Le Fort Fractures Research Articles

Evaluation and Management of the Patient with LeFort Facial Fractures

Fractures of the maxillary facial bones, also described as LeFort fractures, are potentially disfiguring and potentially lethal injuries that require careful examination and expectant management skills. This review article provides an overview of facial anatomy, fracture patterns, patient assessment, and the specific management of patients with LeFort fractures.

Orbital apex injury: trauma at the junction between the face and the cranium

Orbital apex injury is usually seen in multiply and severely injured patients who are subject to high-energy trauma. Orbital apex injury rarely occurs in isolation. By proximity, the face, the skull base, or their combination are the most likely regions to be injured in association with orbital apex trauma. The vast majority of these injuries occur as an extension of orbital, LeFort, naso-orbitoethmoid, panfacial, sphenoid, or temporal bone fractures of the skull. Complex osseous anatomic structures with intimately related multiple neurovascular organs make injuries to the orbital apex diagnostically and therapeutically challenging. Often other facial fractures extend into the orbital apex, or the orbital apex is damaged in conjunction with fractures of the skull base. Therefore abnormal imaging findings within the orbital apex may be indicators of traumatic injury to the entire junctional zone of face and cranium. In this article, we will giv ea n overview of normal CT anatomy, review clinical syndromes, which may indicate traumatic injury of the orbital apex and present an imaging strategy for evaluation of the orbital apex. # 2003 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Fractured zygomas.

The purpose of this paper is to provide a review, based on collected data, on the topic of "fractured zygoma". The review is presented under the headings of epidemiology, fracture patterns, treatment modalities and complications. Throughout the paper comparison is made with published data from around the world. A 10-year retrospective audit was undertaken of all hospitalized patients, at the Royal Hobart Hospital, Tasmania, who had sustained a fractured zygoma. All Le Fort fractures involving the zygoma were excluded. A total of 263 fractures was sustained, largely due to assault. Alcohol was a significant contributing factor. Tetrapod fractures were the most frequent type of fractures witnessed. Plating was the most frequently employed fixation. Inferior orbital nerve dysfunction and other complications were seen in 24.6% and 20.7% of follow-up cases, respectively. Open reductions were nearly 4 times more likely to be accompanied by complications if inferior orbital nerve dysfunction was excluded. Both closed and open reductions are good treatment modalities and were used in near equal numbers of patients. There is a higher incidence of postoperative facial deformity in the closed reduction group, but more complications related to the incisions in the open reduction group. Open reduction and internal fixation is advocated for the unstable, markedly displaced or comminuted fractures. Silastic sheeting is a favoured graft for repair of the associated orbital floor defects and is associated with few complications.

Taste and olfactory disturbances after upper and middle third facial fractures: a preliminary study.

To estimate smell and taste after traumatic disturbances, the authors questioned a sample of 92 patients who underwent surgical treatment for upper third and/or middle third facial fractures between January 1, 1988, and May 31, 1996, at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Italy. A total of 86 patients included in the study had a facial fracture sustained during a motor vehicle accident. Twenty-nine patients reported smell and/or taste after the traumatic disturbance. Of these 29 patients, 8 patients had hyposmia and/or anosmia without taste deficit, 10 patients had taste disturbances without smell loss, and 11 patients noted disturbance in both smell and taste. The authors encountered posttraumatic smell disturbances in 19 patients in their sample. Nasozygomatic-Le Fort fractures, fronto-orbital fractures, and pure Le Fort fractures were found to determine posttraumatic smell disturbances in these 19 patients. Nasal fractures, nasoorbital-ethmoidal fractures, ethmoidal fractures, frontal-Le Fort fractures, and nasal-Le Fort fractures did not determine any olfactory dysfunction. Posttraumatic hypogeusia and ageusia were found in 21 patients and was caused by nasozygomatic-Le Fort fractures, fronto-orbital fractures, and pure Le Fort fractures. The authors did not find any taste deficits after patients sustained other kinds of facial fractures. In the 11 patients observed, disturbances in both smell and taste were noted. Nasozygomatic-Le Fort fracture was the most common in these 11 patients. At 5 years' of follow-up, the results indicate that hypogeusia and hyposmia are connected with the etiology of fracture, the violence of the trauma, and the involvement of specific facial bone regions.

