Levels Of Prior Knowledge Research Articles

Real Or Not Real: The Impact of the Physical Fidelity of Virtual Learning Resources on Learning Anatomy.

Technological advancements have made it possible to create realistic virtual representations of the real world, although it is unclear in medical education whether high physical fidelity is required in virtual learning resources (VLRs). This study, therefore, aimed to compare the effectiveness of high-fidelity (HF) and low-fidelity (LF) VLRs for learning anatomy. For this study, HF and LF VLRs were developed for liver anatomy and participants were voluntarily recruited from two cohorts (cohorts 1 and 2). Knowledge outcomes were measured through pre- and post-tests, task outcomes including activity score and completion time were recorded and participants' perceptions of the VLRs were surveyed. A total of 333 participants (165 HF and 168 LF) took part in this study. Knowledge outcomes were higher for the HF activity in cohort 1 and for the LF activity in cohort 2, although not significantly. There were no significant differences in activity score within either cohort, although completion time was significantly longer for the HF activity in cohort 1 (P=0.001). There were no significant differences within either cohort in perceptions of the VLRs regarding usefulness for reviewing conceptual knowledge, esthetics, quality, mental effort experienced, or future use, although the LF VLR was scored significantly higher regarding the value for understanding in cohort 1 (P=0.027).This study suggests that high physical fidelity is not necessarily required for anatomy VLRs, although may potentially be valuable for improving knowledge outcomes. Also, level of prior knowledge may be an important factor when considering the physical fidelity of anatomy VLRs.

From Growth Poles and Clusters to Business Ecosystems Dynamics: The ILDI Counterproposal

The study of spatial socio-economic development constitutes a significant field of analysis of innovation creation and diffusion. Understanding the spatial evolution of the different socio-economic systems in the age of globalization requires a synthesizing and integrated theoretical approach to how innovation is generated and replicated. This article aims to study three significant spatial socio-economic development theories –the growth poles, the clusters, and the business ecosystems. A literature review reveals that (a) the concept of growth poles concerns mostly the analysis of spatial polarization between specific territories and regions, (b) the clusters concept addresses the issue of developed inter-industrial competition and co-operation from a meso-level perspective, and (c) the analytical field of business ecosystems provides an evolutionary approach that can be valorized for all co-evolving spatial socio-economic organizations. In this context, an eclectically interventional mechanism to strengthen innovation is suggested. The Institutes of Local Development and Innovation (ILDI) policy is proposed for all firms and business ecosystems, of every size, level of spatial development, prior knowledge, specialization, and competitive ability. The ILDI is presented as an intermediate organization capable of diagnosing and enhancing the firm’s physiology in structural Stra.Tech.Man terms (strategy-technology-management synthesis).

The moderating effect of prior knowledge on the relationship between intelligence and complex problem solving – Testing the Elshout-Raaheim hypothesis

Although the relation between intelligence and complex problem solving (CPS) has been investigated repeatedly, the moderating effect of prior knowledge on this relation still remains an open question. The Elshout-Raaheim hypothesis (see Leutner, 2002) predicts a higher correlation between intelligence and CPS at a medium level of problem specific prior knowledge and lower correlations at higher as well as lower levels of prior knowledge, thus a curvilinear moderation. We investigated this hypothesis in a sample of N = 495 high school students by using general intelligence (g) and a minimal complex systems approach (MCS) of CPS. Strategic prior knowledge in the sense of the relative frequency of the vary-one-thing-at-a-time strategy (VOTAT; Tschirgi, 1980) increased across MCS tasks in the knowledge acquisition phase of CPS. With increasing prior knowledge, correlations followed the predicted inverted U-shaped pattern in the knowledge acquisition phase and the knowledge application phase of CPS, thus supporting the Elshout-Raaheim hypothesis. The moderating effect of strategic prior knowledge for the intelligence–CPS relation and its relevance are discussed.

