Left Main Stenosis Research Articles

Coronary CT angiography instead of invasive angiography before TAVI: Feasibility and outcomes

AimsConcomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) candidates. Despite societal recommendations of performing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) for coronary assessment in the pre-TAVI diagnostic workup, the prognostic value of ICA and beneficial effect of revascularization in these patients remains unclear.We aimed to determine feasibility and outcomes following a strategy of cardiac CT + coronary CT angiography (cCTA) rather than cardiac CT + ICA before TAVI. Methods and resultsWe performed a single-center, observational cohort study including all patients, without previous coronary intervention, referred to TAVI between April 2020 and November 2021. CAD was assessed by cCTA, and only patients with proximal stenosis >70 %, or left main stenosis >50 %, or cCTA was non-evaluable regarding proximal segments were subsequently referred to ICA.240 patients were included in the study. No adverse effects to pre-cCTA-scan nitroglycerin administration were observed. On cCTA, 92 % of the patients had atheroscerosis. 191 (80 %) patients had cCTA only performed, while 49 (20 %) patients underwent subsequent ICA. During a median (range) follow-up of 15 (Abdel-Wahab et al., 2012; Rapp et al., 2001; Sabbah et al., 2021; Gautier et al., 2011; Sankaramangalam et al., 2017; Otto et al., 2021; Tarantini et al., 2023; Vahanian et al., 2021; Faroux et al., 2019; Ferraro et al., 2020; Patterson et al., 2021; Blanke et al., 2019; Bleakley and Monaghan, 2018; Knuuti et al., 2020; Moss et al., 2017; van den Boogert et al., 2018; Collet et al., 2018; Linde et al., 2020; Schmidt et al., 2018; Hansson et al., 2013 [6–25]) months, no difference in procedural complication rates, mortality rates, or number of unplanned ICA was observed between patients evaluated with only cCTA vs cCTA+ICA. ConclusionsUpfront cCTA instead of ICA for assessment of obstructive CAD in the diagnostic workup of patients with severe aortic stenosis referred to TAVI is feasible, safe, and with similar procedural and clinical outcomes. Randomized studies are warranted to further validate the safety of using CTA rather than ICA for coronary assessment in TAVI candidates.

Invasive Treatment of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: From Anatomical Features to Mechanistic Differences.

There is debate on the best treatment for significant stenoses of the left main (LM) coronary artery. The available evidence is based on four randomized trials, which were either performed specifically to assess patients with LM disease (EXCEL, NOBLE, PRECOMBAT) or had a significant fraction of patients with this disease pattern (SYNTAX). A meta-analysis revealed no difference in periprocedural and 5-year mortality but demonstrated a significant reduction of spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI) with CABG. Furthermore, the recently published SWEDEHEART registry data have shown survival advantage and fewer MACCE with CABG for LM disease after adjustment. In general, patients with more severe coronary artery disease (CAD) appear to have a survival advantage with CABG both over PCI and medical therapy (independent of the presence or absence of LM stenosis), which is always associated with a reduction of spontaneous MI in the CABG arm. Since the nomenclature of LM disease does not automatically reflect the complexity of CAD, we review the nature of LM disease in this article. We mechanistically assess the treatment effects of PCI and CABG for patients with LM disease, which is rarely isolated, often distal, and mostly associated with varying degrees of single and multi-vessel disease. We conclude that in patients with isolated LM shaft lesions and associated diseases of low complexity, the risk of spontaneous MI is lower, and PCI may achieve similar long-term outcomes compared to CABG. Thus, heart teams are essential for selecting the best treatment option and should focus on assessing infarction risk in chronic CAD.

Prognostic significance of coexistent coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis

