We evaluated left ventricular remodeling (LVR) in patients (pts) with heart failure (HF) of the 2 main aetiologies, coronary artery disease (CAD) and dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) after 1 year (y) of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We enrolled 65 HF outpts with CRT indication (mean age 67.5±13.2 ys 74.6% males, M): 33 had CAD-caused HF (70.2±6.7 ys, 84.4% M) and 32 DCM (64.6±17.3 ys, 64.5% M). All underwent ECG, echocardiography, NYHA evaluation before and after 1 y of CRT. Before CRT, NYHA was similar (CAD 2.7±0.7, DCM 2.7±0.8) and after 1 y it significantly (p<0.05) and equally improved in both (CAD 2.3±0.5, DCM 2.2±0.7). Before CRT left ventricular ejection function (EF,%) was significantly (p=0.04) less in DCM (22.9±7.7) than CAD (26.3±7.3) while end-diastolic (EDV, ml) and end-systolic (ESV) volume, end-diastolic (EDD, mm) and end-systolic (ESD) diameter were significantly greater in DCM than CAD (EDV 239±78 vs 207±62 p=0.04, ESV 192±81 vs 152±57 p=0.03, EDD 72.8±8.1 vs 68.8±8.6 p=0.05, ESD 59.5±10.7 vs 53.8±8.8 p=0.03). After 1 y EF significantly improved in both (DCM 28.8±9.5 p=0.01, CAD 29.5±7.4 p=0.05) with a borderline trend to a greater increase in DCM. After 1 y EDV, ESV, EDD and ESD were reduced in both, with a significant reduction only in DCM. Expressing LVR as the volume parameters variation (Δ), it was significantly greater in DCM than CAD: ΔEDV DCM 44±72 vs CAD 20±34, p=0.04; ΔESV DCM 47±64 vs CAD 19±35, p=0.04. Before CRT QRS duration (msec) was similar in both (DCM 172±33 CAD 176±28, p=ns) as well as after (DCM 123±33 CAD 134±31, p=ns). Pre and post-CRT QRS duration and ΔQRS weren’t related to any modification of the above indicated parameters, both in the overall population and the 2 groups. Thus, CRT determines EF increase and LVR regression in both examined HF aetiologies. Volume reduction is greater in DCM than CAD. No relation exists between the volume and function parameters modifications and QRS duration both before and after CRT.