Combination Of Lenvatinib Research Articles

Prevalence of PD-L1 in Cervical Cancer Patients and the Potential for Combining an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor With Lenvatinib.

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. The potential for targeted therapy against the immune checkpoint programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and receptor tyrosine kinases was examined in cervical cancer patients and cell lines. On tissue microarrays, PD-L1 was analyzed in 123 samples of patients with cervical cancer using immunohistochemistry. In SiHa, HeLa, and CaSki cervical cancer cell lines we examined the combination of lenvatinib with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor using cell viability assays, the activation of cell signaling pathway proteins using western blots and gene expression using quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR. Of 113 evaluable samples, 90 (79.6%) had more than 1% PD-L1 positive cells. The single treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor resulted in the greatest reduction in growth for CaSki and lenvatinib in HeLa cells. In contrast, the combined treatment of lenvatinib with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor demonstrated a significantly stronger impeded proliferation compared to the single treatment in all three cell lines. Moreover, the combined treatment caused significantly less phosphorylation of the signaling molecules ERK and S6 in SiHa and of S6 and STAT3 in HeLa cells but not in CaSki. All treatments diminished the mRNA levels of PD-L1, Il-8, and FGFR in SiHa cells. PD1 is frequently expressed in cervical cancer samples. Combining lenvatinib with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor diminished proliferation of cervical cancer cell lines. Consequently, this combination might be a promising option to treat cervical cancer. Signaling pathways involved in tumor cell growth are blocked by the combined treatment but still a model of the underlying mechanism cannot be drawn.

Adjuvant TACE plus lenvatinib as compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma at high risk of recurrence after surgery: A prospective controlled study.

505 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the fourth leading cause of cancer related deaths globally. Radical resection is still the main curative approach for patients with resectable HCC in China. However, the high 5-year postoperative recurrence rate of about 40% to 70% had become the main negative factor affecting the long-term survival benefit. Although transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) can effectively reduce the recurrence rate and improve disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), the outcomes of patients at high risk of recurrence are still not satisfactory. Thus, there is an urgent need for new adjuvant treatment regimen to further improve the survival outcomes. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of the lenvatinib plus TACE with TACE alone for postoperative patients with HCC who were at high risk of recurrence. Methods: The factors associated with high risk of recurrence were defined as pathological suggested vascular invasion (including vascular embolus, cholangiocarcinoma embolus and microvascular invasion), suspicious positive surgical margin or surgical margin < 1cm, satellite lesion with cancer, positive lymph nodes, low differentiation and incomplete envelope. Eligible patients were those who had received radical resection for HCC and had risk factors above. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive the combination of lenvatinib and TACE or TACE alone. Results: From September 2019 to May 2023, 119 patients were enrolled in Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Sixty received TACE + lenvatinib and 59 received TACE only. The baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. The median duration of follow-up was 22.5 months (rang: 3 to 47) in TACE + lenvatinib group and 23 months (rang: 5 to 48) in TACE group. The 1-year DFS rate was 81.2% (95% CI: 70.8%-93.1%) in lenvatinib + TACE group, which was significantly higher than that of TACE group (58.3% [95% CI: 46.8%-72.7%], p = 0.0087; HR = 0.44 [95% CI: 0.23-0.83]). The median DFS was not reached (95% CI: 28-NR) in lenvatinib + TACE group, and was 20.0 months (95% CI: 12.0-NR) in TACE group. Patients' liver function after treatment with TACE + lenvatinib was comparable to that in the baseline. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this study suggested that adjuvant lenvatinib in combination with TACE can significantly improve DFS compared with TACE alone in patients with HCC at high risk of recurrence after surgery. The toxicity of combined treatment was tolerable and manageable. The follow up is still ongoing to observe the long-term benefit of this treatment regimen.

