Use Of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System Research Articles

Depression risk in users of different doses of levonorgestrel intrauterine systems: a nationwide prospective cohort study

Use of the high-dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) has been associated with increased risk of incident depression. Evidence is lacking on the influence of use of two recently marketed low-dose LNG-IUS on risk of depression. This study aims to examine associations between use of different doses of LNG-IUS and risk of depression. We conducted a nationwide prospective cohort study involving all first-time users of an LNG-IUS among all Danish nulliparous women aged 15-34 years with no medical history of depression, major psychiatric diseases, endometriosis, heavy menstrual bleeding, polyp, myoma, dysmenorrhoea, iron supplement use, abortion, and infertility treatment. A total of 46,565 first-time users of LNG-IUS were followed for 80,516 person-years with 1,531 incident initiations of antidepressant use observed during follow-up. Use of the high-dose LNG-IUS containing 52mg levonorgestrel was initiated by 9,902 (21%) women, while 20,665 (44%), and 15,998 (34%) initiated use of the low-dose LNG-IUS containing 19·5 mg and 13·5 mg levonorgestrel, respectively.The age-, calendar-time-, and education-standardised incidence rates of first-time depression per 1,000 person-years at full LNG-IUS duration were 30.8 (95% CI 23·6-39·5) for the 52 mg LNG-IUS, 19·8 (95% CI 16·1; 24·0) for the 19·5 mg LNG-IUS, and 17·7 (95% CI 14·4-21·5) for the 13·5 mg LNG-IUS-. Compared to the high-dose 52 mg LNG-IUS, the adjusted number of avoided depressions per 1,000 person-years were 11·0 (95% CI 7·1-14·9) for the 19·5 mg LNG-IUS and 13·1 (95% CI 9·6-16·6) for the 13·5 mg LNG-IUS. The corresponding adjusted rate ratios were 0·77 (95% CI 0·68; 0·88) and 0·85 (95% CI 0·75-0·96). The reduced risk of depression with low-dose LNG-IUS compared to high-dose LNG-IUS was observable throughout duration of use. Use of low-dose LNG-IUS containing 19·5 mg and 13·5 mg levonorgestrel, respectively, were associated with a reduced risk of incident depression compared to use of the high-dose 52 mg LNG-IUS. The study suggests that low-dose LNG-IUS should be preferred over the high-dose LNG-IUS for contraceptive purpose. Sygeforsikringen "Danmark" grant: 2021-0128.

Extended Use of Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) 52 mg: A Population Pharmacokinetic Approach to Estimate In Vivo Levonorgestrel Release Rates and Systemic Exposure Including Comparison With Two Other LNG-IUSs

ABSTRACT With over 30 years of use, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) have proven to be highly effective methods of contraceptives. The active ingredient in LNG-IUS, levonorgestrel (LNG), is released directly into the uterine cavity, which causes suppression of endometrial maturation and thickened cervical mucus. A variety of LNG-IUS options exhibit well-established safety profiles and efficacy, providing anywhere between 2 and 18 times lower systemic exposure when compared with LNG-containing pills or implants. Patient-centered decision-making regarding product choice may be encouraged through standardized comparisons of LNG release and exposure during the time of their respective usage periods. Evaluation of the efficacy, safety, and PK of extended Mirena use from beyond 5 years to the conclusion of 8 years was designed in the Mirena Extension Trial (MET), thereby facilitating comparisons with LNG-IUS 19.5 mg and LNG-IUS 13.5 mg. Using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods and SHBG concentrations, the authors determined concentrations of plasma LNG levels. Dichloromethane was used for extracting residual LNG from the elastomer material from removed IUS devices, which was then quantified via liquid chromatography and external calibration on a reversed-phase column. Although previous models used measured LNG and SHBG (serum) concentrations, the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) allows for a uniform method of comparison among different pharmacologic studies. The popPK approach allows for a reliable estimates of in vivo LNG exposure and release during the entirety of the 8-year use period. The MET enrolled premenopausal women aged 18–35 years for a multicenter, single-arm study regarding patients who had used LNG-IUS 52 mg for the last 4.5–5 years for up to 8 years. The study took place from December 22, 2016 to May 28, 2021 throughout 54 US centers, with the primary outcome of contraceptive efficacy and failure rate. Participants each provided written, informed consent. Study strengths of the popPK approach included its robust methodology, its ability to provide in vivo release rate estimates, a stepwise demo of model suitability from use years 6 to 8, model-based estimation of unbound LNG, and the ability to provide estimates for both population and individual PK profiles from sparse available sampling. Limitations include the possibility of findings being group effects possibly inapplicable to all LNG-IUS users. In addition, the data fail to provide local endometrial and cervical LNG concentrations due to the systemic nature of the LNG exposure. Finally, the popPK Mondale should not be used for theoretical question addressing (such as creating rate release estimates outside of available data sets). In conclusion, a broad data set indicates that reliable LNG exposure is delivered by 8-year popPK and release models for up to 7 years of LNG-IUs 52 mg use. Efficacy is data-supported for 6–8 years of use, with constant LNG release throughout this time frame. Systemic LNG exposure from LNG-IUD 52 mg proved both comparable to other LNG-IUS devices and significantly lower than oral and implanted LNG-containing contraceptives.

