Least-squares Mean Difference Research Articles

Health-related quality-of-life analysis from KEYNOTE-590: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.

In the KEYNOTE-590 study, first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy provided statistically significant improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate compared with chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Prespecified health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) outcomes are reported. Change from baseline to week 18 in the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status/QoL (GHS/QoL) and QLQ-Esophageal cancer module (OES18) dysphagia, pain, and reflux scales were evaluated. The HRQoL analysis included 730 patients who received treatment and completed ≥1 HRQoL assessment. Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to week 18 was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 reflux scales. The QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (LSM difference, -5.54; 95% CI, -10.93 to -0.16) and pain (LSM difference, -2.94; 95% CI, -5.86 to -0.02) scales favored pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy over placebo plus chemotherapy. Median time to confirmed deterioration (TTD) was similar between treatment groups for QLQ-C30 GHS/QoL and physical functioning and QLQ-OES18 dysphagia and reflux scales. Compared with chemotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy prolonged median TTD, as seen on the QLQ-OES18 pain scale (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95). The use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy maintained HRQoL at week 18 relative to baseline and was comparable with placebo plus chemotherapy. These HRQoL results together with published reports of efficacy, support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer. NCT03189719.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation focusing on patients with neuropathic pain in the upper limb: a randomized sham-controlled parallel trial

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of navigation-guided repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the primary motor cortex in patients with neuropathic pain in the upper limb. This randomized, blinded, sham-controlled, parallel trial included a rTMS protocol (10-Hz, 2000 pulses/session) consisting of five daily sessions, followed by one session per week for the next seven weeks. Pain intensity, as well as pain-related disability, quality of life, and psychological status, were assessed. For the primary outcome, pain intensity was measured daily using a numerical rating scale as a pain diary. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to the active rTMS or sham-stimulation groups. In the primary outcome, the decrease (least square [LS] mean ± standard error) in the weekly average of a pain diary at week 9 compared to the baseline was 0.84 ± 0.31 in the active rTMS group and 0.58 ± 0.29 in the sham group (LS mean difference, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, − 0.60 to 1.13). There was no significant effect on the interaction between the treatment group and time point. Pain-related disability score improved, but other assessments showed no differences. No serious adverse events were observed. This study did not show significant pain relief; however, active rTMS tended to provide better results than sham. rTMS has the potential to improve pain-related disability in addition to pain relief.Clinical Trial Registration number: jRCTs052190110 (20/02/2020).

Dupilumab for COPD with Blood Eosinophil Evidence of Type 2 Inflammation

BackgroundDupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation, has shown efficacy and safety in a phase 3 trial involving patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and type 2 inflammation and an elevated risk of exacerbation. Whether the findings would be confirmed in a second phase 3 trial was unclear.MethodsIn a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with COPD who had a blood eosinophil count of 300 cells per microliter or higher to receive subcutaneous dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations. Key secondary end points, analyzed in a hierarchical manner to adjust for multiplicity, included the changes from baseline in the prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at weeks 12 and 52 and in the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; scores range from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating better quality of life) total score at week 52.ResultsA total of 935 patients underwent randomization: 470 were assigned to the dupilumab group and 465 to the placebo group. As prespecified, the primary analysis was performed after a positive interim analysis and included all available data for the 935 participants, 721 of whom were included in the analysis at week 52. The annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.06) with dupilumab and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.60) with placebo; the rate ratio as compared with placebo was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.82; P<0.001). The prebronchodilator FEV1 increased from baseline to week 12 with dupilumab (least-squares mean change, 139 ml [95% CI, 105 to 173]) as compared with placebo (least-squares mean change, 57 ml [95% CI, 23 to 91]), with a significant least-squares mean difference at week 12 of 82 ml (P<0.001) and at week 52 of 62 ml (P=0.02). No significant between-group difference was observed in the change in SGRQ scores from baseline to 52 weeks. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups and consistent with the established profile of dupilumab.ConclusionsIn patients with COPD and type 2 inflammation as indicated by elevated blood eosinophil counts, dupilumab was associated with fewer exacerbations and better lung function than placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; NOTUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04456673.)

Effects of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from the randomized phase 3 ORIENT-15 study