NQO1 Mediates Lenvatinib Resistance by Regulating ROS-induced Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-associated death worldwide. As a first-line drug for advanced HCC treatment, lenvatinib faces a significant hurdle due to the development of both intrinsic and acquired resistance among patients, and the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. The present study aims to identify the pivotal gene responsible for lenvatinib resistance in HCC, explore the potential molecular mechanism, and propose combinatorial therapeutic targets for HCC management. Cell viability and colony formation assays were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of cells to lenvatinib and dicoumarol. RNA-Seq was used to determine the differences in transcriptome between parental cells and lenvatinib-resistant (LR) cells. The upregulated genes were analyzed by GO and KEGG analyses. Then, qPCR and Western blotting were employed to determine the relative gene expression levels. Afterwards, the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry. PLC-LR and Hep3B-LR were established. There was a total of 116 significantly upregulated genes common to both LR cell lines. The GO and KEGG analyses indicated that these genes were involved in oxidoreductase and dehydrogenase activities, and reactive oxygen species pathways. Notably, NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) was highly expressed in LR cells, and was involved in the lenvatinib resistance. The high expression of NQO1 decreased the production of ROS induced by lenvatinib, and subsequently suppressed the apoptosis. The combination of lenvatinib and NQO1 inhibitor, dicoumarol, reversed the resistance of LR cells. The high NQO1 expression in HCC cells impedes the lenvatinib-induced apoptosis by regulating the ROS levels, thereby promoting lenvatinib resistance in HCC cells.

Combination of TrxR1 inhibitor and lenvatinib triggers ROS-dependent cell death in human lung cancer cells.

Lung cancer is one of the most lethal diseases in the world. Although there has been significant progress in the treatment of lung cancer, there is still a lack of effective strategies for advanced cases. Lenvatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has achieved much attention due to its antitumor properties. Nevertheless, the use of lenvatinib is restricted by the characteristics of poor efficacy and drug resistance. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of lenvatinib combined with thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) inhibitors in human lung cancer cells. Our results indicate that the combination therapy involving TrxR1 inhibitors and lenvatinib exhibited significant synergistic antitumor effects in human lung cancer cells. Moreover, siTrxR1 also showed significant synergy with lenvatinib in lung cancer cells. Mechanically, we demonstrated that ROS accumulation significantly contributes to the synergism between lenvatinib and TrxR1 inhibitor auranofin. Furthermore, the combination of lenvatinib and auranofin can activate endoplasmic reticulum stress and JNK signaling pathways to achieve the goal of killing lung cancer cells. Importantly, combination therapy with lenvatinib and auranofin exerted a synergistic antitumor effect in vivo. To sum up, the combination therapy involving lenvatinib and auranofin may be a potential strategy for treating lung cancer.

HDAC Inhibition Sensitize Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Lenvatinib via Suppressing AKT Activation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly malignancy with limited treatment options. As a first-line treatment for advanced HCC, Lenvatinib has been applicated in clinic since 2018. Resistance to Lenvatinib, however, has severely restricted the clinical benefits of this drug. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the potential resistance mechanisms of Lenvatinib and identify appropriate methods to reduce resistance for the treatment of HCC. We identified SAHA, a HDAC inhibitor, to have effective anti-tumor activity against Lenvatinib-resistant HCC organoids by screening a customized drug library. Mechanism analysis revealed that SAHA upregulates PTEN expression and suppresses AKT signaling, which contributes to reversing Lenvatinib resistance in liver cancer cells. Furthermore, combinational application of Lenvatinib and HDAC inhibitor or AKT inhibitor synergistically inhibits HCC cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis. Finally, we confirmed the synergistic effects of Lenvatinib and SAHA, or AZD5363 in primary liver cancer patient derived organoids. Collectively, these findings may enable the development of Lenvatinib combination therapies for HCC.

Management of Adverse Reactions Related to Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Treatment Among Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is the predominant histological type of kidney cancer with historically poor patient outcomes. Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab is an approved first-line regimen for people with advanced renal cell carcinoma that showed clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy over sunitinib in the CLEAR trial; however, reduced patient exposure to treatment (often stemming from adverse reactions) is a potential therapeutic barrier that must be addressed. Here, we present management strategies for adverse reactions associated with this treatment combination: fatigue, diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, hypertension, stomatitis, decreased appetite, rash, nausea, and proteinuria.Dosing modification of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab should be made according to the prescribing information for each medication. Clinicians should consider that some adverse reactions, such as diarrhea, may be attributable to lenvatinib, or may be a symptom of immune-related adverse reactions to pembrolizumab (such as colitis). Adverse reactions can generally be managed by: (1) advising the patient on precautionary measures (eg, for stomatitis, practice dental hygiene, avoid irritating foods, and maintain adequate hydration), (2) monitoring for changes in symptoms from baseline (eg, changes in bowel movements, blood pressure or level of fatigue), (3) interrupting/dose reducing lenvatinib or interrupting pembrolizumab, if warranted, and advising the patient to manage their current symptoms via self-care (managing diarrhea with antidiarrheal agents and hydration), and (4) implementing medical interventions (eg, thyroid replacement or antihypertensive therapy) when needed.Through successful management of adverse reactions, oncology clinicians can improve the well-being of their patients and likely enhance adherence rates to treatment with lenvatinib and pembrolizumab.