The role of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for recurrence prevention after conservative surgery among patients with coexistent ovarian endometrioma and diffuse adenomyosis: A retrospective case control study with long-term follow up.

When ovarian endometrioma coexist with adenomyosis, the risk of postoperative recurrence increased. How is the effect of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on symptomatic recurrence for those patients was unknown. This study retrospectively analyzed 119 women with coexistent endometrioma and diffuse adenomyosis who received laparoscopic excision of pelvic endometriosis from January 2009 to April 2013. Women were categorized into two groups: intervention group with LNG-IUS and control group with expectant observation after surgery. Data were compared in terms of preoperative history, laboratory and intraoperative findings, and clinical outcomes during follow-up, including pain regression, changes in uterine volume and recurrence. During a median 79 months (range, 6-107) of follow-up, patients with LNG-IUS experienced a significantly lower symptomatic recurrence of either ovarian endometrioma or dysmenorrhea (11.1% vs. 31.1%, p=0.013), compared with women under expectant observation by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (χ2=5.448, p=0.020) and Cox univariate assessment (hazard ratio of 0.336, 95% confidence interval 0.128-0.885, p=0.027). Patients treated with LNG-IUS demonstrated a more prominent reduction in uterine volume (-14.1±20.9vs. 8.7±48.8, p=0.003) and higher percentage of complete pain remission (95.6% vs. 86.5%). For multivariate analysis, use of LNG-IUS (aHR 0.159, 95%CI 0.033-0.760, p=0.021) and severity of dysmenorrhea (aHR 4.238, 95%CI 1.191-15.082, p=0.026) were two independent factors associated with overall recurrence. Postoperative insertion of LNG-IUS may prevent recurrence in symptomatic women with comorbidity of ovarian endometrioma and diffuse adenomyosis.

Extended use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg: A population pharmacokinetic approach to estimate in vivo levonorgestrel release rates and systemic exposure including comparison with two other LNG-IUSs

ObjectiveTo characterize performance of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52mg (Mirena) over 8 years of use and facilitate comparisons with LNG-IUS 19.5mg and LNG-IUS 13.5mg. Study designWe estimated in vivo levonorgestrel (LNG) release rates and LNG plasma/serum concentrations for LNG-IUS 52mg up to 8 years of use with a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) approach using data from the Mirena Extension Trial (MET) and earlier clinical trials. We compared these with previously published release rates and exposure data for LNG-IUS 19.5mg and 13.5mg. Our 8-year popPK and release models were developed based on measured plasma/serum LNG and sex hormone-binding globulin concentrations and residual LNG content from removed LNG-IUS 52mg devices. ResultsModel-based estimated LNG release rates for LNG-IUS 52mg decreased from ∼21 µg/d after insertion to ∼7.0 µg/d after 8 years, similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg after 5 years (7.6 µg/d) and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg after 3 years (5.5 µg/d). Model-based estimated and measured plasma/serum LNG concentrations showed satisfactory agreement. Average model-based estimated LNG concentrations after 8 years of LNG-IUS 52mg use (100 ng/L [coefficient of variance 39.9%]) were similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg after 5 years (84.8 ng/L [39.9%]) and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg after 3 years (58.1 ng/L [40.8%]). ConclusionsThe 8-year release and popPK models provide reliable in vivo LNG release rates and concentration estimates, respectively, facilitating direct comparisons between the 3 studied LNG-IUSs. LNG release rates from LNG-IUS 52mg at 8 years are similar to LNG-IUS 19.5mg at 5 years and higher than LNG-IUS 13.5mg at 3 years. ImplicationsLevonorgestrel release from intrauterine system reservoirs declines with duration of use in a predictable way, and in relation to the initial load. As release rates and plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel may influence endometrial and systemic side effects, these data may assist clinical decision-making.

