Lichtenstein Technique Research Articles

WE4.5 Meta-analysis of the outcomes of Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) for inguinal hernia

Abstract Aims To evaluate the outcomes of Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair Methods In compliance with PRISMA statement standards, electronic databases were searched to identify all studies reporting the outcomes of TREPP in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. The outcomes of interest included recurrence, chronic pain, haematoma, and wound infection. Proportion meta-analysis model was constructed to quantify the risk of postoperative complications and direct comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes of TREPP and other open techniques. Random-effects modelling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results Seven studies enrolling 1891 patients undergoing TREPP were included. Pooled analyses showed that TREPP was associated with 3.00% (95% CI 1.00–6.00%) risk of recurrence, 3.00% (95% CI 2.00–6.00%) risk of chronic pain, 8.00% (95% CI 0.00–20.00%) risk of haematoma, and 3.00% (95% CI 0.00–6.00%) risk of wound infection. The results remained consistent through subgroup analysis of patients with primary hernias and those with recurrent hernias. Analysis of a limited number of comparative studies showed no difference between TREPP and Lichtenstein technique in terms of recurrence (OR: 1.57, P=0.26) and chronic pain (OR: 1.16, P=0.59). Conclusions The best available evidence suggests that TREPP may be a promising technique for elective repair of inguinal hernias as indicated by low risks of recurrence, chronic pain, haematoma, and wound infection. Moreover, there is a lack of comparative evidence on outcomes of TREPP versus other techniques highlighting a need for high quality randomised controlled trials for definite conclusions.

Pain with sexual activity at 1 and 3 years: Comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair in a randomized setting (TEPLICH trial)

BackgroundPain at sexual activity induced by an inguinal hernia or as a cause of its repair is not thoroughly studied. Reported frequencies are between 25% and 30% preoperatively and 10% and 15% postoperatively. The primary aim was to analyze pain at sexual activity at 1 year comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein repair in a randomized setting. MethodsMen, 30 to 60 years old, with a primary inguinal hernia were randomized to total extraperitoneal without mesh fixation or Lichtenstein repair. A questionnaire on pain prevalence, frequency, intensity, and impairment of sexual functions caused by pain at sexual activity was introduced. Clinical examination, a questionnaire on sexual function, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey were performed preoperatively and at 1 and 3 years postoperatively. A risk factor analysis for pain at sexual activity as performed. ResultsA total of 243 patients (111 total extraperitoneal and 132 Lichtenstein) were included between 2008 and 2014; 97% remained for 1-year and 90% for 3-year analysis. Preoperative pain at sexual activity was reported in 35%, with a reduction to 5.9% in total extraperitoneal and 12.5% in Lichtenstein (P = .098) at 1 year and 7.0% in total extraperitoneal and 9.3% in Lichtenstein (P = .566) at 3 years. Quality of life preoperatively was markedly reduced in patients with pain at sexual activity but restored almost to norm levels at 1 and 3 years. New pain at sexual activity (harm) was seen in 8 patients (3.6%) at 1 year. Risk factors for having postoperative pain at sexual activity were preoperative pain and Lichtenstein technique. ConclusionPain at sexual activity in inguinal hernia patients is more common than suspected and reduces quality of life. Repair will markedly reduce pain at sexual activity and restore quality of life in most patients without difference between techniques. Patients should be informed on a potential relation between having an inguinal hernia and sexual impairment.

Outcome of inguinal hernia repair after previous radical prostatectomy: a registry-based analysis with 12,465 patients

