ABSTRACT Many international organizations (IOs) utilize experts’ knowledge using diverse appointment, compensation, residence, and tenure methods. Research shows that paid experts selected by the IO are increasingly independent of state pressure as their term in office extends. Is this the case in other appointment schemes? This article maintains that when experts’ tenures extend in certain appointment methods, their representation mode becomes more active. The article tests this argument with data on the UN Convention Against Torture's (CAT) treaty body (TB) experts’ home country and time in office. The article defines passive and active representation as two ends of an axis. It argues that time in office plays a role in moving experts along that axis. The article then analyzes the link between time in office and the criticism the TB raises against experts’ home country. The results show that the longer the treaty body expert has been in office, the less critical the reports on the expert's home country. The article interprets this as an indication of a movement toward active representation and substantiates this interpretation through interview data.
Read full abstract