LexA Binding Research Articles

Repression of Promoter Activity by CNOT2, a Subunit of the Transcription Regulatory Ccr4-Not Complex

The evolutionary conserved Ccr4-Not complex controls mRNA metabolism at multiple levels in eukaryotic cells. Genetic analysis of not mutants in yeast identifies a negative role in transcription, which is dependent on core promoter structure. To obtain direct support for this we targeted individual core subunits of the human Ccr4-Not complex to promoters in transient transfections of human cells. In this experimental setup we found that the CNOT2 and CNOT9(hRcd1/hCaf40) subunits act as repressors of reporter gene activity. Interestingly, recruitment of other Ccr4-Not subunits did not affect the reporter gene. The major repression function of CNOT2 is localized in a specialized protein motif, the Not-Box. This conserved motif is present in all CNOT2 orthologs and surprisingly also in CNOT3 orthologs. Repression by the Not-Box was sensitive to treatment with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. In addition, mutation of a canonical TATA-box enhanced repression. Our experiments show for the first time direct regulation of promoter activity by components of the Ccr4-Not complex.

A recA-LexA-dependent pathway mediates ciprofloxacin-induced fibronectin binding in Staphylococcus aureus.

Subinhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin (CPX) raise the fibronectin-mediated attachment of fluoroquinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by selectively inducing fnbB coding for one of two fibronectin-binding proteins: FnBPB. To identify candidate regulatory pathway(s) linking drug exposure to up-regulation of fnbB, we disrupted the global response regulators agr, sarA, and recA in the highly quinolone-resistant strain RA1. Whereas agr and sarA mutants of RA1 exposed to CPX still displayed increased adhesion to fibronectin, the CPX-triggered response was abolished in the uvs-568 recA mutant, but was restored following complementation with wild type recA. Steady-state levels of recA and fnbB, but not fnbA, mRNA were co-coordinately increased >3-fold in CPX-exposed strain RA1. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed specific binding of purified S. aureus SOS-repressor LexA to recA and fnbB, but not to fnbA or rpoB promoters. DNase I footprint analysis showed LexA binding overlapping the core promoter elements in fnbB. We conclude that activation of recA and derepression of lexA-regulated genes by CPX may represent a response to drug-induced damage that results in a novel induction of a virulence factor leading to increased bacterial tissue adherence.

DNA array analysis of gene expression in response to UV irradiation in Escherichia coli

The capacity of DNA macroarrays that contain all 4290 predicted open reading frames of the E. coli K12 genome was evaluated by measuring changes in gene expression in response to irradiation by ultraviolet light (UV). UV and other DNA damaging agents are known to trigger the induction of the SOS response. This is a coordinated increase in the level of expression of a set of approximately 30 unlinked genes, the SOS genes, negatively regulated by the LexA repressor. The analysis was performed on a set of isogenic strains with mutations that affect expression of genes of the SOS system: (i) the lexA + strain, in which the SOS system can be induced after DNA damage, (ii) lexAind − mutants in which the SOS system cannot be induced, and (iii) lexAdef mutants in which the SOS system is induced constitutively. We found that a large set of genes appeared to be either upregulated or downregulated following UV irradiation. Among the genes which appeared to be upregulated in a LexA-dependent manner, we correctly identified 9 out of 27 SOS genes printed on the arrays and one gene containing a LexA binding site. One gene, dnaN, encoding the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, was identified as an upregulated gene in a LexA-independent manner. Our results were compared to those of similar studies previously published. Although the SOS response as a whole could not be illustrated by using DNA arrays, the data suggest that regulation of some SOS genes might be more complex than previously thought.

Characterization of a new LexA binding motif in the marine magnetotactic bacterium strain MC-1.

