Lenvatinib Therapy Research Articles

A case of complete response with rechallenge-lenvatinib plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to multiple molecular-targeted agent treatments.

The efficacy of lenvatinib (LEN) plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (LEN-TACE) has been reported, but its effect on unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to LEN therapy has not been demonstrated. We report a case of HCC refractory to multiple molecular-targeted agents (MTA) treatments, including LEN, that was successfully treated with LEN-TACE. A 59-year-old man was referred to our department with multiple HCCs and a background of hepatitis B virus infection. TACE was the initial treatment. However, he was determined to be TACE-refractory, and multitargeted therapy was initiated. LEN was started at 12mg/day but resulted in progressive disease (PD) after 13months of the administration. The response to second-line sorafenib was PD after 2months. Third-line therapy with atezolizumab + bevacizumab was stopped after one course because of an immune-related adverse event (i.e., dermatitis). The response to fourth-line regorafenib was PD at 2months, and the response to fifth-linecabozantinib was PD after 6months. The efficacy of LEN-TACE was recently reported; therefore, we decided to attempt LEN-TACE therapy as a salvage line. After obtaining the patient's consent to repeat LEN and TACE, treatment was initiated. The tumor markers levels markedly reduced after LEN-TACE therapy. After three additional TACE treatments with continued LEN administration, the tumor marker levels normalized, and complete response was determined based on RECIST guidelines. LEN-TACE therapy may effectively treat unresectable advanced HCC in the LEN-rechallenge setting and may be a treatment option as a last-line therapeutic option.

Outcomes of lenvatinib therapy in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Lenvatinib showed promising results in a subgroup of patients with poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) in the SELECT trial. Our aim was to report the effectiveness and tolerability of lenvatinib in our series of PDTC patients. Medical records of eight consecutive patients with PDTC treated with lenvatinib in a single center between January 2019 and October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were PDTC diagnosis based on Turin criteria and evidence of disease progression in the previous 6 months. Eight PDTC patients received an average dose of lenvatinib of 18.1 mg for a median duration of treatment of 10.3 months. The baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was ≥2 in 50% of patients. Two patients had unresectable primary tumor. Seven patients showed extrathyroidal disease, particularly mediastinal lymph nodes (85.7%), lung (71.4%), and bone (71.4%). The disease control rate was 100%, with partial response and stable disease in 12.5 and 87.5%, respectively. The median time to best overall response was 3 months, and the median duration of response was 7.5 months. Median progression-free survival was 12 months and median overall survival was not reached. At 6, 12, and 18 months, overall survival was 87.5, 71.4, and 57.1%, respectively. All patients experienced drug-related adverse effects (AEs). Four (50%) had dose reductions and two (25%) had temporary treatment interruptions. Lenvatinib was stopped in two patients due to grade ≥3 AEs. Lenvatinib is an effective treatment for real-world PDTC patients. Adequate management of comorbidities and AEs increases treatment tolerability and minimizes dose reductions.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large, real-life, worldwide population.

579 Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib have not been compared in a randomized controlled trial. We conducted a retrospective multi-center study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and atezolizumab with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC in the real-world scenario. Methods: Clinical features of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab patients were balanced through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology, which weights patients' characteristics and measured outcomes of each patient in both treatment arms. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. Results: The analysis included 1,341 patients who received lenvatinib, and 864 patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. After IPTW adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not show a survival advantage over lenvatinib HR 0.97 (p=0.739). OS was prolonged by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over lenvatinib in viral patients (HR: 0.76; p=0.024). Conversely, OS was prolonged by lenvatinib in patients with NASH/NAFLD (HR: 1.88; p=0.014). In the IPTW-adjusted population, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provided better safety profile for most of the recorded adverse events. Conclusions: Our study did not identify any meaningful difference in overall survival between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib. Although some hints are provided suggesting that patients with NASH/NAFLD might benefit more from lenvatinib therapy and patients with viral etiology more from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Reinducing Radioiodine-Sensitivity in Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer Using Lenvatinib (RESET): Study Protocol for a Single-Center, Open Label Phase II Trial.