In ORIENT-15 study, sintilimab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvement on overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report effect of sintilimab plus chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced ESCC. From December 14, 2018 to August 28, 2022, HRQoL was evaluated in all randomized patients using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 items (QLQ-OES18), and visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQol five-dimensional five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Mean scores of each scale were described by treatment group through week 60. Least-squares mean (LSM) score change from baseline through week 24 were analyzed using the mixed-model repeated-measures method. Time to the first onset of deterioration (TTD) and OS for each scale were estimated. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03748134. As of August 28, 2022, 689 of 690 enrolled patients were assessed for HRQoL analysis (sintilimab group: 340, placebo group: 349). Median follow-up was 32.2 months. Differences in LSM favored sintilimab over placebo for QLQ-C30 social functioning (LSM difference: 3.06, 95% CI: 0.55 to 5.57; P=0.0170), pain (-2.24, 95% CI:-4.30 to-0.17; P=0.0337), fatigue (-2.24, 95% CI:-4.46 to-0.02; P=0.0479), constipation (-3.27, 95% CI-5.49 to-1.05; P=0.0039), QLQ-OES18 pain (-1.77, 95% CI-3.11 to-0.43; P=0.0097), trouble swallowing saliva (-2.09, 95% CI:-3.77 to-0.42; P=0.0146), and choked when swallowing (-3.23, 95% CI:-5.60 to-0.86; P=0.0076). TTD favored sintilimab over placebo for QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94, P=0.0104), and trouble swallowing saliva (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, P<0.0001). Improved OS were observed in patients with better performance in several functioning and symptom scales of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-QES18. The statistically significant differences of several HRQoL scales and improvements in delayed deterioration observed in our study further support the use of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. This study was funded by Innovent Biologics and was co-funded by Eli Lilly.

Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in Japanese pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study

BackgroundWe investigated the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years old with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis not adequately controlled with existing therapies. MethodsIn this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study, patients received dupilumab (n = 30) or placebo (n = 32) with concomitant topical corticosteroids for 16 weeks, then all patients received dupilumab from 16 to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score from baseline (EASI-75) to Week 16. Key secondary endpoints included changes in EASI score, proportion of patients with investigator global assessment (IGA) scores of 0/1, and changes in worst daily itch numerical rating scale (NRS) scores (evaluated in patients aged ≥6 to <12 years [n = 35]). ResultsAt Week 16, more patients achieved EASI-75 with dupilumab than placebo (43.3% vs 18.8%; P = 0.0304), and the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percent change in EASI scores at Week 16 of dupilumab vs placebo was –39.4% (P = 0.0003). However, no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving IGA scores of 0/1 at Week 16 with dupilumab versus placebo were seen (10.0% vs 9.4%; P = 0.8476). The percent change in worst daily itch NRS scores at Week 16 was higher with dupilumab (LSM difference: –33.3%; nominal P = 0.0117). Dupilumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. ConclusionsDupilumab showed consistent efficacy and was well tolerated in Japanese patients aged ≥6 months to <18 years with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis previously insufficiently controlled with existing therapies.

PSIII-13 Putative metabolites for sow lifetime opportunity and production traits

Abstract Identifying females with favorable lifetime born alive (opportunity) and weaned (wn; production) traits requires extended observation. Estimate of lifetime (4 parities) difference in the economic margin over genetic cost between a high producing female (48 pigs weaned; wn) and a low producing female (31 wn) is approximately $1,000. Determining metabolic compounds present from females with favorable or unfavorable longevity traits may provide profiles that could be assessed in younger females prior to entry within the breeding system to indicate their potential productivity. Females within the USMARC breeding system were retained through four parities then harvested between 12 to 15 d following their post-weaning estrus. Liver, skeletal muscle, and subcutaneous adipose tissues were collected and stored at -80° C for later analyses. Females were categorically identified by the level of opportunity (born alive; ba) and production (wn) over their lifetime. Females with consistent opportunity and production traits at each parity were categorized as high (H; 61 ba), medium (M; 50 ba), or low (L; 39 ba) opportunity and H (50 wn), M (42 wn), or L (34 wn) production resulting in six categories (HH, HL, MH, ML, LH, LL). Tissue extracts were subjected to positive mode UPLC-MS and numerous features were detected. Using Progenesis Q software features were annotated and those with a fold-change ≥ 2.0 and P &amp;lt; 0.05 by category were then tested using a mixed model in SAS to determine LS Mean differences of raw abundances among the six categories. Of those compounds tested in SAS, a significance threshold was set at P &amp;lt; 0.01 as a false discovery adjustment. Within liver 877 compounds were analyzed with 152 yielding a significant (P &amp;lt; 0.01) categorical effect. Of those, 43 compounds predominantly identified either HH or LL from other categories. Within skeletal muscle 359 compounds were subjected to mixed models, 221 compounds had significance for a category effect, and 105 compounds were predominantly different for HH or LL from all other categories. Within adipose tissue, 406 compounds were submitted to mixed model testing, 186 compounds had a categorical effect with 44 compounds predominantly different for HH or LL categories. Annotation of these compounds suggest differences in metabolites associated with, but not limited to, bacteria by-products (pradmicin, adifolin, lactobacillic acid), alkyloids, sapogenins, amino acids (lysine, tyrosine), minerals (calcium, copper), lipids (sphingomyelin), and fatty acids (mono-, di-, tri-acylglycerol). Future confirmation and evaluation of these metabolites in young pre-breeding females will need to be done. Establishing a metabolic profile panel that could discern young pre-breeding gilts with a likelihood of becoming a LL female will improve economic productivity and animal welfare concerns.