Contraceptive efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system for up to 8 years: findings from the Mirena Extension Trial

The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is an established, long-acting contraceptive option with approved use for up to 7 years. The Mirena Extension Trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use beyond 5 and up to 8 years. This was a multicenter, single-arm study in the United States, enrolling existing users of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, aged 18 to 35 years, who have had the system for 4.5 to 5 years. We assessed the contraceptive efficacy (Pearl Index) and cumulative failure rate (using the Kaplan-Meier method) of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system during extended use. We also evaluated bleeding outcomes and adverse events. Of the 362 participants starting year 6, 243 entered and 223 completed 8 years of 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use. Just more than half the participants were parous. The mean (standard deviation) age was 29.2 (±2.9) years, and all participants were aged ≤36 years at the end of year 8. Two pregnancies occurred, both with the device in situ. The year 6 pregnancy was of undetermined location and resolved spontaneously. The pregnancy in year 7 was ectopic and resolved with methotrexate treatment. In both cases, the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system was removed and the participants left the trial. For years 6 to 8, the 3-year Pearl Index (95% confidence interval) was 0.28 (0.03-1.00) with a 3-year cumulative failure rate of 0.68% (0.17-2.71). Pearl Indexes for years 6, 7, and 8 were 0.34 (0.01-1.88), 0.40 (0.01-2.25), and 0.00 (0.00-1.90), respectively. The 3-year (years 6-8) ectopic pregnancy Pearl Index was 0.14 (0.00-0.77). We found treatment-emergent adverse events in 249 of 362 participants (68.8%), with 65 (18.0%) events considered to be related to the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. The discontinuation rate was 38.4% (139/362), most commonly because of desire for pregnancy (12.2%, 44/362). During extended use beyond 5 years and up to 8 years, participants reported a decrease in the mean number of bleeding or spotting days with approximately half of the women experiencing amenorrhea or infrequent bleeding. We did not enroll a sufficient number of women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for contraception and heavy menstrual bleeding to assess extended use for that indication. At the end of year 8, most (98.7%, 220/223) of the participants who completed the study remained satisfied with the continued use of the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Of the 31 women who discontinued early because of desire for pregnancy with evaluable data for return-to-fertility analysis, 24 reported a posttreatment pregnancy within 1 year, giving a 12-month return-to-fertility rate of 77.4%. The 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, initially approved for 5 years, maintains high contraceptive efficacy, user satisfaction, and a favorable safety profile through 8 years of use. Participants reported 26 posttreatment pregnancies in total, of which 24 occurred in women who had discontinued the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system because of a desire for pregnancy. Of note, among women who elected to continue use through 8 years, bleeding patterns remained highly favorable. These findings support continued 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system use for up to 8 years in women who wish to continue treatment.