IntroductionFollowing radical prostatectomy, the rate of inguinal hernias is fourfold higher compared to controls. Laparo-endoscopic repair after previous radical prostatectomy is considered complex. Therefore, the guidelines recommend open Lichtenstein repair. To date, there are limited data on inguinal hernia repair after prior prostatectomy.MethodsIn a retrospective analysis from the Herniamed Registry, the outcomes of 255,182 primary elective unilateral inguinal hernia repairs were compared with those of 12,465 patients with previous radical prostatectomy in relation to the surgical technique. Furthermore, the outcomes of laparo-endoscopic versus open Lichtenstein repair techniques in the 12,465 patients after previous radical prostatectomy were directly compared.ResultsComparison of the perioperative complication rates for primary elective unilateral inguinal hernia repair with and without previous radical prostatectomy demonstrated for the laparo-endoscopic techniques significantly higher intraoperative complications (2.1% vs 0.9%; p < 0.001), postoperative complications (3.2% vs 1.9%; p < 0.001) and complication-related reoperations (1.1% vs 0.7%; p = 0.0442) to the disadvantage of previous prostatectomy. No significant differences were identified for Lichtenstein repair. Direct comparison of the laparo-endoscopic with the open Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair after previous radical prostatectomy revealed significantly more intraoperative complications for TEP and TAPP (2.1% vs 0.6%; p < 0.001), but more postoperative complications (4.8% vs 3.2%; p < 0.001) and complication-related reoperations (1.8% vs 1.1%; p = 0.003) for open Lichtenstein repair.ConclusionSince there are no clear advantages for the laparo-endoscopic vs the open Lichtenstein technique in inguinal hernia repair after previous radical prostatectomy, the surgeon can opt for one or the other technique in accordance with their experience.

Open Surgery for Sportsman's Hernia a Retrospective Study.

Sportsman’s hernia is a painful syndrome in the inguinal area occurring in patients who play sports at an amatorial or professional level. Pain arises during sport, and sometimes persists after activity, representing an obstacle to sport resumption. A laparoscopic/endoscopic approach is proposed by many authors for treatment of the inguinal wall defect. Aim of this study is to assess the open technique in terms of safety and effectiveness, in order to obtain the benefit of an open treatment in an outpatient management. From October 2017 to July 2019, 34 patients underwent surgery for groin pain syndrome. All cases exhibited a bulging of the inguinal posterior wall. 14 patients were treated with Lichtenstein technique with transversalis fascia plication and placement of a polypropylene mesh fixed with fibrin glue. In 20 cases, a polypropylene mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space. The procedure was performed in day surgery facilities. Early or late postoperative complications did not occur in both groups. All patients returned to sport, in 32 cases with complete pain relief, whereas 2 patients experienced mild residual pain. The average value of return to sport was 34.11 ± 8.44 days. The average value of return to play was 53.82 ± 11.69 days. With regard to postoperative pain, no substantial differences between the two techniques were detected, and good results in terms of the resumption of sport were ensured in both groups. Surgical treatment for sportsman’s hernia should be considered only after the failure of conservative treatment. The open technique is safe and allows a rapid postoperative recovery.

A Comparative Study of Desarda's Versus Lichtenstein's Technique for Uncomplicated Inguinal Hernia Repair.

PurposeSince mesh-related long-term morbidity like chronic groin pain and vas entrapment in patients with an inguinal hernia is a concern, tissue-based repairs should be revaluated. There have been few prospective studies comparing the outcomes of Lichtenstein's technique and Desarda's technique for the repair of uncomplicated inguinal hernias. So, we conducted this prospective study comparing the two techniques.MethodsThis is a single-center prospective observational study conducted for a period of one year (2019). The patients who underwent surgery for uncomplicated inguinal hernia either by Lichtenstein's technique or Desarda's technique were included in the study. The two techniques were compared with respect to recurrence rates, immediate postoperative pain, chronic groin pain, wound infection, and the time taken to return to activities of daily living (ADL).ResultsThere was no significant difference in the recurrence rates, chronic groin pain, wound infection, or return to ADL between Lichtenstein's technique and Desarda's technique of inguinal hernia repair. The mean duration to return to ADL was lesser when patients underwent Desarda's repair though this difference was not significant.ConclusionDesarda's tissue repair was found comparable to Lichtenstein's mesh repair in terms of recurrence and postoperative morbidity, immediate postoperative pain, chronic groin pain, wound infection, and the time taken to return to ADL. Desarda's technique may be considered as an alternative to mesh-based repairs to avoid long-term mesh-related morbidity for uncomplicated indirect hernias in the younger population.

