Abstract Introduction Left ventricular hemodynamic forces (LV-HDF) have been recently demonstrated to be promising markers of sub-clinical dysfunction and potential predictors of disease outcome. However, there is a lack of reference values in healthy subjects. Knowledge of physiologic ranges is mandatory towards the use of LV-HDF-based indices for disease assessment in future clinical applications. Purpose Aim of the current study is to define the normal reference values for LV-HDF parameters in a large cohort of healthy adults. Here we present preliminary results for the initial set of enrolled subjects. Methods We enrolled 82 healthy subjects [mean age 44 ± 13.2 years (range 18-88), 41 men]. All participants underwent standard transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examination, as recommended by current guidelines, including apical two-, three- and four-chamber windows, acquired at a frame rate above 40 Hz. These were then analyzed by tri-plane tissue tracking, measuring LV volume and LV ejection fraction (EF) as reference parameters. The same tracking method was used to evaluate the global hemodynamic force by a novel mathematical calculation technique applied to the three-dimensional endocardial contour. Physical-based LV-HDF parameters were then extracted for clinical application; these included the amplitude (root mean square) of the longitudinal and transversal force components (FL and FT) and their alignment angle relative to the LV axis. Parameters were computed as average over the whole cardiac cycle as well as limited to the systolic phase. Forces were normalized with LV volume to reduce variability with LV dimension, and divided by specific weight to yield a dimensionless measure. Results Mean EF was 63 ± 9%. Whole cycle LV-HDF parameters were: FL = 16.0 ± 5.6%, FT = 2.3 ± 0.8%, with significant longitudinal alignment FT/FL = 0.15 ± 0.04, angle = 13.0°±3.1°. Systolic HDF parameters were: FL = 22.7 ± 8.2%, FT = 2.9 ± 1.1%, with longitudinal alignment FT/FL = 0.13 ± 0.04, angle = 11.2°±3.1°. Importantly, dimensionless physical-based LV-HDF parameters showed no significant variation with age, gender or BSA. Conclusions We report the physiologic range of LV-HDF parameters measured by TTE. Knowledge of age- and gender-specific reference values, for a combination of standard, mechanical and hemodynamic indices, can improve the global assessment of the LV function and may help to detect sub-clinical stages of LV dysfunction.