SINGLE-PILL COMBINATION OF THIRD-DOSE TRIPLE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY VERSUS STANDARD-DOSE MONOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION

Objective: The study compared the single-pill combination of third-dose triple antihypertensive therapy (amlodipine 1.67 mg, losartan potassium 16.67 mg, chlorthalidone 4.17 mg) with standard-dose monotherapy (amlodipine 5mg) in reducing systolic blood pressure (SBP) among patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Design and method: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group phase III noninferiority trial. Eligible participants aged &gt;=19 years with SBP &gt;=140 to &lt;180 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) &lt;110 mmHg after 4 weeks placebo run-in period were randomized to either 8 weeks of combination therapy (ALC) or monotherapy (A5). The primary efficacy endpoint, noninferiority in SBP reduction, was assessed using the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval (97.5%CI) for the difference in SBP reduction between treatments at week 8, with a noninferiority margin of 3 mmHg. Results: The efficacy endpoint analysis included 167 and 166 in the ALC and A5 groups. After 8 weeks, the ALC and A5 groups showed SBP reductions of -18.3±11.9 and -19.4±12.5, respectively, and DBP reductions of -8.5±7.3 and -9.8±7.0 mmHg, respectively (p&gt;0.025 for both). The unadjusted least-square mean (LSM) difference in SBP reduction was 1.15 mmHg, with a 97.5%CI upper limit of 3.51 mmHg. More female patients were allocated to the A5 than the ALC groups (47.6% vs. 34.1%, p=0.012). Both treatments exhibited greater SBP reduction in women than men (-21.4 vs. -16.8 mmHg, p=0.009 in the ALC group; -21.9 vs -17.1 mmHg, p&lt;0.001 in the A5 group). The sex-adjusted LSM difference in SBP reduction was 0.46 mmHg, with a 97.5%CI upper limit of 2.79 mmHg. The response rates (achieving SBP &lt;140 mmHg and DBP &lt;90 mmHg and/or reduction of SBP &gt;=20 mmHg and/or DBP &gt;=10 mmHg from baseline) were 73.1% for ALC and 75.3% for A5 groups (p=0.633). Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 3 patients receiving ALC and 5 patients receiving A5, all being mild. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the single-pill third-dose triple antihypertensive therapy is comparable to standard-dose monotherapy in reducing SBP over 8 weeks without increasing ADRs, providing further support for the low-dose combination antihypertensive drugs in the initial treatment of hypertension. (NCT05362110)

P127 Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of a Proposed Biosimilar MSB11456 with Tocilizumab Reference Product in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of a Randomized Double-Blind Study

Abstract Background/Aims Tocilizumab is an anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody indicated for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. MSB11456 is a proposed biosimilar to US-licensed tocilizumab and EU-approved tocilizumab. It has already shown equivalent pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles to these products given subcutaneously (SC) as a single dose in healthy volunteers. This Phase III, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, multiple fixed-dose, parallel group study compared efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab administered SC in moderate-to-severe RA patients. Methods Patients were randomised to 162mg MSB11456 or EU-approved tocilizumab for 24 weeks (W). At W24, patients receiving EU-approved tocilizumab were re-randomised to continue treatment or switch to MSB11456 for up to W52. Safety evaluations were conducted up to W63. A change from baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 Joint Count-ESR (DAS28-ESR) at W24 was analysed, as the primary efficacy endpoint, using analysis of covariance to determine the least squares mean (LSM) difference between MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab; equivalence was considered if the 90% confidence interval (CI) was entirely within the FDA equivalence interval -0.6 to 0.5. Secondary endpoints were 20% improvement in ACR core set measures at W24 and DAS28-ESR at W12. Additional endpoints included ACR50/70, change in DAS28-CRP, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Indexes, evaluation of immunogenicity up to W55 and safety up to W63. Results Clinically relevant LSM decreases from baseline in DAS28-ESR were observed from W2 up to W24 with both treatments. The 90% CI for LSM difference in the change from baseline in DAS28-ESR between treatments was fully included within the predefined equivalence interval, which demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab (Table 1). Other efficacy endpoint analyses supported this conclusion. No discernible patterns in the nature or frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were identified to suggest a difference between drugs. Anti-drug antibodies incidence was similar among treatment arms. Switching from EU-approved tocilizumab to MSB11456 had no clinically relevant impact on efficacy or safety. Conclusion Equivalent efficacy, immunogenicity and safety profiles of MSB11456 and EU-approved tocilizumab were demonstrated in moderate-to-severe RA patients, confirming equivalence between MSB11456 and the EU-approved tocilizumab. Disclosure A. Zubrzycka-Sienkiewicz: None. M. Misterska-Skora: None. M. Socik-Pojawa: None. K. Klama: None. M. Ullman: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. C. Petit-Frere: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. A. Illes: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. P. Baker: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. J. Monnet: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. J. Morais: Other; Employee of Fresenius Kabi SwissBioSim - Sponsor of the study. J. Brzezicki: None.

