The last two decades has witnessed noticeable changes in the concept of marriage. For many years academic psychologists had not been interested in research on marital relationship. The changes in various aspects of society influence the basic determinants of marriage incessantly. Thus, the outcome is the interest in researchers escalating in the aspects of love and marriage day by day.Though, it is widely believed that love is the fundamental base of marriage but it is also true that marriage is socially, ritually recognized union and legal contract between spouses that establishes rights and obligations between them. In The History of Human Marriage (1922), Edvard Westermarck defined marriage as a more or less durable connection between male and female lasting beyond the mere act of propagation till after the birth of the offspring. Later he rejected his earlier definition and defined marriage from different viewpoint in 'The Future of Marriage in Western Civilization' ( 1936). The anthropological handbook (1951) defined marriage as a union between man and woman such that children born to the woman are the recognized legitimate offspring of both partners.In other words marriage is the foundation of the family, which in turn is the fundamental building block of the society. Previous research has found the associations between marital status and social support (Pugliesi & Shook, 1998). The definition of marriage varies culture to culture. According to Cherlin (2004), the cultural meaning of marriage also changed through deinstitutionalization, where marriage is based on personal choice and self-fulfillment through mutual social responsibility and roles. On the other hand, Hindu doctrine prohibits youth participation in spouse selection and considers the virginity of bride-to-be the most essential qualification for marriage (Pothen, 1989).Marital quality is defined as global evaluation of the marriage (Fincham & Bradbury, 1987), including positive and negative aspects of marriage like support and strain; (Burman & Margolin, 1992; Fincham, Beach, & Kemp-Fincham, 1997; Slatcher, 2010), attitudes, behaviors and interaction patterns (Bradbury, Fincham, & Beach, 2000) etc. According to Filsinger ( 1998), quality or marital quality is often used as synonym for adjustment but refers more to detached evaluation of the characteristics of the relationship. Briefly, it refers to the overall level to which individuals have lit together in smooth functioning dyad. Some longitudinal studies done by Beach & O'Leary ( 1993a, 1993b) and Fincham, Beach, Harold, & Osborne ( 1997) indicate that marital dissatisfaction predicts increases in depressive symptoms over time. Marital satisfaction predicts global happiness, above and beyond other types of satisfaction (Glenn & Weaver, 1981); predicts psychological well-being and physical health (Drigotas, Rusbult, Wieselquist, & Whitton, 1999); and may serve as buffer to stressful life events (Coan, Schaefer, & Davidson, 2006; Treboux, Crowell, & Waters, 2004). Correspondingly, low quality marital bonds are predictive of depression (Beach & O'Leary, 1993) and marital dissolution (Huston et al., 2001).There are many predictors of stability and satisfaction in marriage. Among the various possibilities explored by researchers, one's spouse's personality and living conditions, the effect of autonomy and relatedness on marriage, the Empty Nest Syndrome, as well as types of premarital relations effects the marital satisfaction. Other factors which may influence the marital quality, relationship satisfaction as well as well-being of couples are love attitude and intimacy, relationship threatening attitude, emotional security and insecurity, family influence etc.Romantic love is deemed an important part of marriage. Many individuals view romantic love as basis to marry (Dion & Dion, 1991) and its disappearance as grounds to terminate marriage (Simpson, Campbell, & Berscheid, 1986). …