Comparison of glue versus suture mesh fixation for primary open inguinal hernia mesh repair by Lichtenstein technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The use of glue as a mesh fixator in open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (IHR) has gained popularity to reduce recurrence and postoperative complications. This meta-analysis aims to provide an up-to-date review to compare glue versus suture fixation in primary open Lichtenstein IHR. PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Springer were systematically searched till June 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glue versus suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR. Primary outcomes were early (at 1year) and late recurrence (5years or more). Secondary outcomes were the length of operation, postoperative haematoma and seroma, and chronic pain at 1year. A total of 17 RCTs with 3150 hernias (glue n = 1582, suture n = 1568) were included. Only three studies reported late recurrence. Glue fixation was associated with shorter operative duration (MD -4.17, 95% CI -4.82, -3.52; p < 0.001 and a lower incidence of haematoma formation (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32, 0.81; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in postoperative seroma (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35, 1.49; p = 0.38), chronic pain after 1year (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.73, 1.65; p = 0.65), early recurrence (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45, 2.76; p = 0.81, I2 = 0%), and late recurrence (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.59, 2.59; p = 0.59, I2 = 0%). Early and late recurrence were comparable between glue and suture fixation in open Lichtenstein IHR patients. Glue fixation had shorter operating time and lower haematoma formation than suture fixation. Chronic pain and seroma formation were comparable. More RCTs should report long-term outcomes.

Effectiveness of Inguinal Hernioplasty by Lichtenstein Technique in a Periphery Hospital

Aim: Study was carried out to see the effectiveness of the inguinal hernioplasty by Lichtenstein technique in our hospital which is located in the periphery. Methods: This prospective study was conducted from Aug 2017 to Oct 2021. All male patients older than 18 years with primary inguinal hernia were included in the study by convenient sampling technique. Patients with strangulated, obstructed and recurrent inguinal hernia and patients with obstructive urinary symptoms were excluded from the study. Written consent was taken. Patients were operated under suitable anesthesia (General/Spinal). Standard open inguinal mesh hernioplasty was done by Lichtenstein technique. In order to detect long term outcome of the procedure, a planned scheduled follow-up of the operated cases were done in the OPD. Demographic data along with short &amp; late term complications were recorded and analyzed with Excel 2013. Results: A total of 295 inguinal mesh hernioplasty were done. Right sided hernia was seen in 60.34%, left side hernia was seen 34.58% and bilateral hernia was seen in 5.08% of the patients. Indirect hernia was observed in 65.08%, direct hernia was seen in 32.88% and pantaloon hernia was seen in 2.03%. Hepatitis C virus infection was found in 9.83% of the patients and hepatitis B virus was found in 2.71%. Scrotal swelling was observed in 1.36% of the patients which was treated conservatively, seroma was observed in 1.02% of the patients which was absorbed spontaneously and no intervention was done. Hematoma was seen in one patient having hepatitis C virus infection. During follow-up of one year chronic groin pain was seen in 2.37% patients which resolved conservatively. In long term follow-up no infection, chronic groin pain and recurrence was reported. Conclusion: Effectiveness of open inguinal mesh hernioplasty by Lichtenstein technique is far superior to other techniques. Lichtenstein technique is safe, easy to learn and it does not require any special equipments. We strongly recommend this technique in periphery hospital where laparoscopic facilities are still not available. Keywords: Lichtenstein repair, Shouldice technique, Inguinal mesh hernioplasty.

Meta-analysis of the outcomes of Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) for inguinal hernia.