Baseline Characteristics and mNAPSI Change from Baseline Scores Through Month12 for Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Concomitant Nail Psoriasis Treated with Biologics from PSoHO.

Nail psoriasis is highly prevalent among patients with psoriasis yet remains one of the most challenging areas to treat. To better understand the treatment landscape for psoriatic nail disease, more studies are needed that compare the effectiveness of different biologics for patients with nail psoriasis. This study contributes to this objective by directly comparing the effectiveness of approved biologics in improving nail psoriasis for patients up to month12 in a real-world setting. Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year, prospective, non-interventional cohort study of adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. This study assessed the change in modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) score from baseline to months3, 6 and 12 for 763 patients and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics versus other approved biologics, as well as ixekizumab versus secukinumab, guselkumab, risankizumab and adalimumab. Comparative adjusted analyses used frequentist model averaging (FMA). Least square mean difference (LSMD) in mNAPSI scores are presented as observed. Irrespective of the severity of nail psoriasis at baseline, the anti-IL-17A cohort had greater mean mNAPSI reductions from baseline compared to the other biologics cohort through month12, reaching significance at months3 and 6 in the adjusted analysis. For patients with moderate-to-severe nail psoriasis, ixekizumab showed numerically higher mean reductions in mNAPSI scores compared to all other studied biologics, reaching significance versus guselkumab at all timepoints and risankizumab at month6. This real-world study showed that patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and any severity of concomitant nail involvement had significantly faster and more substantial improvements in nail psoriasis up to month6 in the anti-IL-17A cohort compared to the other biologics cohort. Of the individual biologics studied, ixekizumab showed the highest numerical improvements in nail psoriasis at month12. EUPAS24207.

The impact of severe obesity on image quality and ventricular function assessment in echocardiography and cardiac MRI

This study sought to evaluate the impact of severe obesity on image quality and ventricular function assessment in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MRI) and trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE). We studied 100 consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated cardiac MRI and TTE studies within 12 months between July 2017 and December 2020; 50 (28 females and 22 males; 54.5 ± 18.7 years) with normal body mass index (BMI) (18.5–25 kg/m2) and 50 (21 females and 29 males; 47.2 ± 13.3 years) with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). MRI and TTE image quality scores were compared within and across cohorts using a linear mixed model. Categorical left (LVF) and right (RVF) ventricular function were compared using Cohens Kappa statistic. Mean BMI for normal weight and obese cohorts were 22.2 ± 1.7 kg/m2 and 50.3 ± 5.9 kg/m2, respectively. Out of a possible 93 points, mean MRI image quality score was 91.5 ± 2.5 for patients with normal BMI, and 88.4 ± 5.5 for patients with severe obesity; least square (LS) mean difference 3.1, p = 0.460. TTE scores were 64.2 ± 13.6 for patients with normal BMI and 46.0 ± 12.9 for patients with severe obesity, LS mean difference 18.2, p < 0.001. Ventricular function agreement between modalities was worse in the obese cohort for both LVF (72% vs 80% agreement; kappa 0.53 vs 0.70, obese vs. normal BMI), and RVF (58% vs 72% agreement, kappa 0.18 vs 0.34, obese vs. normal BMI). Severe obesity had limited impact on cardiac MRI image quality, while obesity significantly degraded TTE image quality and ventricular function agreement with MRI.

Safety and Efficacy of Metabolic Modulation With Ninerafaxstat in Patients With Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

BackgroundIn nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (nHCM), there are no approved medical therapies. Impaired myocardial energetics is a potential cause of symptoms and exercise limitation. Ninerafaxstat, a novel cardiac mitotrope, enhances cardiac energetics. ObjectivesThis study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ninerafaxstat in nHCM. MethodsPatients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg, ejection fraction ≥50%, and peak oxygen consumption <80% predicted were randomized to ninerafaxstat 200 mg twice daily or placebo (1:1) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability, with efficacy outcomes also assessed as secondary endpoints. ResultsA total of 67 patients with nHCM were enrolled at 12 centers (57 ± 11.8 years of age; 55% women). Serious adverse events occurred in 11.8% (n = 4 of 34) in the ninerafaxstat group and 6.1% (n = 2 of 33) of patients in the placebo group. From baseline to 12 weeks, ninerafaxstat was associated with significantly better VE/Vco2 (ventilatory efficiency) slope compared with placebo with a least-squares (LS) mean difference between the groups of −2.1 (95% CI: −3.6 to −0.6; P = 0.006), with no significant difference in peak VO2 (P = 0.90). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score was directionally, though not significantly, improved with ninerafaxstat vs placebo (LS mean 3.2; 95% CI: −2.9 to 9.2; P = 0.30); however, it was statistically significant when analyzed post hoc in the 35 patients with baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score ≤80 (LS mean 9.4; 95% CI: 0.3-18.5; P = 0.04). ConclusionsIn symptomatic nHCM, novel drug therapy targeting myocardial energetics was safe and well tolerated and associated with better exercise performance and health status among those most symptomatically limited. The findings support assessing ninerafaxstat in a phase 3 study.