MC-1 is a marine, magnetotactic bacterium that is phylogenetically associated with the alpha subclass of the Proteobacteria and is the first and only magnetotactic coccus isolated in pure culture to date. By using a TBLASTN search, a lexA gene was identified in the published genome of MC-1; it was subsequently cloned, and the protein was purified to >90% purity. Results from reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed that the MC-1 lexA gene comprises a single transcriptional unit with two open reading frames encoding proteins of unknown function and with a rumA-like gene, a homologue of the Escherichia coli umuD gene. Mobility shift assays revealed that this LexA protein specifically binds both to its own promoter and to that of the umuDC operon. However, MC-1 LexA does not bind to the promoter regions of other genes, such as recA and uvrA, that have been previously reported to be regulated by LexA in bacterial species belonging to the alpha subclass of the Proteobacteria: Site-directed mutagenesis of both the lexA and umuDC operator regions demonstrated that the sequence CCTN(10)AGG is the specific target motif for the MC-1 LexA protein.

Characterization of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri LexA: recognition of the LexA binding site.

Levels of l exA transcripts are markedly increased upon exposure of Xanthomonas axonopodis pathovar citri ( X. a. pv. citri) to the DNA-damaging agent mitomycin C. Preliminary electrophoretic mobility-shift data led us to propose that binding of LexA protein to the sequence upstream of the lexA coding region is responsible for low promoter activity in the uniduced state. We determined that the LexA protein binds to the region located between the transcription start site and the translation initiation codon of the lexA gene of X. a. pv. citri. Using a DNase I footprinting technique, we identified a 19-bp palindromic sequence, TTAGTAGTAATACTACTAA (TTAGN(11)CTAA), located in this region as the binding sequence for the LexA protein of X. a. pv. citri, and showed that the two halves of the palindrome have to be in the inverted repeat orientation to permit binding of LexA. We also showed that almost any mutation in this sequence, including changes in the length of the spacer region of the palindrome, destroyed its ability to bind LexA both in vitro and in vivo.

A green nonsulfur bacterium, Dehalococcoides ethenogenes, with the LexA binding sequence found in gram-positive organisms.

Dehalococcoides ethenogenes is a member of the physiologically diverse division of green nonsulfur bacteria. Using a TBLASTN search, the D. ethenogenes lexA gene has been identified, cloned, and expressed and its protein has been purified. Mobility shift assays revealed that the D. ethenogenes LexA protein specifically binds to both its own promoter and that of the uvrA gene, but not to the recA promoter. Our results demonstrate that the D. ethenogenes LexA binding site is GAACN(4)GTTC, which is identical to that found in gram-positive bacteria. In agreement with this fact, the Bacillus subtilis DinR protein binds specifically to the D. ethenogenes LexA operator. This constitutes the first non-gram-positive bacterium exhibiting a LexA binding site identical to that of B. subtilis.

A new regulatory DNA motif of the gamma subclass Proteobacteria: identification of the LexA protein binding site of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa.

Escherichia coli LexA protein is the repressor of a gene network whose members are directly involved in the repair of damaged DNA and in the survival of bacterial cells until DNA lesions have been eliminated. The lexA gene is widely present in bacteria, although the sequences of only three LexA-binding sites are known: Gram-positive, alpha Proteobacteria and some members of gamma Proteobacteria represented by E. coli. Taking advantage of the fact that the genome sequence of the plant-pathogenic bacterium Xylella fastidiosa has been determined, its lexA gene has been cloned and overexpressed in E. coli to purify its product. After demonstration that X. fastidiosa lexA and recA genes are co-transcribed, gel mobility shift assays and directed mutagenesis experiments using the promoter of the lexA-recA transcriptional unit demonstrated that the X. fastidiosa LexA protein specifically binds the imperfect palindrome TTAGN(6)TACTA. This is the first LexA binding sequence identified in the gamma Proteobacteria differing from the E. coli-like LexA box. Although a computational search has revealed the presence of TTAGN(6)TACTA-like motifs upstream of X. fastidiosa genes other than lexA, X. fastidiosa LexA only binds the promoter of one of them, XF2313, encoding a putative DNA-modification methylase. Moreover, X. fastidiosa LexA protein does not bind any of the other genes whose homologues are regulated by the LexA repressor in E. coli (uvrA, uvrB, ssb, ruvAB, ftsK, dinG, recN and ybfE). RT-PCR quantitative analysis has also demonstrated that lexA-recA and XF2313 genes, as well as the X. fastidiosa genes which are homologues to those of E. coli belonging to the LexA regulon, with the exception of ssb, are DNA damage-inducible in X. fastidiosa.