Long-term physical impairment and functional outcomes after complex facial fractures.

To develop an understanding of the expected functional outcomes after facial trauma, a retrospective cohort study of patients with complex facial fractures was conducted. A cohort of adults aged 18 to 55 years who were admitted to the R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center between July of 1986 and July of 1994 for treatment of a Le Fort midface fracture (resulting from blunt force) was retrospectively identified. Outcomes of interest included measures of general health status and psychosocial well being in addition to self-reported somatic symptoms. General health status was ascertained using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The Body Satisfaction Scale was used to define patient concerns about altered body image and shape. To determine whether complex maxillofacial trauma and facial fractures contributed to altered social interactions, the Social Avoidance and Distress scale was used. In addition, information about a patient, his or her injury, and its treatment were ascertained from the medical records. Using the methods described above, 265 patients with Le Fort fractures were identified. These individuals were matched to a similar group of 242 general injury patients. A total of 190 of the Le Fort patients (72 percent of those eligible for the study) and 144 (60 percent) general injury patients were successfully located, and long-term interview data were acquired.Le Fort fracture patients as a group had similar health status outcomes when compared with the group of general injury patients. However, when outcomes were examined by the complexity of the Le Fort fracture, the authors found that study subjects with severe, comminuted Le Fort injuries (group D) had significantly lower SF-36 scores (worse outcomes) for the two dimensions related to role limitations: role limitations due to physical problems and role limitations due to emotional problems (p < 0.05). SF-36 scores for all other dimensions except physical function were also lower for comminuted versus less complex Le Fort fractures, although differences were not statistically significant.Specifically, there was a direct relationship between severity of facial injury and patients reporting work disability. Of group C and D Le Fort patients (severely comminuted fractures) only 55 and 58 percent, respectively, had returned to work at the time of follow-up interview. These figures are significantly lower than the back-to-work percentage of patients with less severe facial injury (70 percent). When study participants were asked if they were experiencing specific somatic symptoms at the time of the interview that they had not experienced before the injury, a significantly larger percent of the Le Fort fracture patients (compared with the general injury patients) responded in the affirmative. Differences between the Le Fort fracture and general injury groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for all 11 symptoms. The percentage of patients reporting complaints increased with increasing complexity of facial fracture in the areas of visual problems, alterations in smell, difficulty with mastication, difficulty with breathing, and epiphora, and these differences reached statistical significance. Patients sustaining comminuted Le Fort facial fractures report poorer health outcomes than patients with less severe facial injury and substantially worse outcomes than population norms. It is also this severely injured population that reports the greatest percentage of injury-related disability, preventing employment at long-term follow-up. The long-term goal of centralized tertiary trauma treatment centers must be to return the patient to a productive, active lifestyle.

Aetiology and incidence of facial fractures sustained during sports: a prospective study of 140 patients

Abstract.A prospective study was carried out involving patients presenting with facial fractures sustained during sports. One hundred and forty patients were admitted to the Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital of Paris between March 1998 and March 2000, accounting for 13.3% of all patients with facial bone fractures. The ratio of males to females was 7.2:1 and the mean age was 28.5 years. The majority of accidents occurred during soccer (25.0%), followed by rugby (15.0%), and as a consequence of collisions between players (50.7%). The majority of the injuries involved the mandible (34.4%), the zygomatic bone (23.4%) and the nasal bone (15.6%). The sporting activities were classified as either contact or non-contact sports. Frontal sinus, central midface and LeFort fractures were seen more often in vehicular sports such as mountainbiking and skiing. The authors stress the importance of preventive measures, including the use of protective equipment, periodic sports medical check-ups and personal discipline.

Midface fractures.