Background: Management of patients with radioiodine (RAI)-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is a challenge as I-131 therapy is deemed ineffective while standard-of-care systemic therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) lenvatinib is associated with frequent toxicities leading to dose reductions and withdrawal. A potential new treatment approach is to use TKIs as redifferentiation agent to restore RAI uptake to an extent that I-131 therapy is warranted. Prior studies show that short-term treatment with other TKIs restores RAI uptake in 50-60% of radioiodine-refractory DTC patients, but this concept has not been investigated for lenvatinib. Furthermore, the optimal duration of treatment with TKIs for maximal redifferentiation has not been explored. Methods and Design: A total of 12 patients with RAI-refractory DTC with an indication for lenvatinib will undergo I-124 PET/CT to quantify RAI uptake. This process is repeated after 6 and 12 weeks post-initiating lenvatinib after which the prospective dose estimate to target lesions and organs at risk will be determined. Patients will subsequently stop lenvatinib and undergo I-131 treatment if it is deemed effective and safe by predefined norms. The I-124 PET/CT measurements after 6 and 12 weeks of the first six patients are compared and the optimal timepoint will be determined for the remaining patients. In all I-131 treated patients post-therapy SPECT/CT dosimetry verification will be performed. During follow-up, clinical response will be evaluated using serum thyroglobulin levels and F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging for 6 months. It is hypothesized that at least 40% of patients will show meaningful renewed RAI uptake after short-term lenvatinib treatment. Discussion: Shorter treatment duration of lenvatinib treatment is preferred because of frequent toxicity-related dose reductions and drug withdrawals in long-term lenvatinib treatment. Short-term treatment with lenvatinib with subsequent I-131 therapy poses a potential new management approach for these patients. Since treatment duration is reduced and I-131 therapy is more tolerable for most patients, this potentially leads to less toxicity and higher quality of life. Identifying RAI-refractory DTC patients who redifferentiate after lenvatinib therapy is therefore crucial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC04858867.

Gelatin sponge microparticles for transarterial chemoembolization combined with regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center retrospective study

The treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. The positive effect of gelatin sponge microparticles for transarterial chemoembolization (GSMs-TACE) in the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C and large HCC has been confirmed by previous studies. This study initially explored the efficacy and safety of GSMs-TACE combined with regorafenib in patients with unresectable HCC who failed first-line sorafenib and/or lenvatinib therapy. This retrospective study collated the data of patients who presented at the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University between December 2018 and June 2021. Patients were treated with GSMs-TACE, followed by regorafenib 1 week later. Follow-up was conducted every 3 to 5 weeks after combination therapy. If the treatment was changed due to disease progression, the patients were followed up every 3 months to obtain overall survival (OS) time. The OS, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment, while adverse events (AEs) was used to assess its safety. A total of 47 patients were included in the study. The age of patients was 64.4±6.8 years; There were 43 (91.5%) males and 4 (8.5%) females; the number of Child-Pugh grade A was 22 (46.8%) and B was 25 (53.2%); the longest tumor diameter was 5.1 cm [interquartile range (IQR), 3.8, 8.9 cm]; the number of BCLC grade B was 14 (29.8%) and grade C was 33 (70.2%). The median follow-up time was 11.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.8 to 14.0 months]. The median number of GSMS-TACE sessions was 3. The initial doses of regorafenib were 80 mg/d (n=17, 36.2%), 120 mg/d (n=23, 48.9%), and 160 mg/d (n=7, 14.9%). The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 4.5 to 7.5 months), and the median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI: 11.8 to 16.8 months). The ORR and DCR were 21.3% and 85.1%, respectively. The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 8 out of 47 patients (17.0%). The study indicated that GSMs-TACE combined with regorafenib may be efficient and safe in patients with unresectable HCC. Future prospective large-scale studies should be conducted to verify these results.