Salvage Treatment of Nivolumab and Lenvatinib in Patients with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: The clinical efficacy of Lenvatinib (a multi‐kinase inhibitor) and Nivolumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor) have been shown in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, real-life experience data of HCC patients receiving the Nivolumab and Lenvatinib combination are scarce, especially those who experienced the first-line or even multi-line treatment. Methods: Recurrent HCC patients (n = 28) treated with Nivolumab plus Lenvatinib as salvage therapy in Hunan Provincial People's Hospital from December 2016 to March 31, 2020, were analyzed. All patients were treated with Nivolumab (3 mg/kg), and Lenvatinib (8 mg/day), and administered every three weeks. Demographics, clinical statistics, and start and end dates of combination therapy were collected and recorded. In addition, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were calculated from the start of Nivolumab plus Lenvatinib. Treatment outcomes were scored based on the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. SPSS17.0 software and GraphPad Prism were used for statistical analyses. Results: All the patients had portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) who were in Child-Pugh grade A and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C. 11 patients (39.3%) were treated with sorafenib only, and 17 patients (60.7%) were treated with at least two lines of multi-target treatment. The disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 23/28 (82.1%), with the median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.7 months and 5.7 months, respectively. Hyperbilirubinemia was the most common adverse event encountered with these combinations. However, no grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found in all HCC patients. Conclusions: The combination salvage therapy of Nivolumab and Lenvatinib was found effective in HCC patients, and most importantly, the side effects were controllable, and no grade 3 - 4 side effects were observed.

Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib–transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation sequential therapy followed by surgical resection for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Up-to-7 criteria: a study protocol for a multicentre, single-arm, prospective study

IntroductionThe feasibility and efficacy of surgical resection following systemic therapy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Up-to-7 criteria is unclear. The combination of lenvatinib (LEN) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation...

Management of metastatic endometrial cancer: physicians' choices beyond the first line after approval of checkpoint inhibitors.

Endometrial cancer (EC) represents 3.4% of all newly diagnosed cancer cases and is responsible for 2.1% of all cancer-related deaths. Approximately 10%-15% of women with EC are diagnosed with advanced-stage disease, resulting in a reported 5-year survival rate of only 17% for those with distant metastases. A better understanding of its molecular features has ushered in a new era of immunotherapy for the treatment of EC, allowing for alternative therapeutic approaches, even in cases of advanced disease. We administered a multi-choice online survey for Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) members. The questionnaire was available for 2 months, starting in October 2022. Our objective was to evaluate the current attitude of incorporating molecular characterization of EC into routine clinical practice, appraise the implementation of newly available therapies, and compare the outcomes with the previous survey conducted in April-May 2021 to ascertain the actual changes that have transpired during this recent time period. The availability of molecular classification in Italian centers has changed in 1 year. Seventy-five percent of centers performed the molecular classification compared with 55.6% of the previous survey. Although this percentage has increased, only 18% performed all the tests. Significant changes have occurred in the administration of new treatments in EC patients in MITO centers. In 2022, 82.1% of the centers administrated dostarlimab in recurrent or advanced MMR-deficient (dMMR) EC experiencing disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy regimens, compared to only 24.4% in 2021. In 2022, 85.7% of the centers already administrated the pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib combination as a second-line therapy for MMR-proficient (pMMR) patients with advanced or recurrent EC who had progressed from first-line platinum-based therapy. Both the therapeutic and diagnostic scenarios have changed over the last couple of years in MITO centers, with an increased prescription of immune checkpoint inhibitors and use of the molecular classification.