Abstract Background The optimal management of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for aortic stenosis (AS) is uncertain. As TAVI expands into lower risk cohorts with longer life expectancies there is increasing need to determine the prognostic significance of coexistent CAD and identify which lesions may benefit from revascularisation. Purpose To evaluate the prognostic significance of coexistent CAD in patients with AS undergoing TAVI stratified according to myocardial territories at risk. Methods Using a retrospective, single-centre, observational registry, patients undergoing TAVI for severe AS between 2015 and 2020 were included. CAD was angiographically determined using computed tomography or invasive coronary angiography. CAD was stratified into 1) low-risk: <70% stenosis in all major epicardial coronary arteries or <50% in the left main (LM); 2) intermediate-risk: ≥70% stenosis in one or two arteries, except the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and LM; 3) high-risk: ≥70% stenosis in the proximal LAD, ≥70% stenosis in 3 arteries or LM stenosis ≥50%. Patients with previous CABG were categorised as high-risk if: ≥70% stenosis of 3 coronary grafts or graft supplying a proximally stenosed LAD; and intermediate-risk if: ≥70% stenosis of 1 or 2 non-LAD grafts. Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes were compared between the 3 cohorts, with the impact of CAD on outcomes evaluated after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities. Results 1805 patients were included; median age 84 (79-88), 51% male sex, median logistic Euroscore 13 (8-21). 1281 (71%), 384 (21%) and 140 (8%) patients were characterised as low-, intermediate- and high-risk coronary anatomy respectively. High risk patients were older than the other groups, however, did not have the highest prevalence of comorbidities (Table 1). Other than pacemaker implantation (9% vs 12% vs 6%, p=0.04), there were no differences in procedural complications or in-hospital mortality between groups (Table 1). At a median follow-up of 3.5 (2.3-4.8) years, 920 patients (51%) died, 292 (16%) had hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) and 565 patients (31%) had a major adverse coronary event (MACE); defined as either myocardial infarction, HHF or cardiovascular death. Coronary anatomical stratification was associated with MACE (Log rank p<0.001) (Figure 1). After multivariate adjustment, high-risk anatomy was associated with all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR): 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.68, p=0.013), HHF (HR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.01-2.21, p=0.046) and MACE (HR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.27-2.21, p<0.001). Conclusions Whilst the presence of CAD does not impact TAVI procedural safety, untreated high-risk coronary anatomy is associated with future adverse events and may warrant intensive medical therapy and/or revascularisation.

Coronary artery disease polygenic risk score in patients undergoing coronary angiography and risk of future revascularization

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk score (PRS) is a strong predictor of incident CAD. The role of CAD PRS in patients with known or suspected CAD already presenting for invasive coronary angiography remains poorly understood. Purpose We aimed to (i) study the association between CAD PRS and coronary angiography traits, and (ii) determine whether CAD PRS can predict risk of future revascularization after an initial coronary angiogram. Methods Patients who underwent coronary angiography at a single hospital and were part of its biobank were included in the study. Participants were classified into 3 risk groups based on CAD PRS distribution–low (0-20%), intermediate (21-80%), and high (81-100%)–computed from a recently reported PRS comprised of 1,296,172 variants (GPSMult, PGS003725). Revascularization was defined as a composite of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention with a 3-month blocking window after the initial angiogram. Associations between coronary stenosis severity and burden, and CAD PRS were assessed using multinomial logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and genetic ancestry. The cumulative incidence of revascularization was tested using Fine-Gray regression accounting for competing risk of all-cause mortality and compared across CAD PRS strata by log-rank test. Results Among 3,518 participants (29.90% female, mean age 63.29±12.14 years), 2,568 (73%) had angiographic evidence of CAD – 340 (13.24%) mild, 346 (13.47%) moderate, and 1,882 (73.29%) severe. Out of those with CAD, 844 (32.87%) presented with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and 1,724 (67.13%) with stable CAD. CAD PRS was strongly associated with angiographic presence of CAD (OR 2.62, 95%CI 2.08-3.29) and this did not differ among patients presenting with ACS vs. stable CAD (Fig1A). The association was weakest for mild CAD (OR 1.14, 95%CI 0.77-1.68) and strongest for severe CAD (OR 3.04, 95%CI 2.40-3.84). Besides severity, CAD PRS was also strongly associated with angiographic burden of CAD with the strongest association observed for presence of left main coronary stenosis (OR 2.63, 95%CI 1.86-3.73). Each standard deviation increase in CAD PRS was associated with a 10-point increase in the Gensini score, a continuous measure of angiographic burden of CAD (p<2e-16) (Fig1B). Over a mean follow-up period of 9.26±5.81 years, 659 (18.73%) patients required revascularization at a mean period of 5.31±4.69 years. Risk of revascularization varied dramatically by CAD PRS; HR was 1.64 (95%CI 1.28-2.10, p=8.7e-5) for high vs. low CAD PRS (Fig2). CAD PRS remained predictive of future revascularization even after adjusting for the angiographic burden of CAD at baseline (HR 1.41, 95%CI 1.09-1.82, p=7.9e-3). Conclusion CAD PRS is strongly associated with severity and burden of CAD assessed on coronary angiography and is predictive of future risk of revascularization even after accounting for baseline disease burden.Figure 1.CAD PRS and angiographic traitsFigure 2.CAD PRS and revascularization