Cognitive–behavioral therapy for patients with somatoform disorders: A pilot preliminary randomized controlled trial

Background and objective: Cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) for somatoform disorders (SFDs) is understudied in China. Western findings may not be applicable to Chinese culture. This preliminary study evaluated the efficacy of CBT for patients in China, relative to treatment-as-usual (TAU). Methods: Seventy patients with SFDs randomly received either combined CBT and TAU (CBT + TAU), or TAU alone between January 2018 to May 2019. The CBT + TAU group received 12 weekly individual 50-minute CBT sessions. Participants were blindly assessed at 4 timepoints (baseline, week 6, end of treatment: week 12; 12 weeks post-treatment: week 24) using the following outcome measures: SQSS (Self-screening Questionnaire for Somatic Symptoms); PHQ-15 (Patient-Health-Questionnaire-15) and the WI (Whiteley Index); GAD-7 (General Anxiety Disorder-7); HAMD-17 (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17); Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS); Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); and the Short Form of Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF). The primary endpoint was the difference between the SQSS total score at week 24 and the baseline. A mixed model for repeated measures was used to analyze inter- and intra-group changes from the baseline. Results: At week 24, The least-squares mean (LSM) change of the total score on the SQSS was −18.87 points and −9.69 points, respectively in the CBT + TAU group and in the TAU group (LSM difference, −9.18 points; 95% confidence interval, −15.72 to −2.64; P = 0.0068). At week 24, the LSM changes from baseline in the WI, HAMD, PHQ15, FBIS and SDS total scores were significantly different between the two groups, however, there was no significant difference in the Q-LES-Q-SF. The SQSS of group effect sizes were 0.63 at 24 weeks. The dropout rates of the CBT + TAU and TAU groups were comparable (22.9% and 19.3%). Conclusions: These preliminary findings suggest that CBT may be helpful for improving the symptoms of patients with SFDs in China.

Proof-of-concept study exploring the effect of spesolimabin patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease with a considerable disease burden. Existing treatment options are limited and often suboptimal; a high unmet need exists for effective targeted therapies. To explore the effects of spesolimab treatment in patients with HS. This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled proof-of-clinical-concept (PoCC) study was conducted at 25 centres across 12 countries from 3 May 2021 to 21 April 2022. Patients had moderate-to-severe HS for ≥ 1 year before enrolment. Patients were randomized (2 : 1) to receive a loading dose of 3600-mg intravenous spesolimab (1200 mg at weeks 0, 1 and 2) or matching placebo, followed by maintenance with either 1200-mg subcutaneous spesolimab every 2 weeks from weeks 4 to 10 or matching placebo. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count at week 12. Secondary endpoints were the absolute change from baseline in the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), percentage change from baseline in draining tunnel (dT) count, the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of 0, absolute change from baseline in the revised Hidradenitis Suppurativa Area and Severity Index (HASI-R), the proportion of patients achieving Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR50), the proportion of patients with ≥ 1 flare (all at week 12) and patient-reported outcomes. In this completed trial, randomized patients (n = 52) received spesolimab (n = 35) or placebo (n = 17). The difference vs. placebo in least squares mean is reported. At week 12, the percentage change in total AN count was similar between treatment arms: -4.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) -31.7 to 23.4]. There was greater numerical improvement in the spesolimab arm, as measured by IHS4 (13.9, 95% CI -25.6 to -2.3); percentage change from baseline in dT count (-96.6%, 95% CI -154.5 to -38.8); and the proportion of patients achieving a dT count of 0 (18.3%, 95% CI -7.9 to 37.5). Spesolimab treatment also improved HASI-R and HiSCR50 vs. placebo. Spesolimab demonstrated a favourable safety profile, similar to that observed in trials in other diseases. This exploratory PoCC study supports the development of spesolimab as a new therapeutic option in HS.