Prognostic Nutrition Index as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response to Lenvatinib Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Lenvatinib (LEN) has been approved as an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, in some patients, LEN does not provide adequate therapeutic benefits. In this study, we examined the factors that affect the therapeutic response to LEN. This retrospective cohort study involved patients with HCC who received LEN therapy at Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital. We used the delivered dose intensity to body surface area ratio for 60 days (2M-DBR) as an index of the therapeutic response. This study included 83 patients divided into two groups, the high 2M-DBR group (47 patients, 56.7%) and low 2M-DBR group (36 patients, 43.4%). Univariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh class, C-reactive protein, and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were significant factors for high 2M-DBR. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a PNI>39.15 was significantly associated with high 2M-DBR. A PNI cut-off value of less than 39.15 may indicate a poor response to LEN therapy. PNI, an easy, simple, and inexpensive tool, may be useful in identifying patients in need of early intervention.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a large real-life worldwide population

Background and aimsAtezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib have not been compared in a randomised controlled trial. We conducted a retrospective multi-centre study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and atezolizumab with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC in the real-world scenario. MethodsClinical features of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab patients were balanced through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology, which weights patients' characteristics and measured outcomes of each patient in both treatment arms. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point. ResultsThe analysis included 1341 patients who received lenvatinib, and 864 patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. After IPTW adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not show a survival advantage over lenvatinib HR 0.97 (p = 0.739). OS was prolonged by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over lenvatinib in viral patients (HR: 0.76; p = 0.024). Conversely, OS was prolonged by lenvatinib in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (HR: 1.88; p = 0.014).In the IPTW-adjusted population, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provided better safety profile for most of the recorded adverse events. ConclusionOur study did not identify any meaningful difference in OS between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib. Although some hints are provided suggesting that patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease might benefit more from lenvatinib therapy and patients with viral aetiology more from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Pre-therapeutic evaluation and practical management of cardiovascular and renal toxicities in patients with metastatic radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer treated with lenvatinib

ABSTRACT Introduction Multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors with anti-angiogenic activity, particularly lenvatinib, have become the standard treatment for radioiodine-refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer but are associated with a high incidence of toxicity. Although patients treated with lenvatinib have been shown to have a significant improvement in progression-free survival, lenvatinib-associated toxicity may result in dose reductions, dose interruptions or even complete lenvatinib withdrawal, compromising anti-tumor efficacy. Areas covered The article covers the main cardiological and renal toxicities of lenvatinib, including hypertension, prolonged QT interval, heart failure, arterial and venous thromboembolic events, proteinuria and renal failure, and proposes appropriate management of these events during lenvatinib therapy. We performed a literature review of cardiovascular and renal toxicities of Lenvatinib in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer. We discussed prophylactic and therapeutic management for each toxicity based on literature and clinical expertise. Expert opinion Specific pre-therapeutic evaluation and close monitoring of patients treated with lenvatinib is necessary to prevent and detect cardiovascular and/or renal toxicities early, and to propose appropriate management. Oncologists who treat patients with lenvatinib should know how to monitor and treat these adverse events, and when to ask for the advice of a specialist (cardiologist or nephrologist).

Neoadjuvant Lenvatinib in a Locally Invasive Hobnail Variant Papillary Thyroid Cancer Enabling Surgical Resection

A 64-year-old man presented with a 7 cm papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and suspicion of diffuse lung metastases. Thyroidectomy was attempted, but his tumour was deemed unresectable due to gross invasion into surrounding neck structures. After institutional tumour board discussion, he was started on neoadjuvant lenvatinib therapy with the goal of enabling surgical resection. The tumour decreased in size from 6.2 x 3.3 cm at baseline to 3.1 x 2.1 cm after 3 months on therapy. Lenvatinib treatment was complicated by grade 1 diarrhea, rash and hypertension; he also developed acute cholecystitis, which was surgically treated.