Implementing pelvic floor muscle training for women with pelvic organ prolapse: a realist evaluation of different delivery models

BackgroundPelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) has been shown to be effective for pelvic organ prolapse in women, but its implementation in routine practice is challenging due to lack of adequate specialist staff. It is important to know if PFMT can be delivered by different staff skill mixes, what barriers and facilitators operate in different contexts, what strategies enable successful implementation and what are the underlying mechanisms of their action. PROPEL intervention was designed to maximise the delivery of effective PFMT in the UK NHS using different staff skill mixes. We conducted a realist evaluation (RE) of this implementation to understand what works, for whom, in what circumstances and why.MethodsInformed by the Realist and RE-AIM frameworks, the study used a longitudinal, qualitative, multiple case study design. The study took place in five, purposively selected, diverse NHS sites across the UK and proceeded in three phases to identify, test and refine a theory of change. Data collection took place at 4 time points over an 18 month implementation period using focus groups and semi-structured interviews with a range of stakeholders including service leads/managers, senior practitioners, newly trained staff and women receiving care in the new service models. Data were analysed using thematic framework approach adapted to identify Context, Mechanism and Outcome (CMO) configurations of the RE.ResultsA heightened awareness of the service need among staff and management was a mechanism for change, particularly in areas where there was a shortage of skilled staff. In contrast, the most established specialist physiotherapist-delivered PFMT service activated feelings of role protection and compromised quality, which restricted the reach of PFMT through alternative models. Staff with some level of prior knowledge in women’s health and adequate organisational support were more comfortable and confident in new role. Implementation was seamless when PFMT delivery was incorporated in newly trained staff’s role and core work.ConclusionRoll-out of PFMT delivery through different staff skill mixes is possible when it is undertaken by clinicians with an interest in women’s health, and carefully implemented ensuring adequate levels of training and ongoing support from specialists, multi-disciplinary teams and management.

Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research

ObjectivesGiven widespread interest in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to health data to improve patient care and health system efficiency, there is a need to understand the perspectives of the general...

An adaptive educational computer game: Effects on students' knowledge and learning attitude in computational thinking

Several studies have reported that adaptivity and personalization in educational computer games facilitate reaching their full educational potential. However, there is little effort to develop adaptive educational computer games for promoting students' computational thinking (CT). In this study, an adaptive computer game is introduced, called AutoThinking, that not only promotes both CT skills and conceptual knowledge, but also provides adaptivity in both game-play and learning processes. To evaluate the possible effects of the game, an experimental study was carried out with 79 students in an elementary school in Estonia. AutoThinking and a conventional technology-enhanced learning approach were used for teaching CT to the experimental and control group, respectively. Our results reveal that AutoThinking improved students’ CT skills and conceptual knowledge better than the conventional approach. It was also found that students with a low and high level of prior knowledge made higher improvement in knowledge gain using the adaptive game compared to the traditional approach, especially those students with lower prior knowledge. Finally, our findings show that the adaptive game could also improve students' learning attitude toward CT better than the conventional approach, especially those students with higher prior learning attitudes.

Problem Posing Inquiry Approaches in Enhancing the Learners’ Scientific Discovery Process Skills

Learning science is a bit technical, scientific, as well as complex. Understanding scientific processes, through a certain teaching method was the central theme of this investigation. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of Problem Posing Approaches in teaching science and its effect to Science Discovery Process of Grade 10 learners at Col. Lauro D. Dizon Memorial National High School, San Pablo City during the Academic Year 2018-2019. The study utilized the pretest-posttest experimental design. Three heterogeneous groups of Grade 10 students were used; the first group was exposed to free-structured problem posing, the second to semi-structured problem posing and the third group to structured problem posing. Students in the experimental group were matched and paired in accordance to their second grading grades before the execution of the test. The research findings indicated that the pre-test scores of the students who were subjected to problem posing approaches had almost the same level of prior knowledge and proficiency skill in science at the start of the study. Meanwhile, the post test scores revealed that majority of the students improved their level of performance after the implementation of the said approach. In addition, since the posttest scores were higher than pre-test scores, high mean gain scores were also observed and noted. The difference between the mean pre-test scores of the students from the experimental groups was all marked as “Not Significant.” Likewise, there was no significant difference in the mean posttest scores of the students in all components of scientific discovery process. However, the mean difference in the pretest and posttest scores among the three experimental groups was found “significant”.

