It is widely recognized that leisure participation has a beneficial effect on satisfaction, psychological well-being and health (Coleman, 1993; Coleman & Iso-Ahola, 1993; Schreyer & Driver, 1989; Tinsley & Tinsley, 1986). Among the psychological aspects listed by many scholars as conducive to these positive outcomes are the opportunity for skills utilization, self expression and self actualization (Crandall, 1980; Kleiber & Rickards, 1985; Tinsley & Tinsley, 1986), need gratification (Iso-Ahola, 1984, 1989; Tinsley & Tinsley, 1986), freedom of choice (Iso-Ahola, 1984; Mannell, 1980), and an avenue to develop one's sense of competence, autonomy and self-determination (Coleman & Iso-Ahola, 1993; Iso-Ahola, 1980, 1989; Witt, Ellis & Niles, 1984).Yet, aside from the studies on need gratification (e.g., Lounsbury & Polik, 1992; Tinsley & Tinsley, 1986), insufficient attempts have been made to identify the optimal choice of leisure activities for a particular individual for meeting the above psychological aspects and producing positive outcomes. The tendency in recent years has moved from studying the beneficial effects of various leisure pursuits (such as tourism or mountaineering) towards identifying the forms of leisure participation that contribute more than others to well-being and health (Caldwell, Smith, & Weissinger, 1992; Ragheb, 1993). However, no systematic efforts have been made to further explore individual differences in benefit from different types of activities. As Van Langenhove (1992) correctly pointed out, the same leisure pattern could mean something completely different for different individuals. Thus, what is now needed is research that would elucidate what types of leisure activities cause or facilitate particular types of benefits, for what types of persons, and why (Schreyer & Driver, 1989). The present study is a step in this direction.This study was based on the assumption, common to several leisure research works (e.g., Blocher & Siegel, 1984), that leisure activity choices, like vocational choices, are an expression of the individual's personality. This assumption was tested in our earlier study (Melamed & Meir, 1981), which examined whether Holland's (1973) theory of vocational choice could be generalized to leisure activity choice. Central to Holland's theory was the assumption, similar to the theorized psychological aspects of leisure participation, that search for environments that will allow them to exercise their skills and abilities, express their attitudes and values, and take on agreeable problems and roles (Holland, 1985a, p.4). We used Holland's typology to classify persons and their leisure activities into one of six occupational personality types [Realistic (R), Investigative (I), Artistic (A), Social (S), Enterprising (E), or Conventional (C)]. We found that Realistic persons tended to select realistic leisure activities, Investigative types tended to select investigative leisure activities, and so on. This supported the hypothesis that people tend to select leisure activities congruent with their personality type. This hypothesis was also confirmed in other studies (Cairo, 1979; Taylor, Kelso, Cox, Alloway, & Matthews, 1979; Varca & Shaffer, 1982). Varca and Shaffer (1982) demonstrated the stability of choice of leisure activity type over a nine-year period, which is in accord with the stability of leisure preferences found in other studies (e.g., Crawford, Godbey & Crouter, 1986).Our previous study (Melamed & Meir, 1981) included persons with congruent/incongruent occupations and congruent/incongruent leisure activities; this allowed testing some of the conceptually feasible functional relationships between work and leisure activities, namely, extension/spillover versus compensatory/complementary (Kabanoff, 1980; Parker, 1971; Staines, 1980; Wilensky, 1960). We found that persons in congruent occupations were vocationally satisfied and conceived their preferred leisure activities as an extension of the types of activities they do at work. …