BackgroundA deep understanding of human reactions and stabilization strategies is required to predict their kinematics under external dynamic loadings, such as those that occur in vehicle passengers. Low-level frontal accelerations have been thoroughly investigated; however, the human response to different lateral accelerations is not well understood. The objective of this study is to gain insight regarding the responses of seated humans to lateral perturbations from volunteer experiments in different configurations. MethodsFive volunteers anthropometrically comparable to the 50th-percentile American male, were seated on a sled and submitted to 21 lateral pulses. Seven configurations, each repeated three times, were investigated in this study: a relaxed muscular condition with four pulses, namely, sine and plateau pulses of 0.1 and 0.3 g in a straight spinal posture; a relaxed muscular condition with a plateau pulse of 0.3 g in a sagging spinal posture; and a braced condition with both plateau pulses in a straight spinal posture. Upper body segment kinematics were assessed using inertial measurement units. FindingsThe maximum lateral bending of the head was found to differ significantly among the four acceleration pulses (p < 0.001). Braced muscles significantly reduced lateral bending compared to relaxed muscles (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in lateral bending between straight and sagging spinal postures (p = 0.23). InterpretationThe study shows that not only pulse amplitude but also pulse shape influences human responses to low accelerations, while spinal posture does not influence lateral head bending. These data can be used to evaluate numerical active human body models.