Learning to diagnose collaboratively: validating a simulation for medical students.

Objectives: Physicians with different professional backgrounds often diagnose a patients’ problem collaboratively. In this article, we first introduce a process model for collaborative diagnosing (CDR model), describe the development of a simulation used to empirically examine the facilitation of collaborative diagnostic reasoning. Based on a contemporary validity framework [1], we further suggest indicators for validity and collect initial evidence with respect to the scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and implication inferences to assess the validity of the simulation when used to assess effects of learning interventions. Method: In a quasi-experimental study, we assessed objectivity and reliability of the simulation and compared medical students with low and advanced prior knowledge to practitioners with high prior knowledge with respect to their diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, information sharing skills, and their intrinsic cognitive load. Additionally, we obtained authenticity ratings from practitioners with high prior knowledge. Results: The results yielded satisfying initial evidence for the validity of the scoring and the extrapolation inferences as ratings are objective, and the simulation and the collaborative process is perceived as rather authentic. Additionally, participants on different levels of prior knowledge differ with respect to their diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic efficiency, information sharing skills, and their reported intrinsic cognitive load. With one exception (information sharing skills), the generalization inference seems to be valid as well. Conclusions: We conclude that collecting validity evidence for the simulation was an important step towards a better interpretation of the simulation. We found that the simulation is an authentic and valid representation of the chosen collaborative situation and that the collected validity evidence offers sufficient evidence for an initial validation of the simulation. Nevertheless, the validation process highlighted some important gaps that need further consideration. We further conclude that applying a validation model to the context of empirical research is promising and encourage other researchers to follow the example.

Black Music is American Music: Learning Underrepresented Aspects of Black History in College through Critical Race Media Literacy

The New York Times 1619 Project materials on American popular culture were presented to college students at a Historically Black University & College (HBCU) and Predominantly White Institution (PWI). Guided by Critical Race Media Literacy, we employed quantitative and qualitative analysis to explore the knowledge-based and emotional responses to Black historical media. The findings suggest that HBCU and PWI students had similar levels of prior knowledge. HBCU and PWI students experienced disparate emotional responses to the material. Overall, both HBCU and PWI students’ knowledge increased on this topic following the study as the content is underrepresented in education and popular culture.

Immersive virtual reality for supporting complex scientific knowledge: Augmenting our understanding with physiological monitoring

