Femoral Tunnel Length Research Articles

Anatomic femoral tunnel and satisfactory clinical outcomes achieved with the modified transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAnatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is considered the gold standard treatment for ACL injuries because it aims to restore the knee's normal anatomy and stability, while also protecting long-term knee health. Long-term clinical and radiological outcomes after ACL reconstruction using the modified TT technique are unclear. ObjectiveTo assess the clinical and radiological outcomes following ACL reconstruction using modified transtibial (TT) techniques at a minimum 12-month follow-up. DesignA systematic review with meta-analysis. MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched from the inception to December 1, 2022. PICO search strategy was used to identify studies applying modified TT techniques on patients with ACL reconstruction and a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Eligible studies were identified independently by two reviewers. We extracted data on patient demographics, surgical characteristics, patient reported outcomes including subjective evaluations and clinical outcomes. Radiological data including femoral and tibial tunnel position, femoral and tibial tunnel length, and femoral tunnel angle were also extracted. The tunnel position was evaluated using the quadrant method based on three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) images. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated for clinical and radiological outcomes. ResultsSixteen studies involving 628 patients were finally included. The SMD of Lysholm (90.39; 95 % CI 83.41–97.38), IKDC (86.07; 95 % CI 79.84–92.31), and Tegner (6.15; 95 % CI 3.96–8.33) scores were considered satisfactory. The depth of the femoral tunnel showed a pooled SMD of 30.08 % (95 % CI 28.25–31.91 %), and the height showed a pooled SMD of 37.72 % (95 % CI 35.75–39.70 %). The pooled SMD for the femoral tunnel angle in the coronal plane was 48.27°(95 % CI 43.14–53.40°), and the pooled SMD for the femoral tunnel length was 33.98 mm (95 % CI 29.03–38.93 mm). ConclusionsThis investigation has shown that modified TT technique can create an anatomic femoral tunnel and maintain optimal tunnel length and angulation. Most patients had satisfactory subjective outcomes and physical examinations after ACL reconstruction using modified TT technique. This information may assist in guiding expectations of clinicians and patients following ACL reconstruction with modified TT technique.

Femoral tunnel length does not impact outcomes following ACL reconstruction using a single-bundle quadriceps tendon autograft: A systematic review.

To determine whether femoral tunnel length (FTL) affects clinical or functional outcomes following primary Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with single-bundle quadriceps tendon autograft, both with and without a patellar bone block. An electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was carried out via OVID. Data pertaining to study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical techniques, femoral tunnel length, and subjective/objective clinical outcomes was abstracted. Studies were stratified into two groups based on FTL; a short femoral tunnel (S-FT) group of ≤25 mm, and a long femoral tunnel (L-FT) group of >25 mm. There was a high degree of heterogeneity between studies, prohibiting meta-analysis. Seven studies comprising 368 total patients with a mean age of 30.3 years (range: 23.4-34 years) were included for analysis. The S-FT group included 126 patients and the L-FT group 242 patients. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant postoperative improvements across both subjective and objective clinical and functional outcomes. Average complication rates were 11.9% (range: 0%-29%) in the S-FT group and 4.5% (range: 1%-14%) in the L-FT group. Ranges of re-rupture rates were 0%-2% and 0%-3% for the S-FT and L-FT groups, respectively (n.s.). Both S-FT and L-FT groups demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes following primary ACLR with single bundle quadriceps tendon autograft. There were slightly superior, although non-significant, outcomes reported with short femoral tunnel length, however, this may have been confounded by the variation in surgical technique used. IV.

RESULTS OF ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION USING THE ALL-INSIDE TECHNIQUE AT PHO NOI HOSPITAL: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Objectives: To evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the all-inside technique. Methods: A retrospective study on 30 patients who underwent primary anatomic ACL reconstruction using the all-inside technique from January 2019 to January 2022 at Pho Noi Hospital, Hung Yen. The Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score were used to evaluate outcomes before surgery, at 6 months, and ≥ 12 months postoperatively. Results: Among 30 patients who underwent all-inside ACL reconstruction, the mean follow-up time was 26.5 months (13 - 50 months), the mean age was 32.43 ± 10.6, and the mean duration between the injury and surgery was 9.4 months. The mean graft diameter was 7.8 ± 0.5mm (6.5 - 9mm), the mean femoral tunnel length was 28.8 ± 1.7mm (25 - 35mm), and the mean tibial tunnel length was 30.5 ± 2.1mm (30 - 35mm). Functional outcomes: Preoperatively, the IKDC score was 55.2 ± 0.5, and the Lysholm score was 61.1 ± 4.5. At 6 months postoperatively, symptoms improved; at over 12 months postoperatively, the IKDC score was 91.5 ± 2.5. The rate of normal and nearly normal grades was 96.7% and the Lysholm score was 94.1 ± 2.5. The rate of excellent and good grades was 100%. Conclusion: The ACL reconstruction using the all-inside technique provides good functional outcomes and anteroposterior knee stability at short-term follow-up.