Role of supportive periodontal management in patient with metastatic cancer

Background: Treatment of head and neck cancers may cause sequelae affecting patients’ quality of life during and after treatment. As a result, periodontal management of a patient with parotid gland adenoid cystic carcinoma, particularly in advanced stage 4, can be challenging for dental practitioners, especially if the patient is on active oral molecular therapy and undergoing long-term radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Purpose: This report was intended to describe the conservative non-surgical management of tooth 27 with poor prognosis owing to grade II mobility in a patient on active Lenvatinib therapy – where the extraction was not advisable to lessen the risk of osteonecrosis. Case: A 52-year-old female patient was referred by an oncologist to our dental clinic for noncarious toothache. Five years ago, the patient was diagnosed with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and had a treatment history of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical removal of the left parotid gland to manage the malignancy. Oral examination revealed characteristic findings of periodontitis. Case Management: Ultrasonic scaling, antimicrobial mouth rinses and reinforcement in oral hygiene instructions manage the tooth 27 conservatively. Conclusion: A cautious approach by the dental surgeon, together with the multidisciplinary team caring for cancer patients, is fundamental and helps with the palliative periodontal management of this patient to enhance oral health-related quality of life. With a lack of reports on conservative periodontal therapy in ACC patients, this report highlights the combination of smoking cessation, reinforcement of oral hygiene instructions and conservative periodontal treatment.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma progressing after molecular targeted therapy: A multicenter prospective observational study.

To evaluate the efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with molecular targeted agents (MTAs).Thirty-one patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC and previously treated with MTAs were enrolled in this study.The treatment lines ranged from second to sixth lines. The treatment effect on HCC differed from that during first-line treatment. The treatment effect was determined using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified RECIST. The treatment response was different for each MTA immediately prior to atezolizumab + bevacizumab treatment. Tumors treated with lenvatinib followed by atezolizumab + bevacizumab showed rapid growth for a short period of time followed by shrinkage. However, patients who received ramucirumab, sorafenib, and regorafenib did not show such changes. This was likely because of differences in the mechanism of action of the MTA administered immediately beforehand. The side-effect profile differed from that observed in the IMbrave150 phase 3 study of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, which showed more adverse events related to hepatic reserve.Patients treated with the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab after lenvatinib therapy may experience rapid tumor growth and subsequent shrinkage.

Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A review.

Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)have become the first choice for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that are unsuitable for TACE. Sorafenib plus TACE therapy for patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) achieved positive results. However, Lenvatinib plus TACE appeared to achieve a more advantageous result for these patients based on the phase 3 REFLECT trial. Both TACE and lenvatinib therapy have immune-stimulating effects, so would lenvatinib plus TACE and immune checkpoint inhibitors be an advantageous therapy for unresectable HCC (uHCC)? Thirteen articles from PubMed were explored to determine the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus TACE with or without PD-1 inhibitors therapy. Most of the adverse events (AEs) were manageable. Lenvatinib plus TACE therapy was superior to lenvatinib monotherapy with intermediate stage HCC especially beyond up-to-seven criterion and was superior to TACE monotherapy in patients with uHCC or sorafenib plus TACE therapy in patients with PVTT. Objective response rates (ORRs) of 53.1%–75%, median progression free survival (PFS) of 6.15–11.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) of 14.5–18.97 months were achieved in the lenvatinib plus TACE group. Levatinib plus TACE and PD-1 inhibitors achieved ORRs of 46.7% –80.6%, median PFS of 7.3–13.3 months, and median OS of 16.9–24 months. Control studies also confirmed the triple therapy was superior to lenvatinib plus TACE in patients with uHCC. Overall, the triple therapy is a promising treatment for patients with uHCC, including main PVTT and extrahepatic metastasis. Lenvatinib plus TACE therapy was also preferable for intermediate stage HCC beyond up-to-seven criterion and for patients with PVTT.

