Enemies and adversariesThey try and tear me downYou want me, baby, I dare youTry and tear me down.-Tear Me Down, Hedwig Schmidt,Hedwig and the Angry InchGender is a complexity whose totality is permanently deferred.-Judith Butler, Gender TroubleIntroductionIn the late 1980s and early 1990s, independent film studios produced an array of films that candidly explored the lives and experiences of gay, lesbian, bisexual, trans gender, and individuals, inadvertently launching what B. Ruby Rich infamously labeled the New Queer Cinema.1 Among other things, these films helped foster visibility, making identity a more integral part of the mass media and lives a larger part of the national conversation. commercial success of these films led Hollywood to follow suit, and within a few short years the studios were also producing films with subject matter.2 By the mid-1990s, gay-themed storylines and references to homosexuality were also plentiful on network television.3 1995, Entertainment Weekly, then the foremost arbiter of popular cultural tastes, published a special issue on The '90s, claiming that entertainment had come out of the closet. the cover story, John Cagle discusses gay-friendly entertainment, which he sees everywhere in the 1990s, citing the success of films such as Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert (1994), and To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar (1995) and the appearance of gay characters on television shows such as Roseanne, Friends, and Simpsons. Given this, Cagle quite optimistically says: In 1995, the gay stream flows freely into the (23).4In her introduction to a special Trans gender Issue of GLQ in 1998, Susan Stryker similarly notes the sweeping changes occurring in professional and popular attitudes toward trans gender phenomena, pointing out that representations of cross-dressed, transsexual, gender-ambiguous, or otherwise gender-queer figures are ubiquitous in venues such as drag-queen and -king shows, gay and lesbian film festivals, and she-male pornography, as well as in television sitcoms, major motion pictures, billboard advertising, and a variety of mass media print sources (146). Gay, lesbian, and representation within main- stream media became even more widespread (as well as more lucrative) at the end of the 1990s and the start of the 2000s, as evidenced by commercially and critically successful films such as Birdcage (1996), & Out (1997), Chasing Amy (1997), Gods and Monsters (1998), and Boys Don't Cry (1999); by popular television shows such as Ellen (1994-1998), Will & Grace (1998-2006), and Queer as Folk (2000-2005); and by the dramatic increase in advertising aimed at the niche market of gay and lesbian consumers.5 October of 2000, Entertainment Weekly published another special issue on gay culture, this one promising to take us Inside the TV Revolution and to let us hear Gay Filmmakers Sound Off. There was little here that was new or news, but there was a good deal of celebration over the high visibility and acceptance of gay characters, actors, writers, directors, and producers, which made it quite clear that the previous decade marked a significant increase in the representation of identities in the mainstream media.The media's treatment of identities calls for a serious critical inquiry among media scholars, one aligned with the academic discipline of queer media a merger of well-established film and television studies practices with a queer perspective. antecedents of theory can be traced to earlier work on social constructionism found in women's studies and gay and lesbian studies, and to poststructuralist literary and cultural theory, but two works in particular have been taken as foundational texts for theory: Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick's Epistemology of the Closet (1990) and Judith Butler's Gender Trouble (1990). …
Read full abstract