LDL-C Target Research Articles

Adherence to the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for dyslipidaemia management in a large rheumatoid arthritis cohort: Data from the CORDIS Study Group of the Italian Society of Rheumatology.

Lipid-lowering therapy prescription is low in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, often not achieving lipid threshold target despite treatment. However, evidence derives from small, monocentric cohorts. We assessed adherence to lipid-lowering treatment for primary cardiovascular (CV) prevention in a RA cohort according to international guidelines. A cross-sectional analysis of an Italian RA cohort was performed. Disease-related features and traditional CV risk factors were collected. The 10-year CV risk was estimated by Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE-2) algorithm. The primary preventive dyslipidaemia strategy was assessed according to 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. 1.133 RA patients (78.2% female, aged 60.6±10.2 years) free from CV events were included. According to SCORE-2, 42.9% of patients were at moderate risk (1-5-%), 33.3% at high risk (5-10%) and 23.7% at very high risk (>10%). In the whole cohort, 12.9% of patients with <5%, 23.6% with 5-10% and 32.3% with >10% risk were on statin, respectively (p<0.001). According to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, 51.5% of patients had LDL-c at target. Among patients with LDL-c not at target, 76% were not on lipid-lowering treatment. At multivariate analysis, patients with higher CV risk had significantly lower probability of LDL-c at target. In a wide Italian RA cohort, more than 50% of patients had high or very high CV risk. In these, lipid-lowering treatment prescription is suboptimal leading to not achievement of LDL-c target. Physicians should improve lipid screening and primary prevention therapy to reduce CV risk and improve CV comorbidity in RA patients.

Strike early-strike strong lipid-lowering strategy with PCSK9i in ACS patients. Real-world evidence from AT-TARGET-IT registry

Abstract Background/Introduction No data are available on early initiation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in real-world. Purpose This study investigates the effects of PCSK9i started at time of ACS hospitalization on lipid control and major CV events in real-world. Methods The lipid control outcome was the percentage of patients reaching the LDL-C target of &amp;lt; 55 mg/dL at first lipid control. The clinical outcome was the incidence of composite major CV events (all cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and ischemia-driven revascularization) during follow-up in relation to quartiles of LDL-C at first lipid control. Results We included 771 patients with ACS from AT-TARGET-IT registry, receiving PCSK9i prescription during hospitalization or at discharge. Median LDL-C was 137 mg/dL and decreased to 43 mg/dL at first lipid control. 527 (68.3%) patients achieved LDL-C target at the first lipid control at a median time of 37 days from hospitalization; of them, 404 (76.8%) were discharged on statin plus ezetimibe background therapy. Event curves through a median follow-up of 11 months across quartiles of LDL-C showed a stepwise lower risk of 4P-MACE, 3P-MACE, all-cause mortality, and ischemia-driven revascularization in lower quartile of LDL-C values at first lipid control (&amp;lt;23 mg/dL) and in patients reaching LDL-C &amp;lt;55 mg/dL. Conclusions Intensive and early lipid-lowering therapy using PCSK9i in patients with ACS (strike early strike strong strategy) is safe and effective in clinical practice and associated with a reduction of residual CV risk.

Sex differences in atherogenic lipid profile following acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Despite significant advancements in lipid-lowering therapy, the management of dyslipidemia remains challenging in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Significant differences are shown in lipid panels and management between different sexes following ACS. Objective To shed light on the alterations and characteristics of atherogenic lipoproteins and the characteristics of patients who achieve LDL-C targets after statin treatment, harnessing real-world data from electronic health records of patients with ACS after their discharge between sexes. Methods The data in the present study were derived from the iHeart program sponsored by the Chinese Cardiovascular Association. Eligible patients with a diagnosis of ACS from January 2014 to December 2021 during hospitalisation and having at least one lipid panel record after discharge within 12 months were enrolled. We analysed the control of atherogenic lipid profiles between sexes. The primary outcome was the achievement of the LDL-C target, defined as LDL-C &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/L. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to assess the associations between patient characteristics and LDL-C achievement. Results Between 2012 and 2021, 4861 patients (1299 [26.7%] women) were hospitalised with a primary diagnosis of ACS (49.2% STEMI, 13.8% NSTEMI, and 33.8% UA). The mean age was 64.9 (12.4) years. In contrast to a higher proportion of AMI in men, more prevalence of UA was observed in women. Women had more cardiovascular comorbidities than men and were more likely to receive lipid-lowering therapies, blood pressure-lowering therapies, glucose-lowering therapies, and antiplatelet medications at discharge. In both men and women, TC, TG, LDL-C, ApoB, and non-HDL-C levels significantly decreased within 12 months (P&amp;lt;0.05). Women had less reduction in atherogenic lipid profile than men. The rate of LDL-C &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/L was similar between sexes (14.3% vs16.1%; P=0.136) at baseline, whereas within 12 months after discharge, women had a much lower achievement rate of LDL-C target than men (34.6% vs 45.6%; P&amp;lt;0.001). The risk factors for non-achievement of the LDL-C target in men were revascularisation, history of MI, atrial fibrillation, newly diagnosed MI, and high baseline LDL-C levels. For women, the risk factor was hypertension and diabetes. Conclusion Substantial sex disparities were observed in the management of atherogenic lipids. Despite a higher likelihood of receiving guideline-recommended medical therapy at discharge, women had poorer lipid control compared to men, especially among those with NSTEMI.