Clinical and morphological features in patients with advanced endometrial cancer treated with immunotargeting therapy

Background. Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most significant oncogynecological problems. The main mortality cause in this disease, as in the case of other malignant neoplasms, is the tumor progression. The presence of mutations associated with mismatch repair-deficient is of great prognostic importance. Immunotargeting therapy (ITT), lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab, seems to be the most effective solution in the second line treatment of advanced EC without microsatellite instability. At the same time, the group of such patients is heterogeneous in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) on ITT. So that it determines the continuing need to search for reliable parameters steadily associated with the PFS duration in this type of treatment.Aim. To analyze the clinical and morphological features in patients with advanced EC depending on the PFS duration on ITT. Materials and methods. The study included data on patients (n = 36) with advanced EC who received ITT in oncological dispensaries in Siberia and the Russian Far East. The overall patients’ group was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. PFS was defined as the time from the ITT initiation until progression or death against the background of treatment. The influence of the selected factors (clinical and morphological parameters, treatment features, and adverse events) on PFS was assessed using a log-rank criterion. The study participants were then divided into 2 subgroups (15 women and 9 women) according to median PFS. Mann–Whitney tests for independent samples (quantitative measures), and Fisher’s tests (qualitative measures) were used to identify significant differences in comparison subgroups for the selected factors. Differences were considered statistically significant when the significance level was reached (p <0.05); data at the statistical trend level (p <0.10) were also discussed.Results. In the study group, median PFS on ITT was 9.7 months (cut-off point), which was accepted as a response criterion. Among the 74 parameters reflecting clinical and morphological features in patients with advanced EC, metastatic lesions of pelvic lymph nodes (p = 0.028), para-aortic lymph nodes (p = 0.014), bone metastases (p = 0.080), and degree of estrogen receptor expression in tumor cells (p = 0.071) were associated with PFS. Partial regression as the maximal response to ITT (62.5 % vs 7.14 %, p = 0.011), as well as longer duration of response (median PFS 15.11 ± 1.10 months vs 4.47 ± 0.57 months, p = 0.00007), and the absence of foci in the pelvic/para-aortic lymph nodes (89 % vs 50 %, p = 0.069, and 89 % vs 47 %, p = 0.048, respectively), were more frequently observed in patients with a duration of median PFS ≥9.7 months compared to those with progression before 9.7 months. Stabilization as the maximum response to ITT (78.6 % vs 37.5 %, p = 0.072) was more frequently registered in the subgroup of patients with progression up to 9.7 months.Conclusion. ITT can be considered as a potentially promising therapeutic option in advanced EC. Further research in this direction should be aimed at finding criteria to identify patients with EC who would have most benefit from this type of therapy more accurately.

Application and Resistance Mechanisms of Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Lenvatinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is one of the preferred targeted drugs for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Since the REFLECT study showed that lenvatinib was noninferior to sorafenib in overall survival (OS), lenvatinib monotherapy has been widely used for aHCC. Moreover, lenvatinib combination therapy, especially lenvatinib combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has shown more encouraging clinical results. However, drug development and comprehensive treatment have not significantly improved the prognosis, and lenvatinib resistance is often encountered in treatment. The underlying molecular mechanism of lenvatinib resistance is still unclear, and studies to solve drug resistance are ongoing. The molecular mechanisms of lenvatinib resistance in patients with aHCC include the regulation of signaling pathways, the regulation of noncoding RNAs, the impact of the immune microenvironment, tumor stem cell activation and other mechanisms. This review aims to (1) summarize the progress of lenvatinib in treating aHCC, (2) delineate the known lenvatinib resistance mechanisms of current therapy, and (3) describe the development of therapeutic methods intended to overcome these resistance mechanisms.

Efficacy and safety of different PD-1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer: a multicentre retrospective study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are safe and efficacious treatments for advanced primary liver cancer (PLC). The efficacy of different ICIs in the treatment of liver cancer remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to explore whether there is a difference in the efficacy and safety of various programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable PLC. Patients with PLC treated with lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitors (camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, or pembrolizumab) between January 2018 and December 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor response, adverse events, and grades were evaluated. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients treated with different PD-1 inhibitors. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to identify clinical variables related to treatment efficacy. This study included a total of 176 patients who received a combination of lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors. Of these, 103 patients received camrelizumab, 44 received tislelizumab, 20 received sintilimab, and 9 received pembrolizumab. There was no significant difference in the pairwise comparison of camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and pembrolizumab using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Adverse events occurred in 40 (22.7%) patients (grade ≥ 3, 2.3%). The incidence of grade 3 adverse events among the four PD-1 inhibitor groups was below 5%. Camrelizumab, tislelizumab, sintilimab, and pembrolizumab are viable options for patients with unresectable PLC. These PD-1 inhibitors in combination with lenvatinib showed good safety profiles. The results guide selecting treatment for patients with unresectable PLC.