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Utilization in Patients with Developmental Delays

Adolescent females with developmental delays (DDs) experience unique physical and emotional challenges related to menstruation. Providers often recommend hormonal medication for menstrual management. The objective of our study was to describe the utilization and safety of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in adolescents with DDs. We utilized the Pediatric Health Information System to identify females aged 10-25 with DDs who underwent an LNG-IUS insertion between 2011 and 2020. Using a gynecologic procedure and diagnosis codes, we assessed indications for and complications of LNG-IUS use. We also evaluated early LNG-IUS removal. One thousand five hundred and sixty female patients with DDs underwent LNG-IUS insertion. LNG-IUS insertion under anesthesia was most commonly performed in patients with autism and Down syndrome, and unspecified menstrual issues were documented for 40% of the cohort. Perforation was observed in 11 patients (1%), and mechanical complications (malpositioned IUS or lost threads) were observed in 23 patients (1%). This is the largest analysis of LNG-IUS use in patients with DDs to our knowledge and shows the utilization of LNG-IUS in patients with DDs. We provide descriptive information that providers can use to accurately advise their patients with DDs on the risks and benefits of LNG-IUS use for menstrual management.

The use of different doses levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS): real-world data from a multicenter Italian study

Purpose Current research fails to adequately inform about the differential use of available levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems (LNG-IUSs) in real life. Aim of our study was to compare the characteristics, satisfaction, continuation rates, and adverse effects between users of the high-dose LNG-IUS (52 mg) and of the low dose LNG-IUS (13.5 mg and 19.5 mg). Materials and Methods A prospective cohort study was performed in two Services for Family Planning in normal menstruating women with the inclusion of all new prescriptions of LNG-IUS for contraception. Women were followed for a mean of 9.1 ± 2.6 months after placement. Results 109 women (mean age of 39.8 ± 8.7 years old) were included, 69.7% using a high dose LNG-IUS and 30.3% using a low dose LNG-IUS. Women with a low dose LNG-IUS were significantly younger, thinner, more nulliparous, with fewer vaginal deliveries and C-sections, with a lower menstrual flow length and with more previous use of short-acting reversible contraceptives (p < 0.05). LNG-IUS continuation was similar and very high at the last follow-up: 100 vs. 94.7% in the low and high dose LNG-IUS groups, respectively (p = 0.18). Satisfaction with treatment at the end of the study was similar between different LNG-IUS doses (p = 0.85), with 78.9% being satisfied/very satisfied. Bleeding patterns were significantly different between the two LNG-IUS doses (p < 0.0001). Diagnosis of dysfunctional cysts was more frequent in women with high dose compared to low dose LNG-IUS (22.2 vs. 12.1%), albeit not significantly. Conclusions We have shown a clear differential use of available LNG-IUS in clinical practice, both as baseline characteristics and as different outcomes, primarily for bleeding patterns. However, all these systems were associated with a very high rate of satisfaction and continuation.

Comparison of Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System (LNG-IUS) against Laparoscopic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy (LASH) for menorrhagia treatment: An economic evaluation

BackgroundThis economic evaluation and literature review was conducted with the primary aim to compare the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) with NICE's gold-standard treatment of Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for menorrhagia. Materials and methodsA cost-utility analysis was conducted from an NHS perspective, using data from two European studies to compare the treatments. Individual costs and benefits were assessed within one year of having the intervention. An Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated, followed by sensitivity analysis. Expected Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYS) and costs to the NHS were calculated alongside health net benefits (HNB) and monetary net benefits (MNB). ResultsA QALY gain of 0.069 was seen in use of LNG-IUS compared to LASH. This yielded a MNB between -£44.99 and -£734.99, alongside a HNB between –0.0705 QALYs and –0.106 QALYS. Using a £20,000-£30,000/QALY limit outlined by NICE,this showed the LNG-IUS to be more cost-effective than LASH, with LASH exceeding the upper bound of the £30,000/QALY limit. Sensitivity analysis lowered the ICER below the given threshold. ConclusionsThe ICER demonstrates it would not be cost-effective to replace the current gold-standard LNG-IUS with LASH, when treating menorrhagia in the UK. The ICER's proximity to the threshold and its high sensitivity alludes to the necessity for further research to generate a more reliable cost-effectiveness estimate. However, LASH could be considered as a first line treatment option in women with no desire to have children.