Factors influencing low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol after acute coronary syndrome and effectiveness of intensive teleconsultation monitoring, the teleobjectif cohort study

Abstract Context: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) plays a key role in the development and progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite the availability of effective lipid-lowering treatments, patients who have experienced an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continue to face a high risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality. Achieving the recommended LDL-c target of &amp;lt;0.55 g/L in secondary cardiovascular prevention remains a significant challenge, with fewer than 30% of patients reaching this goal. Aim To investigate the factors influencing LDL-c control after ACS and the effectiveness of intensive teleconsultation monitoring to control LDL-c, even in sub-groups where control is poorest. Methods This bi-centric prospective cohort study conducted between december 2019 and december 2021 compared a group that received standard follow-up after an ACS with an interventional group that received regular follow-up by teleconsultation in addition of usual care to optimize lipid-lowering treatment. A subgroup analysis was carried out to examine the effect of teleconsultation in subpopulations known to be significantly associated with better or worse LDL-c control in the usual care group or described in the literature. Results 1602 patients met the inclusion criteria for our study (814 in the usual care group and 788 in the teleconsultation group). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. In the usual care group, factors influencing lipid control included gender, diabetes, cardiology consultation, distance to the nearest cardiologist, social deprivation and initial LDL-C levels. Teleconsultation significantly improved LDL-C target attainment compared to usual care (74.7% vs. 26.6%, p&amp;lt;0.001 with multivariate analysis OR 5.06 [4.21 ; 6.07]), particularly benefiting geographically and socially disadvantaged patients. Conclusion Teleconsultation significantly improves lipid control in acute coronary syndrome patients compared to usual care. This universal intervention, particularly beneficial for geographically and socially disadvantaged patients, highlights the potential of telemedicine in enhancing cardiovascular management.analysis in usual care groupTeleconsultation effect in sub-groups

Failure of primary prophylaxis: statin use, risk profile, and outcomes in contemporary patients treated with PCI for first atherosclerotic event

Abstract Background Atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) are potentially preventable through lifestyle modifications and the use of medical cholesterol-lowering drugs in individuals at risk. However, guidelines for optimal use of statins are debated, and not enough is known about the real-world barriers to effective CAD-prevention. Understanding the mechanisms of prophylactic treatment failure in patients who undergo PCI for their first atherosclerotic event could help improve primary prevention strategies. Purpose To 1) examine the relative contribution of failure mechanisms of medical prophylaxis in patients undergoing PCI for their first atherosclerotic event, 2) examine how clinical characteristics differ between patients with different failure mechanisms, and 3) examine whether long-term outcomes after PCI differ depending on the mechanism of prophylactic failure. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to study electronic healthcare records for all patients ≥18 years treated with PCI at Gentofte Hospital, Denmark in 2019. Data was extracted from electronic health care records. Patients with first atherosclerotic event were divided into cardiovascular risk groups based on the ESC/EAS guidelines and further into four different prophylactic failure mechanism groups based on cardiovascular risk, statin indication, statin use and whether the risk-based LDL-C treatment goals were reached. Results 507 patients were treated with PCI for their first atherosclerotic event. 54% were categorized as low-moderate cardiovascular risk. 41% were not on statin and did not have class I indication for statin treatment (strategy failure). 26% were not on statin treatment despite class I indication for statin treatment (implementation failure). 18% were on statin treatment but had not reached their LDL-C target (efficiency failure), and 16% were on statin treatment, and had reached the LDL-C target (efficacy failure). Patients with strategy failure, were more likely to be younger, mostly males, and often had a smoking history. Patients with implementation failure, were typically elderly, with relatively few comorbidities. The frequency of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization over 4 years was 15.3%, with no statistically difference between the groups (p =0.3). Conclusion In this cohort study, patients treated with PCI for first atherosclerotic event were often classified as low or intermediate risk, and a majority had not been on statin treatment before. Improved primary prevention should focus on at-risk groups that are either not included in current recommendation for statin treatment, especially young smokers, or patients not receiving treatment despite recommendations, especially older patients with few medical contacts.Cardiovascular risk &amp; failure mechanismKaplan-Meier MACE