Lenvatinib with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a retrospective study

Background and objectivesPatients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) are presently lacking effective treatment options. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib with or without SBRT for HCC with PVTT.Materials and methodsThis retrospective analysis included 37 patients treated with lenvatinib in combination with SBRT and 77 patients treated with lenvatinib alone from August 2018 to August 2021. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS) and objective remission rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups, while adverse events (AEs) was analyzed between the two groups to assess safety profiles.ResultsMedian OS, PFS and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in the combination treatment group compared with the single treatment group (median OS, 19.3 vs. 11.2 months, p < 0.001; median PFS: 10.3 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001; median IHPFS, 10.7 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001). Moreover, a higher ORR (56.8% vs. 20.8%, P < 0.001) were observed in the lenvatinib combined with SBRT group. In subgroup analyses of Vp1-2 and Vp3-4 group, median OS, PFS and IHPFS were also significantly longer in the lenvatinib combined with SBRT group than those in the lenvatinib alone group. AEs in the combined therapy group were mostly manageable and the incidence was not statistically significant compared to the monotherapy group.ConclusionLenvatinib plus SBRT had a significantly better survival benefit than lenvatinib monotherapy in the treatment of HCC patients with PVTT and was well tolerated.

Lenvatinib in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of mid-late stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and impact on serum Ki-67, PCNA, GP73, and GPC-3 levels

Lenvatinib in combination with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of mid-late stage hepatocellular carcinoma: Efficacy and impact on serum Ki-67, PCNA, GP73, and GPC-3 levels

Elevated nuclear PIGL disrupts the cMyc/BRD4 axis and improves PD-1 blockade therapy by dampening tumor immune evasion.

To improve the efficacy of lenvatinib in combination withprogrammed death-1 (PD-1) blockade therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we screened the suppressive metabolic enzymes that sensitize HCC to lenvatinib and PD-1 blockade, thus impeding HCC progression. After analysis of the CRISPR‒Cas9 screen, phosphatidylinositol-glycan biosynthesis class L (PIGL) ranked first in the positive selection list. PIGL depletion had no effect on tumor cell growth in vitro but reprogrammed the tumor microenvironment (TME) in vivo to support tumor cell survival. Specifically, nuclear PIGL disrupted the interaction between cMyc/BRD4 on the distant promoter of target genes and thus decreased the expression of CCL2 and CCL20, which are involved in shaping the immunosuppressive TME by recruiting macrophages and regulatory T cells. PIGL phosphorylation at Y81 by FGFR2 abolished the interaction of PIGL with importin α/β1, thus retaining PIGL in the cytosol and facilitating tumor evasion by releasing CCL2 and CCL20. Clinically, elevated nuclear PIGL predicts a better prognosis for HCC patients and presents a positive correlation with CD8 + T-cell enrichment in tumors. Clinically, our findings highlight that the nuclear PIGL intensity or the change in PIGL-Y81 phosphorylation should be used as a biomarker to guide lenvatinib with PD-1 blockade therapy.

Lenvatinib in combination with PD-1 inhibitor and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with potentially resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective analysis.

e16160 Background: Surgical resection is the primary radical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the percentage of initially resectable HCC is only 15-30%, and most patients are unable to undergo surgical resection at the time of initial diagnosis. Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor and transarterial intervention has demonstrated good efficacy and safety in unresectable HCC. The retrospective study was designed to explore the safety and conversion effects of lenvatinib + camrelizumab+ HAIC in potentially resectable HCC. Methods: In this single-arm retrospective study, investigators collected patients with potentially resectable HCC treated with lenvatinib + camrelizumab + HAIC from November 2020 to December 2022. The potentially resectable population was selected by the following screening criteria: acceptable liver function (Child-Pugh A-B), good ECOG PS (0-1), intrahepatic tumors confined to one lobe (left, right, or middle lobe), and unresectable by surgical or oncological causes. Results: A total of 64 patients with potentially resectable HCC were included in this analysis. The conversion rate was 31.25% (20), and 23.4% (15) patients underwent surgery. The ORR and DCR were 56.3% and 85.9% by RECIST 1.1. Progression had occurred in 8 patients by the data cutoff on November 1, 2022. The median follow-up time was 13.6 months (range: 2.9-23.7) and 8 patients died. The data was not yet mature, with 1-year survival rate of 90.7%, Overall, 65.6% of patients experienced at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 15.6% of patients had Grade 3/4 TEAE, the most common was hand and foot syndrome (7.8%, n=5). Conclusions: Lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitor and HAIC was well tolerated and showed potential conversion efficacy in the treatment of patients with potentially resectable HCC.