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia

Research questionHow does use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in infertile women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia affect endometrial hyperplasia regression and pregnancy rates compared with oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA)? DesignThis prospective cohort study included 215 infertile women with an indication for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and a diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Endometrial hyperplasia was diagnosed by hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy. At the time of first- and second-line treatment, patients were offered therapy with either oral MPA 10 mg daily or LNG-IUS. Follow-up biopsies were scheduled after 90 days’ treatment. After endometrial hyperplasia regression, patients were admitted to IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. ResultsBaseline characteristics and confounders including age at diagnosis, body mass index and duration of infertility did not differ between LNG-IUS users and control participants and were accounted for using propensity score weighting. Endometrial hyperplasia regression rate at first follow-up was higher in the LNG-IUS group than the oral progestins group (28/28, 100% and 110/187, 58.8%; P < 0.001), while that after second-line treatment was comparable between the two groups (89/91, 97.8% and 122/124, 98.4%; P = 0.22). Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and cumulative live birth rate following ART in patients ever receiving LNG-IUS were similar to those of patients receiving only MPA (34% versus 39.5%, 22.6% versus 34.7% and 26.4% versus 25.8%). ConclusionEndometrial hyperplasia regression is greater in women receiving LNG-IUS compared with oral MPA, while live birth rates following ART are comparable between the two groups. The use of LNG-IUS does not jeopardize the chances of pregnancy in women seeking fertility treatment.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in reducing risk of ovarian cancer.

BackgroundOvarian carcinoma (OC) is one of the most widespread tumors in the world and is characterized by low survival rates.ObjectiveTo determine whether the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) can prevent OC.Search strategyThe literature until December 2020 were systematically reviewed according to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42019137957).Selection criteriaStudies assessing the impact of LNG‐IUS on the risk of OC were included.Data collection and analysisData were extracted independently by two authors to ensure accuracy and consistency.Main resultsA total of 34 323 records were obtained, of which three satisfied the inclusion criteria. In total, 1687 events of OC in a population of 20 461 311 person‐years were considered. Data pooling revealed that the use of LNG‐IUS did not confer a lower risk of OC relative to the never‐use of LNG‐IUS, with an estimated odds ratio of 0.66 (95% confidence interval 0.41–1.08; I2 = 84%; P = 0.002).ConclusionThe meta‐analysis did not demonstrate a preventive role of LNG‐IUS on OC. However, it was carried out on a few papers, and a definitive conclusion on the topic still cannot be drawn. Further studies are indicated in the future to define the impact of LNG‐IUS on OC.The meta‐analysis carried out on three papers did not demonstrate a preventive role of the levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine device on ovarian cancer.

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Use in Perimenopausal Women.

The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is a highly effective contraceptive method that has several noncontraceptive benefits. It has been used in various gynecological conditions, such as heavy menstrual bleeding, dysmenorrhea, and endometrial hyperplasia. During the perimenopausal period, hormonal fluctuations occur, and there is a high tendency for the development of several benign gynecologic diseases. Therefore, the use of LNG-IUS in perimenopausal women might be more beneficial than in women belonging to other age groups. Moreover, the insertion of LNG-IUS during the perimenopausal period could confer endometrial protection during estrogen replacement therapy. In this review, we discuss the use of LNG-IUS in perimenopausal women.

Contemporary prescriptions pattern of different dose levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems in an Italian service for family planning

Objective Current research informations fail to adequately inform about when levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 52 mg is used instead of other lower dose LNG-IUSs (13.5 and 19.5 mg) and other long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in clinical practice. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed in a third-level Service for Family Planning of Modena University hospital about all the first modern contraceptives prescriptions in the whole year 2019 performed by the same group of physicians. All women included underwent a detailed transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) at prescription and a second evaluation within 3 months when they were still using the prescribed method. Results To 69/160 (43.1%) women a short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC), while to 91/160 (56.9%) a LARC was prescribed. Women with a LARC prescription were older than them with a short-acting (SARC) (p < .0001). Women with LNG-IUS 52 mg prescription were significantly the oldest (42.9 ± 5.3), while those with intrauterine copper device and lower dose LNG-IUS were of similar age (36.5 ± 7.3 and 34.9 ± 2.3), significantly lower (p < .005). Women with implant prescription had the same age as SARC, being the youngest (30.7 ± 8.9 and 31.0 ± 9.5) (p < .0001). Women with LNG-IUS 52 mg prescription mg presented with bigger uterine volume (p = .001). In multivariate analyses, the LNG-IUS 52 mg prescription was significantly linked only to age (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.11–1.37, p < .0001) and presence of adenomyosis (OR 4.56; 95% CI 1.45-14.33, p = .009). Conclusions The use of LNG-IUS 52 mg instead of other LARCs is preferred for older women, with uteri of increased volume due to adenomyosis, suggesting a possible differential use of available LNG-IUSs in the contemporary clinical practice.