Clinical reality and challenges with familial hypercholesterolemia patients management. 2024 results from the Regional Center for Rare Diseases (RCRD) Registry in Poland

Abstract Background HeFH is one of the most prevalent genetic diseases significantly increasing the risk of CVD events and mortality. Despite new achievements with earlier diagnosis and new effective drugs, most of heFH patients do not achieve LDL-C goal and are still on residual CVD risk. Purpose We aimed to present the most recent data from the regional FH registry in Poland to show the challenges and reality of everyday clinical management with FH patients. Methods The registry is conducted at the RCRD in the 2nd largest, supraregional hospital in Poland. The main inclusion criteria were being phenotypically or genetically diagnosed with FH. Nonadherence was investigated based on detailed interview, monitoring the treatment’s effects and purchasing prescribed medications. For this analysis we investigated only adult FH patients from the registry. Due to small number of cases (n=5), patients treated with inclisiran were not included in this analysis. Results We included 142 consecutive heFH patients at mean age 45,8±14,9 years (min/max 18-75 years; 60% women). Mean BMI was 29.6±5.52 kg/m2, mean baseline TC was 282.9±80 mg/dl (the highest observed was 600 mg/dl), LDL-C 204.2±72.5 mg/dL (the highest observed -762 mg/dl), TG - 151.1±123.4 mg/dl, Lp(a) 37.6±41.5 mg/dl and HDL-C - 52.3±14.2 mg/dl. Most patients were diagnosed with LDLR (72%) or APOB (24%) mutations. High intensity statin therapy was used in 74.3% of patents, ezetimibe (mostly as a part of combination LLT) in 47.2%, and PCSK9 inhibitors in all those that met the reimbursement criteria – 25.6% of FH patients. Non-adherence to statin therapy and ezetimibe in the follow up of 2 years was 27%. In patients treated with statin therapy and ezetimibe mean achieved LDL-C was 153.6±82.82 mg/dl and on triple therapy - 64.5±43.73 mg/dl. Mean achieved LDL-C in the investigated population was 87.9±55.5 mg/dl. LDL-C goal was achieved in 39% of patients – in those treated with triple therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors it was 57.14%, and in those on statins and ezetimibe only 27.1%. Combination therapy of statins and ezetimibe did not significantly change baseline Lp(a) level (p=0.109), but when PCSK9 inhibitors were introduced the mean Lp(a) reduction by 34.2% (p=0.049) was observed. Based on the multivariable regression analysis, the following factors played the most important role for FH patients to be on LDL-C target: DLCN total score (OR 1.21, 95%CI: 1.04-1.40; p=0.013), DLCN category (10.39, 1.43-75.29; p=0.021), ezetimibe use (4.78, 1.15-19.92; p=0.031), and PCSK9 inhibitors use (4.56; 1.40-14.86; p=0.012). Conclusions FH patients in Poland are diagnosed definitely too late (45 years) and most of them are still not on LDL-C goal. Double and especially triple therapy significantly, even 5 times, increase the chance of achieving LDL-C goal, therefore PCSK9 inhibitors should be available for all FH patients, without the limitations existing currently e.g., within B101 drug program in Poland.