DNA damage induction of recA in Mycobacterium tuberculosis independently of RecA and LexA.

The ubiquitous and highly conserved RecA protein is generally expressed from a single promoter, which is regulated by LexA in conjunction with RecA. We show here using transcriptional fusions to a reporter gene that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis recA gene is expressed from two promoters. Although one promoter is clearly regulated in the classical way, the other remains DNA damage inducible in the absence of RecA or when LexA binding is prevented. These observations demonstrate convincingly for the first time that there is a novel mechanism of DNA damage induction in M. tuberculosis that is independent of LexA and RecA.

Definition of the mycobacterial SOS box and use to identify LexA-regulated genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

The bases of the mycobacterial SOS box important for LexA binding were determined by replacing each base with every other and examining the effect on the induction of a reporter gene following DNA damage. This analysis revealed that the SOS box was longer than originally thought by 2 bp in each half of the palindromic site. A search of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome sequence with the new consensus, TCGAAC(N)(4)GTTCGA, identified 4 sites which were perfect matches and 12 sites with a single mismatch which were predicted to bind LexA. Genes which could potentially be regulated by these SOS boxes were ascertained from their positions relative to the sites. Examination of expression data for these genes following DNA damage identified 12 new genes which are most likely regulated by LexA as well as the known M. tuberculosis DNA damage-inducible genes recA, lexA, and ruvC. Of these 12 genes, only 2 have a predicted function: dnaE2, a component of DNA polymerase III, and linB, which is similar to 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-1,4-cylcohexadiene hydrolase. Curiously, of the remaining 10 genes predicted to be LexA regulated, 7 are members of the M. tuberculosis 13E12 repeat family, which has some of the characteristics of mobile elements.

The Bacillus subtilis competence transcription factor, ComK, overrides LexA-imposed transcriptional inhibition without physically displacing LexA.

During the development of competence in Bacillus subtilis the recA gene is activated by the competence transcription factor, ComK, which is presumably required to alleviate the transcriptional repression of recA by LexA. To investigate the mechanism by which ComK activates recA transcription we examined the binding of ComK and LexA to the recA promoter in vitro. Using hydroxyl radical protection analyses to establish the location of ComK dimer-binding sites within the recA promoter, we identified four AT-boxes in a configuration unique for ComK-regulated promoters. Gel mobility shift experiments showed that all four ComK dimer-binding sites were occupied at ComK concentrations in the physiological range. In addition, occupation of all ComK-binding sites did not prevent LexA from binding to the recA promoter, despite the fact that the ComK and LexA recognition motifs partially overlap. Although ComK did not replace LexA from the recA promoter, in vitro transcription analyses indicated that the presence of ComK is sufficient to alleviate LexA repression of recA.

Identification of Some DNA Damage-Inducible Genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis : Apparent Lack of Correlation with LexA Binding

The repair of DNA damage is expected to be particularly important to intracellular pathogens such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and so it is of interest to examine the response of M. tuberculosis to DNA damage. The expression of recA, a key component in DNA repair and recombination, is induced by DNA damage in M. tuberculosis. In this study, we have analyzed the expression following DNA damage in M. tuberculosis of a number of other genes which are DNA damage inducible in Escherichia coli. While many of these genes were also induced by DNA damage in M. tuberculosis, some were not. In addition, one gene (ruvC) which is not induced by DNA damage in E. coli was induced in M. tuberculosis, a result likely linked to its different transcriptional arrangement in M. tuberculosis. We also searched the sequences upstream of the genes being studied for the mycobacterial SOS box (the binding site for LexA) and assessed LexA binding to potential sites identified. LexA is the repressor protein responsible for regulating expression of these SOS genes in E. coli. However, two of the genes which were DNA damage inducible in M. tuberculosis did not have identifiable sites to which LexA bound. The absence of binding sites for LexA upstream of these genes was confirmed by analysis of LexA binding to overlapping DNA fragments covering a region from 500 bp upstream of the coding sequence to 100 bp within it. Therefore, it appears most likely that an alternative mechanism of gene regulation in response to DNA damage exists in M. tuberculosis.

