Abstract Background Non-invasive myocardial work (MW) indices can be estimated from pressure-strain loops obtained by integrating left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) with brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and cardiac event timings (opening and closure of the aortic and mitral valve). Compared to LV GLS, MW indices offer the possibility to correct myocardial performance for LV afterload and dyssynchrony. Purpose To assess whether MW indices could provide additional prognostic value in a contemporary cohort of stable outpatients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) on optimal medical and device therapy, with controlled afterload and no dyssynchrony. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 307 patients (mean age 65.6±12.7 years, 78% males) with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF<50%). Liner regressions were performed to assess the relationships between MW indices and LVGLS, SBP, and parameters of inter- (i.e. inter-ventricular mechanical delay>40 msec) and intra-ventricular (i.e. mechanical dispersion>100 msec) dyssynchrony. The study endpoint was a composite of all-cause death/HF-hospitalization. Multivariable models including each MW indices once at a time [global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE)] were compared with the model including LVGLS by C-statistics. Results Mean LVEF was 32±9%, mean LVGLS was -9±3, mean GWI was 800±378 mmHg% and median NT-proBNP was 1.800 pg/ml (IQR: 731–4110). The majority of patients (84%) had SBP< 130 mmHg (mean 117±16 mmHg), and had no inter- (71%) and (68%) intra-ventricular dyssynchrony. Over a median follow-up of 20 months (IQR: 11-34), 82 patients reached the study endpoint. After multivariable adjustment for MAGGIC score, natriuretic peptide levels, LV end-diastolic volume index, left atrial volume index, E/e’ ratio, and TAPSE/PASP ratio, both GWI and GCW were independently associated with adverse outcomes, with identical goodness of fit compared to the model including LVGLS (C-index 0.75 for all). On the contrary, both GWW and GWE were not independently associated with outcomes. While GWI and GCW were strongly correlated with LVGLS (B coefficient<-0.85; Figure), their association with SBP was modest and there was no significant association between them and parameters of intra- and inter-ventricular dyssynchrony. Conclusions In a cohort of stable chronic HFrEF patients on optimal medical and device therapy, with controlled afterload and without dyssynchrony, MW indices showed similar prognostic value to LVGLS. Association between LVGLS and MW indices
Read full abstract