AbstractEducators are recognizing the potential power of immersive virtual reality (IVR) to allow learners to experience previously intangible firsthand phenomena, such as atoms and molecules. In this study, an IVR simulation of a complex gene regulation system was co‐designed with an undergraduate microbiology course instructor. The course, with 234 students, was taught using active learning strategies, including peer instruction and exposure to a two‐dimensional computer simulation. Thirty‐four students from the course participated in an interactive IVR experience using head‐mounted displays. We assess students' conceptual understanding using tests, multimodal data collected during the IVR sessions (including video analysis in combination with physiological sensor data and eye‐tracking data) as well as semi‐structured interviews. We found that students who were seated while in IVR demonstrated significantly higher conceptual understanding of gene regulation at the end of the course and higher overall course outcomes, as compared to students who experienced the course as originally designed (control). However, students who experienced IVR in a standing position performed similarly to the control group. In addition, learning gain appears to be influenced by a combination of prior knowledge and how IVR is experienced (ie, sitting vs. standing). Learning implications for the connections between sensorimotor systems and cognition in IVR are discussed. Practitioner NotesWhat is already known about this topic Research on the educational applications of IVR for K‐12 and higher education emerged in the nineties, which can be summarized by several key reviews and meta‐reviews surveying the field but the answer to questions about the “added‐value” of IVR is often mixed (Dede, Jacobson, & Richards, 2017; Merchant, Goetz, Cifuentes, Keeney‐Kennicutt, & Davis, 2014)—we turn to the question of when IVR is effective for student learning. A common issue reported by researchers is that cognitive overload can hinder learning in IVR (Makransky & Lilleholt, 2018; Moreno & Mayer, 2004). Research considering the contribution of body positioning and sensorimotor perception on cognitive load is just emerging (Funk et al., 2012; Nerhood & Thompson, 2016). What this paper adds Our finding that learning outcome is influenced by a combination of how IVR is experienced (ie, sitting vs. standing position) and students’ level of prior domain knowledge, builds on earlier findings that suggest IVR experiences to be taxing on cognitive resources and further suggests that body position and prior knowledge are related mitigating factors for learning outcomes in an IVR experience—thus a more nuanced relationship exists between cognitive resources, prior knowledge and learning outcomes in IVR. We offer a new approach for using multimodal physiological measures to gain insight into the conditions under which IVR impacts the learning experience. Implications for practice and/or policy Implications of our preliminary study suggest for a seated IVR learning experience for supporting students with lower levels of prior knowledge of complex concepts, while students with higher levels of prior knowledge could choose between either sitting or standing, full‐body experience.

Individual differences and personalized learning: a review and appraisal

Personalized learning allows students to pursue individual learning goals at their own pace. Such a benefit is achieved by understanding each individual’s needs. Hence, it is important to implement personalized learning to accommodate students’ individual differences. Due to such importance, research into this issue has increased over the past decade. Accordingly, this paper presents a state-of-the art review of the current research that investigates relationships between individual differences and personalized learning. The main results from past research include that: (1) learning style is a major individual difference considered in works on personalized learning; (2) current works shift to address multiple individual differences, instead of a single difference; (3) learner models are widely applied to deal with multiple individual differences in the development of personalized learning; (4) learning styles, prior knowledge, preferences and ability levels are frequently considered together, and (5) it is a current trend to consider emotion recognition in the context of personalized learning. In addition to reviewing existing empirical studies, this paper also does an appraisal to identify directions for future research.

The Efficacy of a Brief Educational Training Session in Point-of-Care Pediatric Hip Ultrasound.

Pediatric limp is a common presenting complaint to emergency departments. Despite this, diagnosis can be difficult in young patients with no history of trauma. Ultrasound can be used to identify a hip effusion, which may be the etiology of limp in pediatric patients. Brief educational training sessions have successfully been used to introduce novice ultrasound users to point-of-care (POC) ultrasound; however, the education of POC hip ultrasound is underexplored, and the efficacy of educational training sessions in this domain remains unknown. To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using a brief educational training session to teach novice ultrasound users to identify hip anatomy and effusions. Medical and physician assistant students were enrolled during an ultrasound education conference. A pretest evaluated prior knowledge, experience, and confidence level regarding POC hip ultrasound. Students attended a brief didactic session and then completed an objective structured assessment of technical skill as well as a posttest. Twenty-eight students naive to hip ultrasound participated in this study. Levels of training included medical and physician assistant students. Mean test scores increased from the pretest (4.8 of 9, SD = 1.6) to the posttest (7.9 of 9, SD = 0.72) (P < 0.001). Average objective structured assessment of technical skill was 4.6 of 5 (SD, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 4.3-4.9). After the sessions, confidence levels in identifying landmarks, joint space, and a joint effusion significantly increased (P < 0.001). Pediatric hip ultrasound knowledge, performance, skills, and confidence improved as demonstrated by novice ultrasound users after a brief educational training session. Our study shows that a brief, targeted educational intervention was a feasible and effective method of introducing pediatric POC hip ultrasound to novices.