Robotic-assisted anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative analysis of modified transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques in cadaveric knees.

Introduction: This study employed surgical robot to perform anatomic single-bundle reconstruction using the modified transtibial (TT) technique and anteromedial (AM) portal technique. The purpose was to directly compare tunnel and graft characteristics of the two techniques. Methods: Eight cadaveric knees without ligament injury were used in the study. The modified TT and AM portal technique were both conducted under surgical robotic system. Postoperative data acquisition of the tunnel and graft characteristics included tibial tunnel position, tunnel angle, tunnel length and femoral tunnel-graft angle. Results: The mean tibial tunnel length of the modified TT technique was significantly shorter than in the AM portal technique (p < 0.001). The mean length of the femoral tunnel was significantly longer for the modified TT technique than for the AM portal technique (p < 0.001). The mean coronal angle of the tibial tunnel was significantly lower for the modified TT technique than for the AM portal technique (p < 0.001). The mean coronal angle of the femoral tunnel was significantly lower for the AM portal technique than for the modified TT technique (p < 0.001). The AM portal technique resulted in a graft bending angle that was significantly more angulated in the coronal (p < 0.001) and the sagittal planes (p < 0.001) compared with the modified TT technique. Discussion: Comparison of the preoperative planning and postoperative femoral tunnel positions showed that the mean difference of the tunnel position was 1.8 ± 0.4mm. It suggested that the surgical navigation robot could make predictable tunnel position with high accuracy. The findings may support that the modified TT technique has benefits on femoral tunnel length and obliquity compared with AM portal technique. The modified TT technique showed a larger femoral tunnel angle in the coronal plane than the AM portal technique. Compared with the modified TT technique, the more horizontal trajectory of the femoral tunnel in the AM portal technique creates a shorter femoral tunnel length and a more acute graft bending angle.

Effect of anteromedial portal location on femoral tunnel inclination, length, and location in hamstring autograft-based single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study

BackgroundPortal positioning in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is critical in facilitating the drilling of the femoral tunnel. However, the traditional approach has limitations. A modified inferior anteromedial portal was developed. Therefore, this study aims to compare the modified and conventional far anteromedial portals for femoral tunnel drilling, assessing factors such as tunnel length, inclination, iatrogenic chondral injury risk, and blowout.Material and methodsPatients scheduled for hamstring autograft-based anatomical single-bundle arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were divided into two groups: modified and far anteromedial groups. Primary outcomes include differences in femoral tunnel length intraoperatively, tunnel inclination on anteroposterior radiographs, and exit location on lateral radiographs. Secondary outcomes encompass tunnel-related complications and reconstruction failures. To identify potential risk factors for shorter tunnel lengths and posterior exits, regression analysis was conducted.ResultsTunnel parameters of 234 patients were analyzed. In the modified portal group, femoral tunnel length and inclination were significantly higher, with tunnels exhibiting a more anterior exit position (p < 0.05). A higher body mass index exerted a negative influence on tunnel length and inclination. However, obese patients in the modified portal group had longer tunnels, increased inclination, and a lower risk of posterior exit. Only a few tunnel-related complications were observed in the far anteromedial group.ConclusionThe modified portal allowed better control of tunnel length and inclination, ensuring a nonposterior femoral tunnel exit, making it beneficial for obese patients.

Femoral Tunnel Length in Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Correlated with Body Size and Knee Morphology.