Interaction of the repressors Nrg1 and Nrg2 with the Snf1 protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The Snf1 protein kinase is essential for the transcription of glucose-repressed genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We identified Nrg2 as a protein that interacts with Snf1 in the two-hybrid system. Nrg2 is a C(2)H(2) zinc-finger protein that is homologous to Nrg1, a repressor of the glucose- and Snf1-regulated STA1 (glucoamylase) gene. Snf1 also interacts with Nrg1 in the two-hybrid system and co-immunoprecipitates with both Nrg1 and Nrg2 from cell extracts. A LexA fusion to Nrg2 represses transcription from a promoter containing LexA binding sites, indicating that Nrg2 also functions as a repressor. An Nrg1 fusion to green fluorescent protein is localized to the nucleus, and this localization is not regulated by carbon source. Finally, we show that VP16 fusions to Nrg1 and Nrg2 allow low-level expression of SUC2 in glucose-grown cells, and we present evidence that Nrg1 and Nrg2 contribute to glucose repression of the DOG2 gene. These results suggest that Nrg1 and Nrg2 are direct or indirect targets of the Snf1 kinase and function in glucose repression of a subset of Snf1-regulated genes.

The Splicing Factor U1C Represses EWS/FLI-mediated Transactivation

EWS is an RNA-binding protein involved in human tumor-specific chromosomal translocations. In approximately 85% of Ewing's sarcomas, such translocations give rise to the chimeric gene EWS/FLI. In the resulting fusion protein, the RNA binding domains from the C terminus of EWS are replaced by the DNA-binding domain of the ETS protein FLI-1. EWS/FLI can function as a transcription factor with the same DNA binding specificity as FLI-1. EWS and EWS/FLI can associate with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme as well as with SF1, an essential splicing factor. Here we report that U1C, one of three human U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein-specific proteins, interacts in vitro and in vivo with both EWS and EWS/FLI. U1C interacts with other splicing factors and is important in the early stages of spliceosome formation. Importantly, co-expression of U1C represses EWS/FLI-mediated transactivation, demonstrating that this interaction can have functional ramifications. Our findings demonstrate that U1C, a well characterized splicing protein, can also function in transcriptional regulation. Furthermore, they suggest that EWS and EWS/FLI may function both in transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes.

Identification of additional genes belonging to the LexA regulon in Escherichia coli.

Exposure of Escherichia coli to a variety of DNA-damaging agents results in the induction of the global 'SOS response'. Expression of many of the genes in the SOS regulon are controlled by the LexA protein. LexA acts as a transcriptional repressor of these unlinked genes by binding to specific sequences (LexA boxes) located within the promoter region of each LexA-regulated gene. Alignment of 20 LexA binding sites found in the E. coli chromosome reveals a consensus of 5'-TACTG(TA)5CAGTA-3'. DNA sequences that exhibit a close match to the consensus are said to have a low heterology index and bind LexA tightly, whereas those that are more diverged have a high heterology index and are not expected to bind LexA. By using this heterology index, together with other search criteria, such as the location of the putative LexA box relative to a gene or to promoter elements, we have performed computational searches of the entire E. coli genome to identify novel LexA-regulated genes. These searches identified a total of 69 potential LexA-regulated genes/operons with a heterology index of <15 and included all previously characterized LexA-regulated genes. Probes were made to the remaining genes, and these were screened by Northern analysis for damage-inducible gene expression in a wild-type lexA+ cell, constitutive expression in a lexA(Def) cell and basal expression in a non-inducible lexA(Ind-) cell. These experiments have allowed us to identify seven new LexA-regulated genes, thus bringing the present number of genes in the E. coli LexA regulon to 31. The potential function of each newly identified LexA-regulated gene is discussed.

