62 Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies Vol. XXXVII, No.1, Fall 2013 Zarruq’s Tradition in Muslim Scholarship Ghulam Shams-ur-Rehman* Introduction The endeavour to integrate tariqah with shari‘ah—a melding of Sufi devotion with legal rectitude—is a recurring topic in the field of Sufi studies. Ahmad Zarruq (d. 899/1493), one of the most distinguished scholars of North Africa, addressed this issue by proposing the concept of juridical sainthood. He sought to unite spirituality and law through the application of Sunnah, presenting his synthetic vision of Islam through the Qawa‘id genre which previously only been used for legal and theological matters. Zarruq’s work has long impressed scholars across the Muslim world; however, the current wave of puritanical, anti-Sufi Islam gives the late mediaeval author’s opinions fresh relevance in Sufi circles. My paper aims to present Zarruq’s intellectual tradition and its impact on subsequent Muslim scholarship. I shall trace the roots of Zarruq’s theories by presenting a brief introduction of his best-known works, along with an assessment of their continued importance to evolving Islamic thought. Zarruq devoted himself to his project of the unification of shari‘ah and tariqah—a fusion of legal rectitude with Sufi devotion and piety. He compiled many important commentaries and abridged many books of the Maliki school of law and Shadhili Sufis. Although he spent all his life in poverty and hardship, he was enormously productive producing works up until his death.1 The distinctive feature of his commentaries on the books *Ghulam Shams-ur-Rehman is an assistant professor in the Department of Islamic Studies, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Pakistan. He earned his PhD from the University of Exeter, UK and Post-Doc at Chatham Houses, London, UK. His field of interest is North African Shadhili Sufi and the role of religion in contemporary Afghan society. He published several articles on the role of Sufis in the Pak-Afghan society in historical perspectives. 1 Al-‘Ayyashi notes: “He left nothing in his inheritance except a horse; that was shared with al-Hajj ‘Abd Allah b. Muhammad al-Misrati, a white cap, a jubbah of cotton, a dress and a rosary which was gifted by al-Hadrami and fourteen volumes of his books on various topics.” Al-‘Ayyashi, Abu Salim ‘Abd Allah, al-Rihlah al-‘Ayyashi, (Rabat: 1397/1977), vol. 1, p. 98. 63 of Maliki jurisprudence is the conjunction of juridical commentary with Sufi teachings as it could be observed in his commentary of al-Risalah Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani. Similarly, his Sufi work is highly occupied with theological and juridical interpretations. For example, ‘Uddat al-Murid alSadiq is a guide book for a true disciple of “the way” but its topics, style and arrangement is very close to a work of fiqh. He integrates Islamic theology, jurisprudence and Sufism in a unique style, presenting his conception of an integrated Islam which is the fundamental objective of his writings. For example, the Risalah ibn Abi Zayd is on Maliki jurisprudence. Ibn Abi Zayd briefly noted some theological issues in the prolegomena of Risalah. Zarruq explained them with detailed exposition and emphasized the role of the sunnah and cited the views of al-Hasan [al-Basri], Abu Hamid al-Ghazali and Abu al-Hasan al-Shadhili in this effect. Then he writes: “Sunnah is the way of Muhammad (peace be upon him) as mentioned in his sayings, actions and reports whereas bid‘ah is a way contrary to the sunnah. It is a way of reprehensible innovation in the religious matters and one should avoid it and the sunnah is the best to follow.”2 Discussing the theological discourse about the relation of iman and ‘amal (belief and practice), Zarruq writes: “The verbal confession of iman is not completed except with practice, and verbal confession and practice both are conditioned with the purification of intention. All these three elements: verbal confession, practice and the purification of intention are unacceptable unless they are compatible with the Sunnah.”3 Zarruq defines bid‘ah in a very simple way: “Introducing a rule which is not described in the sacred law is reprehensible innovation in religion...