The purpose of this study was to reveal the correlation between anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel lengths in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and body size and knee morphology. Thirty-four subjects undergoing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Preoperative body size (height, body weight, and body mass index) was measured. Using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), quadriceps tendon thickness and the whole anterior-posterior length of the knee were measured. Using postoperative computed tomography (CT), axial and sagittal views of the femoral condyle were evaluated. The correlation between measured intraoperative AM and PL femoral tunnel lengths, and body size and knee morphology using preoperative MRI and postoperative CT parameters was statistically analyzed. Both AM and PL femoral tunnel lengths were significantly correlated with height, body weight, posterior condylar length, and Blumensaat's line length. These results suggest that the femoral ACL tunnel length created using a transportal technique can be estimated preoperatively by measuring the subject's body size and/or the knee morphology using MRI or CT. For clinical relevance, surgeons should be careful to create femoral tunnel of sufficient length when using a transportal technique, especially in knees of subjects with smaller body size and knee morphology. Level of evidence is III.

Freehand vs. Medial Portal Offset Aimer Technique for Accurate Femoral Tunnel Placement in Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction.

In this study, our aim was to reveal the effect of the medial femoral offset aimer usage through the femoral tunnel entry and exit points and the tunnel length during femoral tunnel drilling in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. One hundred patients who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in the study. Group 1 consisted of 50 patients who underwent femoral tunnel drilling using a medial portal offset aimer device, while Group 2 consisted of 50 patients who were operated on using the freehand technique. Both groups were compared in terms of femoral tunnel and graft tunnel lengths, femoral tunnel angle in the coronal plane, and the location of the femoral tunnel entry and exit points. The mean femoral tunnel and graft tunnel lengths were significantly longer in Group 2 (p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in terms of localization of the femoral tunnel entry point in both the axial and sagittal planes. The tunnel exit point was located significantly more posterior in Group 1 in the axial plane (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in terms of the coronal plane femoral tunnel angle between the two groups. In arthroscopic ACL reconstructions, more successful results may be obtained with the freehand technique compared to drilling with a femoral offset aimer. For an experienced orthopedic surgeon, using a medial portal offset aimer device during femoral tunnel drilling does not seem necessary. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-023-00929-z.

Femoral Tunnel Geometry and Graft Inclination Angles in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Flexible Reamer System.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the femoral tunnel geometry (femoral tunsnel location, femoral graft bending angle, and femoral tunnel length) on three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) and graft inclination on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a flexible reamer system. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients who underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using a flexible reamer system were retrospectively reviewed. One day after the ACLR procedure was performed, all patients underwent three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The femoral tunnel location, femoral graft bending angle, femoral tunnel length, and graft inclination were assessed. Results: In the 3D-CTs, the femoral tunnel was located at 29.7 ± 4.4% in the posterior to anterior (deep to shallow) direction and at 24.1 ± 5.9% in the proximal to distal (high to low) direction. The mean femoral graft bending angle was 113.9 ± 5.7°, and the mean femoral tunnel length was 35.2 ± 3.1 mm. Posterior wall breakage was observed in five patients (8.3%). In the MRIs, the mean coronal graft inclination was 69.2 ± 4.7°, and the mean sagittal graft inclination was 52.4 ± 4.6°. The results of this study demonstrated that a comparable femoral graft bending angle and longer femoral tunnel length were observed compared with the reported outcomes from previous studies that used the rigid reamer system. Conclusions: ACLR using a flexible reamer system allowed for an anatomic femoral tunnel location and a comparable graft inclination to that of the native ACL. In addition, it achieved a tolerable femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel length.

BIOMECHANICAL EFFECTS OF ASPECT RATIO OF THE KNEE DURING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY

The objective of this study was to analyze the biomechanical effect of an implanted ACL graft by determining the tunnel position according to the aspect ratio (ASR) of the distal femur during flexion-extension motion.To analyze biomechanical characteristics according to the ASR of the knee joint, only male samples were selected to exclude the effects of gender and 89 samples were selected for measurement. The mean age was 50.73 years, and the mean height was 165.22 cm. We analyzed tunnel length, graft bending angle, and stress of the graft according to tunnel entry position and aspect ratio (ratio of antero-posterior depth to medio-lateral width) of the articular surface for the distal femur during single-bundle outside-in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. We performed multi-flexible-body dynamic analyses with wherein four ASR (98, 105, 111, and 117%) knee models.The various ASRs were associated with approximately 1-mm changes in tunnel length. The graft bending angle increased when the entry point was far from the lateral epicondyle and was larger when the ASR was smaller. The graft was at maximum stress, 117% ASR, when the tunnel entry point was near the lateral epicondyle. The maximum stress value at a 5-mm distance from the lateral epicondyle was 3.5 times higher than the 15-mm entry position and, the cases set to 111% and 105% ASR, showed 1.9 times higher stress values when at a 5-mm distance compared with a 15-mm distance. In the case set at 98% ASR, the low-stress value showed a without-distance difference from the lateral epicondyle.Our results suggest that there is no relationship between the ASR and femoral tunnel length, A smaller ASR causes a higher graft bending angle, and a larger ASR causes greater stress in the graft.

