Left Atrial Appendage Closure Research Articles

Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Stroke despite Oral Anticoagulation.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) experiencing ischemic stroke despite oral anticoagulation (OAC), i.e., breakthrough strokes, are not uncommon, and represent an important clinical subgroup in view of the consistently high risk of stroke recurrence and mortality. The understanding of the heterogenous potential mechanism underlying OAC failure is essential in order to implement specific therapeutic measures aimed at reducing the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke. However, due to the incomplete comprehension of this phenomenon and the limited available data, secondary stroke prevention in such high-risk patients represents a clinical dilemma. There are several available strategies to prevent ischemic stroke recurrence in AF patients with breakthrough stroke in the absence of competing causes unrelated to AF, and these include continuation or change in the type of OAC, addition of antiplatelet therapy, left atrial appendage closure, or any combination of the above options. However, due to the limited available data, the latest guidelines do not provide any specific recommendations about which of the above strategies may be preferred. This review describes the incidence, the clinical impact and the potential mechanisms underlying OAC failure in AF patients. Furthermore, the evidence supporting each of the above therapeutic options for secondary stroke prevention and the potential future directions will be discussed.

Feasibility and safety of a percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedure for left atrial appendage closure in patients for whom fluoroscopy presents risk: a cohort study.

Most patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) are older adult individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) and many comorbidities, which may elevate the risk for complications associated with contrast agents with the fluoroscopic image-guided procedure. This retrospective cohort study of patients with AF at high risk for use of contrast agents compared the feasibility and safety of LAAC using percutaneous and non-fluoroscopic procedure with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the only image guidance relative to those under fluoroscopic image guidance. In this retrospective study, we enrolled 126 patients with AF who underwent LAAC from September 2017 to December 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the imaging guidance modality: a TEE group (n=32) and a fluoroscopic group (n=94). We analyzed the differences in complete closure rates and device- and procedure-related complications between the 2 groups. Continuous variables were assessed using the Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test, while categorical variables were evaluated using Pearson chi-squared test or Fisher exact test. Propensity-score matching was used to adjust for baseline differences. Propensity-score matching yielded 25 pairs of patients with similarly distributed age (72.9±6.9 vs. 73.1±4.9 years; P=0.925), gender (10:15 vs. 11:14; P>0.99), weight (68.3±11.2 vs. 68.1±12.3 kg; P=0.948), and alanine aminotransferase level (20.0±9.8 vs. 22.5±14.2 U/L; P=0.482). The LAA was successfully occluded in all patients, and the TEE group showed similar results to the fluoroscopic group in terms of success rate (100% vs. 100%; P>0.99) and hospitalization duration [5.0 (IQ1-IQ3: 3.0-7.0) vs. 5.0 (IQ1-IQ3: 3.0-6.0) days; P=0.498]. The groups also demonstrated comparable complication rates, with 1 (4.2%) case of pericardial effusion and 1 (4.2%) case of residual shunt in the TEE group, and 5 (20%) cases of residual shunt, 1 (4.2%) case of pericardial effusion, 1 (4.2%) case of myocardial infarction, and 1 (4.2%) case of access-related complications in the fluoroscopic group. There were no deaths. The overall incidence rate of procedure-related complications (6.2% vs. 18.1%, P=0.153) at mean 22.2±4.5 months follow-up between the 2 groups was similar. In patients with AF of high risk for use of contrast agents, LAAC under non-fluoroscopic guidance appears feasible and safe with similar outcomes to that under fluoroscopic guidance.

Risk factors and management strategies for atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac arrhythmia characterised by the irregular and frequently fast depolarization of the atrial myocardium resulting from a disturbance of the usual electrical conduction routes within the atria, which causes disorganised and ineffective atrial contractions. The management of AF involves a multidisciplinary approach that includes identifying and treating underlying risk factors, managing symptoms, and preventing complications. The risk factors for AF include age, hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, valvular heart disease, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, alcohol consumption, sleep apnea, and family history. The management strategies for AF include rate control, rhythm control, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage closure, lifestyle modifications, surgical ablation, catheter ablation, cardioversion, and education and support. The choice of management strategy should be tailored to the individual patient’s risk profile, comorbidities, and other factors. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of AF and to develop more effective management strategies for this condition.