Long-term outcome of diabetic patients after unprotected left main percutaneous coronary interventions

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) represents an elevated risk in terms of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in patients with significant left main (LM) disease. Purpose Our aims were to investigate the 60-month mortality and event-free survival of consecutive patients with DM undergoing unprotected LM PCI at our centre and sought to determine the independent predictors of event-free survival. Methods We included all patients undergoing unprotected LM PCI at our tertiary care centre between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2014. The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization at 60 months. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier non-parametric estimator. ROC analysis was used to investigate the predictive power of conventional risk scores (SYNTAX, SYNTAX II, EuroSCORE II, additive and logistic EuroSCORE, ACEF, GRACE 2). Independent predictors were determined by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results A total of 513 patients (mean age 68 ± 12 years, 64% male) underwent unprotected LM PCI during this period, among these 310 (60%) were non-diabetic (non-DM) and 203 (40%) were diabetic (DM). In terms of indication, 157 (31%) elective and 356 (69%) acute LM PCI were performed. There was no significant difference between the non-DM and DM groups in terms of acute indication (218 (70%) vs. 138 (68%), p=0.574). Within the DM group, 135 (67%) were treated with oral antidiabetics (OAD) and 68 (33%) were treated with insulin (IDM). The mean survival (34.6 vs. 39.7 vs. 43.1 months, p=0.003) and event-free survival (29.3 vs. 34.7 vs. 39.3 months, p=0.001) were significantly lower in the IDM and OAD groups compared to non-DM, respectively. Of the risk scores, the SYNTAX score was the most predictive in diabetic patients (AUC=0.767). Based on the SYNTAX score, diabetic patients with a low SYNTAX score (<23) had less events (59% vs. 66%, p=0.043) than those having a moderate/high SYNTAX score (≥23). LVEF (HR 0.976; 95% CI, 0.965-0.987, p<0.001), right coronary artery occlusion (HR 2.031; 95% CI, 1.346-3.064, p=0.001), acute coronary syndrome (HR 1.861; 95% CI, 1.252-2.767, p=0.002), use of FFR (HR 0.481; 95% CI, 0.265-0.871, p=0.016), true bifurcation lesion (HR 1.559; 95% CI, 1.068-2.277, p=0.021) and newer DES generation (HR 0.706; 95% CI, 0.568-0.877, p=0.002) were predictors of event-free survival in diabetics by univariate analysis. Glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.982; 95% CI, 0.973-0.991, p<0.001) emerged as an independent predictor according to multivariate analysis. Conclusion Consecutive diabetic patients with significant unprotected LM stenosis have poor long-term outcome after LM PCI. Anatomical complexity of the lesions is a significant predictor of event-free survival. Careful intervention planning and the use of appropriate tools can improve the outcome in this high-risk population.

Ostial left main disease tackled with a percutaneous coronary intervention using a second-generation drug-eluting stent: A case report

Abstract: The hospital emergency admitted a middle-aged male who had previously undergone stenting in the left anterior descending (LAD) and right coronary arteries due to severe central chest pain radiating to both arms. A two-dimensional color Doppler echocardiogram showed septal hypokinesia, and coronary angiography showed a 70% ostial left main (LM) stenosis. The LAD coronary artery had a patent stent, but the mid-right coronary artery had a totally occluded stent. The chest pain increased during coronary angiography, and the patient consented to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a second-generation drug-eluting stent. The patient was discharged in a stable condition. The evolution and the current approach of PCI compared to coronary artery bypass grafting surgery for LM coronary disease based on randomized trials are discussed.

Feasibility and Safety of Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Coronary Revascularization Guided by Stress Cardiac Imaging

