Background and aimsThe objective of this study was a standardized comparison of the safety and effectiveness of the Kaneka (Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) whole blood (Liposorber DL-100) and plasma (Liposorber LA-15) lipoprotein apheresis (LA) system to optimize the individual therapy of patients with cardiovascular disease and severe dyslipidemia. MethodsSix chronic LA patients with a pre-treatment LDL-C < 6 mmol/l in steady state received a total of three treatments with the LA-15 device, followed by three treatments with the DL-100 device or vice versa. To achieve a standardized comparison the treated blood volume for any patient was kept identical for both procedures. Sampling points for total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Lp(a), triglyceride, blood count, and bradykinin measurements were adjusted for both techniques. ResultsTotal cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, Lp(a), and triglycerides were reduced by 59.2 ± 6.5%, 79.3 ± 6.9%, 7.1 ± 3.9%, 87.3 ± 3.1%, 22.5 ± 24.2% using the DL-100 system and by 51.4 ± 5.2%, 65.2 ± 3.7%, 2.2 ± 4.9%, 72.7 ± 2.2%, 46.5 ± 9.4% using the LA-15 system, showing that the DL-100 adsorber was significantly more effective for lowering total cholesterol (p = 0.044), LDL-C (p = 0.001), Lp(a) (p = 0.029), while triglycerides were reduced to a higher extent by the plasma system (p = 0.046) in this patient group. The regenerable LA-15 adsorber columns showed a higher removal capacity considering the difference between inflow and outflow concentrations. Bradykinin levels significantly increased up to 145 fold in the outflow lines using the plasma system (p = 0.028), but not systemically. There was no significant bradykinin generation using the whole blood adsorber. ConclusionIn conclusion, the whole blood system was faster and more effective in this LA patient group with pre apheresis LDL-C<6 mmol/l. Whether the regenerable plasma system is more effective in patients with higher LDL-C content should be evaluated in future standardized comparisons.
Read full abstract