The efficacy of medical treatment for adenomyosis after adenomyomectomy.

To compare the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH-a + levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) after adenomyomectomy for improved adenomyosis-associated symptoms. Overall, 193 patients with adenomyosis included in this study were categorized into three groups: adenomyomectomy (n = 57, group 1), adenomyomectomy + GnRH-a (n = 83, group 2) and adenomyomectomy + GnRH-a + LNG-IUS (n = 53, group 3). Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and uterine volumes were determined to evaluate the severity of adenomyosis. Dysmenorrhea improvement and uterine volume were the main outcomes. The VAS scores of all patients reduced from 7.3 (6.0, 8.5) to 0 (0, 0.6) at the 6 months after surgery, which were significantly higher in group 1 compared to other groups (P < 0.05). In groups 1, 2 and 3, there were 14, 7 and 4 patients, respectively, who suffered dysmenorrhea recurrence. The mean recurrent-free-survival (RFS) was 51.6 ± 2.4, 58.0 ± 1.2 and 58.3 ± 1.0 months, respectively, which was significantly shorter in group 1 (P < 0.05). The dysmenorrhea recurrences were 26.3%, 6.1%, 5.9% in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, at the 36 months, which was significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.01). Significantly decreased uterine volumes were observed in all patients from 222.2 (147.6, 350.4) to 77.0 (65.9, 94.1) mL (P < 0.05) at the 6 month after surgery. Treatment GnRH-a and LNG-IUS after surgery could significantly reduce the recurrence and prolong the RFS. It seemed that the use of LNG-IUS was beneficial for a lower recurrence in long-term follow-up.

Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System as a Contraceptive Method in Nulliparous Women: A Systematic Review.

The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence about the use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) as a contraceptive method in nulliparous women. For this purpose, studies evaluating the efficacy, safety, bleeding pattern, satisfaction and discontinuation of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in nulliparous women were analyzed. Only original research articles published in English between 1990–27th March 2020 were considered eligible. Reviews, book chapters, case studies, conference papers, opinions, editorials and letters were excluded. The systematic literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane Library databases identified 816 articles, 23 of which were analyzed. The available evidence indicates that LNG-IUS is an effective and safe contraceptive method for nulliparous women that achieves high levels of satisfaction among patients. Moreover, nulliparous women seem to experience fewer expulsions than parous ones. Bleeding pattern is acceptable for the majority of patients, and bleeding disorders mainly occur in the first months after the insertion. More in-depth, long-term prospective studies are needed in this patient group to determine risk factors for the occurrence of side effects and associated discontinuations, which should not, however, delay the wider use of the method in this group, given the number of advantages.

Consecutive Use of the 52 mg Levonorgestrel-releasing Intrauterine System: Variations in Bleeding Patterns.