Fractures of the middle portion of the facial skeleton are commonly referred to as midface or LeFort fractures. While significant progress has been made in terms of evaluation and treatment of such fractures, they remain a challenge for the maxillofacial surgeon. In this section, we will review the principles of midface fracture evaluation and repair, emphasizing the importance of understanding biomechanics and controversies that exist in respect to repair sequencing.

Patterns of Maxillofacial Injuries in Powered Watercraft Collisions

Because of the widespread popularity of water sports, plastic and reconstructive surgeons can expect to manage an increasing number of injuries associated with these activities, particularly those related to powered watercraft vehicles. Although seat belts for motorists and helmets for motorcyclists may be efficacious, such devices currently do not serve a similar role in powered watercraft sports. In this study, a retrospective chart review of 194 consecutive patients who presented to the University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital (Level I trauma center) as a result of powered watercraft collisions is presented. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the incidence, cause, demographics, and available management options for head and neck injuries secondary to powered watercraft. Identified were 194 patients who presented because of watersports-related injuries during the period January 1, 1991, through December 31, 1996. From this group, 81 patients (41.8 percent) sustained injuries directly attributable to powered watercraft collisions, including 41 personal watercraft collisions (50.6 percent), 39 boat collisions (48.1 percent), and 1 airboat collision (1.2 percent). The patient population, as expected, tended to be young and male with an average age of 29 years (range, 8 to 64 years old). Interestingly, 41 of the patients (50.6 percent) who presented to this trauma center as a result of powered watercraft collisions also sustained associated head and neck trauma. Of 74 injuries 24 were facial fractures (32.4 percent), 18 were facial lacerations (24.3 percent), 14 were closed head injuries (18.9 percent), 8 were skull fractures (10.8 percent), 4 were scalp lacerations (5.4 percent), 4 were C-spine fractures (5.4 percent), 1 was an ear laceration (1.4 percent), and 1 was a fatality (1.4 percent). Le Fort fractures were the most commonly identified facial fracture in this series. The number of these injuries seen in hospital emergency rooms will most likely increase in the future as the popularity of water-related recreational activities becomes even more widespread. Based on these findings, it is strongly recommended that future efforts be directed toward the prevention of these injuries through patient education and the eventual development of efficacious and safe protective equipment. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 104: 922, 1999.)

The edentulous Le Fort fracture.

A retrospective review of 328 Le Fort fractures has identified 20 (6.1%) of these fractures as edentulous. A review of treatment of the patients was conducted. Conservative (nonsurgical treatment methods) and classic open reductions produce aesthetic and functional results that lead to posterior and oblique positioning of the maxillary occlusal segment in comminuted fractures. Attention to positioning the maxilla by relating it to the mandible through maxillomandibular fixation minimized these deformities. Establishing maxillary-mandibular relationships in edentulous fractures, therefore, seems to have the same importance as establishing occlusion in dentulous patients as an important initial step in the treatment of comminuted Le Fort fractures.

Midfacial fractures in pediatric patients. Frequency, characteristics, and causes.

To determine the frequency, characteristics, and causes of midfacial fractures in children. A retrospective review of the patients' medical charts and radiographs. Tertiary referral center. Fifty-four patients under 16 years of age, with midfacial fractures diagnosed and treated in the Helsinki (Finland) University Central Hospital from 1980 through 1992. The data examined included sex, age, time and cause of the accident, type and location of the fractures, the presence and location of associated injuries, complications, and treatment methods. The male-to-female ratio was 1.16:1. Motor-vehicle accident was the most common cause of injuries. The frequency of injuries was in decreasing order: (1) maxillary alveolar bone, (2) zygoma, and (3) Le Fort fractures of the maxilla. The majority of injuries occurred in subjects who were 13 to 15 years old. In children less than 6 years old, only alveolar fractures occurred. For the other age groups, no significant difference in the fracture pattern was found. No fatalities occurred in this patient series. Midfacial pediatric fractures are rare. A high velocity force, such as that from a motor-vehicle accident is a factor producing the injury. Owing to the high impact, associated injuries are common. The severity of the insult is more essential than the age of the patient and the development of the paranasal sinuses.