To evaluate the outcomes of Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP) in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. In compliance with PRISMA statement standards, electronic databases were searched to identify all studies reporting the outcomes of TREPP in patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. The outcomes of interest included recurrence, chronic pain, haematoma, and wound infection. Proportion meta-analysis model was constructed to quantify the risk of postoperative complications and direct comparison meta-analysis model was constructed to compare the outcomes of TREPP and other open techniques. Random-effects modelling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Seven studies enrolling 1891 patients undergoing TREPP were included. The mean operative time was 26min (95% CI 15-36). Pooled analyses showed that TREPP was associated with 3.00% (95% CI 1.00-6.00%) risk of recurrence, 3.00% (95% CI 2.00-6.00%) risk of chronic pain, 8.00% (95% CI 0.00-20.00%) risk of haematoma, and 3.00% (95% CI 0.00-6.00%) risk of wound infection. The results remained consistent through subgroup analysis of patients with primary hernias and those with recurrent hernias. Analysis of a limited number of comparative studies showed no difference between TREPP and Lichtenstein technique in terms of recurrence (OR 1.57, P = 0.26) and chronic pain (OR 1.16, P = 0.59). The best available evidence suggests that TREPP may be a promising technique for elective repair of inguinal hernias as indicated by low risks of recurrence, chronic pain, haematoma, and wound infection. The available evidence is limited to studies from a same country conducted by almost the same research group which may affect generalisability of the findings. Moreover, there is a lack of comparative evidence on outcomes of TREPP versus other techniques highlighting a need for high-quality randomised controlled trials for definite conclusions. Although the available evidence is not adequate for definite conclusions, the results of current study can be used for sample size calculation and power analysis in future trials.

Massive Vesical Hernias and Its Management: Case Series and Literature Review

Background: Bladder hernias are infrequent and should be treated by the urologist, or an experienced surgeon. An inguinoscrotal hernia of the bladder should be suspected in male patients with voiding symptoms and a fluctuant mass in the scrotum that changes its volume during urination. The most common characteristics found on the series were patients with advanced age, sedentary, and overweight. Case Presentation: We present a case series of 4 patients with inguinoscrotal herniation of the bladder, the surgical management, and outcome. Conclusion: The surgical technique used was inguinal plasty with Lichtenstein technique and either laparoscopic or open surgery mesh-plug placement. None had surgical complications, and none had recurrence at their follow-up.

Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair: A historical review

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common procedures performed in general surgery. Approximately 20 million hernia surgeries are performed every year worldwide. Conventionally, hernial repair is carried out with the open Lichtenstein technique; however, laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repairs have been developed as a minimally invasive alternative to the classic Lichtenstein repair. The prosthetic mesh can be placed by totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal pre-peritoneal approaches. Choosing the best technique for repairing an inguinal hernia is a challenge because the available data are contradictory. However, a growing number of studies have claimed that robotic-assisted hernia repair is not only feasible and safe, but it is associated with outcomes that are comparable to those obtained with laparoscopy and open surgery, including shorter hospital stay, and fewer complications. The aim of the review article is to provide an overview of the current practice of inguinal hernia repair, with a focus on the advances in robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of this surgical procedure compared to the laparoscopic technique in view of the current reports in the literature. Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, Robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair, Lichtenstein technique, Mesh, Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal approach, Totally extraperitoneal approach.

Desarda versus Lichenstein repair in treatment of inguinal hernia: our experience in KVG Medical College and Hospital

Background: Desarda technique of inguinal hernia repair introduced in 2001 is still not considered standard tissue-based hernia repair technique. The aim of the study was to compare the tissue based Desarda technique with standard Lichtenstein repair in treatment of primary inguinal hernia.Methods: 72 cases were allocated into 2 groups. Desarda (D Group) had 36 and Lichtenstein (L Group) had 36 patients. Primary outcome factors included operative time measured from skin incision to skin closure. Post operative pain scores was using Sheffield scale. Ecchymosis, hematoma, seroma, surgical site infections, foreign body sensation etc. were evaluated as postoperative complications. A follow up examination was planned for 6 month to look for early recurrence (&lt;6 month) and chronic groin pain.Results: Mean age in desarda’s group 44.94±15.5 years while Lichtenstein group was 45.47±13.12 years. The mean duration of surgery 42.83 min (D) versus 50.72 min (L). Duration of hospital stay 3.38 days (D) versus 4.08 days (L). Time taken to return to normal and work activities was significantly less in Desarda group (p=0.001). After 6-month mean follow up period 1 recurrence is noted in each arm (p=1).Conclusions: On comparison of Desarda with Lichtenstein repair. Desarda technique does not use a mesh. Patients after Desarda's operative procedure gets normal activity sooner as compared to the standard Lichtenstein mesh repair. Complications similar to standardized technique. We also found the use of Desarda technique in patients with indirect hernia is a technically sound option than Lichtenstein technique.