Three decades of lipid-lowering therapy in type 2 diabetic patients with angiographically proven stable coronary artery disease

Abstract Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) is key to reducing the burden of macrovascular diabetes complications. Here, we aim to assess long-term trends in LLT and LDL-C levels among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with angiographically proven coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated T2DM patients (n=590), who were referred to elective coronary angiography and were diagnosed with CAD in one of three observational cohort studies (OS) spanning 25 years: OS1: 1999-2000 (n=190); OS2: 2005-2008 (n=241); OS3: 2022-2023 (n=159). These studies were conducted at the same cardiology unit of a tertiary care hospital in Central Europe. The proportion of patients receiving statin therapy (C10AA and C10AB) increased significantly from 57.9% in OS1 to 64.3% in OS2 and 78.6% in OS3 (ptrend&amp;lt;0.001). Further, there was an increase in patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy, rising from none in OS1 to 8.5% in OS2 and 73.4% in OS3 (ptrend&amp;lt;0.001). The proportion of patients receiving more than one LLT compound also increased (OS1: 2.1%; OS2: 2.1%; OS3: 35.2%; ptrend&amp;lt;0.001). Use of ezetimibe (C10AX09) increased (OS1: 0.0%; OS2: 1.2%; OS3: 39.0%; ptrend&amp;lt;0.001) and fibrate use (C10AB) decreased (OS1: 5.3%; OS2: 3.3%; OS3: 0.6%; ptrend=0.015). Newly approved compounds (C10AX13 - C10AX16) were prescribed for 3.8% of patients in OS3. Among statin combination therapies, ezetimibe was predominantly used (93.5%). Mean LDL-C levels declined significantly from 123±38 mg/dL (OS1) to 115±39 mg/dL (OS2) and 77±38 mg/dL (OS3; ptrend&amp;lt;0.001). However, only 2.2% of patients in OS1, 2.5% in OS2 and 32.1% in OS3 reached an LDL-C target of &amp;lt;55 mg/dL (ptrend&amp;lt;0.001). This analysis suggests an upward trend in treatment intensity and a substantial improvement in LDL-C levels among T2DM patients with CAD. However, the majority of these patients still does not reach their LDL-C target.

Management of children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia worldwide: a meta-analysis

Abstract Background HeFH is one of the most frequent monogenic disorders in the world, leading to premature ASCVD. Purpose The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lipid lowering therapy (LLT) and achievement of LDL-C goal in heFH children. Methods The main endpoint was efficacy of goal achievement for LDL-C and other lipid parameters: total cholesterol [TC], triglycerides [TG], high density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], apolipoprotein B [apo B] and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]), and the LLT safety (adverse events [AEs], including endocrine function, and growth indices). The secondary endpoint was an effect of LLT on attainment of LDL-C goal treatment (&amp;lt;3.5 mmol/L/130 mg/dL). Results A total of 41 studies with 4667 pediatric patients at mean age 12.08±2.4 years were included. At median follow-up of 18.8 months, the group on LLT had significantly higher mean reductions of TC, LDL-C, TG, and increased HDL-C compared to control (-1.75 [-67,7 mg/dl], -1.84 [-71.2 mg/dl], -0.11 [-9.74 mg/dl], 0.08 mmol/L [3.1 mg/dl], respectively, p&amp;lt;0.001 for all). In the subgroup analysis according to different types of LLT we observed a significantly higher mean reduction of LDL-C by statin combined with ezetimibe treatment, followed by PCSK9 inhibitors, statins in monotherapy, and monotherapy with ezetimibe (-2.48 [-95.9 mg/dl], -2.16 [-83.5 mg/dl], -2.03 [-78.5 mg/dl], and -1.50 mmol/L [-58 mg/dl], respectively, test for overall effect: p&amp;lt;0.001). The pooled LDL-C was reduced by 33.44% (-2.14 mmol/L [-82.8 mg/dl], p&amp;lt;0.001) and failed to reach the goal treatment (&amp;lt;3.5 mmol/L) by 12.6% (95%CI, 12.4 – 12.9%). 38.7% of children achieved the LDL-C goal, 23.9% fell short by up to 10%, 10.7% experienced moderate failure (were over the LDL-C target between &amp;gt;10-20%), and 26.7% failed by more than 20% to reach the LDL-C target. When comparing different regions, only Sweden and Greece achieved the LDL-C goal &amp;lt;3.5 mmol/L in the follow-up, followed by the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, USA, UK, France, Spain, Belgium, and Austria (with the following additional required LDL-C reduction to be on the goal: 2.2%, 3.4%, 3.5%, 8.9%, 10.2%, 11.2%, 11.2%, 15%, 19.4%, respectively). For other investigated countries over 20% mean LDL-C reduction was required. All parameters related to endocrine function and demographic indices were unaffected by LLT therapy (p&amp;gt;0.05). The adverse events were not reported significantly higher when compared to the control and the prevalence of therapy discontinuation was only 0.8%. Conclusions Despite the efficacy of LLT in children with HeFH and the low occurrence of discontinuation-related adverse events, achieving LDL-C treatment goals was relatively rare, with large differences between the investigated countries. These results underscore the importance of considering early combination therapy of statins and ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors (if available) to attain LDL-C goals effectively.Lipoproteins reduction with LLT.Goal achievement and therapy safety.