Blindness after maxillofacial blunt trauma: Evaluation of candidates for optic nerve decompression surgery

Clinical and computerized tomography (CT) findings in 10 patients with post-traumatic blindness after maxillofacial blunt trauma were evaluated as potential candidates for optic nerve decompression surgery. The total number of blind eyes was 14. All patients suffered from midfacial fractures (isolated zygomatic fracture in 4 and Le Fort fracture in 6 cases) predominantly caused by road traffic accidents. CT scanning and clinical findings allowed location of damage to the optic nerve region in all patients. The most common CT finding was swelling of the optic nerve. Fracture in the optic canal wall was seen in only 3 cases. The clinical situations characteristic of this type of injury make diagnosis and early surgical intervention difficult. It was concluded that two of the 10 patients might have benefitted from optic nerve decompression.

Radiology of maxillofacial trauma

There has been a rising incidence of maxillofacial injuries during the past decade as a result of an increasing number of assaults and motor vehicle accidents. The maxillofacial region is one of the most complex areas of the human body, and the radiographic imaging of this region becomes even more difficult in traumatized patients because of their clinical condition and their inability to cooperate. Imaging modalities used in the evaluation of the traumatized maxillofacial region include conventional (plain) films, tomography, panoramic radiography, computed tomography, three-dimensional computed tomography, DentaScan, and magnetic resonance imaging. Each modality is discussed with regard to technique, advantages, and disadvantages. Plain films and computed tomography, the modalities that are used most in evaluating maxillofacial structures, are discussed in more detail. The normal anatomy and radiologic features are presented for both of these modalities. Radiographic evaluation of maxillofacial injury begins with a knowledge of the direct and indirect radiographic signs of injury seen on most imaging modalities. Computed tomography also has allowed a method of classifying facial fractures that is based on the involvement of the facial buttresses or struts. Three horizontal, two coronal, and five sagittal oriented struts are described. Limited fractures are differentiated from transfacial fractures by the lack of involvement of the pterygoid plates in the limited fractures. Limited fractures also can be subclassified as solitary (fracture of a single strut) or complex (fractures of multiple struts). A portion of the orbit is involved in almost every form of facial fracture; therefore, evaluation of facial injuries should always include the orbital structures. Although both can occur simultaneously, orbital injuries can be divided into soft tissue and bony vault injuries. Similar to midface fractures, orbital fractures also can be classified as solitary (fracture involves a single wall) or copplex (fracture involves more than one wall or a part of a midface fracture). Computed tomography is of great value in evaluating both forms of injury. Magnetic resonance imaging is becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of orbital soft tissue injuries. Classification of midface injuries includes the solitary strut fractures and the complex strut fractures. Solitary strut fractures include fractures of the nasal arch, zygomatic arch, and isolated sinus wall fractures. Complex strut fractures include the nasal complex fractures, zygomatic (tripod) and zygomaticomaxillary fractures, transfacial fractures (LeFort fractures), and facial smash fractures. Each fracture type and its radiographic appearance are discussed. The mandible, temporomandibular joint, and dentoalveolar structures are regions that also must be considered in evaluating patients with maxillofacial injuries. Because of their unique nature, they are discussed separately from the other forms of facial injury. The normal anatomy, types of traumatic lesions, and imaging modalities used to evaluate these regions are presented.

Use of Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implants in 140 Patients with Facial Fractures

Use of alloplastic materials in facial bone reconstruction is still controversial. Medpor porous polyethylene is a relatively new implant material that is well suited for this purpose and has a number of advantages over other alloplasts. It is a pure polyethylene with a unique manufacturing process and pore size. Technically, it is easy to work with; it can be carved, contoured, adapted, and fixated to obtain a precise three-dimensional construct. Physically, it is a pure, biocompatible, strong substance that does not resorb or degenerate. It demonstrates long-term stability, high tensile strength, resistance to stress and fatigue, and a virtual lack of surrounding soft-tissue reaction. Rapid tissue ingrowth occurs into the pores. Extensive vascular ingrowth creates the potential to transport cellular products that fight infection deep into the implant. The implant was used in 140 patients from June 1988 to August 1991 to treat acute orbitozygomatic injuries (71), acute Le Fort injuries (24), delayed orbitozygomatic injuries (33), and delayed onlay augmentation (12). In this series, there was 1 instance of implant infection requiring removal, and no implant migration, or exposure.

