A new alternative circuitry for the transformer-coupled LC inversion generator (TCLCG) is presented. In principle, a TCLCG consists of one in-phase 1:1 transformer and two capacitors per elementary stage. First, the two capacitors will be charged via the primary winding of the transformer in opposite polarity. Afterward, voltage multiplication is being achieved by a closing switch which shortcuts the two capacitors. The odd-numbered capacitor discharges slowly through the primary inductance of the transformer, whereas the even-numbered capacitor discharges fastly through only the leakage inductance of the transformer and, thus, inverts. However, one of the main drawbacks of the classical “textbook” TCLCG circuitry is caused by the fact that connection of the transformers of the higher generator stages is done through the transformers of the lower stages. Consequently, compensation techniques must be applied, i.e., adjustment of the even capacitors and/or transformer inductance values, in order to ensure effective voltage multiplication by means of constructive superposition of each stage. This limits the maximum practical generator stage number and rise time. In the alternative TCLCG circuit principle, the connections to the primary and secondary inputs of the transformers of the higher stages are being done directly from the closing switch. Now, the transformers are in parallel to each other, not in series as in the classical TCLCG circuitry. As a result, the even-numbered capacitors see the same leakage inductance and compensation techniques are no longer necessary. The first experimental verification was done by direct comparison of the classical circuitry and alternative circuitry for two compact two-stage TCLCGs with identical transformers and capacitances. The results showed that the alternative circuitry leads to a fast generator rise time of 25 ns, about 38% faster than the classical circuitry, while still reaching the same generator efficiency of 67%. Additionally, rise time proved to stay constant at 25 ns even if adding the third stage to the TCLCG with the new alternative geometry. This version was still 46% faster than an optimized classical three-stage TCLCG using the asymmetric compensation method.