3D CT analysis of the positioning of the femoral tunnel using single-bundle reconstruction of the ACL by drill-ing through an additionally created low medial approach

Introduction: We analyzed the location of the femoral bone tunnel by performing 3D CT reconstructions postoperatively after single-bundle reconstruction of the ACL using an additional low medial approach.&#x0D; Materials and methods: The data of 34 patients was analyzed by 3D CT reconstruction, after single-bundle reconstruction of the ACL. Images were analyzed according to the method of Bernard (1997) regarding the position of the femoral bone tunnel.&#x0D; Results: The mean distance from the center of the femoral tunnel to the posterior surface of the femoral condyle along the line parallel to the line of Blumensaat (t) was 37.4% ± 6%. The mean distance from the center of the femoral tunnel to the line of Blumensaat along a line perpendicular to the line of Blumensaat (h) is 27%± 3%. In the 4x4 grid, femoral tunnel centers were located—2 in the 2c box and 32 in the 2b box. The mean length of femoral tunnels was 30±0.5 mm.&#x0D; Conclusion: Using the technique of making an additional low medial approach during single-bundle reconstruction of the ACL allows to make a femoral bone tunnel in an anatomic position, namely between the foot-prints of the AM and PL bundle of the ACL.

The Hybrid Transtibial Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis Model of Graft Bending Angles and Peak Graft Stresses in Comparison With Transtibial and Anteromedial Portal Techniques.

The purpose of this finite element analysis was to compare femoral tunnel length; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft bending angle; and peak graft stress, contact force, and contact area created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal (AMP), and hybrid transtibial techniques. Finite element analysis modeling was used to examine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction models based on transtibial, AMP, and hybrid transtibial femoral tunnel drilling techniques. An evaluation of femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, peak graft stress, contact force, and contact area was done in comparison of these techniques. The femoral tunnel created with the hybrid transtibial technique was 45.3 mm, which was 13.3% longer than that achieved with the AMP technique but 15.2% shorter than that with the transtibial technique. The femoral graft bending angle with the hybrid transtibial technique (105°) was less acute than that with the AMP technique (102°), but more acute than that with the transtibial technique (109°). At 11° knee flexion, the hybrid transtibial technique had 22% less femoral contact force, 21% less tibial contact force, 21% less graft tension than the AMP technique. Yet, the hybrid transtibial technique had 41% greater femoral contact force, 39% greater tibial contact force, 33% greater graft tension, and 6% greater graft von Mises stress than the transtibial technique. A similar trend was found for the anterior knee drawer test. At both 6-mm anterior tibial displacement and 11° knee flexion, the hybrid transtibial and AMP techniques had at least 51% more femoral contact area than the transtibial technique. This finite element analysis highlights that the hybrid transtibial technique is a true hybrid between the AMP and transtibial techniques for femoral tunnel drilling regarding femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, and peak graft stress.

Influence of the Anteromedial Portal and Transtibial Drilling Technique on Femoral Tunnel Lengths in ACL Reconstruction: Results Using an MRI-Based Model.

