The currently accepted idea that the nucleation controlled growth of polymer crystals and spherulites proceeds in different regimes is evaluated. We start from the concepts of mono- and polynucleation regimes of nucleation controlled growth of 2D crystal ( Frank's theory). We recall and illustrate by a morphological observation a clear-cut distinction between mono- (poly) nucleation regimes and Hoffman's regimes of polymer crystal growth, namely regimes I (and II) respectively. In fact, the concepts of regimes I, II (and III) rely upon additional strong postulates. The currently accepted methods of analysis of the kinetics of polymer crystallization (in the framework of the regime I, II and III theories) are also reviewed. Three criteria are proposed and applied, which show that the breaks observed in the curve of G( T c) giving the thermal dependence of the crystal or spherulitic growth rate are not the signature of regime I–II or II–III transitions. This is very likely because the postulate of a quantified “persistence length” ( Lauritzen) and of the thermal insensitivity of the rate g of spreading of surface nuclei are not satisfied. In addition, the concept of the Hoffman regime III has neither theoretical, computational nor experimental sound basis. In a prospective view, the method of estimation of g is discussed and, in a few cases, alternative explanations of the breaks observed in the G( T c) curves are illustrated. Note that it appears that the values of important physical parameters such as the product of the so-called fold and lateral surface free energies have until now been widely overestimated. Our analysis of the experimental data is not exhaustive and is open to discussion but, on the other hand, we cannot find in the literature any valuable support for the theory of regimes I, II and III.