Background: Systematic revascularization of asymptomatic coronary artery stenosis before transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is controversial. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of functional evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) followed by selective ischemia-guided percutaneous coronary revascularization following TAVR. Methods: This prospective, bi-centric, single-arm, open-label trial included all patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) eligible for TAVR and with significant CAD defined as ≥1 coronary stenosis ≥ 70%. Patients with left main stenosis ≥ 50%, proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis ≥ 90% or > class 2 Canadian Classification Society (CCS) angina were excluded. Myocardial ischemia was evaluated by stress cardiac imaging one month after TAVR. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consotium ≥ 3), major vascular complication (Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and hospitalization for cardiac causes within 6 months of receiving TAVR. Results: Between June 2020 and June 2022, 64 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 84 ± 5.2 years. CAD mostly involved LAD (n = 27, 42%) with frequent multivessel disease (n = 30, 47%) and calcified lesions (n = 39, 61%). Stress cardiac imaging could be achieved in 70% (n = 46) of the patients, while 30% (n = 18) did not attend the stress test. Significant myocardial ischemia was observed in only three patients (4.5%). At 6-month follow-up, fifteen patients (23%) reached the primary endpoint, including death in six patients (9%), stroke in three patients (5%) and major bleeding in three patients (5%). ACS was observed in only two patients (3%) but both had severe coronary stenosis (≥90%) and did not refer for stress imaging for personal reasons. Hospital readmission (n = 27, 41%) was mostly related to non-cardiac causes (n = 17, 27%). Conclusions: In patients with asymptomatic CAD scheduled to undergo TAVR, a selective ischemia-guided coronary revascularization after TAVR seems to be safe, with a very low rate of ACS and few cases of myocardial ischemia requiring revascularization, despite low adherence to medical follow-up in this elderly population. This strategy could be evaluated in a randomized study.

Lipoprotein apheresis: an established therapeutic modality for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients refractory to PCSK9 inhibitors: a case report and literature review

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), is a rare genetic disorder characterized by dual mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, leading to dysfunctional or absent LDLRs, often accompanied by severe premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) and exhibiting refractoriness to aggressive pharmacological interventions. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a form of lipoprotein apheresis (LA), has been effectively utilized as an adjunctive treatment modality to reduce serum LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH. Here, we report a case of a 36-year-old female with HoFH who developed xanthomas on her limbs and waist at age 7. Despite maximum-tolerated doses of statins from age 32, combined with ezetimibe and evolocumab, her LDL-C levels remained critically elevated at 12–14 mmol/L. Her genetic testing confirmed a homozygous LDLR mutation. At 35 years old, she experienced exertional chest pain, and percutaneous coronary intervention revealed severe calcific left main stenosis, necessitating stent implantation. Subsequently, she initiated once every 1–2 months DFPP. Pre-DFPP, her LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels were 13.82 ± 3.28 and 15.45 ± 0.78 mmol/L, respectively. Post-DFPP, her LDL-C and TC levels significantly decreased to 2.43 ± 0.33 mmol/L (81.76 ± 4.11% reduction) and 3.59 ± 0.41 mmol/L (76.76 ± 2.75% reduction), respectively. Lipoprotein (a) and triglycerides also decreased by 89.10 ± 1.39% and 42.29 ± 15.68%,respectively. Two years later, there was no progression of coronary artery disease, and her symptoms and xanthomas regressed significantly. Collectively, DFPP effectively reduces LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH and contributes to delaying ASCVD progression, representing an efficacious adjunctive therapeutic modality.

Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting for left main stenosis on the basis of current regional registry evidence

ObjectivesThere is an ongoing debate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the better choice for treatment of left main (LM) stenosis. We aimed to provide external validation for the recently reviewed guideline recommendations for invasive LM therapy by evaluating the impact of CABG or PCI on long-term survival from local reports of different regions in the world. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to address contemporary registry studies comparing PCI and CABG for patients with LM stenosis. MethodsThree databases were assessed. Our primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, stroke, and periprocedural mortality. Reconstruction of time-to-event data was performed. ResultsA total of 2477 studies were retrieved. Seven studies with risk-adjusted populations were selected for the analysis. Four studies favored CABG and 3 studies showed no difference for the primary end point. Compared with PCI, patients who underwent CABG had lower risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.26, P < .01) and MACE (hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.69, P < .01) during follow-up. Moreover, PCI was associated with more myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, but less strokes when compared with CABG. There was no significant difference regarding periprocedural mortality. The MACE rate was lower after CABG in both early and late phase, which outweighs the higher rate of periprocedural stroke after CABG. ConclusionsRegional registry evidence supports the current notion of superior long-term endpoints with CABG compared with PCI for the treatment of LM stenosis over time.

TCT-659 Deferred Revascularization of Left Main Stenosis According to iFR: A Subanalysis of the PHYNAL Study

TCT-659 Deferred Revascularization of Left Main Stenosis According to iFR: A Subanalysis of the PHYNAL Study

Kugel's Artery in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in a Patient with Left Main Subtotal Stenosis.