Background:In anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, graft placement through the anteromedial (AM) portal technique requires more horizontal drilling of the femoral tunnel as compared with the transtibial (TT) technique, which may lead to a shorter femoral tunnel and affect graft-to-bone healing. The effect of coronal and sagittal femoral tunnel obliquity angle on femoral tunnel length has not been investigated.Purpose:To compare the length of the femoral tunnels created with the TT technique versus the AM portal technique at different coronal and sagittal obliquity angles using the native femoral ACL center as the starting point of the femoral tunnel. The authors also assessed sex-based differences in tunnel lengths.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Magnetic resonance imaging scans of 95 knees with an ACL rupture (55 men, 40 women; mean age, 26 years [range, 16-45 years]) were used to create 3-dimensional models of the femur. The femoral tunnel was simulated on each model using the TT and AM portal techniques; for the latter, several coronal and sagittal obliquity angles were simulated (coronal, 30°, 45°, and 60°; sagittal, 45° and 60°), representing the 10:00, 10:30, and 11:00 clockface positions for the right knee. The length of the femoral tunnel was compared between the techniques and between male and female patients.Results:The mean ± SD femoral tunnel length with the TT technique was 40.0 ± 6.8 mm. A significantly shorter tunnel was created with the AM portal technique at 30° coronal/45° sagittal (35.5 ± 3.8 mm), whereas a longer tunnel was created at 60° coronal/60° sagittal (53.3 ± 5.3 mm; P < .05 for both). The femoral tunnel created with the AM portal technique at 45° coronal/45° sagittal (40.7 ± 4.8 mm) created a similar tunnel length as the TT technique. For all techniques, the femoral tunnel was significantly shorter in female patients than male patients.Conclusion:The coronal and sagittal obliquity angles of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction can significantly affect its length. The femoral tunnel created with the AM portal technique at 45° coronal/45° sagittal was similar to that created with the TT technique.Clinical Relevance:Surgeons should be aware of the femoral tunnel shortening with lower coronal obliquity angles, especially in female patients.

Assessment of Femoral Tunnel Length and Position in ACL Reconstruction Techniques and its Effect on Stability

Assessment of Femoral Tunnel Length and Position in ACL Reconstruction Techniques and its Effect on Stability

Lower anatomical femoral ACL tunnel can be created in the large volume of femoral intercondylar notch.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between femoral intercondylar notch volume and the characteristics of femoral tunnels in anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Fifty-one subjects (24 male and 27 female: median age 27: range 15-49), were included in this study. Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed in all subjects using a trans-portal technique. Femoral tunnel length was measured intra-operatively. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) was taken at pre and post-surgery. The intercondylar notch volume was calculated with a truncated-pyramid shape simulation using the pre-operative 3D-CT image. In the post-operative 3D-CT, the modified quadrant method was used to measure femoral ACL tunnel placement. Femoral tunnel placement was 47.6 ± 10.5% in the high-low (proximal-distal) direction, and 22.6 ± 5.4% in the shallow-deep (anterior-posterior) direction. Femoral tunnel length was 35.3 ± 4.4cm. Femoral intercondylar notch volume was 8.6 ± 2.1cm3. A significant correlation was found between femoral intercondylar notch volume and high-low (proximal-distal) femoral tunnel placement (Pearson's coefficient correlation: 0.469, p = 0.003). Femoral ACL tunnel placement at a significantly lower level was found in knees with large femoral intercondylar notch volume in the trans-portal technique. For the clinical relevance, although the sample size of this study was limited, surgeons can create femoral ACL tunnel low (distal) in the notch where close to the anatomical ACL footprint in the knees with large femoral intercondylar notch volume. III.

Effects of flexible reamer on the femoral tunnel characteristics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

To compare the femoral tunnel characteristics using a rigid versus flexible reamer during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. It was hypothesized that the employment of a flexible reamer along with femoral tunnel would exhibit longer tunnel length and more acute femoral graft tunnel angle compared to the case of a rigid reamer.The study population included 28 patients who underwent anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using transportal technique and were able to take postoperative computed tomography (CT) evaluation. Of these, the femoral tunnel of 14 cases was drilled with a flexible reamer (group I) and in another 14 cases drill was performed with a conventional rigid reamer (group II). The femoral tunnel in group I was made at 90° of knee flexion. In group II, the femoral tunnel was created at 120° of knee flexion. The parameters of the femoral tunnels were compared in terms of the femoral tunnel length and femoral graft tunnel angle. Special software was used to create and manipulate (3-D) 3-dimensional knee models.The difference in the mean femoral tunnel locations expressed in percentage distance between the 2 groups was not significantly different. The mean femoral tunnel length of group I was significantly longer than that of group II, (P = .03, 36.7 ± 2.9 vs 32.9 ± 9.0 mm). The angle formed by the femoral tunnel and the graft in group I was significantly smaller than in group II (P = .01, 109.8° ± 9.4° vs 118.1° ± 7.2°).Our data suggest that the flexible reamer can provide sufficient tunnel length for the suspensory fixation with a fixed loop. Whereas, the femoral graft-tunnel angle through flexible reaming at 90° of knee flexion was more acute compared to rigid reaming at 120° of knee flexion.Study Design: level of evidence III