How Much Cueing Is Needed in Instructional Animations? The Role of Prior Knowledge

This study explored the effects of prior knowledge and cueing on the learning (retention, transfer, and matching) and mental effort of learners who studied an instructional animation with accompanying narration about photosynthesis. A 4 × 2 between-subjects factorial design with four levels of cueing (no cueing, label cueing, picture cueing, and label and picture cueing) and two levels of prior knowledge (low vs. high) was used. A total of 216 undergraduate students from various majors in a large Southwestern university volunteered to participate in this study. The results revealed no significant effect of cueing on learning or mental effort. However, high prior knowledge learners outperformed low prior knowledge learners on a retention test and reported investing more mental effort than low prior knowledge learners. Although it was not significant, high prior knowledge learners had higher transfer and matching scores when no cues were provided.

Quality of Laypersons' Assessment of Forensically Relevant Stimuli.

The current study examined the potential for cognitive bias in lay examiners' comparisons of footwear impressions within the technical review process while addressing limitations of previous research. Prior research has found inconsistent results regarding the extent to which cognitive bias may influence forensic comparisons, often asking non-experts to review forensic stimuli above their competency level. Furthermore, past research has largely ignored the potential for cognitive bias during the technical review process. In collaboration with the Miami-Dade Police Department's Forensic Services Bureau, we examined the effects of previous examiners' level of experience and prior knowledge of the previous examiner's decision on the technical review stage of footwear impression stimuli. Before lay examiners were presented with pairs of known match and nonmatch footwear impressions, they were either told that an expert or a novice had previously examined them and determined them to be either a match, nonmatch, or inconclusive (plus a no-information condition). Participants then evaluated each pair of footwear impressions to make their own determinations of match, nonmatch, or inconclusive. Results support the technical review process for all decision types, as known nonmatch stimuli were generally more difficult for lay examiners to assess than known match stimuli. Knowledge of a prior examiner's decision and status was observed only when the prior decision was inconclusive, suggesting the need for inclusion of inconclusive decisions in future research examining cognitive bias in forensic examination.

Divergence and the use of digital technology in learning: Undergraduate students’ experiences of email feedback in a South African university

South African universities’ use of digital technologies in learning has increased in recent years. Given that social exposure, the context and pedagogic uses of technology influence learning expectations and learner involvement, it is important to understand students’ experiences of the use of different technological tools. This article employs activity theory as a lens to explore how students with different levels of prior knowledge experienced the use of e-mail feedback. The feedback involves content discussion and comments on assessment drafts in a modular learning environment of a unit of undergraduate study at one of the country’s universities. The students reported mixed experiences of the level of personal control and responsibility for their learning. The article explores the findings’ implications for teaching and learning praxis in the university and makes suggestions for further research.

Guiding the learner's cognitive processing of a narrated animation

In this study, three experiments were conducted to explore whether adding eye movement modeling examples (EMME) to a short narrated animation could facilitate visual processing during multimedia learning and learning outcomes, and whether the effects of EMME depended on the pace of lesson or prior knowledge level of the learners. In Experiment 1, college students viewed a system-paced animation on synaptic transmission that either did or did not include EMME. The EMME group paid more attention to relevant elements and performed better on learning outcomes. In Experiment 2, EMME facilitated visual processing and learning outcomes with system-pacing but not learner-pacing. In Experiment 3, both low and high knowledge learners showed improved visual processing and learning outcomes with EMME. In conclusion, adding visual signaling (or cueing) in the form of EMME can guide visual processing and improve learning outcomes in multimedia learning with a short lesson.