Outcomes of lenvatinib therapy in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma

Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology ISSN 1470-3947 (print) | ISSN 1479-6848 (online)

The change rate in serum nitric oxide may affect lenvatinib therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundLenvatinib is appropriate for reducing the production of nitric oxide (NO) and facilitating as block angiogenesis. However, to our knowledge, there are no data that support the correlation between NO and clinical response in patients who received lenvatinib therapy for HCC. Therefore, we investigated the correlation between the change rate of NO levels and clinical responses including adverse events (AEs) after lenvatinib therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsThis study was conducted using previously collected data from another study. We enrolled 70 patients who received lenvatinib for advanced or unresectable HCC. NO was measured by converting nitrate (NO3−) to nitrite (NO2−) with nitrate reductase, followed by quantitation of NO2− based on Griess reagent. To determine whether lenvatinib influences NO in unresectable HCC, we evaluated the influence of the change rate of NO from baseline after administration of lenvatinib on maximal therapeutic response and SAE.ResultsAfter lenvatinib administration, a change rate in the NO from 0.27 to 4.16 was observed. There was no difference between the clinical response to lenvatinib and the change rate of NO (p = 0.632). However, the change rate of NO was significantly lower in patients with AEs than in those without AEs (p = 0.030). When a reduction in NO rate of < 0.8 was defined as a clinically significant reduction of NO (CSRN), the CSRN group had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the non-CSRN group (p = 0.029 and p = 0.005, respectively).ConclusionDecreased NO levels were associated with the occurrence of AEs and worse prognosis after lenvatinib administration. Change rate in serum NO can be used as predictive markers in patients receiving lenvatinib therapy for HCC.

Anti-PD-1 antibodies plus lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on lenvatinib: a retrospective cohort study of real-world patients.

BackgroundLenvatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has proven efficacy as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there is no standard effective second-line treatment option following progression on lenvatinib therapy. Because of the comprehensive coverage of therapeutic targets of lenvatinib, the remission rate of other TKI treatments in HCC patients resistant to lenvatinib is quite low.MethodsIn this study, the effectiveness and safety of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies plus lenvatinib were assessed in 46 patients between April 2018 and April 2020 at the Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, by retrospectively reviewing their clinical data. Patients with unresectable HCC who progressed on lenvatinib were given standard doses of lenvatinib and anti-PD-1 antibodies. They were followed-up every 6–8 weeks with medical imaging and laboratory tests and treatment-related adverse reactions were investigated.ResultsThe objective response and the disease control rates were 23.9% (11/46) and 71.7% (33/46), respectively by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 (RECIST). After a median follow-up period of 15.6 [interquartile range (IQR), 11.2–22.0] months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1–11.8] and 14.5 months (95% CI: 6.8–22.3), respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were anorexia (43.5%), hypothyroidism (43.5%), hypertension (36.9%), fatigue (34.8%), and diarrhea (26.1%). Grade 3/4 events occurred in 16 patients (34.8%). Emotional functioning and overall quality of life were improved significantly following the initiation of anti-PD-1 antibodies plus lenvatinib therapy (fatigue, 4.9±7.5 vs. 11.1±12.7, P=0.03; diarrhea, 12.3±20.9 vs. 18.5±16.8, P=0.01; pain, 5.5±10.3 vs. 11.1±13.9, P=0.01).ConclusionsThe combination of anti-PD-1 antibodies and lenvatinib may benefit patients with unresectable HCC who progressed on lenvatinib. This study provides a real-world data and treatment choice for patients progressed with lenvatinib.

Survival analysis of patients with advanced metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer

Introduction. Current treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer includes surgical resection of the thyroid gland, radioiodine therapy (RIT) followed by hormone therapy with levothyroxine. If a patient has distant metastases, radioiodine therapy gains vital importance, becoming a non-competitive method of treatment. However, with incomplete expressed or lost ability of tumor cells to absorb radioactive iodine (131I), the effect of RIT occurs to be limited or completely lost. Radioactive iodine refractivity develops, in which the disease progresses despite ongoing therapy. Therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the progressive radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer is currently the only recognized effective treatment. Based on the results of the SELECT study, in an indirect comparison with the data obtained earlier in the DECISION study, lenvatinib was found to be the most effective drug.The study objective is to provide a comparative analysis of response to treatment and overall survival in two groups of patients with progressive metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. In group 1, treatment was based on continuing radioiodine therapy in combination with suppressive hormone therapy with levothyroxine; in group 2, with the development of radioiodine refractivity, lenvatinib was prescribed.Materials and methods. The study included two groups of patients treated at different times in the A.f. Tsyb medical Radiology Research Center - branch of the National medical Research Center of Radiology, ministry of Health of Russia. group 1 included patients who continued radioiodine therapy, despite disease progression on treatment (historical control group). This group (n = 191) consisted of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who received radioiodine therapy until January 2015, when the criteria for radioactive iodine refractivity had not yet been established and there was no unified approach to such patients and no possibility of targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. group 2 (n =71) consisted of patients receiving lenvatinib in the 1st line targeted therapy from January 2015 to march 2022, from the time of radiographically confirmed tumor progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and establishing the fact of radioactive iodine refractivity.Results. In the historical control group (n = 19) 18 (9.4 %) patients are alive to date. It should be specifically noted that all of them had a miliary dissemination in the lungs. None of the 191 patients had a complete or partial response to treatment. All patients had either disease stabilization (83 (43.45 %) patients), or disease progression (108 (56.54 %) patients). The number of RIT courses varied from 9 to 27, 13 ± 3.4 on average. The total dose for the entire treatment period varied from 21 to 75 GBq, 39.3 ± 10 on average. Overall survival averaged 80 ± 20.3 months (min 54 months, max 162 months). patients with slow disease progression had the longest overall survival. In the lenvatinib group the median duration of therapy in patients who discontinued treatment reached 26.3 months (1-52 months). Tumor response to treatment was evaluated in 71 patients. According to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, the maximum response was regarded as complete in 1 (1.41 %) patient, as partial - in 30 (42.45 %) patients, as stable disease - in 23 (32.39 %) patients, as disease progression - in 13 (18.31 %) cases. The median time to evaluate the first response to treatment was 4 (2-8) months. PFS was 17.3 months (95 % confidence interval 15.1-19.4 months). The median PFS in the subgroup of patients who responded to lenvatinib therapy (with a complete and partial response) was 32.5 months (95 % confidence interval 30.7-37.7). The median overall survival at the time of data analysis was not reached.Conclusion. A comparative analysis showed that the approach to the treatment of patients with progressive radioyod-refracted differentiated thyroid cancer based on continued radioiodine therapy is wrong. It was the only impelled option when tyrosine kinase inhibitors therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer was unavailable. Currently, the majority of patients with progressive radioyodrefracted differentiated thyroid cancer receive lenvatinib in the first line targeted therapy. The role of this therapy in the treatment of patients with radioyodrefracted differentiated thyroid cancer is currently increasing. The promising prospects for the synthesis of new targeted drugs are becoming obvious, such as the need for further research and comparison of drugs already in use as well.

P30-9 A case of thymic adenocarcinoma that responded to lenvatinib therapy

A 63-year-old woman complained of dyspnea lasting for 5 months and was referred to our hospital. Physical examinations revealed wheezing, bone pain in the pelvis, and subacute weight loss. Tumor markers, CA125 and NSE, were found to be slightly elevated, but others remained unaffected. Computed tomography (CT) findings of the chest and abdomen revealed an invading anterior mediastinal mass with stenosis of the trachea, multiple liver mass, and osteolysis of the pelvis. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of thymic adenocarcinoma.

The combination treatment strategy of lenvatinib for hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.