Changes in bleeding patterns could influence the decisions of healthcare professionals to change the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) before 7 years of use, the recommended period of extended use. We evaluated changes in the bleeding patterns of users of the 52 mg LNG-IUS at the end of use of the first (IUS-1) and during the second device (IUS-2) use. We performed an audit of the medical records of all women who used two consecutive LNG-IUSs at the Family Planning clinic. We evaluated the sociodemographic/gynecological variables, the length of use, and the bleeding patterns reported in the reference periods of 90 days before removal of the IUS-1 and at the last return in use of IUS-2. We used the McNemar test to compare bleeding patterns. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. We evaluated 301 women aged (mean ± SD) 32 (±6.1) years, with lengths of use of 68.9 (±16.8) and 20.3 (±16.7) months for the IUS-1 and IUS-2, respectively. No pregnancies were reported. Bleeding patterns varied significantly among women who used the IUS-2 for ≥ 7 months to 6 years when compared the bleeding patterns reported in IUS-1 use. Eighty-nine out of 221 (40%) women maintained amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding; 66 (30%) evolved to bleeding patterns with light flow, and 66 (30%) maintained or evolved to heavy flow patterns (p = 0.012). No differences were observed among the 80 women with ≤ 6 months of use. Changes in bleeding patterns occur during the use of LNG-IUS and should not be decisive for the early replacement of the device.

Analysis of the effect and safety of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on patients with breast cancer who take tamoxifen

Objective To analyze the effect and safety of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system(LNG-IUS) for the premenopausal patients with breast cancer who took tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy. Methods From June 2014 to June 2016, 84 patients with breast cancer who met the inclusion criteria in the First People′s Hospital of Xiaoshan District were randomly divided into two groups according to the digital table.The treatment group (39 cases) underwent LNG-IUS insertion, while the control group (45 cases) received no LNG-IUS insertion.The general condition of patients before the use of tamoxifen and LNG-IUS was evaluated.Transvaginal ultrasound was used to measure the thickness of endometrium, hysteroscope was used for pathological examination of endometrium and the measurement of ER/PR expression, and blood lipid level was also detected.All above was done before the treatment of tamoxifen and LNG-IUS, 1 year after treatment and 2 years after treatment. Results Before the therapy, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in general condition and uterine cavity condition(all P>0.05). After 1 year, the incidences of endometrial polyp, endometrial hyperplasia/secretion, benign lesion and endometrial atrophy in the treatment group were 2.6%, 5.1%, 15.4%, 76.9%, respectively, which in the control group were 6.7%, 20.0%, 17.8%, 55.6%, respectively.the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(χ2=4.06, 4.22, all P<0.05). After 2 years, the incidences of endometrial polyp, endometrial hyperplasia/secretion, benign lesion and endometrial atrophy in the treatment group were 0.0%, 2.6%, 84.6%, respectively, which in the control group were 11.1%, 15.6%, 60.0%, respectively, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(χ2=4.608, 4.092, 6.203, all P<0.05). Conclusion LNG-IUS can prevent the benign endometrial lesions of breast cancer patients caused by tamoxifen therapy after surgery, and can decrease the incidence of endometrial polyp and endometrial hyperplasia/secretion, while increase the incidence of endometrial atrophy, without increasing the recurrence risk of breast cancer. Key words: Intrauterine devices, Medicated; Levonorgestrel; Tamoxifen; Breast neoplasms; Premenopause; Endometrium

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and breast cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Epidemiological studies have shown that some hormonal contraceptive methods are associated with increased breast cancer risk, especially if used over long periods. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on the risk of breast cancer development in women using the 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS). We performed a thorough review of peer-reviewed publications from 10 January 1999, through 31 July 2019, using combinations of search terms for breast cancer risk and LNG-IUS in the Medline, EMBASE, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), and Scielo databases. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017059076). Studies reporting breast cancer risk estimates among healthy users of LNG-IUS were included according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) criteria. Two authors performed data extraction, and a third author resolved disagreements. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Downs and Black instrument. A funnel plot was generated, and a linear regression test of funnel plot asymmetry was used to assess publication bias. Finally, we performed a random-effects model (owing to high study heterogeneity) meta-analysis of seven suitable studies, stratified by the age distribution of patients (<50years, ≥50years, and mixed). We identified 96 studies and manually cross-referenced and excluded duplicate articles. Seventy articles were excluded on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in the assessment of 26 full-text articles. Eight articles were considered adequate for inclusion in this systematic review, and seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. Three publications were case-control studies and five were cohort studies. According to the Downs and Black instrument, 5 studies were rated as "good" and 3 studies were deemed "fair". Our meta-analysis results indicated increased breast cancer risk in LNG-IUS users: for all women, odds ratio (OR)=1.16 (95% CI 1.06-1.28, I2 =78%, P<.01); for women aged <50years, OR=1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.22, I2 =66%, P=.02); and for women aged ≥50years, OR=1.52 (95% CI 1.34-1.72, I2 =0%, P=.84). Current evidence suggests that LNG-IUS users have an increased breast cancer risk regardless of age and indication. The effect of LNG-IUS on breast cancer risk seems to be larger in older users. However, our systematic review detected methodological issues across the available studies, and confounding factors may be responsible for at least a fraction of the risk effects associated with LNG-IUS use. Nevertheless, users of LNG-IUS should be aware of these trends. We believe that caution is needed, and risks should be balanced against proven health benefits (eg effective treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding and avoidance of surgical interventions), when prescribing LNG-IUS for long periods of use, especially in women with other known breast cancer risk factors such as old age, obesity, and familial predisposition.