Efficacy and safety of inclisiran in real-world clinical practice. Results from the CHOLINET Registry

Abstract Background/Introduction Inclisiran has been recently introduced in clinical practice. Thus, efficacy and safety data from real-world settings are limited. Purpose Cholinet (Cholesterol inclisiran Italian network) is an Italian multicenter prospective phase 4 registry including 36 Italian centers, designed to assess efficacy, safety, adherence and persistence of inclisiran treatment, and clinician’s behavior on LLT in very high CV risk patients with atherosclerotic CV disease and/or familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Methods From November 2022 through February 2024, the Cholinet registry enrolled patients receiving inclisiran according to standard clinical practice. Clinical and demographic characteristics, concomitant therapies, blood chemistry, were recorded at the time of first prescription and at subsequent follow-up. Results We enrolled 668 patients in treatment with inclisiran (15.1% with FH, 30.7% female, mean age 63 years), Data on follow-up at 3 months (booster time) were available for 495 of them. At the time of inclisiran first prescription median LDL-C was 102 mg/dl and reached 51 mg/dl at the time of 3 months observation (50% mean reduction, 51 mg/dl absolute median reduction). None of the 495 patients reaching 3 months follow up missed the reinjection dose administration. Of 668 patients enrolled, 553 patients (82.7%) were on LLT, of them 107 (19.3%) were on ezetimibe alone, 67 (12.1%) on statin alone and 379 (68.5%) on a statin and ezetimibe combination. Of the enrolled patients, 45 (6.7%) were previously treated with evolocumab and 34 (5%) with alirocumab. Among the patients evaluated at the 3-month follow-up, 307 patients (62%) achieved the LDL cholesterol target; of them, 450 (91%) were treated with inclisiran and statin±ezetimibe. Evaluating the distribution of the percentage reduction in LDL cholesterol values, a heterogeneity emerged that was partly explainable by the concomitant lipid-lowering therapy and partly by the previous exposure to PCSK9 inhibitors. Conclusions These preliminary data from the Cholinet Italian registry show that inclisiran effectively reduces (50%) LDL-C in real-world settings. The LDL-C target was achieved in 62% of patients; of them 91% were on lipid-lowering therapy, showing that combination therapy is necessary in most of these patients.

Serum lipid profiles and uptake of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in comparison to older patients with ASCVD

Abstract Background Serum lipid levels are well-established risk factors for developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). There are multiple guideline-supported treatments for managing dyslipidaemia for secondary prevention of ASCVD events. Lipid profiles and uptake of guideline-directed lipid-lowering therapy (GDLLT) is poorly characterised in patients with premature ASCVD compared to their older counterparts. Purpose To investigate serum lipid profiles and GDLLT uptake in patients with premature ASCVD in comparison to older patients with ASCVD. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent inpatient invasive coronary angiography at our institution between January 2019-December 2021 were examined. Patients with confirmed ASCVD on coronary angiography were stratified into two groups based on the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias definition of premature ASCVD: Group 1 comprised of younger patients (&amp;lt;55 years for men, &amp;lt;60 years for women) and Group 2 comprised of older patients (≥55 years for men, ≥60 years for women). Demographics, clinical and biochemical parameters (including lipid profiles) and medications were obtained from the electronic medical record and compared between groups to identify differences in risk factor profiles. Results A total of 1437 patients (980 [68.2%] male, mean age 62.4±13.9 years) underwent coronary angiography. 916 patients (63.7%) had confirmed ASCVD, of which 225 were classified as premature ASCVD (24.6%, mean age 47.8±10.1 years) vs 691 older patients with ASCVD (75.4%, mean age 69.5±8.7 years). Group 1 patients had significantly higher mean BMI (31.7±8.1 vs 69.5±8.7; p=0.001) and lower prevalence of hypertension (54.2% vs 69.5%; p&amp;lt;0.001) or chronic kidney disease (5.3% vs 12.6%; p=0.002) compared to Group 2. There were no significant differences in sex, diabetes mellitus, or smoking history. Lipid profiles were significantly different between the two groups: Group 1 had higher levels of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, triglycerides, and TC/HDL-C ratio, but lower HDL-C levels (all p&amp;lt;0.001). A lower proportion of Group 1 patients were on GDLLT (42.7% vs. 60.3%; p&amp;lt;0.001). Amongst patients on GDLLT, there were similar rates in the use of high-intensity statins between groups, but Group 1 patients were significantly more likely to have an LDL-C level ≥1.8mmol/L (p=0.003). Multivariable models for individual lipid subfractions, accounting for gender, cardiovascular risk factors, and LLT use, showed that all lipid parameters remained significantly different between groups (all p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Patients with premature ASCVD have significantly different lipid profiles compared to older ASCVD patients. They also have lower uptake of guideline-directed LLT and are less likely to meet recommended LDL-C targets for high-risk ASCVD despite therapy. These findings highlight the need for tailored risk factor evaluation and management in this population.