The artery of Kugel is defined as a rare anatomical variant of the coronary arteries. It consists of an anastomotic connection between the branches of the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left circumflex artery (LCx). In patients with coronary artery occlusion, the presence of this connection bypassing the area of the occluded vessel may be a factor that prevents significant necrosis of a specific area of the myocardium. Most cases are detected by invasive coronary angiography. We present images from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), which documented the existence of Kugel's artery in a 67-year-old patient with subtotal stenosis of the left main artery. The presented images clearly indicate that CCTA can visualize the existing rescue collateral circulation in patients with significant coronary artery disease.

Preliminary Results of Iran Premature Coronary Artery Disease (IPAD study) and Implementation of IPAD Biobank: A Case-Control Study.

Iran Premature Coronary Artery Disease (IPAD) is one of the first and largest studies of its kind in Asia that investigates different aspects of premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) in different ethnic groups in multiple cities. In this paper, we aim to describe the IPAD biobank establishment and present some preliminary results of the IPAD study. This case-control study was conducted on patients with documented angiography from different ethnicities in more than ten cities of Iran (males aged 60 years and below and females aged 70 years and below). Patients with coronary artery stenosis of more than 75% in at least one vessel (or left-main stenosis of more than 50%) were defined as the case group and patients with normal coronary angiography were considered as the control group. In addition to completing questionnaires and performing physical measurements, samples of serum, buffy coat, plasma, whole blood, saliva, urine, and feces were stored in the freezer at -80 °C. The mean age of patients was 51.1±8.2, of which 43% were women. There were 1221 people in the control group and 1702 in the case group. Our enrollment is completed and data entry and transferring biosamples from different cities is still ongoing. About 30000 biosamples of different ethnicities are saved in the IPAD biobank. This study aims to develop a high-quality biobank and facilitate research on different aspects of PCAD, especially gene-environment interaction regarding ethnicity.

Combined Computed Coronary Tomography Angiography and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Planning Computed Tomography Reliably Detects Relevant Coronary Artery Disease Pre-TAVI.

Background: Before surgical or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), coronary status evaluation is required. The role of combined computed coronary tomography angiography (cCTA) and TAVI planning CT in this context is not yet well elucidated. This study assessed whether relevant proximal coronary disease requiring coronary revascularization can be safely detected by combined cCTA and TAVI planning CT, including CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) calculation in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Methods: This study analyzed patients with successful cCTA combined with TAVI planning CT using a 128-slice dual-source scanner. The detection via cCTA of relevant left main stem stenosis (>50%) or proximal coronary artery stenosis (>70%) was compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Results: This study comprised 101 consecutive TAVI patients with a median age of 83 [77-86] years, a median STS score of 3.7 [2.4-6.1] and 54% of whom had known coronary artery disease. Of 15 patients with relevant coronary stenoses, 14 (93.3%) were detected with cCTA, while false positive results were found in 25 patients. Only in patients with previous percutaneous coronary stent implantation (PCI) were false positive rates (11/29) increased. In the subgroup without previous PCI, an improved classification performance of 87.5%, being mainly due to 11.1% false positive classifications, led to a negative predictive value of 98.5%. Conclusions: Combined cCTA and CT-FFR with TAVI planning CT via state-of-the-art scanners and protocols as a one-stop shop can replace routine ICA in patients prior to TAVI due to its safe detection of relevant coronary artery stenosis, although diagnostic performance of cCTA is only reduced in patients with coronary stents.

Long-Term Outcomes in a Contemporary Population Being Managed Medically for Significant Left Main Stenosis

Long-Term Outcomes in a Contemporary Population Being Managed Medically for Significant Left Main Stenosis

Cracking the Code of Coronary Calcium: One-year Clinical Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in All-comers and Two Complex Cohorts