Efficacy and safety of switching other tyrosine kinase inhibitors to regorafenib combined with primary PD-1 antibodies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

e14612 Background: Currently, formal tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as sorafenib or lenvatinib in combination with PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor had achieved promising results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, a portion of patients experienced drug-resistant tumor progression and/or severe adverse events associated with TKIs during the course of treatment, resulting in unfavorable disease control and poorer overall survival. Therefore, a better medication strategy is urgently needed in aim to improve the prognosis of these patients who experienced discontinuing medication of TKIs. Methods: We reviewed the medical data of 23 HCC patients with disease progression after received sorafenib or lenvatinib combined with PD-1 antibodies from Jan Feb 2020 to Sep 2021 at the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital in China. These patients had switched to regorafenib PO for 3 weeks on/1 week off combined with primary PD-1 antibodies after experienced tumor progression and/or severe adverse events with respect to sorafenib or Lenvatinib. All patients were followed up regularly. Changes of tumor lesions, survival data and adverse events (AEs) were detailed recorded after switched. All AEs were evaluated according to the CTCAE v5. Results: Initially, 20 (87.0%) patients were treated with lenvatinib and 3 (13.0%) patients were treated with sorafenib before switched to regorafenib. Of all patients, tumor progression caused 15 (65.2%) switching and severe AEs caused 8 (34.8%) switching, and the initial daily dose of regorafenib were 80mg (95.6%) and 40 mg (4.4%), respectively. Before switched to regorafenib, the most common mild AEs were hypertension, hypothyroidism and granulocytopenia, and the most common severe AEs were rash, hepatitis, and lung infections. In contrast, the most common AEs was mild hoarseness after switched to regorafenib. During the follow-up, 12 (52.2%) patients died, 3 (13.0%) patients lost and 8 (34.8%) patients sustained survival. The overall median survival time (MST) was 22.47 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.98 months to 41.96 months], the MST after switched to regorafenib was 10.53 months (95% CI: 0.257 months to 20.81 months). Of note, size of tumor lesion decreased in 7 (30.4%) patients and increased in 3 (13.0%) patients, and the other 13 (56.6%) patients could not be evaluated due to incomplete data after switching to regorafenib. Conclusions: For patients who are resistant to other TKIs, switching to regorafenib showed good efficacy and manageable safety. Therefore, this treatment protocol can be considered as a potential treatment for patients without clinical benefits after first or second-line combination therapy.

Targeted Treatment of Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Focus on Pembrolizumab.

Endometrial cancer (EC) accounts for 2% of all new cancers. Advanced forms have a poor prognosis with barely 17% 5-year survival. The last few years improved our knowledge of EC with a new molecular classification derived from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). They are now divided between POLE mutant, Microsatellite Instability High (MSI-H) or deficient in Mismatch Repair System (dMMR), TP53 mutant and no specific molecular profile. Until now, treatments for advanced EC have included conventional platinum-based chemotherapy or hormonotherapy. The revolution in oncology represented by the advent of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICI) has also led to a major advance in the management of recurrent and metastatic EC. Pembrolizumab, a well-known anti PD-1, has firstly been approved as monotherapy in the second-line setting for dMMR/MSI-H advanced EC. More recently, a combination of lenvatinib with pembrolizumab offered a new effective option in the second line setting irrespectively of the MMR status, giving a new opportunity for these patients who had no actual standard of care before. This combination is currently being evaluated as frontline therapy. Despite exciting results, the main problem in identifying solid biomarkers remains unresolved and further investigations are required. New original combinations of pembrolizumab with other drugs including chemotherapy, poly ADPribose polymerase inhibitors (PARP-i) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors are being tested and promise exciting new therapeutic evolutions in a close future.