OV01 A LOW-COST HERNIA MODEL FOR THE TRAINING OF THE SHOULDICE AND THE LICHTENSTEIN INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR

Abstract Aim Based on an international European survey, residents prefer to study inguinal hernia repair through lectures or video-demonstrations or want to practice either on simulation or cadaveric models. Simulation models in inguinal hernia are scarce or expensive. Material and Methods A low-cost model was developed that can be produced everywhere with the aid of the instruction video: “How to build an inguinal hernia model”. Initially, the model was designed to practice the Lichtenstein technique but after some minor modifications (adding the conjoint tendon, enough slack in the transversalis fascia) it was also possible to practice the Shouldice technique on the same model. It only needs the removal of the stitches of the third and fourth layer before the Lichtenstein can be performed. Results The model was used for several studies with students and residents and proved to be realistic and was approved by an international survey among experienced hernia surgeons. It has been used once in a national training session of residents. Conclusions The video shows the execution of both procedures on the same model.

Comparison between TAPP & Lichtenstein techniques for inguinal hernia repair: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundWorldwide, inguinal hernia repair is one of the commonest surgeries. The best treatment option to primary hernia has been investigated, but there still remains lack of evidence about the ideal approach. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair using transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAPP) & Lichtenstein techniques. Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study, conducted at Department of General & Minimal Invasive Surgery, SKIMS Medical College, Bemina, Srinagar. For performing the analysis, we used SPSS. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation, and the categorical ones were presented as frequencies and percentages. ResultsA total of 60 patients were included (30 in each group). The mean age of the patients in both groups was around 54 years, and all patients were males. In unilateral cases the operating time was greater in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001); however, in the bilateral cases, the operating time was significantly greater in the Lichtenstein than the TAPP group (p = 0.003). The pain scores, in unilateral cases, were significantly lower in the TAPP group than the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate in the TAPP group was 6.7% while in the Lichtenstein group it was at 23.3%. In unilateral and bilateral cases, the patients significantly returned to work earlier in the TAPP group than those in the Lichtenstein group (p < 0.001). ConclusionTAPP and Lichtenstein techniques are both safe and reliable techniques for inguinal hernia repair. However, TAPP repair showed lesser post-operative pain, earlier discharge from the hospital, earlier return to usual activities, better cosmetic outcomes, and less persisting pain. However, there was no significant difference in the complication rate and TAPP repair was more costly for the patient.

A comparative study of Stoppa’s repair versus Lichtenstein technique for surgical management of bilateral inguinal hernia

Background: The surgical management of bilateral inguinal hernias has been a point of contention for a long time, particularly in terms of whether to repair them sequentially or simultaneously, especially following tension-free surgeries. The present study was planned to compare the outcomes of bilateral inguinal hernia repair between patients who underwent the Stoppa’s repair and those who underwent Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty repair.Methods: The study included all patients of both genders with age of 18 years with bilateral inguinal hernias. Patients with following any condition-a complicated inguinal hernia; an obstructed or strangulated inguinal hernia; a recurrent inguinal hernia; previous abdominal surgery; a local skin infection-were excluded from the study. Patients were randomised into 2 groups based on simple randomization-group 1: patients underwent Lichtenstein tension free mesh hernioplasty; and group 2: patient underwent Stoppa's repair.Results: The operative time was significantly shorter in group 2 patients as compared to group A. In both groups, there were no intraoperative complications. Group 2 patients had significantly lower postoperative pain scores measured by the visual analogue scale at 12 hours postoperatively, but there was no statistically significant difference in pain at 24 hours or 7 days postoperatively. Post-operative hospital stays, return to normal daily activities, and chronic groin pain, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.Conclusions: The present study was unable to show that either technique was superior in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias. Both procedures, on the other hand, were capable of achieving favourable postoperative outcomes and had similar problems.