Background: Severe coronary calcifications are commonly encountered in real-world populations and in left main (LM) disease, heightening complication risks including stent underexpansion. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) appears safe, longer-term data in high-risk populations are lacking. The aim of this study was therefore to examine 1-year IVL outcomes for severely calcified lesions in two complex cohorts: LM stenosis and underexpanded stents (UES) during stent implantation. Methods: A registry study was carried out to examine major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (MI, target vessel revascularisation [TVR], cardiac mortality). The LM and UES subgroups were compared with their counterparts in the non-LM and de novo lesion subgroups, respectively. Results: The study involved 102 participants (median age, 70 years, 68% male), and the cardiovascular burden was high (diabetes, 72%; dialysis, 18%; prior MI, 43%, median left ventricular ejection fraction, 45%). Many participants presented acutely (acute coronary syndrome, 36%; decompensated heart failure, 13%) and had complex anatomies (triple-vessel disease, 77%). The cardiovascular burden was higher in the LM and UES subgroups than in the non-LM and de novo lesion subgroups, but the rates of procedural complications and 30-day MACEs were low and were not significantly different. The 1-year MACE rate was higher in the LM group than in non-LM (29% versus 10%, p=0.042), but was non-significant after adjusting for baseline variables (OR 3.08; 95% CI [0.87–10.9]); the rates of 1-year MI, TVR and mortality did not differ from non-LM. In the UES group, 1-year MACE rate (17% versus 13%, p=0.500) was similar to that for de novo lesions. Conclusion: The preliminary data suggest that the use of IVL is reasonable when encountering stent underexpansion due to severe coronary calcifications during stent implantation. The 1-year MACE rate was higher in calcific LM stenosis, probably due to greater comorbidity burden and acute presentations.

Invasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential.

Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) occurs due to acquired mutations in bone marrow progenitor cells. CHIP confers a 2-fold risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, there are limited data regarding specific cardiovascular phenotypes. The purpose of this study was to define the coronary artery disease phenotype of the CHIP population-based on coronary angiography. We recruited 1142 patients from the Vanderbilt University Medical Center cardiac catheterization laboratory and performed DNA sequencing to determine CHIP status. Multivariable logistic regression models and proportional odds models were used to assess the association between CHIP status and angiography phenotypes. We found that 18.4% of patients undergoing coronary angiography had a CHIP mutation. Those with CHIP had a higher risk of having obstructive left main (odds ratio, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.40-4.27]; P=0.0018) and left anterior descending (odds ratio, 1.59 [1.12-2.24]; P=0.0092) coronary artery disease compared with non-CHIP carriers. We additionally found that a specific CHIP mutation, ten eleven translocase 2 (TET2), has a larger effect size on left main stenosis compared with other CHIP mutations. This is the first invasive assessment of coronary artery disease in CHIP and offers a description of a specific atherosclerotic phenotype in CHIP wherein there is an increased risk of obstructive left main and left anterior descending artery stenosis, especially among TET2 mutation carriers. This serves as a basis for understanding enhanced morbidity and mortality in CHIP.

Sternum-sparing multivessel coronary surgery as a routine procedure: Midterm results of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy

ObjectiveA sternum-sparing approach of minimally invasive total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy demonstrated promising early outcomes in unselected patients with coronary artery multivessel disease. Follow-up data are still missing. MethodsFrom November 2019 to September 2023, coronary artery bypass grafting via left anterior minithoracotomy on cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic cardiac arrest was performed as a routine procedure in 392 consecutive, nonemergency patients (345 men; 67.0 ± 9.9 years; range, 32-88 years). All patients had multivessel coronary artery disease (77.6% 3-vessel-disease, 22.4% 2-vessel-disease, and 32.9% left main stenosis). Patients at old age (older than a 80 years, 12.5%), with severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <30%, 7.9%), diabetes mellitus (34.9%), massive obesity (body mass index > 35, 8.9%), and chronic lung disease (17.1%) were included. Mean European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score was 2.9 ± 2.8. Mean midterm follow-up (100%) was 15.2 ± 10.7 months (range, 0.1-39.5 months). ResultsLeft internal thoracic artery (99.0%), radial artery (70.4%), and saphenous vein grafts (57.4%) were used, and 70.4% of patients received at least 2 arterial grafts. A total of 3.0 ± 0.8 anastomoses (range, 2-5 anastomoses) per patient were performed to revascularize the territories of left anterior descending (98.7%), circumflex (91.6%), and right coronary (70.9%) artery. Complete anatomical revascularization was achieved in 95.1%. At follow-up, all-cause-mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke was 3.1%, 1.5%, 5.4%, and 0.7%, respectively. Overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rate was 8.7%. ConclusionsThis is the first report of midterm follow-up after routine sternum-sparing total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy for multivessel coronary artery disease with a high rate of multiple arterial grafting and complete anatomical revascularization. Outcome was favorable and similar to that of contemporary conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

Cardiac Surgery 2023 Reviewed.