Effect of loperamide on heart rhythm: Randomized, double-blind, controlled study in healthy adults

BackgroundExcessively high doses of loperamide (of up to 792 mg/day) have recently been associated with reports of cardiac events. However, no data currently demonstrate a direct effect of high doses of loperamide on the occurrence of cardiovascular abnormalities. ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the effects of loperamide on QT/corrected QT (QTc) intervals, electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology, and overall safety and tolerability at therapeutic and supratherapeutic exposures in healthy adults. MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, 4-way-crossover study enrolled 65 healthy adults to receive loperamide 8 mg (therapeutic dose), loperamide 48 mg (supratherapeutic dose), moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control), and placebo. Least square (LS) mean difference in change from baseline in Fridericia-corrected QT (ΔQTcF) intervals between loperamide (8 mg and 48 mg) and placebo with the 2-sided 90% CI was calculated for each time point. A noninferiority criterion of mean difference in ΔQTcF of 10 ms evaluated whether loperamide was noninferior to placebo. Treatment safety was assessed throughout the study. ResultsMost participants were female (66.2%) and white (95.4%). The age was 36.4 years (SD 9.77). The highest upper limit of the 2-sided 90% CI for LS mean difference in ΔQTcF between loperamide and placebo was 3.39 ms for the therapeutic dose and 9.28 ms for the supratherapeutic dose of loperamide, which were below the 10 ms threshold, thereby demonstrating noninferiority of loperamide to placebo. There were no statistically significant morphologic ECG changes after loperamide administration. There were no deaths, serious adverse events, or severe treatment-emergent adverse events. ConclusionSingle-dose loperamide at therapeutic (8 mg) and supratherapeutic (48 mg) doses do not show evidence of QTc prolongation of clinical concern in healthy participants. No new safety findings were identified.

Exploring Cariprazine’s Potential in Late-Stage Schizophrenia Treatment

IntroductionSchizophrenia is a chronic neuropsychiatric disorder that often requires long-term pharmacotherapy to manage symptoms and prevent relapse. There are important clinical differences between early-stage versus late-stage schizophrenia, like the predominant symptomatology. In later stages, negative, cognitive, and anxiety/depressive symptoms dominate the clinical picture, with relapses further potentiating the emergence of positive symptoms. Therefore, it is crucial to establish the efficacy of an antipsychotic medication in the later stages of schizophrenia as well. Cariprazine is a novel dopamine D3-preferring D3/D2 receptor partial agonist that has shown efficacy in treating schizophrenia across the symptom spectrum.ObjectivesThe aim of this poster is to present the findings of cariprazine’s efficacy in treating late-stage schizophrenia, especially in symptoms that are more commonly occurring in this phase of the disorder.MethodsThis poster reports the results of a post-hoc pooled analysis of three 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (NCT01104766, NCT01104779, NCT00694707) that assessed the efficacy of cariprazine in schizophrenia. The primary outcome was the change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Scores from baseline to endpoint. The analysis focused on patients with late-stage schizophrenia (defined as having an illness-duration of more than 15 years) who received cariprazine at doses between 1.5 mg/day to 6.0 mg/day. The changes in PANSS-derived Marder Factor Scores for Negative, Disorganised Thought (i.e., Cognitive) and Anxiety/Depression symptoms were further examined. The least square mean differences (LSMDs) between cariprazine and placebo groups were calculated using mixed-models for repeated measures (MMRM).ResultsAltogether, 128 placebo-, and 286 cariprazine-treated patients were identified as having schizophrenia for more than 15 years. The mean age of patients was about 45 years, while the mean illness-duration was about 24 years. The mean baseline PANSS scores were the same between the two groups. In the late-stage schizophrenia population, at Week 6, cariprazine yielded statistically significantly greater reductions on the PANSS Total Score (LSMD -6.7, p&lt;0.01). Cariprazine further showed superiority over placebo in reducing negative (LSMD -1.4, p&lt;0.05), disorganised thought (LSMD -1.3, p&lt;0.01), and anxiety/depression (LSMD -0.9, p&lt;0.05) symptoms.ConclusionsCariprazine showed efficacy in treating patients with late-stage schizophrenia. It improved overall schizophrenia symptoms, as well as the negative, cognitive and anxiety/depression symptoms that are more prevalent in this phase of the disorder.Disclosure of InterestP. Falkai Consultant of: Janssen-Cilag, AstraZeneca, Lilly, and Lundbeck, Speakers bureau of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Essex, GE Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Gedeon Richter, Janssen Cilag, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, and Takeda, R. Csehi Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc, K. Acsai Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc, G. Németh Employee of: Gedeon Richter Plc

The preponderance of major depressive disorder among women of reproductive age and the clinical utility of sertraline