Morphological alterations in endometrium after use of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: a case report

Case Report: A 44-year-old patient attended the gynecology service for routine consultation. The patient reported implantation of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), five years ago. No macroscopic changes were seen in the uterus or in the endometrium cavity during the procedure, but an endometrial biopsy was performed. Histopathological analysis revealed an endometrium with an expanded stroma by pseudo-decidualization and mucoid (mucinous) alterations, forming small puddles of mucin, also presenting with polypoid indentations, ectatic vessels, lymphoid cell foci, including plasma cells and deposits of calcium salts. Conclusion: As the use of this type of contraceptive method becomes more usual, knowledge of LNG-IUS-induced changes becomes increasingly relevant for the assessment of its long-term efficacy and safety.

Effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system on cardiovascular risk markers among women with thrombophilia or previous venous thromboembolism.

To assess the effects of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on standard cardiovascular risk markers among women with thrombophilia and/or previous venous thromboembolism (VTE). A prospective cohort study enrolled women aged 18-45years with thrombophilia and/or a history of VTE who received the 52-mg LNG-IUS (20μg/d initial release) at the University of Ribeirão Preto Medical School, Brazil, from January 2006 to December 2015. Before and 12months after LNG-IUS placement, the following cardiovascular risk markers were assessed: lipid profile, body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and waist circumference. The primary outcome was changes in cardiovascular risk markers. A subanalysis of anticoagulant users versus non-users was also conducted. In total, 45 women were enrolled. BMI increased by 2.3% after 12months of LNG-IUS placement (P<0.01), but the other risk factors did not change. Cardiovascular risk markers were similar between anticoagulant users and non-users after 12months of LNG-IUS use. Among women with thrombophilia and/or previous VTE, cardiovascular risk markers were not found to change significantly after 12months of LNG-IUS use. The study adds safety information regarding use of the LNG-IUS for women at risk of thromboembolism.

Treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

To determine the long-term effects of using the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) to treat symptomatic adenomyosis. A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among 1100 women who received the LNG-IUS at a tertiary teaching hospital in China between December 10, 2006, and December 24, 2014. All participants had symptomatic adenomyosis (visual analogue scale [VAS] ≥7 and/or pictorial blood loss assessment chart [PBAC] score >100) diagnosed by transvaginal sonography. Follow-up was at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60months after LNG-IUS placement. The primary outcome was symptom relief. Secondary outcomes included LNG-IUS retention status; changes in uterine volume; serum levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA125); menstruation pattern; and adverse events. In all, 374 (33.7%) participants completed 60months of LNG-IUS treatment. The VAS, verbal rating scale, PBAC score, hemoglobin level, uterine volume, and serum CA125 level all showed marked improvements at this time point when compared with baseline (P<0.05 for all comparisons). The cumulative retention rate of LNG-IUS was 56.2%. Changes in menstruation pattern at 60months included amenorrhea (n=97, 25.9%) and shortened periods (n=82, 21.9%). The incidence of adverse events was <10% and not considered notable. Long-term use of LNG-IUS was effective and acceptable for the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis. Registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03027648).