Inclisiran-containing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction effectively stabilizes atherosclerotic plaques

Abstract Background/Introduction Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) allows to quantify lipid composition of coronary artery lesions. High plaque lipid content has been associated with increased adverse cardiovascular event risk. Purpose Aim of this study was to evaluate atherosclerotic plaque lipid content reduction in association with low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) lowering on the background of intensive hypolipidaemic therapy. Methods NIRS investigation was performed in stable coronary artery disease patients having 20-50% stenosis in the proximal or middle third of a coronary artery. Segment of interest was repeatedly evaluated after 15 months. Lipid-rich plaques (LRPs) were defined as lesions with maximum lipid-core burden index within 4 mm (maxLCBI4 mm) &amp;gt;250. Study participants were taking high-intensity statin (atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg and rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg) with or without ezetimibe for a run-in period of 4-6 weeks. Afterwards, in patients not achieving LDL-C level &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/l, add-on inclisiran was started. Baseline LDL-C was defined as the level at the time of initiation of optimal lipid-lowering therapy. Statistical significance level of 0.05 was set. Results Data of 36 patients was analyzed. Mean baseline maxLCBI4 mm was 203.9, reduced by 39.8% (-81.1, 95%CI -129.2 to -33.0) at 15-month follow-up (P=0.003). In 15 patients LRPs were detected with mean baseline maxLCBI4 mm 363.5, which was decreased by 35.8% (-130.3, 95%CI -235.0 to -25.7) (P=0.020). Mean LDL-C level at baseline was 2.5 mmol/l among all participants, lowered by 32.0% (-0.8, 95%CI -1.1 to -0.5) after 15 months of treatment (P&amp;lt;0.001). 19 patients received inclisiran in addition to high-dose statin and optional ezetimibe therapy. In 24 patients achieving LDL-C target &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/l at 15-month follow-up, a significant maxLCBI4 mm reduction from 208.5 by 48.4% (-101.0, 95%CI -169.3 to -32.7) was established (P=0.010). Among those having LDL-C &amp;gt;1.8 mmol/l, maxLCBI4 mm reduction from 194.7 by 21.2% (-41.25, 95%CI -94.7 to 12.2) was observed, however the change was not statistically significant (P=0.114). Conclusion LDL-C lowering with high-intensity hypolipidaemic therapy, including escalation to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition, demonstrated atherosclerotic plaque stabilization by NIRS-detected lipid content decrease.

Innovative drugs for LDL-cholesterol reduction: a new era in the field of dyslipidaemia

Over the past decade, the therapeutic landscape of cholesterol-lowering drugs has rapidly expanded to address the limitations of current therapies, the failure to achieve LDL-C targets, and the need to reduce cardiovascular residual risk. Actually, the innovative cholesterol-lowering drugs available can act on new metabolic pathways involved in LDL-C metabolism. These drugs include enzyme inhibitors, peptides, molecules capable of influencing protein synthesis or gene in the form of antisense oligonucleotides or short interfering RNA, gene therapy, and vaccines.