From direct oral anticoagulants shift to left atrial appendage closure after major stroke

From direct oral anticoagulants shift to left atrial appendage closure after major stroke

Safety and Efficacy of Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Left Atrial Appendage Closure Combined Procedure and Half-Dose Rivaroxaban After Operation in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of cryo-balloon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) combined procedure and half-dose rivaroxaban after operation in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). A total of 203 AF patients presented for cryo-balloon PVI, and LAAC combined procedure was included from 2019 to 2021. Postoperative patients were anticoagulated with rivaroxaban with/without clopidogrel for 60 days, with oral rivaroxaban of 10 mg in the elderly group and 20 mg in the non-elderly group. Patients with AF ≥80 and <80 years were considered elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively. Scheduled follow-ups and transesophageal echocardiography were used to assess peri- and post-procedural safety and effectiveness. A total of 203 patients underwent the combined procedure, 83 in the elderly and 120 in the non-elderly groups. All patients successfully obtained PVI and satisfactory LAAC. During the perioperative period, one patient had puncture complications in the elderly group and one with thrombosis in the non-elderly group. Oral rivaroxaban was administered to 83.2% and 75% of patients in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively, and rivaroxaban was combined with clopidogrel anticoagulation in the remaining patients. The annual rates of composite clinical events were 8.4% and 9.2% in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Patients in both groups had complete sealing, and there was no displacement of devices, death and peripheral arterial thrombosis. Recurrence of AF occurred in 25 and 32 patients in the elderly and non-elderly groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. Besides, the two groups had no statistically significant difference in cerebral infarction/transient ischemic attack and device-related thrombosis (p > 0.05). This study suggests that cryo-balloon PVI and LAAC combined procedure and half-dose rivaroxaban after the operation is safe and effective in treating elderly patients with AF.

Validation study of new left atrial appendage closure device measurement by two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size. We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE. A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27mm, p < 0.01) line methods. Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: What Do We Know?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States and the most common cause of embolic cerebrovascular events, with the majority of these thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has separate developmental, ultrastructural, and physiological characteristics from the left atrium. Although LAA anatomy is highly variable, it can be categorized into 4 types: cactus, cauliflower, chicken wing, and windsock. The cauliflower type is associated with higher stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular AF. Although the cornerstone of therapy to prevent embolic strokes from AF has been anticoagulation with thrombin inhibitors, a large group of patients are unable to tolerate anticoagulation due to bleeding. This has led to the development and advancement of multiple surgical and percutaneous LAA closure devices to prevent embolic cerebrovascular accidents without the need for anticoagulation. In this article, we discuss the outcomes of major studies that utilized surgical LAA occlusion and its effectiveness. Furthermore, we summarize nonsurgical methods of LAA closure and future directions regarding LAA closure.

Clinical features of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation: the role of the endovascular left atrial appendage closure

Clinical features of heart failure in patients with atrial fibrillation: the role of the endovascular left atrial appendage closure

Left atrial appendage closure in a patient with hemophiliaC. An option or the only antithrombotic treatment for patients with a rare bleeding disorder?

Left atrial appendage closure in a patient with hemophiliaC. An option or the only antithrombotic treatment for patients with a rare bleeding disorder?