Measurement of globe position in complex orbital fractures. II. Patient evaluation utilizing a modified exophthalmometer.

Globe position was assessed by both the Hertel exophthalmometer and the modified external auditory canal (EAC)-fixated device in 27 patients with complex orbital fractures (18 tripod and 9 Le Fort fractures). Although 94% of the patients with tripod fractures had relative exophthalmos on the fracture side or no difference between eyes by Hertel exophthalmometry, greater than 30% of the same patients showed relative enophthalmos when measured by the EAC-fixated device. In three of four patients undergoing surgical repair of the orbital floor, modified exophthalmometry showed exophthalmos of greater than or equal to 2 mm postoperatively on the fractured side. The relatively low incidence of enophthalmos in tripod fractures indicates a need for selective orbital floor repair; the uniform exploration of the orbital floor should be discouraged. Multiple comminuted facial fractures (Le Fort II and III) showed a greater variability in globe position and a high frequency (90%) of enophthalmos, suggesting a need for early orbital repair in these patients. EAC-fixated exophthalmometry can provide meaningful information regarding globe position in orbitofacial fracture patients in which orbital rim-based methods are precluded.

Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

I. Principles of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Anatomy and Physiology of the Skin Wound Healing Soft Tissue Techniques Skin Grafts and Flaps Scar Revision Synthetic Implants Biologic Tissue Implants Lasers in Facial Plastic Surgery Aesthetic Facial Proportions Computer Imaging in Facial Plastic Surgery Photography in Facial Plastic Surgery Ethics in Facial Plastic Surgery. II. Aesthetic Facial Surgery: Aesthetic Facial Analysis Anesthesia for Facial Plastic Surgery Rhytidectomy Surgical Treatment of the Forehead, Brow, and Midface Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasty Lipectomy of the Face, Head, and Neck Dermabrasion and Chemical Peel Laser Facial Resurfacing Injectable and Implantable Materials for Facial Wrinkles Aesthetic Facial Skeletal Implants Aesthetic Facial Implants Hair Replacement Techniques Otoplasty The Asian Face in Facial Plastic Surgery Aesthetic Surgery of the Lip Aesthetic Dentistry. III. Functional and Aesthetic Surgery of the Nose: Analysis in Rhinoplasty Philosophy and Principles of Rhinoplasty External Rhinoplasty Approach Management of the Bony Nasal Vault Management of the Middle Vault Surgery of the Nasal Tip: Intranasal Approach Surgery of the Nasal Tip: Vertical Dome Division Secondary Rhinoplasty Complications of Rhinoplasty Nasal Septal Surgery Management of Nasal Septal Perforations. IV. Reconstructive Surgery of the Face and Neck: Cutaneous Malignancies Grafts and Minimally Invasive Options for Cutaneous Reconstruction Local Cutaneous Flaps Tissue Expansion Musculocutaneous Flaps Microvascular Flaps Mandible Reconstruction Major Nasal Reconstruction Auricular Reconstruction and Temporoparietal Flaps Lip Reconstruction Periocular Reconstruction Management and Reanimation of the Paralyzed Face. V. Trauma: Soft Tissue Injuries of the Face Fundamentals of Bone Healing and Stabilization Bone Plating Systems Clinical Applications of Bone Plating Systems to Facial Fractures Treatment of Orbitozygomatic Fractures Nasal, Frontal Sinus, and Nasorbitoethmoid Complex Fractures Le Fort Fractures (Maxillary Fractures) Mandibular Fractures. VI. Congenital and Pediatric Facial Plastic Surgery: Embryology of the Face, Head, and Neck Craniomaxillofacial Deformities Microtia Reconstruction Cleft Lip and Palate Cleft Lip Rhinoplasty Orthognathic Surgery Hemifacial Microsomia Velopharyngeal Incompetence.