Lenvatinib is recommended as a first-line therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combination therapy with local therapy (LT) or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (PI) might improve the antitumor effect of lenvatinib. The objective of this study was to investigate the antitumor effect of lenvatinib-based combination therapies. The study retrospectively analyzed 215 HCC patients who received lenvatinib therapy. The outcomes of patients treated with lenvatinib monotherapy as well as combination strategies were compared. Progression-free survival (PFS) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 was the primary endpoint, while PFS by mRECIST, overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety were the secondary endpoints. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to overcome the bias of baseline characteristics. Compared with lenvatinib monotherapy, combination therapy prolonged PFS (by RECIST v1.1, 7.77 vs. 4.43months, P = 0.045; by mRECIST, 6.97 vs. 5.27months, P = 0.067). A higher ORR was also recorded in the combined-therapy group, according to both RECIST v1.1 (37 vs. 5%, P < 0.001) and mRECIST (53 vs. 11%, P < 0.001). Similar outcomes were obtained after PSM. Moreover, triple therapy (combined with both PI and LT) was significantly superior to dual therapy (combined with either PI or LT) in terms of better PFS according to RECIST v1.1 (8.90 vs. 6.43months, P = 0.023). However, adverse events occurred in more patients receiving combined therapy and triple therapy. No difference was observed in OS between groups. Combination therapies based on lenvatinib were associated with significantly better PFS and tumor response rates than lenvatinib monotherapy in HCC patients.

Prognostic Advantages of Individual Additional Interventions After Lenvatinib Therapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BackgroundIncreasing number of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has recently achieved salvage interventions after introduction of new biologic agents, while there are insufficient data to determine if such additional intervention(s) after treatment with newer biologic agents are truly advantageous for patients with advanced HCC. MethodsThe clinical records of 107 consecutive patients who underwent lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC were extensively reviewed and the prognostic advantages of individual additional treatments after lenvatinib treatment were investigated through a regression analysis considering time-dependent covariates. ResultsMultivariate analysis revealed that R0 resection or curative-intent radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01–0.32), transarterial chemoembolization or transarterial infusion therapy (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.19–0.81), and subsequent line of systemic therapy (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10–0.63) were associated with improved disease-specific survival (DSS), while R2 resection or palliative-intent RFA showed no correlation with DSS. The best response during lenvatinib therapy, nutritional status, plasma des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin level, a baseline CT enhancement pattern, and BCLC stage were also selected as independent predictors for DSS. Among the various treatments performed after lenvatinib therapy, R0 resection also showed clear prognostic advantage in both progression-free survival (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.16–0.58) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02–0.39), suggesting that successful conversion to surgery may prolong survival outcomes through prolonged cancer-free interval in advanced HCC. ConclusionsAdditional intervention(s)/treatment(s) after lenvatinib therapy for advanced HCC may have prognostic advantage in strictly selected populations. Successful conversion to curative resection may offer survival benefit with acceptable clinical outcomes.

Comparison of the prognostic effect of sarcopenia on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Background and AimSarcopenia has received much attention as a poor prognostic factor in various fields, and has also been reported to worsen prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib (LEN). Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is recommended as first‐line drug therapy for unresectable‐HCC, but the effect of sarcopenia on patients treated with ATZ/BEV is unknown.MethodsWe enrolled 98 patients treated with ATZ/BEV or LEN. Computed tomography performed before the initiation of drug therapy was used to diagnose sarcopenia in accordance with the criteria proposed by the Japanese Society of Hepatology. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of sarcopenia in each regimen, and patient characteristics, adverse events, and prognosis were compared.ResultsIn ATZ/BEV therapy, 57.1% of patients had sarcopenia. The sarcopenia group had significantly more women (P = 0.0125) and more macroscopic vascular invasion (P = 0.0270). Sarcopenia had no significant effect on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In LEN therapy, 63.4% of patients had sarcopenia. The sarcopenia group was significantly older (P = 0.0064) and had a higher number of women (P = 0.0003), a higher neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.0222), worse albumin–bilirubin grade (P = 0.0087), and worse best response (P = 0.0255). PFS (P = 0.0091) and OS (P = 0.0006) were worse in the sarcopenia group. In multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.0362), lymphocyte–monocyte ratio (P = 0.0365), and sarcopenia (P = 0.0268) were independent prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionIn ATZ/BEV therapy, sarcopenia does not determine prognosis, and therapeutic efficacy can be expected even in cases of sarcopenia.