Based on the analysis of current legislation and available scientific sources, the article clarifies the concept and content of admissibility of evidence in the criminal procedure of Ukraine. It is established that the admissibility of evidence can be interpreted as: a requirement of law; a procedural form; an institution of criminal procedural law; a conclusion regarding a particular piece of evidence after appropriate evaluation; a characteristic (property) of evidence. Admissibility characterizes the possibility of using factual data about the crime committed for evidence. Violation of the procedural form of obtaining evidence does not allow using it for proof, since the use of evidence obtained in accordance with the requirements of law in the process of proof is not only a guarantee of an objective examination of criminal proceedings and making the right decision thereon, but also a guarantee of observance of the rights and legitimate interests of representatives of all parties to criminal proceedings during the collection of evidence. The author proves that admissibility is one of the key characteristics (properties) of evidence. Each of these properties should be considered as an independent construction with its own internal structure and functional integrity. The main difference between admissibility and other properties of evidence is that admissibility is based not only on the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine, but also on the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine. It is determined that, based on the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine and the Constitution of Ukraine, evidence is considered admissible if: it is obtained by a party to criminal proceedings authorized to conduct procedural actions; it is obtained from a proper source of information about the facts; it is obtained as a result of conducting only the procedural actions specified in the law; the procedural form of conducting procedural actions and consolidating their results is observed; and human rights, freedoms and legitimate interests are ensured. Based on the analysis, the author proposes to: 1) to restate Article 86 of the CPC of Ukraine «Admissibility of Evidence» in a new wording; 2) to supplement Article 84 of the CPC of Ukraine «Evidence» with a third part.
Read full abstract