An account is given of the investigations on which were based much of the revision and, in particular, the new rating and voltage-drop tables, with Appendix 5, of the Tenth Edition of the I.E.E. Regulations for the Electrical Equipment of Buildings. The results of these investigations will, subject to the approval of the I.E.E. Council, be embodied in the next edition of the Regulations for the Electrical Equipment of Ships. This work, carried out partly at the National Physical Laboratory and partly at the E.R.A. auxiliary laboratory, dealt mainly with the effect of alternating current instead of direct current; of new modes of installation such as heavy cables in cleats, large groups of cables in conduits, ducts, chases, and surface wiring systems; the use of bare copper rods, long vertical runs in chases or shafts, etc.; and with the effect of steel bulkheads or steel-reinforced concrete structures in proximity to a. c. systems. While the earlier figures of the Ninth Edition were largely confirmed as general averages for certain conditions, a large number of new circumstances were investigated in detail, and the values observed were theoretically substantiated to the accuracy permitted by the conditions. The main purpose of the paper is to indicate the more accurate figures on which the necessarily condensed average tables of the Regulations are based, but the detailed results have also other applications.The experimental work is classified broadly in three sections, as follows:—(a) The current-carrying capacities of large cables run in air in various configurations.(b) Effects due to proximity of large cables to steel structures. In this section of the research, cables were run parallel to a steel plate, through holes in a steel plate, and through a steel-rod structure (to simulate reinforced concrete). Tests were made on both singlephase and 3-phase systems.(c) The properties of small rubber-insulated cables (sizes up to 0.5 sq. in. were included in some conditions of test) installed in a variety of methods such as in conduits, ducts, etc.The results of the investigations show that the reduction in current-carrying capacity due to skin effect and sheath losses is only serious in cables of 0.5 sq. in. conductor section and above. The increase in current rating due to better cooling conditions when cables are spaced farther apart may be partially or wholly counterbalanced in lead-covered cables by increase in sheath losses. In the case of bare copper rods run vertically, the temperature of which may be higher than that of insulated cables, it was found that excessive heating of rubber-insulated cables connected to the rods occurred near the joints.When cables carrying alternating current are run close to a steel plate the impedance is increased, and in some cases the effect on the voltage-drop may be sufficient to necessitate reducing the current rating of the cable below that based on the permissible temperature-rise. Also, in the case of a reihforced-concrete building, steelwork may be so heated owing to heavy currents in large cables as to cause serious expansion.
Read full abstract