Reviewed by: Athens of the New South: College Life and the Making of Modern Nashville by Mary Ellen Pethel Michael David Cohen (bio) Athens of the New South: College Life and the Making of Modern Nashville. By Mary Ellen Pethel. (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 2017. Pp. xiii, 340. $60.00 cloth; $39.95 paper; $60.00 ebook) The postbellum South underwent both educational growth and urban modernization. In Athens of the New South, Mary Ellen Pethel argues that these went hand in hand. Southerners used higher education to enact their "own version of modernity," one that accommodated their regional identity and history (p. 3). Colleges, conversely, shaped the economic and cultural growth of cities. Following nine educational institutions in Nashville between 1865 and 1930, Pethel contends that higher education "was what marked cities like Nashville as 'progressive' and 'New South'" (p. 31). Nashvillians believed higher education was central to their city's success. Marketing it as "the ideal New South urban center," business leaders donated to local colleges, joined boards of trust, and enrolled their children (p. 53). White alumni became professionals who shaped the twentieth-century city. Black alumni became teachers, doctors, and nurses who helped Tennessee's black communities to survive Jim Crow. [End Page 618] Education, Pethel shows, literally shaped the urban landscape. After four colleges for whites opened in Nashville's western section, commercial development and residential preferences followed. African Americans, forbidden to purchase property in much of the west, formed their own commercial district and elite residential area in the north alongside three black colleges. Other parts of the north and east became low-income and immigrant enclaves. Race and gender fundamentally shaped Southern education. Blacks studied in separate colleges because the whites excluded them. In Nashville, these followed both Booker T. Washington's teacher-training model, as at Tennessee Agricultural and Industrial School, and W. E. B. Du Bois's liberal arts model, as at Fisk University. Colleges that admitted women, either alone or alongside men, retained some commitment to antebellum feminine roles—they offered gendered curricula that taught women home economics, teaching, and nursing. Alumnae performed volunteer community work or entered feminized professions. New leisure activities empowered students to shape and enjoy the modern city. Fraternities and sororities existed largely off campus. Students patronized Nashville's theaters, parks, skating rink, and racetrack. African Americans, unwelcome at white facilities, participated in "a segregated system of leisure" that included black-designated Hadley Park and women's organizations dedicated to community service (p. 185). Sports, especially those played by white men, transformed both higher education and Southern culture. Athleticism came to define Southern manhood, and devotion to teams, especially football after 1890, which "in some part, replaced [Southerners'] allegiance to the Confederacy" (p. 197). Vanderbilt's excellent football record became a source of regional pride and made Nashville "a prime representative of southern-style progressivism" (p. 196). Pethel deftly applies the work of scholars such as Amy McCandless, on women's higher education, and Andrew Doyle, on college football, to her case study of Nashville. (She excessively quotes [End Page 619] secondary sources, though, where citations would suffice.) Blending their analyses with a wide primary source base centered around the colleges' publications and archives, she convincingly shows that Nashville became a modern city largely because of and defined by its colleges. Writing as most of them celebrate or approach their sesquicentennials, she balances a bit of celebration—including a final chapter on growth after 1930—with a lot of scholarship. Historians of Nashville must read this book, and many residents will want to as well. Historians of higher education should too; it stands out in that field for its recognition of the campuses and the city as a continuous and connected space. A few passing references would benefit from explanations. Pethel mentions that married men and working teachers attended colleges, but does not explore the impact of age on their experiences. Her exclusion of Johns Hopkins from institutions "in the Southeast" and her inclusion of Tennessee in "the Deep South" leave me curious how she defines those regions (pp. 16, 41). These, however, detract very little from her engaging account of modern Nashville's birth...