Outcomes and Readmissions after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Octogenarians: A Contemporary Analysis

Introduction and ObjectivesThe outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with the Watchman device in octogenarians are unknown as this population was underrepresented in major clinical trials. This study aims at examining the causes and outcomes of readmission after LAAO. DesignA retrospective cohort study based on the National Readmission Database in the United States. Settings and ParticipantPatients aged ≥80 years, admitted between January 2016 and December 2018, with the primary diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or flutter or who had LAAO were included in the study. Patients who died during index admission were excluded. MethodsWe used the National Readmission Database and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes to identify study participants. Data analysis was performed through Stata, version 17. Univariate and multivariate aggression analysis was used to adjust for confounders using Student t tests and χ2 tests. ResultsWe identified 491,329 patients on anticoagulation (AC) and 2030 patients who underwent LAA closure. Neither group differed regarding hypertension, previous myocardial infarction, or valvular heart disease. All-cause readmissions were lower in the LAAO group at 45 days (adjusted P < .01). All-cause readmissions at 45 and 90 days were similar in both groups. There was an increase in gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) readmissions in the LAAO at 45 (P < .01), 90 (P < .01), and 180 (P < .01) days. There was no difference in GIB readmission between the 2 groups. There was no also difference in stroke or intracranial hemorrhage rates between the 2 groups throughout the follow-up period. Conclusion and ImplicationsIn octogenarians who received LAAO, the rate of GIB increased during the first 6 months after the procedure; however, it was not different from that of AC after that. Special attention should be given to the antithrombotic regimens after LAAO to avoid bleeding in this vulnerable patient population.

The Emerging Role of Intracardiac Echocardiography (ICE) in Left Atrial Appendage Closure (LAAC).

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool to guide percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Herein, we review an imaging protocol for ICE-guided LAAC and discuss the evidence for its use. Standardized imaging protocols have been proposed but have not been fully validated. ICE imaging yields similar procedural and clinical outcomes when compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to guide LAAC. Despite benefits of avoiding general anesthesia, TEE, and multiple physicians for LAAC procedures, ICE imaging remains under-utilized. Novel ICE catheters with 3D imaging capabilities may improve accuracy and efficiency of LAAC device implantation. ICE guidance is feasible, safe, and effective for LAAC. As the field evolves, further studies will be necessary to assess this technological advancement in imaging guidance.

Subocclusion of the Left Main Coronary Artery During Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Subocclusion of the Left Main Coronary Artery During Surgical Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Computed Tomography Scan Evidence for Left Atrial Appendage Short-Term Remodeling Following Percutaneous Occlusion: Impact of Device Oversizing.

Background The interrelationships between left atrial appendage (LAA) dimensions and device following implantation are unknown. We aimed to analyze the impact of Watchman device implantation on LAA dimensions following its percutaneous closure and potential predictors of remodeling. Methods and Results All consecutive LAA closure procedures performed at 2 centers between November 2017 and December 2020 were included in the WATCH-DUAL (Watchman 2.5 Versus Watchman FLX in a Dual-Center Left Atrial Appendage Closure Cohort) registry. This study included patients who had pre- and postintervention computed tomography scan analysis. The LAA and device dimensions were measured in a centralized core lab by 3-dimensional computed tomography scan reconstruction methods, focusing on the device landing zone. This analysis included 104 patients (age, 76.0 [range, 72.0-83.0] years; 72% men; 53% Watchman FLX; 47% Watchman 2.5). The baseline characteristics were comparable between Watchman 2.5 and Watchman FLX groups, except for the higher use of oversizing in the latter group. The median delay for computed tomography control was 49 (range, 43-64) days. The landing zone area (median, 446 [range, 363-523] versus 290 [222-366] mm2; P<0.001) and minimal diameter (median, 23.0 [range, 20.7-24.8] versus 16.7 [14.7-19.4] mm; P<0.001) significantly increased after implantation. The absolute (median, 157 [range, 98-220] versus 85 [18-148] mm2, P<0.001) and relative (median, 50% [range, 32%-79%] versus 26% [4%-50%]; P<0.001) increases in landing zone area were more pronounced in patients with oversized device. Baseline LAA dimensions were smaller, landing zone eccentricity larger, and oversized device more frequent in patients with significant overexpansion compared with the others. Conclusions LAA dimensions increased at the site of the Watchman prosthesis after implantation, suggesting a local positive remodeling after the procedure. This phenomenon was more pronounced in the case of oversized devices.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Watchman vs Amulet Devices: Similarities and Differences.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has shown to be non-inferior to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). LAAC is now becoming a leading method for stroke prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation and are unable to tolerate OAC. There are currently two FDA-approved endocardial closure devices, namely, the Watchman FLX and Amplatzer Amulet. Current data highlights that both devices offer similar efficacy and safety for LAAC. While the two devices differ in terms of intraprocedural complication rates, they offer similar short- to long-term outcomes in regard to peri-device leaks, device-related thrombosis, and mortality. With similar risk and safety profiles, both devices are indicated for patients who are unable to tolerate OAC. Newer clinical studies are directed to establish the efficacy of both devices as the primary method for stroke prevention in AF as an alternate to OAC.