Roles for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SDS3, CBK1 and HYM1 genes in transcriptional repression by SIN3.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sin3 transcriptional repressor is part of a large multiprotein complex that includes the Rpd3 histone deacetylase. A LexA-Sin3 fusion protein represses transcription of promoters with LexA binding sites. To identify genes involved in repression by Sin3, we conducted a screen for mutations that reduce repression by LexA-Sin3. One of the mutations identified that reduces LexA-Sin3 repression is in the RPD3 gene, consistent with the known roles of Rpd3 in transcriptional repression. Mutations in CBK1 and HYM1 reduce repression by LexA-Sin3 and also cause defects in cell separation and altered colony morphology. cbk1 and hym1 mutations affect some but not all genes regulated by SIN3 and RPD3, but the effect on transcription is much weaker. Genetic analysis suggests that CBK1 and HYM1 function in the same pathway, but this genetic pathway is separable from that of SIN3 and RPD3. The remaining gene from this screen described in this report is SDS3, previously identified in a screen for mutations that increase silencing at HML, HMR, and telomere-linked genes, a phenotype also seen in sin3 and rpd3 mutants. Genetic analysis demonstrates that SDS3 functions in the same genetic pathway as SIN3 and RPD3, and coimmunoprecipitation experiments show that Sds3 is physically present in the Sin3 complex.

Phosphorylation regulates in vivo interaction and molecular targeting of serine/arginine-rich pre-mRNA splicing factors.

The SR superfamily of splicing factors and regulators is characterized by arginine/serine (RS)-rich domains, which are extensively modified by phosphorylation in cells. In vitro binding studies revealed that RS domain-mediated protein interactions can be differentially affected by phosphorylation. Taking advantage of the single nonessential SR protein-specific kinase Sky1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we investigated RS domain interactions in vivo using the two-hybrid assay. Strikingly, all RS domain-mediated interactions were abolished by SKY1 deletion and were rescuable by yeast or mammalian SR protein-specific kinases, indicating that phosphorylation has a far greater impact on RS domain interactions in vivo than in vitro. To understand this dramatic effect, we examined the localization of SR proteins and found that SC35 was shifted to the cytoplasm in sky1Delta yeast, although this phenomenon was not obvious with ASF/SF2, indicating that nuclear import of SR proteins may be differentially regulated by phosphorylation. Using a transcriptional repression assay, we further showed that most LexA-SR fusion proteins depend on Sky1p to efficiently recognize the LexA binding site in a reporter, suggesting that molecular targeting of RS domain-containing proteins within the nucleus was also affected. Together, these results reveal multiple phosphorylation-dependent steps for SR proteins to interact with one another efficiently and specifically, which may ultimately determine the splicing activity and specificity of these factors in mammalian cells.

Differential cleavage of LexA and UmuD mediated by recA pro67 mutants: implications for common LexA and UmuD binding sites on RecA

In Escherichia coli, RecA-mediated cleavage of LexA repressor is a key regulatory event required for expression of SOS genes involved in the repair of DNA damage. RecA also mediates the cleavage of UmuD protein to UmuD′, a form active in SOS mutagenesis. To determine whether LexA and UmuD have common binding determinants on RecA, we have compared the ability of several recA mutants to function in the cleavage of LexA versus UmuD in vivo. The data reveal that while some recA mutations at Pro67 have a similar effect on LexA and UmuD cleavage, others have striking differential effects. For example, a Pro67 → Trp mutation results in a high level of constitutive cleavage of both proteins. However, Pro67 → Asp and Glu mutations promote constitutive cleavage of LexA and reduce induction of UmuD cleavage to just 5 to 10% of wild-type activity. In contrast, Pro67 → Arg prevents LexA cleavage while allowing nearly 50% of wild-type induction of UmuD cleavage. These results are consistent with the idea that Pro67 is located at a site in the nucleoprotein filament where both LexA and UmuD contact RecA.

