The Patent Law in Indonesia does not regulate patents filed by artificial intelligence at all. This is because fromthe start only humans and legal entities were considered legal subjects, so cases such as DABUS (Device forAutonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience) which were new, constituted an urgency to review the PatentLaw as a whole. If we look at the case of DABUS, which until now has not been categorized as an inventor, it willhave a bad impact on the inventor of artificial intelligence because the inventor of artificial intelligence doesnot get recognition or profit from a product created by artificial intelligence. This also has another bad impact,namely reducing the motivation of inventors to develop artificial intelligence technology. In this study using anormative juridical approach using data obtained through library materials. The results of the study show that artificial intelligence is still considered a tool (tools) only and does not develop due to a lack of adequateappreciation, one of which is the recognition of patent rights for the DABUS invention, so there is an urgencyto review the Patent Law as a whole.