Although several prior studies have described outcomes of OCA transplantation for single osteochondral lesions, a paucity of information exists comparing outcomes of single versus multiple OCA transplants. We aimed to describe initial outcomes of single versus multiple-plug knee OCA transplants at minimum 1-year follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-reported outcome measures between patients undergoing single versus multiple-plug OCA transplants at minimum 1-year follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data for patients undergoing OCA transplantation for large (>2cm2) osteochondral defects about the knee. Thirty patients with multi-plug (2+) OCA transplants (either single surface using snowman technique or multi-surface) were 1:1 age- and sex-, and BMI-matched to 30 patients with single-plug OCA transplants. PROMs, including IKDC and KOOS subscores, were obtained preoperatively and minimum 1-year postoperatively. Failure was defined as revision OCA or conversion to UKA or TKA. The cohort included 30 females, 31 left knees, average age of 37±10.3 years, and median follow up of 2.0 years [interquartile range: 1.7-2.5 years]. There was a significant increase in PROMs from pre- to postoperative for the entire cohort and the single versus multi-plug subgroups (p<0.01). There was no difference between groups with respect to the percentage of patients who achieved the MCID for each PROM (p>0.05). There were two failures, each in the single plug group, with a mean time to failure of 3.5 years. There is no difference in initial outcomes between patients undergoing single versus multi-plug OCA transplant at short-term follow-up. Level IV, case series Keywords: knee, patella; knee, articular cartilage; knee, general.