Less major bleeding and higher hemoglobin after left atrial appendage closure in high-risk patients: Data from a long-term, longitudinal, two-center observational study.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is a mechanical alternative for stroke prevention in patients at risk who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulation (OAC). Our hypothesis was that the reduction of anticoagulation following LAAC results in a decrease of bleeding events and a rise in serum hemoglobin in a high-risk collective of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Bleeding events, use of erythrocyte concentrates, anticoagulation, embolic events, and serum hemoglobin levels before and following LAAC were compared over more than 4 years. Seventy-five patients (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score 4.4 ± 1.7, HAS-BLED score 4.6 ± 1.1) were analyzed. Before LAAC (observation period 1.8 ± 1.8 years), 67 patients experienced 1.8 ± 1.4 bleeding events (0.9 ± 1.3 major) per year resulting in 0.7 ± 1.3 transfusions per year. After LAAC (2.6 ± 2.0 years), 26 patients (p < .0001 vs. before) had 0.6 ± 2.1 bleeding events (p < .0001), 0.2 ± 0.6 major bleedings (p < .0001) and received 0.6 ± 1.9 transfusions per year (p = .671). Fourteen patients had stroke before and 3 after LAAC (p = .008). Serum hemoglobin increased from initially 9.9 ± 3.0to 11.9 ± 2.3 g/dL until the end of follow-up (p = .0005). Adverse embolic events did not differ before and after LAAC in our collective. In this clinical relevant cohort of AF patients with high risk for stroke and intolerance to OAC, we show that LAAC was able to reduce the rate of stroke and bleeding events, which translated into a rising serum hemoglobin concentration.

Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Peri-Device Leak After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) reduces the risk of thromboembolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. Peri-device leak (PDL) after LAAC may affect the subsequent risk of thromboembolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of PDL after LAAC. We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies reporting outcomes of PDL after LAAC from inception through October 2022. The primary outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, and device-related thrombus. Outcomes were pooled using random-effects models. We used I2 statistics to assess statistical heterogeneity; I2 >50% considered significant heterogeneity. This study included 54,279 patients from 11 studies (6 observational, 2 nonrandomized controlled trials [non-RCTs] primary results, 2 RCT post hoc analyses, and 1 analysis combining 2 RCTs data). PDL was associated with a significant increase in the composite outcome of stroke, TIA, or SE (odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.52, p=0.03, I2=43%) as compared with cases with no PDL. There were no significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, ischemic stroke, TIA, or device-related thrombus. In conclusion, PDL after LAAC is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism (composite stroke, TIA, or SE) without impacting mortality.

Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Closure and Oral Anticoagulation After Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) proved to be noninferior to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in nonablated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LAAC with those of OAC therapy in patients after AF ablation. This study included patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) of AF between January 2016 and December 2020. The cohort was divided into CA+LAAC and CA+OAC, where propensity score matching was used to select controls, and each group contained 682 subjects. The enrolled patients' mean age was 70.34 ± 8.32years, and 47.3% were female; their CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.48 ± 1.17. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. After a 3-year mean follow-up, the incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.25 and 1.10 and that of major bleeding events was 0.65 and 1.72 per 100 patient-years in the CA+LAAC, and CA+OAC groups, respectively. The rate of thromboembolisms and major adverse cardiovascular events was similar between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.162, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.665 to 2.030, p=0.598, HR 0.711, 95% CI 0.502 to 1.005, p=0.053); however, that of major bleeding and all-cause death was significantly reduced with LAAC (HR 0.401, 95% CI 0.216 to 0.746, p=0.004, HR 0.528, 95% CI 0.281 to 0.989, p=0.046). There was no significant difference in periprocedural complications (p >0.05) and the rate of AF recurrence (OAC vs LAAC: 39.44% vs 40.62%, p=0.658). LAAC is a reasonable and safer alternative to OAC therapy in high-risk patients after AF ablation.

Nonprocedural bleeding after left atrial appendage closure versus direct oral anticoagulants: A subanalysis of the randomized PRAGUE-17 trial.

Observational studies have shown low bleeding rates in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated by left atrial appendage closure (LAAC); however, data from randomized studies are lacking. This study compared bleeding events among patients with AF treated by LAAC and nonvitamin K anticoagulants (NOAC). The Prague-17 trial was a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial that compared LAAC to NOAC in high-risk AF patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of a cardioembolic event, cardiovascular death, and major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH). The trial enrolled 402 patients (201 per arm), and the median follow-up was 3.5 (IQR 2.6-4.2) years. Bleeding occurred in 24 patients (29 events) and 32 patients (40 events) in the LAAC and NOAC groups, respectively. Six of the LAAC bleeding events were procedure/device-related. In the primary intention-to-treat analysis, LAAC was associated with similar rates of ISTH major or CRNMB (sHR 0.75, 95% CI 0.44-1.27, p = 0.28), but with a reduction in nonprocedural major or CRNMB (sHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31-0.97, p = 0.039). This reduction for nonprocedural bleeding with LAAC was mainly driven by a reduced rate of CRNMB (sHR for major bleeding 0.69, 95% CI 0.34-1.39, p = .30; sHR for CRNMB 0.43, 95% CI 0.18-1.03, p = 0.059). History of bleeding was a predictor of bleeding during follow-up. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common bleeding site in both groups. During the 4-year follow-up, LAAC was associated with less nonprocedural bleeding. The reduction is mainly driven by a decrease in CRNMB.

Effectiveness and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Moderate Conscious Sedation: One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes

Effectiveness and Safety of Same-Day Discharge After Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Moderate Conscious Sedation: One-Year Follow-Up Outcomes

Thoracoscopic surgery for atrial fibrillation in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava: a case report

BackgroundA persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is an anomaly of the thoracic venous system that flows into the right atrium via an enlarged coronary sinus. When performing pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial appendage closure, the PLSVC can interfere with the procedure. We have performed thoracoscopic surgery on such a patient and would like to share our experience.Case presentationThe patient is a 70-year-old male with a 1-year history of repeated tachycardia with chest discomfort due to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed the presence of a PLSVC that flows into the right atrium. The hepatic vein flows directly into the right atrium, whereas the inferior vena cava enters the thoracic cavity next to the descending aorta and flows into the parazygous vein and PLSVC. We performed thoracoscopic stapler closure of the left atrial appendage and epicardial clamp-isolation of the pulmonary veins and the PLSVC. There was concern that the PLSVC would interfere with the visual field needed to perform the procedure. We carefully removed the adhesions to the surrounding tissue and provided mobility to the PLSVC and expanded it ventrally. As a result, the procedure could be performed safely and without complications.ConclusionsOur results demonstrate that in cases where catheter ablation is difficult for anatomical reasons, thoracoscopic stapler closure of the LAA and epicardial clamp-isolation of pulmonary veins may be a viable option.