IntroductionMajor depressive disorder (MDD) is twice as common in women than men and is more frequently reported during their reproductive years (Shi et al. Front. Psychiatr 2021; 12 589687). MDD affects up to 12.7% of pregnant women and can significantly impact foetal and maternal health. Hence, clinical practice guidelines recommend focused screening and expedited management of MDD in women (Guo et al. Obstet. Gynecol 2018; 131(4) 671-679). Despite this, drug labelling or dosing recommendations rarely account for gender or physiological differences between sexes, even though sex steroid level variations can impact drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and activity both pharmacokinetically and pharmacodynamically (Soldin et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009; 48(3): 143–157). Sertraline, an SSRI approved for the treatment of MDD, is one of the safer agents which can be given to childbearing or breastfeeding women (Cuomo et al. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2018; 17(7) 719-725). However, studies on the efficacy of sertraline for the treatment of MDD among women of childbearing age are limited.ObjectivesThis post-hoc pooled analysis evaluated the efficacy of sertraline in women with MDD, with a particular focus on women of reproductive age.MethodsA pooled data analysis of 8 short-term clinical studies of sertraline in persons with MDD (comprising 1600 participants from North America and Europe, of whom 947 were females; with moderate to severe MDD [mean±SD baseline HAM-D17 score was 23.73±3.58 for sertraline and 23.37± 3.47 for placebo]; sertraline dose, 50-200 mg) was performed. HAM-D17 total score was used to assess the efficacy of sertraline compared with placebo. The study period was 8 weeks. An MMRM method was used to analyse changes over time and ANCOVA to evaluate the change from baseline at week 8 with LOCF employed to manage missing data.ResultsThe analysis set consisted of 947 women (sertraline, 612; placebo, 335). The change from baseline in HAM-D17 total score was significantly higher for sertraline than for placebo at the end of 8 weeks (LS mean difference, 95% CI: -1.81 [-3.01, -0.62], p=0.0029, Figure 1A). This change from baseline was statistically significant starting from week 2 and increased over time (Week 2-8; Figure 2A).The analysis set for women of child-bearing age consisted of 572 participants aged 18-44 (sertraline, 359; placebo, 213) from 7 clinical studies. The change from baseline in HAM-D17 total score was significantly higher for sertraline than for placebo at the end of 8 weeks (LS mean difference, 95% CI: -2.08 [-3.52, -0.64], p=0.0047, Figure 1B). This change from baseline was statistically significant starting from week 2 (Figure 2B).Image:Image 2:Conclusions Significant improvement in HAM-D17 scores was observed in the analysis, suggesting that sertraline is efficacious in treating women with MDD, including those in the childbearing age.Disclosure of InterestA. Fagiolini Grant / Research support from: Angelini, Boheringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Consultant of: Angelini, Biogen, Boheringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Janssen, Mylan, Neuraxpharm, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Rovi, Sanofi Aventis, Viatris, Speakers bureau of: Angelini, Apsen, Biogen, Boheringer Ingelheim, Glaxo Smith Kline, Lundbeck, Janssen, Mylan, Neuraxpharm, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Rovi, Sanofi Aventis, Viatris, Vifor, M. Mariano Consultant of: Johnson &amp; Johnson, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Inc., Speakers bureau of: Viatris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Otsuka (Philippines) Pharmaceutical, Inc. H. Lundbeck A/S, Johnson &amp; Johnson Philippines, Inc., E. Biesheuvel Employee of: Viatris Inc. Netherlands, P. Purushottamahanti Employee of: Viatris Inc. India

Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in diabetic macular oedema (PHOTON): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial

A high-dose formulation of intravitreal aflibercept (8 mg) could improve treatment outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) by requiring fewer injections than the standard comparator, aflibercept 2 mg. We report efficacy and safety results of aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in patients with DMO. PHOTON was a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial performed at 138 hospitals and specialty retina clinics in seven countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with type 1 or 2 diabetes and centre-involved DMO. Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:1) to intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), or aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), following initial monthly dosing. From week 16, dosing intervals for the aflibercept 8 mg groups were shortened if patients met prespecified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48 (non-inferiority margin of 4 letters). Efficacy and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429503). Between June 29, 2020, and June 28, 2021, 970 patients were screened for eligibility. After exclusions, 660 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aflibercept 8q12 (n=329), 8q16 (n=164), or 2q8 (n=167); two patients were randomly assigned in error and did not receive treatment. 658 (99·7%) patients were treated and included in the full analysis set and safety analysis set (8q12 n=328, 8q16 n=163, and 2q8 n=167). Mean patient age was 62·3 years (SD 10·4). 401 (61%) patients were male. 471 (72%) patients were White. Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 demonstrated non-inferior BCVA gains to aflibercept 2q8 (BCVA mean change from baseline 8·8 letters [SD 9·0] in the 8q12 group, 7·9 letters [8·4] in the 8q16 group, and 9·2 letters [9·0] in the 2q8 group). The difference in least squares means was -0·57 letters (95% CI -2·26 to 1·13, p value for non-inferiority <0·0001) between 8q12 and 2q8 and -1·44 letters (-3·27 to 0·39, p value for non-inferiority 0·0031) between aflibercept 8q16 and 2q8. Proportions of patients with ocular adverse events in the study eye were similar across groups (8q12 n=104 [32%], 8q16 n=48 [29%], and 2q8 n=46 [28%]). Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals and could decrease treatment burden in patients with DMO. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Bayer.

Therapeutic Potential of Buprenorphine in Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence.

