Reviewed by: Aspectos de la neología en el Siglo de Oro: Lengua general y lenguajes especializados Regina Morin Verdonk, Robert, and María Jesús Mancho Duque, eds. Aspectos de la neología en el Siglo de Oro: Lengua general y lenguajes especializados. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2010. Pp. 349. ISBN 978-90-420-3117-3. Aspectos de la neología en el Siglo de Oro: Lengua general y lenguajes especializados is a collection of high-quality scholarly articles written in Spanish and presented in two parts. The introduction (7–20) provides a thorough discussion of how neologisms enter into a language, either through language-internal morphological, semantic, and syntactic mechanisms, or through linguistic borrowing. It also carefully discusses the content of each article. The volume as a whole is extremely well documented, and contains at the end an extensive bibliography (273–330) and an index of terms (331–49). The eight contributions in the first part, “Neología en los tecnolectos del Siglo de Oro,” examine neology and obsolescence in the specialized language of sixteenth- to seventeenth-century Spanish naval affairs, medicine, astronomy and cosmography, jurisprudence, finance, navigation, mathematics, and economics. Most approach their subject matter in a similar fashion, examining a variety of Golden Age texts and analyzing attestations of word-level neology, resulting either from derivational and compositional morphological processes, or from lexical borrowing and subsequent adaptation. Two essays take a somewhat different approach. Gómez de Enterría (93–109) examines the lexical innovations of a single writer, José de la Vega, in his treatise on the buying and selling of stocks in seventeenth-century Europe, and Quirós García (149–67) focuses on the creation of syntagmatic combinations (sintagmación) or lexical chunks, rather than on word-level neology in sixteenth-century economics treatises. The second part, “Neología en la lengua general del Siglo de Oro,” contains five contributions that examine neology in the general language of the period. Anula (171–96) applies the criterion of frequency of use rather than first attestation to examine the creation, from 1474 to 1700, of words ending in –ada and –azo that denote types of blows (golpe). Clavería Nadal (197–212) discusses the neologisms and related commentary appearing in the 1611 Tesoro de la lengua castellana o española by Covarrubias. Colón Domènech (213–37) compares a portion of Nebrija’s 1493 Diccionario latino–español with the corresponding part of Cardoso’s 1570 Dictionarium Latino–Lusitanicum to identify similarities and differences in a sampling of the sixteenth–century lexicon of Spanish and Portuguese. Espinosa Elorza (239–54) questions whether the neologism amen de (both ‘except for’ and ‘in addition to’) can be correctly attributed to Cervantes, as has been the case to date. The final contribution, by Jiménez Ríos (255–72), discusses the range of strategies employed by Fray Vicente de Burgos in a late fifteenth-century Spanish translation of De las Propiedades de las Cosas, a medieval encyclopedia compiled in the early decades of the thirteenth century by Bartolomé Ánglico. The essays in Aspectos de la neología en el Siglo de Oro: Lengua general y lenguajes especializados are written in academic Spanish and assume at least a basic knowledge of the processes involved in linguistic evolution; derivational, compositional, and syntagmatic neology; linguistic borrowing; and phonological and morphological adaptation. However, the clearly written and well-illustrated introduction goes a long way towards making the volume accessible to readers with a basic command of linguistics and an interest in the subject matter. This is a collection that will appeal to anyone interested in the history of the Spanish lexicon, especially scholars and graduate students in historical linguistics and sociolinguistics, and those working on modern-day neology, especially that resulting from linguistic borrowing. Each of the essays in the first part, “Neología en los tecnolectos del Siglo de Oro,” can stand alone. [End Page 368] However, read together they form a coherent whole that presents a rich picture of linguistic, but also social, political, technological, and economic forces that can lead to and sustain lexical evolution. To give just a few examples, Gutiérrez Rodilla (41–56) discusses the societal pressures...
Read full abstract