the growing influence of a philosophically oriented monotheism among pagans, a perspective with strong and important similarities to Christianity. This evidence substantially alters the religious landscape of the late third and...