SOS induction in mycobacteria: analysis of the DNA-binding activity of a LexA-like repressor and its role in DNA damage induction of the recA gene from Mycobacterium smegmatis.

The protein encoded by the lexA gene from Mycobacterium leprae was overproduced in Escherichia coli. The recombinant protein bound to the promoter regions of the M. leprae lexA, M. leprae recA and M. smegmatis recA genes at sites with the sequences 5'-GAACACATGTTT and 5'-GAACAGGTGTTC, which belong to the 'Cheo box' family of binding sites recognized by the SOS repressor from Bacillus subtilis. Gel mobility shift assays were used to confirm that proteins with the same site specificity of DNA binding are also present in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. smegmatis. Complex formation was impaired by mutagenic disruption of the dyad symmetry of the M. smegmatis recA Cheo box. LexA binding was also inhibited by preincubation of the M. smegmatis and M. tuberculosis extracts with anti-M. leprae LexA antibodies, suggesting that the mycobacterial LexA proteins are functionally conserved at the level of DNA binding. Finally, exposure of M. smegmatis to DNA-damaging agents resulted in induction of the M. smegmatis recA promoter with concomitant loss of DNA binding of LexA to its Cheo box, confirming that this organism possesses the key regulatory elements of a functional SOS induction system.

Interaction of the human androgen receptor transactivation function with the general transcription factor TFIIF.

The human androgen receptor (AR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that regulates genes important for male sexual differentiation and development. To better understand the role of the receptor as a transcription factor we have studied the mechanism of action of the N-terminal transactivation function. In a protein-protein interaction assay the AR N terminus (amino acids 142-485) selectively bound to the basal transcription factors TFIIF and the TATA-box-binding protein (TBP). Reconstitution of the transactivation activity in vitro revealed that AR142-485 fused to the LexA protein DNA-binding domain was competent to activate a reporter gene in the presence of a competing DNA template lacking LexA binding sites. Furthermore, consistent with direct interaction with basal transcription factors, addition of recombinant TFIIF relieved squelching of basal transcription by AR142-485. Taken together these results suggest that one mechanism of transcriptional activation by the AR involves binding to TFIIF and recruitment of the transcriptional machinery.

The VITOTOX® test, an SOS bioluminescence Salmonella typhimurium test to measure genotoxicity kinetics

A new test to detect genotoxicity, that we refer to as the VITOTOX® test, was developed. Four gene fusions that are based on the Escherichia coli recN promoter were constructed and evaluated for their SOS response-dependent induction. The wild-type recN promoter, a derivative mutated in the second LexA binding site, a derivative with a mutated −35 region, and a derivative from which both the second LexA binding site and the −35 region were mutated, were cloned upstream of the promoterless Vibrio fischeri luxCDABE operon of pMOL877, in such a way that lux became under transcriptional control of the recN promoter derivatives. The inducibility by the SOS response of the promoter constructs was tested in both E. coli and in the Ames test Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100 and TA104. In all strains, the highest sensitivity and induction was observed with the plasmids pMOL1067 and pMOL1068, that contain the lux operon under control of the recN promoter mutated in the second LexA binding site, or a recN promoter with a mutated −35 region, respectively. Therefore, strains containing pMOL1067 or pMOL1068 were further used for genotoxicity testing. With the VITOTOX test, genotoxicity was detected within 1–4 h. The VITOTOX test is very sensitive: for most products tested, the minimal detectable concentration (MDC) values were considerably lower (5 to >100 times) than those described for the Ames test and the SOS chromotest. A good correlation was observed with the results from the Ames tests, but certain PAHs that are not mutagenic in the Ames test were genotoxic in the VITOTOX test. With the VITOTOX strains, the kinetics of SOS induction can be determined. This feature made it possible to distinguish between compounds in mixtures of genotoxic products so long as they had different induction kinetics.