The CNIC polypill (Acetylsalicylic acid + Atorvastatin + Rampril) in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A comparative analysis with alternative therapeutic approaches

BackgroundPatients with type 2 DM (T2DM) and established cardiovascular disease (CVD) are at high risk of recurrent CV events. We analysed the use of the CNIC-polypill (acetylsalicylic acid, ramipril, and atorvastatin) compared with other therapeutic strategies in patients with T2DM and CVD from the retrospective NEPTUNO study. MethodsPatients were stratified into four therapeutic approaches: CNIC-polypill, its monocomponents as loose medications, equipotent medications, and other therapies. Outcomes included the 2-year cumulative incidence and risk of recurrent major adverse CV events (MACE) and CV death, risk factors control, medication persistence, and utilisation of healthcare resources and costs. ResultsAfter two years, T2DM patients treated with Monocomponents, Equipotent drugs, or Other therapies had increased recurrent MACE risk compared to CNIC-polypill (11 %, 23 %, and 44 %, respectively; P < 0.05) and shorter median time to CV events (305–377 vs. 396 days; P < 0.05). The CNIC-polypill group achieved a significant 11.2 % increase in patients reaching LDL-c targets <70 mg/dL, outperforming other strategies. It also exhibited superior triglyceride control and a higher proportion achieving the <130/80 mmHg blood pressure goal. The CNIC-polypill cohort displayed significantly higher 24-month persistence (71.5 % vs. 54.7 %–58.3 %, p < 0.05) and lower mean adjusted costs per patient (€5083 vs. €6000–€6523; p < 0.05). In a comparative analysis, T2DM patients had lower baseline LDL-c and total cholesterol levels than non-T2DM counterparts yet experienced a higher incidence of recurrent MACE over two years. ConclusionThe CNIC-polypill (ASA, atorvastatin and ramipril) emerged as a promising treatment for patients with CVD, particularly those with T2DM, offering improved clinical outcomes and economic efficiency.

Analysis of Blood Lipids, Blood Glucose, Blood Uric Acid, and Blood Routine Test Results in Retired Employees of a Unit in the Civil Aviation System

Objective: To investigate and analyze the annual physical examination results of retired employees from a unit in the civil aviation system, focusing on blood lipids, blood glucose, blood uric acid, and blood routine results. The study aims to provide relevant references for formulating reasonable disease management measures for preventing and controlling hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, and other conditions in retired employees. Methods: The examination results of 231 participants were collected and analyzed. The participants were divided into four groups based on age: middle-aged group, young-old group, middle-old group, and old-old group. The blood test results were compared across these groups, and an assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk levels was completed in conjunction with medical history. Blood test results were also compared by gender. Results: There were no significant statistical differences in blood test results when grouped by age. However, the prevalence of hyperuricemia was higher in males than in females, while the prevalence of hypercholesterolemia was higher in females than in males. The LDL-C target achievement rate was lower in the moderate-and-high-risk group as well as the very high-risk group as defined by ASCVD risk levels. Conclusion: Management of hyperuricemia and hyperlipidemia in retired employees (elderly patients) should be strengthened to reduce the risk of ASCVD events and alleviate the potential medical burden associated with disease progression.

The journey to LDL-C goal in the era of combination lipid lowering therapy and why it matters for ASCVD patients: a UK perspective

Objective We aim to explore the concept of distance and journey to goal, and consideration of these 2 elements a priori when choosing LLT. Methods Modelling of expected % LDL-C reductions was carried out on a range of hypothetical patients’ baseline LDL-C values prior to any LLT being commenced. Therapies were then added in a stepwise manner based on the pathway demonstrated in current national guidance and compared with goal achievement on a novel LLT optimization pathway implemented in Morecambe Bay NHS Trust. Results Modelling of a stepwise lipid management pathway shows that high-intensity statin monotherapy is not sufficient in most modelled baseline LDL-C scenarios to achieve guideline-recommended goals. Furthermore, ezetimibe second line may preclude 3rd line injectable prescribing and lead to “ezetimibe limbo” where the patient is now below the reimbursement threshold for injectable prescribing but still not achieving their LDL-C target. Overall goal achievement is poor across the spectrum of modelled LDL-C levels. In contrast, by following the Morecambe Bay pathway all patients on statin for the range of hypothetical baseline LDL-C levels can reach an LDL-C target of < 1.8 mmol/L. Conclusions This study identifies a therapeutic gap when following a stepwise approach highlighted by recent national guidance. Our proposal of a novel pathway highlights that the order in which drugs are added is important in the context of national reimbursement thresholds and allows LDL-C goal to be reached in a timely manner, regardless of the starting baseline LDL-C level.