Sequencing LeFort Fracture Treatment (Organization of Treatment for a Panfacial Fracture)

The types of midfacial fractures and their complexity were evaluated in admissions to the Maryland Institute of Emergency Medical Service Systems (MIEMSS) during the years of 1984 to 1988. Two hundred and sixty-eight LeFort fractures were treated and followed (3.2 percent of admissions). One half (50 percent) had skull fractures and 40 patients (15 percent) had LeFort, skull and mandibular fractures. Isolated nasoethmoidal fractures were observed in 176 patients and in 107 patients (39 percent) of patients with LeFort fractures. Isolated mandibular fractures were observed in 321 patients and in 104 patients with LeFort fractures (39 percent). Eleven percent of patients had midfacial, nasoethmoidal and frontal sinus fractures. Six percent of patients had midfacial, frontal bone, frontal sinus and nasoethmoidal fractures (Cranial Base Crush Syndrome). Twenty two percent of patients had LeFort and frontal sinus fractures. Reconstruction of multiple area injuries is simplified by a highly organized treatment sequence that conceptualizes the face in two groups of two units. Each unit is divided into sections, and each section is assembled in three dimensions. Sections are integrated into units and units into a single reconstruction. Conceptually, in each unit, facial width must first be controlled by orientation from cranial base landmarks. Projection is then (and often reciprocally with width) established. Finally, facial length is set both in individual units and in the upper and lower face. Soft tissue is considered the "fourth dimension" of facial reconstruction. Bone reconstruction should be completed as early as possible to minimize soft tissue shrinkage, stiffness and scarring of soft tissues in nonantomic positions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Le Fort Fractures Without Mobility

The Le Fort fracture without maxillary mobility constitutes 9 percent of maxillary fractures observed over a 3-year period. A high Le Fort (level II or III) injury exists as a one- or two-piece incomplete fracture. The degree of fracture is insufficient to permit mobility of the maxillary alveolus. Frequently, an obvious unilateral zygomatic fracture is present. Physical findings consist of bilateral eyelid ecchymosis and malocclusion. The occlusal disturbance may consist of either crossbite, open bite, maxillary rotation, or lack of proper dental intercuspation. On CT scan, fractures are best demonstrated in the posterior and medial maxillary walls at the Le Fort I level; they are most obvious unilaterally with contralateral fractures that may be subtle. Bilateral maxillary sinus fluid is consistently present on CT. Treatment usually consists of observation and traction elastics but may require mobilization of the fragments followed by open reduction and rigid fixation.

An acrylic head appliance for craniomaxillary fixation

An acrylic head appliance for the treatment of LeFort fractures is described. The appliance remains stable and effective during the course of treatment. When immobilization is no longer needed, it may be removed without anesthetizing the patient.

Timing and techniques of reconstruction and stabilization of combined craniofacial injuries.

According to Scheunemann (1972 personal communication) Le Fort-fractures present an additional involvement of the skull-base in about 40% of cases. It is therefore essential, with serious craniofacial trauma, to ensure first of all the vital functions and afterwards to restore as quickly as possible the shape, full function and cosmetic appearance of the face. Considering the necessity of the vital functions, it is advisable to take the following primary steps in treating craniofacial lesions:

Rigid internal fixation for fractures involving tooth-bearing maxillary segments.

Fracture dislocations of the middle third of the face usually involve a complex combination of the three types of fractures initially described by LeFort. Treatment of these injuries requires a six- to eight-week period of intermaxillary fixation, unless rigid internal fixation devices (plates and screws) are used to stabilize the fractures. However, rigid fixation carries the risk of producing a malunion and serious malocclusion if not performed correctly. A review of 22 patients with complex LeFort fractures treated with rigid fixation revealed that the only absolute contraindication to its use is difficulty in interdigitating the maxillary and mandibular teeth in a passive fashion at the time of fracture reduction. Rigid internal fixation should therefore be considered as an alternative treatment for most fractures of the middle third of the face.