AbstractMuch has been learned from the use of resonance Raman spectroscopy and high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy techniques about the micro‐/nanoscopic structure of various nanostructured carbons. However, they still possess some features that are not entirely understood particularly in terms of topological characteristics, which go beyond making a distinction with just the geometrical structure at nanoscale. To effectively utilize the potential of these materials for technological needs, understanding both the geometrical and topological structure and perhaps relating these attributes to physical (optical/electronic, lattice vibrational) properties become indispensable. Here, we make an attempt to describe the differences between various nanostructures and provide geometrical and topological property assessment semiquantitatively by monitoring the phonon spectra using resonance Raman spectroscopy thereby also capturing the electronic spectra. We elucidate the notion of global topology and curvature for a range of technologically important nanoscale carbons including tubular (single‐, double‐ and multiwalled nanotubes, peapod), spherical (hypo‐ and hyperfullerenes, onion‐like carbon) and complex (nanocones, nanohorns, nanodisks and nanorings) geometries. To demonstrate the proof‐of‐concept, we determined the variation in the prominent Raman bands of the respective materials, represented as D, G and D* (the overtone of D) bands, as a possible topological or curvature trend due to their sensitivity toward structural modification. The latter arises from local topological defects such as pentagons giving rise to curved nanocarbons. In this study, we provide systematics of their variation with respect to their geometric forms and compare with highly oriented pyrolytic graphite and monolayer graphene since the nanocarbons discussed are their derivatives. Once established, this knowledge will provide a powerful machinery to understand newer nanocarbons and indeed point to an unprecedented emergent paradigm of global topology/curvature → property → functionality relationship. We emphasize that these concepts are applicable to other topologically distinct nanomaterials, which include boron‐nitride (BN) nanotubes and nanotori, helical gold nanotubes and Möbius conjugated organics. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Read full abstract