Comparing the Use of Flexible and Rigid Reaming Systems Through an Anteromedial Portal for Femoral Tunnel Creation During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Background:Recent studies have suggested that femoral tunnel drilling during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with the use of a flexible reaming system through a standard anteromedial portal (AM-FR) may result in a different tunnel geometry compared with a rigid reamer through an accessory anteromedial portal with hyperflexion (AM-RR).Purpose:To summarize radiologic, anatomic, and clinical outcomes from available studies that directly compared the use of AM-FR versus AM-RR for independent femoral tunnel creation during ACLR.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A literature search was performed using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Web of Science databases to identify all studies that directly compared radiologic, anatomic, and clinical outcomes between the use of AM-FR and AM-RR. The literature search, data recording, and methodological quality assessment was performed by 2 independent reviewers. The outcomes analyzed included resultant ACL graft positioning and graft bending angle; femoral tunnel positioning, aperture morphology, length, and widening; posterior wall breakage; and distance from various posterolateral knee structures.Results:A total of 13 studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. There was no difference in femoral tunnel aperture location between techniques. There were conflicting findings among studies regarding which technique resulted in a more acute graft bending angle. One study reported greater femoral tunnel widening upon follow-up with the use of AM-FR. AM-FR produced longer and more anteverted femoral tunnels than did AM-RR. The difference in tunnel length was significant and more prominent in lesser degrees of knee flexion. With AM-FR, femoral tunnels were farther from the lateral collateral ligament and peroneal nerve, and 1 of 5 studies had fewer reports of posterior wall breakage. There has been no literature comparing the clinical or functional outcomes of these techniques.Conclusion:Although no clinical studies exist comparing AM-FR and AM-RR for femoral tunnel creation during ACLR, both systems allow for reproducible positioning of an anatomic femoral tunnel aperture. The use of AM-FR results in longer and more anteverted femoral tunnels than using AM-RR, with exit points on the lateral femur that are different but safe. Surgeons should be aware of the technical differences with each method; however, further study is needed to identify any clinically important difference that results.

Biomechanical Effects of Aspect Ratio of the Knee during Outside-In Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

We analyzed tunnel length, graft bending angle, and stress of the graft according to tunnel entry position and aspect ratio (ASR: ratio of anteroposterior depth to mediolateral width) of the articular surface for the distal femur during single-bundle outside-in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery. We performed multiflexible body dynamic analyses with four ASR (98, 105, 111, and 117%) knee models. The various ASRs were associated with approximately 1 mm changes in tunnel length. The graft bending angle increased when the entry point was far from the lateral epicondyle and was larger when the ASR was smaller. The graft was at maximum stress, 117% ASR, when the tunnel entry point was near the lateral epicondyle. The maximum stress value at a 5 mm distance from the lateral epicondyle was 3.5 times higher than the 15 mm entry position, and the cases set to 111% and 105% ASR showed 1.9 times higher stress values when at a 5 mm distance compared with a 15 mm distance. In the case set at 98% ASR, the low-stress value showed a without-distance difference from the lateral epicondyle. Our results suggest that there is no relationship between the ASR and femoral tunnel length. A smaller ASR causes a higher graft bending angle, and a larger ASR causes greater stress in the graft.

Anterior cruciate ligament femoral-tunnel drilling through an anteromedial portal: 3-dimensional plane drilling angle affects tunnel length relative to notchplasty