Students’ patterns of accessing time in a text structure learning system: relationship to individual characteristics and learning performance

This study developed a learning system that allows teachers to edit assignments designed to teach students the text structure strategy through the use of four phases: instructing, modeling, practicing, and reflecting. A 7-week instructional experiment was conducted in which 84 12th-grade students learned the text structure strategy using this system. The results produced several significant findings. First, the students demonstrated very different patterns of accessing time when using this system, making it possible to classify them into 3 categories or clusters of users: “low-practice-low-reflection students”, who spent little time using the system; “low-practice-high-reflection students” who spent most of their time in the reflecting phase, during which they constructed graphic organizers and wrote summaries primarily by referring to the teacher’s examples; and “high-practice-low-reflection students” who spent most of their time in the practicing phase, during which they constructed graphic organizers and wrote summaries without referring to the teacher’s examples. Second, the students’ patterns of accessing time were related to their prior knowledge, Web experience, and learning performance. In particular, the “low-practice-low-reflection students” had the lowest learning performance. The “low-practice-high-reflection students” had a higher frequency of using PCs to access the Web, a lower level of prior knowledge, and higher gain scores than the “high-practice-low-reflection students”. These findings are discussed, and several suggestions are proposed for future research work.

The role of self-regulated learning on science and design knowledge gains in engineering projects

ABSTRACTResearch on self-regulated learning (SRL) in engineering design is growing. While SRL is an effective way of learning, however, not all learners can regulate themselves successfully. There is a lack of research regarding how student characteristics, such as science knowledge and design knowledge, interact with SRL. Adapting the SRL theory in the field of engineering design, this study proposes a research model to examine the mediation and causal relationships among science knowledge, design knowledge, and SRL activities (i.e. observation, formulation, reformulation, analysis, evaluation). Partial least squares modeling was utilized to examine how the science and design knowledge of 108 ninth-grade participants interacted with their SRL activities in the process of performing an engineering task. Results reveal that prior science and design knowledge positively predict SRL activities. They also show that reformulation and analysis are the two SRL activities that can lead to an improvement in post science and design knowledge, but excessive observation can hinder post design knowledge. These results have important implications for the construction of learning environments to support SRL based on students’ prior knowledge levels.

Patterns of peer scaffolding in technology-enhanced inquiry classrooms: application of social network analysis

The purpose of this study was to identify types and patterns of peer scaffolding that occur during inquiry-based learning (IBL) group activities. It employed a single instrumental case approach that integrated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data gathered from 21 students in a ninth grade biology course. A verbal analysis, a content analysis, and a social network analysis (SNA) were performed to identify patterns in group interactions and refine emergent themes. First, nine types of peer scaffolding were identified and found to serve the goals of direction maintenance, cognitive structuring, and simplification. Second, three different patterns related to the high, mixed, and low prior knowledge levels of each group were identified. The high prior knowledge group provided peer scaffolding that focused attention on considerations key to developing their arguments, and this scaffolding may have improved the group’s work. In the mixed prior knowledge group, the students with greater prior knowledge were likely to support those with less prior knowledge. Together, these findings indicate the way students are grouped may impact observable patterns in peer scaffolding. Identifying the difficulties that learners face and the assistance they seek could help instructional designers and teachers identify areas in which students need support during IBL group activities. This study informs educators and practitioners of effective strategies for designing and implementing peer scaffolding to assist inquiry activities in technology-enhanced classroom settings.

First-year pharmacy students’ prior knowledge correlates with study progress and reveals different dynamics of misconceptions

The varying levels and quality of students’ prior knowledge pose a challenge for instruction at university. Due to the scarcity of studies in pharmacy, in this study pharmacy students (N=126) prior knowledge of biosciences was measured at the beginning of their first study year using a questionnaire comprising ten multiple choice questions and a case task. The results of multiple-choice and open-ended questions revealed serious gaps and different-level misconceptions in students’ answers partly related to the absence of elementary knowledge. The level of prior knowledge correlated with study progress measured at the end of the first study year. The study’s findings suggest that it is possible to identify students at risk of delayed studies using this kind of relatively light pre-test. Problem-solving tasks such as case descriptions can be used to detect potential misconceptions. The pedagogical implications of these results are discussed.