Emerging research indicates buprenorphine, used in management of opioid use disorder, has attracted interest for its potential in treating a variety of psychiatric conditions. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of buprenorphine in treating symptoms of depression. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted of several databases until April 25, 2022, for English language articles related to buprenorphine and its use in treating various mental health conditions. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores. Statistical analyses were performed using Cochrane RevMan 5. Of the 1,347 identified studies, six clinical trials were included. MADRS-10 least square mean difference (LSMD) inter-group assessment favored buprenorphine over placebo, but it lacked statistical significance. Similarly, MADRS scores as well as HAM-D inter-group assessment were in favor of buprenorphine, however, were not statistically significant. These findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for buprenorphine in treating depression, albeit with caution due to the observed lack of statistical significance and the potential for confounding factors. Preliminary evidence suggests potential efficacy of buprenorphine at lower doses in improving improving outcomes specifically related to depression. However, due to limitations in statistical significance and possible confounding factors, entail cautious interpretation. Further rigorous research is needed to investigate the long-term effects, optimal dosing, and determine the role of adjuvant drug therapy.

Safety and Efficacy of Switching SAR341402 Insulin Aspart and Originator Insulin Aspart vs Continuous Use of Originator Insulin Aspart in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: The GEMELLI X Trial.

SAR341402 insulin aspart (SAR-Asp) is a rapid-acting insulin analog developed as an interchangeable biosimilar to the marketed insulin aspart reference product (NovoLog; NN-Asp). GEMELLI X was a randomized controlled trial to assess outcomes with a biosimilar in line with the US Food and Drug Administration requirements for designation as an interchangeable biosimilar. This report assessed whether multiple switches between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp lead to equivalent safety and efficacy compared with continuous use of NN-Asp in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with multiple daily injections, using once-daily insulin glargine U100 (Lantus) as the basal insulin. This open-label randomized (1:1), parallel-group, phase 3 trial compared four × four weeks of alternating use of individually titrated SAR-Asp and NN-Asp (NN-Asp for first four weeks, SAR-Asp in last four weeks; switching group) vs 16 weeks of continuous use of NN-Asp (nonswitching group). End points included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, adverse events, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and change in efficacy parameters. Of the 210 patients randomized, 200 (95.5%) completed the trial. Patients assigned to switching group (n = 104) and nonswitching group (n = 106) showed similar safety and tolerability, including anti-insulin aspart antibody responses, adverse events, and hypoglycemia. At week 16, there was no relevant difference between switching vs nonswitching groups in the change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (least square [LS] mean difference = 0.05% [95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.13, 0.22]; 0.50 mmol/mol [-1.40, 2.39]), fasting plasma glucose (LS mean difference = 0.23 mmol/L [95% CI = -1.08, 1.53]; 4.12 mg/dL [-19.38, 27.62]), and changes in insulin dosages. Alternating doses of SAR-Asp and NN-Asp compared with continuous use of NN-Asp showed similar safety, immunogenicity, and clinical efficacy in adults with T1D. This study supports interchangeability between SAR-Asp and NN-Asp in T1D management.

Varenicline solution nasal spray for dry eye disease in Chinese patients: a randomized phase 3 trial

Dry eye disease has a high prevalence and exerts a significant negative effect on quality of life. In China, there are currently no available nasal sprays to promote natural tear production in patients with dry eye disease. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and safety of OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray versus vehicle in Chinese patients with dry eye disease. This was a randomized, multicenter, double-masked, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial conducted at ophthalmology departments in 20 hospitals across China (NCT05378945). Eligible patients had a diagnosis of dry eye disease based on patient symptoms, Eye Dryness Score (EDS), Schirmer's Test (with topical anesthesia) Score (STS), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 using an Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) to receive OC-01 0.6mg/mL twice daily (BID) or vehicle nasal spray. Participants, investigators, and sponsor were all masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects in the intention-to-treat population achieving ≥10mm improvement in STS from baseline at week4. In total, 340 patients were randomized from 21 July 2022 to 04 April 2023, 78.8% were female. Patients in the OC-01 group (n=176) had significantly higher achievement of ≥10mm improvement in STS (35.8% [n=63] versus 17.7% [n=29], stratified odds ratio: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.570-4.533, p=0.0002) and a significantly greater increase from baseline STS (least-squares mean difference [SE]: 3.87 [0.794], p<0.0001) at week 4 versus the vehicle group (n=164). In addition, OC-01 led to a numerically greater reduction in mean EDS from baseline at week 4 compared to the vehicle group (LS mean [SE] difference:-1.3 [2.20]; 95% CI:-5.64 to 2.99, p=0.5467). The most common adverse event was mild, transient sneezing (78% of OC-01 administrations). No serious adverse events related to nasal administration occurred. OC-01 (varenicline solution) nasal spray BID has clinically meaningful efficacy for reducing the signs (as measured by STS) and may improve the symptoms (as measured by EDS) of dry eye disease, with an excellent safety and tolerability profile, in the Chinese population. Jixing Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.