BackgroundNotchplasty is a surgical technique often performed during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with widening of the intercondylar notch of the lateral distal femur to avoid graft impingement. The purpose of this study was to correlate femoral-tunnel length with 3-dimensional (3D) drilling angle through the anteromedial (AM) portal with and without notchplasty.Materials and methodsComputer data were collected from an anatomical study using 16 cadaveric knees. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral insertion was dissected and outlined for gross anatomical observation. The dissected cadaveric knees were scanned by computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional measurements were calculated using software (Geomagic, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) and included the center of the ACL footprint and the size of the ACL femoral footprint. The femoral-tunnel aperture centers were measured in the anatomical posterior-to-anterior and proximal-to-distal directions using Bernard’s quadrant method. The ACL tunnel was created 3-demensionally in the anatomical center of femoral foot print of ACL using software (SolidWorks®, Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). The 8-mm cylinder shaped ACL tunnel was rested upon the anatomical center of the ACL footprint and placed in three different positions: the coronal plane, the sagittal plane, and the axial plane. Finally, the effect of notchplasty on the femoral-tunnel length and center of the ACL footprint were measured. All the above-mentioned studies performed ACLR using the AM portal.ResultsThe length of the femoral tunnels produced using the low coronal and high axial angles with 5-mm notchplasty became significantly shorter as the femoral starting position became more horizontal. The result was 30.38 ± 2.11 mm on average at 20° in the coronal plane/70° in the axial plane/45° in the sagittal plane and 31.26 ± 2.08 mm at 30° in the coronal plane/60° in the axial plane/45° in the sagittal plane, respectively, comparing the standard technique of 45° in the coronal/45° in the axial/45° in the sagittal plane of 32.98 ± 3.04 mm (P < 0.001). The tunnels made using the high coronal and low axial angles with notchplasty became longer than those made using the standard technique: 40.31 ± 3.36 mm at 60° in the coronal plane/30° in the axial plane/45° in the sagittal plane and 50.46 ± 3.13 mm at 75° in the coronal plane/15° in the axial plane/45° in the sagittal plane (P < 0.001).ConclusionsOur results show that excessive notchplasty causes the femoral tunnel to be located in the non-anatomical center of the ACL footprint and reduces the femoral-tunnel length. Therefore, care should be taken to avoid excessive notchplasty when performing this operation.

Femoral tunnel length has no correlation with graft rupture: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundLiterature is controversial on femoral tunnel length as a risk factor for graft injury if the graft length in the tunnel is kept constant at ≥15 mm. MethodsA total of 1079 sportspersons, meeting our inclusion criteria, were assessed for graft rupture. Patients with femoral tunnel length (FTL) ≤30 mm were labeled as Group 1, while those with FTL > 30 mm were labeled as Group 2. Both groups were compared for potential risk factors for graft injury keeping graft length in the tunnel at ≥15 mm and statistical analysis was performed to study whether the femoral tunnel length acted as an additional risk factor. ResultsOf 1079 sportspersons, 37 suffered from graft rupture. Patients with FTL > 30 mm were included in Group 1(n = 22) and patients with FTL ≤ 30 mm (n = 15) were included in Group 2. Both groups were comparable for risk factors for ACL injury: age (P = 0.37), gender (P = 0.53), mode of re-injury (P = 0.38), graft diameter (P = 0.71), level of sports activity (P = not significant), duration from injury to index surgery (P = 0.74), duration from index surgery to re-injury (P = 0.52), timing of return to sports after index surgery (P = 0.30), duration of sporting activity before second injury (P = 0.31), Tegner’s level (P = not siginificant), Notch width index (P = 0.12) posterior slope (P = 0.77) and height (P = 0.41). ConclusionBecause the graft length in the tunnel was kept at optimum and the risk factors for ACL injury were comparable in both groups at a follow up period, we suggest that femoral tunnel length is not a risk factor for graft failure.

Predictors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Re-injury after Successful Primary ACL Reconstruction (ACLR).

Introduction:Few authors have addressed risk factors related to an ipsilateral graft rupture and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after return to sports (RTS) following primary ACL reconstruction.Material and Methods:Patients with ACL re-injury to either knee after successful primary ACLR were included in Group I and those with no further re-injury were included in Group II. Variables including age, gender, side, body mass index (BMI), thigh atrophy, anterior knee laxity difference between both knees measured by KT-1000 arthrometer, mean time of return to sports (RTS), graft type, type of game, mode of injury, Tegner Activity Score, hormone levels, femoral tunnel length (FTL), posterior tibial slope (PTS) and notch width index (NWI) were studied. Binary logistic regression was used to measure the relative association.Results:A total of 128 athletes were included with 64 in each group. Mean age in Group I and II were 24.90 and 26.47 years respectively. Mean follow-up of Group I and Group II were 24.5 and 20.11 months respectively. Significant correlation was present between ACL re-injury and following risk factors; PTS of >10º, KT difference of >3.0mm, thigh atrophy of >2.50cm and time to RTS <9.50 months P value <0.05). No correlation was found with age, sex, BMI, type of game, Tegner Activity Score, mode of injury, NWI, size of graft, FTL and hormone levels.Conclusion:Possible risk factors include PTS of ≥ 10º, KT difference of ≥ 3.0mm at 1 year follow-up, thigh atrophy of ≥ 2.50cm at 1 year follow-up and RTS <9.5 months after primary ACLR.