A STUDY OF COMPARISON OF PURE TISSUE REPAIR (DESERDA) AND PROSTHETIC REPAIR (LICHTENSTEIN) METHODS FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR-A COMPARATIVE STUDY

INTRODUCTION: An ideal hernia repair should be tension free, tissue based, with no potential damage to vital structures, no long term pain or complications and no recurrence. Although Lichtenstein's prosthetic repair is simple and safe, but it is also correlated with risk of infections, recurrence, chronic pain, testicular atrophy and infertility, foreign body sensations and chronic groin sepsis. Desarda hernia repair does not require mesh and provide more physiological support. It is simple, easy to learn. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: a) To compare the operative time, postoperative stay and time required to return normal activity between two groups. b) To compare early complication rate and late complication rate between two groups. MATERIALAND METHODS: This observational study was conducted among patients admitted with the diagnosis of primary inguinal hernia in SMIMER, Surat. The patients were randomly allocated to either Lichtenstein or Desarda method of hernia repair. Operating time, post operative stay and duration of return to normal activity were recorded. Early complications were noted and the patients were followed up to 12 months for late complications (chronic pain, foreign body sensation, and recurrence). RESULTS: The mean operative time and postoperative stay did not show signicant differ for both groups. Patients operated by Desarda technique returned to normal activity signicantly early by 12.2 ± 2.54 days as compared to patients operated by Lichtenstein techniques (14.0 ± 2.76 days, p = 0.01). Most common early complication in both groups was pain (D group; 40.0%, Lgroup: 45.2%) followed by wound infection (D group; 8.0%, Lgroup: 6.5%) and seroma (D group; 0.0%, Lgroup: 3.2%). Occurrence of chronic pain was more in Lgroup (58.1%) as compared to D group (16.0%, p=0.001). None of the patients from D group had foreign body sensation. Foreign body sensation was observed only in ve patients of Lgroup (16.1%). Recurrence rate during one year in Lgroup (6.5%) was higher than D group (4.0%). CONCLUSION: Early return to work was potential benet of Desarda repair. Early complications were similar in both procedures. Desarda repair has lower incidence of chronic pain and foreign body sensation. However, there is no signicant difference for chronic pain in Desarda group when compared in same patients operated bilaterally with different technique. This study was conducted with small sample size with short follow up. Therefore, result of late complication in the present study may insufcient to conclude the probability of occurrence as longer follow up and larger sample size is required.

Hybrid method using laparoscopy and Lichtenstein's technique for incarcerated inguinal hernia in a patient with liver cirrhosis and severe varicose veins: A case report.

IntroductionCirrhosis is a significant determinant of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Patients with severe liver cirrhosis are substantially contraindicated for surgical treatment of inguinal hernia because of the substantial recurrence rate and high postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, hernia with incarceration and strangulation, which could become life-threatening, should be repaired urgently even for patients with severe liver cirrhosis. No clear surgical guidelines have been established regarding the treatment strategy for inguinal hernia in patients with cirrhosis.Presentation of caseA 62-year-old man with a history of chronic C-type liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh classification C) and hepatocellular carcinoma was referred to us for surgical treatment of an irreducible right inguinal hernia. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed that the small intestine had herniated into the scrotum and severe abdominal wall varicose veins due to liver cirrhosis. We performed a hybrid method that combines examination laparoscopy and Lichtenstein's technique to observe the abdominal cavity and to avoid the risks due to severe varicosis of the inferior epigastric vein.DiscussionThere have been some reports of inguinal hernia with cirrhosis and ascites, but no reports of incarcerated inguinal hernia with abdominal wall varicose veins. In the present case, we chose a laparoscopic approach to observe the abdominal cavity to confirm intestinal necrosis. Hybrid surgery using laparoscopy and Lichtenstein's technique for incarcerated inguinal hernia could be performed safely.ConclusionHybrid surgery using laparoscopy and Lichtenstein's technique may be an effective method for patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia with end-stage cirrhosis and severe abdominal varicosis.

Inguinal hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique under local anesthesia (with video).

Inguinal hernia repair using the Lichtenstein technique under local anesthesia (with video).