We reviewed the cardiac surgical literature for 2023. PubMed displayed almost 34,000 hits for the search term "cardiac surgery AND 2023." We used a PRISMA approach for a results-oriented summary. Key manuscripts addressed the mid- and long-term effects of invasive treatment options in patient populations with coronary artery disease (CAD), comparing interventional therapy (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) with surgery (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]). The literature in 2023 again confirmed the excellent long-term outcomes of CABG compared with PCI in patients with left main stenosis, specifically in anatomically complex chronic CAD, but even in elderly patients, generating further support for an infarct-preventative effect as a prognostic mechanism of CABG. For aortic stenosis, a previous trend of an early advantage for transcatheter (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI]) and a later advantage for surgical (surgical aortic valve replacement) treatment was also re-confirmed by many studies. Only the Evolut Low Risk trial maintained an early advantage of TAVI over 4 years. In the mitral and tricuspid field, the number of interventional publications increased tremendously. A pattern emerges that clinical benefits are associated with repair quality, making residual regurgitation not irrelevant. While surgery is more invasive, it currently generates the highest repair rates and longest durability. For terminal heart failure treatment, donor pool expansion for transplantation and reducing adverse events in assist device therapy were issues in 2023. Finally, the aortic diameter related to adverse events and technical aspects of surgery dominated in aortic surgery. This article summarizes publications perceived as important by us. It cannot be complete nor free of individual interpretation, but provides up-to-date information for patient-specific decision-making.

PET-determined myocardial perfusion and flow in coronary artery disease characterization

Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging in conjunction with tracer-kinetic modeling enables the concurrent assessment of myocardial perfusion and regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) of the left ventricle in absolute terms in milliliters per gram per minute (mL/g/min). The non-invasive quantification of MBF during pharmacologically induced hyperemia, at rest, and corresponding myocardial flow reserve (MFR) opens a new avenue for the identification and characterization of classical or endogen type of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) as functional substrate for microvascular angina in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and/or no CAD at all. Further, PET-MBF quantification expands the scope of conventional myocardial perfusion imaging from the identification of advanced, and flow-limiting, epicardial CAD to early stages of atherosclerosis and/or CMD. Adding MBF assessment to myocardial perfusion may also reliably unravel diffuse ischemia owing to significant left main stenosis and/or multivessel CAD, commonly confirmed by peak stress transient ischemic cavity dilation of the left ventricle during maximal vasomotor stress compared to rest on gated PET images. Owing to high spatial and contrast resolution in conjunction with photon-attenuation free myocardial perfusion PET images, PET is preferentially used for CAD detection in advanced obesity and women with pronounced breast habitus. With increasing clinical use of cardiac PET perfusion and MBF assessment, individualized, and image-guided cardiovascular treatment decisions in CAD patients is likely to ensue, while its translation into improved cardiovascular outcome remains to be investigated.

Diagnostic performance of intravascular ultrasound-based fractional flow reserve in evaluating of intermediate left main stenosis.

The recently introduced ultrasonic flow ratio (UFR), is a novel fast computational method to derive fractional flow reserve (FFR) from intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. In the present study, we evaluate the diagnostic performance of UFR in patients with intermediate left main (LM) stenosis. This is a prospective, single center study enrolling consecutive patients with presence of intermediated LM lesions (diameter stenosis of 30%-80% by visual estimation) underwent IVUS and FFR measurement. An independent core laboratory assessed offline UFR and IVUS-derived minimal lumen area (MLA) in a blinded fashion. Both UFR and FFR were successfully achieved in 41 LM patients (mean age, 62.0 ± 9.9 years, 46.3% diabetes). An acceptable correlation between UFR and FFR was identified (r = 0.688, P < 0.0001), with an absolute numerical difference of 0.03 (standard difference: 0.01). The area under the curve (AUC) in diagnosis of physiologically significant coronary stenosis for UFR was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-1.01), which was significantly higher than angiographic identified stenosis > 50% (AUC = 0.66, P < 0.001) and numerically higher than IVUS-derived MLA (AUC = 0.82; P = 0.09). Patient level diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity for UFR to identify FFR ≤ 0.80 was 82.9% (95% CI: 70.2-95.7), 93.1% (95% CI: 82.2-100.0), 58.3% (95% CI: 26.3-90.4), respectively. In patients with intermediate LM diseases, UFR was proved to be associated with acceptable correlation and high accuracy with pressure wire-based FFR as standard reference. The present study supports the use of UFR for functional evaluation of intermediate LM stenosis.