Sex specific analysis of patients with and without reported statin intolerance referred to a specialized outpatient lipid clinic

BackgroundLowering LDL-cholesterol is a fundamental goal for both primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Our study aims to analyse potential sex disparities regarding the tolerability and effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with and without reported statin intolerance who are being treated at a lipid-outpatient clinic.MethodsFrom 2017 to 2022, n = 1062 patients (n = 612 men, n = 450 women) at high-risk were referred to our lipid-outpatient clinic because of difficulties in lipid control by primary healthcare providers. The main therapeutic objective was to optimize lipid-lowering therapy according to current treatment guidelines.ResultsPatients presented with high LDL-C baseline levels (4.97 ± 1.81 mmol/l (192 ± 70 mg/dL) in men and 5.46 ± 2.04 mmol/l (211 ± 79 mg/dL) in women). Intolerance towards statins was reported more frequently by women (48.2%) than by men (38.9%, p = 0.004). LDL-C continuously decreased with individual treatment adjustments across follow-up visits. In total, treatment goals (LDL < 1.4 mmol/l (< 55 mg/dl) or < 1.8 mmol/l (< 70 mg/dl)) were accomplished in 75.8% of men and 55.5% of women after the last follow-up visit (p < 0.0001). In men, these data are almost identical in subjects with statin intolerance. In contrast, treatment goals were reached less frequently in women with statin intolerance compared to women tolerant to statin therapy.ConclusionEven if treated in a specialized lipid clinic, women are less likely to reach their target LDL-C than men, particularly when statin intolerant. Nevertheless, many patients with statin intolerance can be successfully treated using oral combination and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy. However, ongoing follow-up care to monitor progress and to adjust treatment plans is necessary to reach this goal.

Lipid-Lowering Treatment Gaps in Patients after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Using Global Database TriNetX.

Background and Objectives: Patients with previous acute myocardial infarction are at significantly higher risk of recurrent events. Early and intensive lipid-lowering therapy targeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is a key strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk in post-acute myocardial infarction patients worldwide. This study aimed to assess patients' real-life lipid-lowering treatment gaps after acute myocardial infarction using a global network, TriNetX, of anonymous, real-time patient data. The uniqueness of the study was the use of the novel, evolving, and constantly improving TriNetX platform and the evaluation of its feasibility for clinical research. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on global repository patients in 2020, diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction, with a three-year follow-up. Results: After acute myocardial infarction, the prescribing rate of lipid-lowering medication (statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9I) was insufficient to reach target LDL-C values. The mean LDL-C level decreased from 2.7 mmol/L (103 mg/dL) as measured on the day of AMI to 1.97 mmol/L (76 mg/dL) between 31D and 3M. During the second and third years, the mean LDL-C value was stable (around 2.0 mmol/L (78 mg/dL)). LDL-C goals were not sufficiently reached, as only 7-12% of patients were reported to have LDL-C values < 55 mg/dL (1.4 mmol/L) and 13-20% of patients were reported to have LDL-C values < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) during the follow-up periods. This means that a substantial number of patients remain at a very high risk for CV complications and mortality. Most cardiovascular complications happen within three months after acute myocardial infarction. Conclusions: Gaps remain between the recommendations for managing LDL-C in guidelines and what occurs in real life. The TriNetX platform is an innovative platform with significant potential and should be further developed for clinical research, as it enables the use of valuable interinstitutional data.

The impact of SLCO1B1 rs4149056 variant on LDL-C target achievement after lipid lowering therapy optimization in men and women with familial hypercholesterolemia

The impact of SLCO1B1 rs4149056 variant on LDL-C target achievement after lipid lowering therapy optimization in men and women with familial hypercholesterolemia

The effect of an intensive lipid-lowering therapy protocol on achieving target LDL-C levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome

The effect of an intensive lipid-lowering therapy protocol on achieving target LDL-C levels in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Difficulties in achieving target LDL-C levels in ASCVD patients in real clinical practice

Difficulties in achieving target LDL-C levels in ASCVD patients in real clinical practice