Laparoscopic Totally Extra-peritoneal Hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein Open Tension Free Mesh Repair for Inguinal Hernia

Background: Surgery for a groin hernia is the most common operation in general surgery. The recurrence rate in non-specialized centres is high, and postoperative pain and discomfort are common. The inguinal hernia repair has been a controversial area in surgical practice ever since it was associated with recurrence rates which have decreased because of the use of prosthetic mesh. Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of the total extra-peritoneal technique compared with the Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair. Patients and Material: This randomized controlled trial study included a total of 40 male patients aged between 14 and 60 years with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia, attending at Outpatient Clinic, Aswan University Hospital and followed up there. This study was conducted period from August 2017 to August 2018. They were randomly divided into two groups; Group A Open Lichtenstein hernioplasty and Group B; laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP). Results: There was a statistically significant difference between Groups A and B cases as regard operative time and hospital stay. There was no statistically significant difference between Group A and B cases as regard intra-operative/postoperative complications. Also, there was no s statistically significant difference as regard VAS, recurrence in either group during the follow- up period of 6 months. Conclusions: It could be concluded that laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty yielded better results regarding operative time and hospital stay. Yet, better results were found regarding complications, but the study could not detect statistical differences.

Evaluation of Trans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Mesh Repair:Our Early Results

Background:An inguinal hernia is a protrusion of the content of the abdominal cavity or preperitoneal fat through a hernia defect in the inguinal area.Inguinal hernia repair is considered one of the most common surgical procedures done all over the world. The Lichtenstein technique, introduced in 1984, is the best evaluated and the most common open tensionless mesh repair of different open mesh techniques with low morbidity and low recurrence rates (≤4%) in the long-term follow-up. Objectives:Evaluation of our results ofTrans Rectus Sheath Extra-Peritoneal Procedure (TREPP)considering the data available from the literature of the standard Lichtenstein method for the treatment of primary adult inguinal hernia. Patients and Methods: A clinical study was conducted at Qena University Hospital over 6 months period, between 1/9/2019 to 1/3/2020 for patients with hernia visiting the outpatient clinic. We operated on 52 patients using the TREPP technique with a follow-up period at 6 months duration post-operative. Results:We operated on 52 patients using the TREPP technique; all of them were males with a mean age of 33.3±10.2years. Intra-operative complications occurred in 1.9% of cases. No cases showed recurrence during the first 6 months post-operative. No cases had CPIP (chronic post-operative pain). Conclusion: The TREPP technique is a good alternative to the standard Lichtenstein tension-free mesh repair with a low recurrence rate as in Lichtenstein repair, but with a less incidence of CPIP and scrotal edema with shorter operation time.

Outcome of open inguinal hernia repair using sutureless self-gripping mesh - a retrospective single cohort study.

Neurological disturbances after open inguinal hernia repair affect approximately one in ten patients. Sutureless, self-gripping meshes were developed with the aim of reducing postoperative neurological disturbances or neuralgia. This study assessed short- and long-term outcomes after open inguinal hernia repair using a self-gripping light-weight mesh in a peripheral teaching hospital. Patients with uni- or bilateral inguinal hernia were included in this study. Open inguinal hernia repair was performed according to the Lichtenstein technique with a self-gripping, lightweight macroporous mesh. Postoperative follow-up was at 6 weeks after surgery and any long-term complications or recurrences were recorded up to 5 years postoperatively. The median follow up time for all patients was 5&ndash;6 years and the median operation time was 40.0 minutes (inter quartile range 25.0&ndash;55.8). Of the 162 included patients, the mean numeric rating scale for pain (0 = no pain, 10 = excruciating pain) before hospital discharge was 2.7 (standard deviation [SD] 2.6) and 1.1 (SD 1.1) at 6 weeks postoperatively. The overall incidence of neurological disturbances at 6 weeks postoperatively was 11% when surgery was performed by the chief of surgery and 40% when it was performed by a senior consultant, 49% by chief-residents and 47% by supervised residents (p = 0.005). Patients with neurological disturbances were younger than asymptomatic patients (age 50, SD 15 vs 62, SD 17, p &lt;0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year recurrence rates were 1%, 2% and 3%, respectively. This study shows that open inguinal hernia repair using a self-gripping mesh is feasible, with a short operation time and low hernia recurrence rates in a peripheral teaching hospital. However, significant differences in neurological disturbances dependent on the surgeons experience were identified. Especially younger patients should be operated on by an experienced surgeon to reduce neurological disturbances and neuralgia.