Belzutifan plus lenvatinib for patients (pts) with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) after progression on a PD-1/L1 and VEGF inhibitor: Preliminary results of arm B5 of the phase 1/2 KEYMAKER-U03B study.

4553 Background: The oral HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan demonstrated antitumor activity with manageable safety as monotherapy in pts with heavily pretreated ccRCC and in combination with a VEGF-TKI in pts who previously received a PD-1/L1 inhibitor. KEYMAKER-U03B (NCT04626518) is phase 1/2, multicenter, multi-arm, open-label, adaptive umbrella study. We present preliminary results from arm B5 for belzutifan + lenvatinib. Methods: In all arms, adults with histologically confirmed ccRCC, KPS ≥70%, and disease progression on or after PD-1/L1 inhibitor and VEGF-TKI treatment (in sequence or in combination) were enrolled. In arm B5, pts received belzutifan 120 mg PO QD + lenvatinib 20 mg PO QD. The study comprised a safety lead-in phase to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), followed by an efficacy phase. Primary end point for the safety lead-in phase was safety and tolerability to establish RP2D; co-primary end points of the efficacy phase were safety and ORR per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points include clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD ≥6 mo), DOR and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Response will be presented in pts who had an opportunity to receive ≥2 postbaseline scans due to ongoing enrollment. PFS was evaluated in all enrolled pts and safety in all treated pts. End points will be evaluated in each arm separately; no comparisons will be made across arms. Results: As of September 29, 2022, 32 pts were enrolled and 30 received treatment. Median age was 60.5 y, 78% were male and 78% had intermediate/poor IMDC risk. 23 pts were on treatment at data cutoff date. Median follow up was 6.9 mo (range: 0.1-18.2). Safety of belzutifan 120 mg + lenvatinib 20 mg was manageable. Of 10 evaluable pts in the safety lead-in phase, only 1 experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (grade 1 dyspnea). Among pts who had opportunity for ≥2 postbaseline scans (n = 24), ORR was 50% (95% CI, 29-71; all PRs); CBR was 54% (95% CI, 33-74). Median DOR was not reached (NR; range: 1.4+ to 14.0+ mo); 74% of responders remained in response for ≥12 mo by KM estimation. For all enrolled pts, median PFS was 11.2 mo (95% CI, 4-NR); 6-mo rate was 55%. In the safety analysis, 28 pts (93%) experienced a treatment-related AE (TRAE), most commonly (≥40%) anemia (43%), fatigue (43%), and hypertension (43%). Grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 15 pts (50%); most commonly hypertension (27%) and anemia (17%). 1 pt experienced grade 2 hypoxia. No pt died due to a TRAE. Conclusions: Preliminary data from the belzutifan + lenvatinib combination exhibited promising antitumor activity in pts with ccRCC that progressed on PD-1/L1 inhibitors and VEGF-TKIs. Safety findings were consistent with individual profiles of each agent. The combination is being further evaluated in the phase 3 LITESPARK-011 study. Clinical trial information: NCT04626518 .

Metformin synergistically enhances the antitumour activity of Lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma by altering AKT-FOXO3 signalling pathway.

Lenvatinib is a first-line drug commonly used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its clinical efficacy is very limited due to drug resistance. Therefore, there is a great need to explore its combination with other agents to achieve better therapeutic effects. Metformin has been demonstrated to show an anti-cancer effect. This study aimed to investigate the combined effect of lenvatinib with metformin in HCC cells both in vitro and in vivo and elucidate the possible molecular mechanisms. Flow cytometry, colony formation, CCK-8 and transwell assays were used to study the effect of Lenvatinib-Metformin combination on the malignant behaviour of HCC cells in vitro. Constructing an animal model of tumour-bearing to study the effect of combined drugs on HCC in vivo. Western blot experiments were performed to assess the relationship between AKT and FOXO3 and the cellular translocation of FOXO3. Our results suggested that Lenvatinib and Metformin synergistically inhibited HCC growth and motility. Mechanistically, the combination of Lenvatinib and Metformin synergistically suppressed the activation of the AKT signalling pathway, which in turn reduced the phosphorylation level of downstream effector FOXO3 and induced its nuclear aggregation. In vivo studies further confirmed the synergistic suppression of lenvatinib with metformin in HCC growth. The Lenvatinib-Metformin combination may provide a potential therapeutic strategy to improve the prognosis of HCC patients.