Fracture Of Lateral Process Research Articles

Vascularized medial femoral condyle bone graft for the management of an acute talar neck fracture: A case report

Background Management of talar neck fractures can be challenging due to the high rate of non- or malunion, avascular necrosis and post-traumatic arthritis, which has been attributed to the disruption of the bone’s tenuous blood supply during fracture displacement. Osseous medial femoral condyle (MFC) flaps are increasingly being used in the reconstruction of small bony defects due to recalcitrant non-union and avascular necrosis in the upper and lower limbs. We report a rare case of an MFC flap used in the reconstruction of an acute talar neck fracture. Case Presentation A 38-year-old male presented with multiple injuries following a motor vehicle accident, including an open comminuted talar neck and lateral process fracture, with dislocation of the subtalar and talocrural joints (Hawkins III). Initial exploration and debridement demonstrated a significant defect in the dorsal portion of the talar neck. Temporary stabilisation was achieved with Kirschner wires and the defect was packed with bone cement. Two weeks later, a MFC flap was harvested from the ipsilateral knee and tailored to fit the talar defect. Fixation was achieved with cannulated compression screws. At six weeks post-operative, all wounds had healed, a radiograph demonstrated a positive Hawkins sign and computed tomography showed incorporation of the flap. The patient had no donor site morbidity, and commenced weight bearing at 3 months postoperatively. Conclusion This is the first report demonstrating the viability of MFC flap reconstruction for the management of bony defects in acute talar neck fractures.

Management and classification of the fracture of lateral process of talus: An overview and literature update.

Fracture of the lateral process of the talus (FLPT) is uncommon in clinical practice and can be easily missed or misdiagnosed. In recent years, as researchers from all over the world have further deepened their research on FLPT, there has been a breakthrough in the classification, and the methods and principles of clinical management have changed accordingly; however, there is still no standardized guideline for the diagnosis and management of FLPT, and there have been few relevant literature review articles related to this kind of fracture in the past at least 5 years. In this article, we review the clinical classification, classification-based therapeutic recommendations, and prognosis of FLPT, with the aim of providing a reference for the clinical diagnosis and management of this infrequent fracture.

Effect of hollow compression screw internal fixation in treating McCrory-Bladin type Ⅱ lateral process fracture of the talus: open versus arthroscopy surgery

In order to explore the clinical efficacy of hollow compression screw internal fixation in the treatment of lateral process fracture of the talus under open surgery versus arthroscopy procedure, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 33 patients with lateral process fracture of the talus admitted to Xuzhou Central Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021. There were 19 males (19 feet) and 14 females (14 feet), aged 18 to 50 years, with an average age of (32.2±9.3) years. According to the modified McCrory-Bladin classification, all patients were classified as type Ⅱ. Based on the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into the arthroscopy group (21 cases, treated with double-tunnel subtalar arthroscopy combined with hollow compression screw internal fixation) and the open group (12 cases, treated with open reduction and internal fixation with hollow compression screw). The operation time was observed and the surgical effects were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the Foot Function Index (FFI), and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), which includes the FAAM-ADL (activity of daily living subscale) and the FAAM-S (sport subscale). All the patients of the two groups achieved stage Ⅰ wound healing. On the first day after the operation, the mean VAS score of the arthroscopy group was 2.4±0.7, which was significantly lower than that of the open group (3.4±1.6) (P=0.020). No significant difference was observed in terms of the follow-up time, operation time and AOFAS score between the two groups (all P>0.05). The FFI score of the arthroscopy group was significantly lower than that of the open group, and the FAAM-ADL and FAAM-S scores were significantly higher than those in the open group (all P<0.05). Two cases of dorsal foot numbness occurred in the open group after the operation, and the incidence of complications was not significantly different from that of the arthroscopy group (P=0.054). For McCrory-Bladin type Ⅱ lateral process fracture of the talus, the use of compression screw internal fixation could achieve reliable results, however, compared to open surgery, arthroscopy procedure obtained mini trauma and better functions.

Talus Fractures in Snowboarders: A Case Series

Fractures of the lateral process of the talus have been associated with snowboarding, so much so that they have earned the nickname “snowboarder’s ankle”; these typically occur with relatively low-energy injuries when compared with fractures of the talar head, neck, and body. We have observed that snowboarding portends a higher risk of talus fractures when compared with skiing and can include higher energy injury patterns. This study describes a series of talar head, neck, and body fractures caused by snowboarding, their treatment, and outcomes. A retrospective chart review was performed on all surgical cases collected from 2007 to 2012 to include talar head, neck, body, or lateral process fractures sustained while snowboarding. Radiographs were reviewed and the fractures were characterized. Questionnaires, including the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), were mailed to the patients. The pre-operative reports, surgical treatments, and outcomes were evaluated. Nine patients were identified with fractures of the talus caused by a snowboarding injury. One patient sustained an isolated talar head fracture, three sustained isolated talar neck fractures, one patient had an isolated talar body fracture, and two patients had isolated lateral process fractures. Two patients had a combination of talar injuries. At 2.5 years mean follow-up (range 6 months to 5 years), none of the patients developed avascular necrosis, nonunion/malunion, or required subsequent surgery. FADI scores indicated good to excellent results post-operatively.

Different patterns and characteristics of Talar injuries at two main orthopedic trauma centers in Shiraz, south of Iran

BackgroundCategorizing different injury patterns of the talus, describing demographic data, mechanisms of injury and associated fractures are important issues in orthopedic trauma surgeries. Injuries of the talus require careful attention with appropriate treatment approaches in order to reduce possible complications.MethodsIn a cross-sectional study, the demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, fracture type, and associated fractures were compiled from all patients’ files and operation notes with diagnosis of talar injuries from January 2014 to December 2019.ResultsAmong 367 patients, 317 (86.4%) males and 50 (13.6%) females with mean age of 31.8 ± 11.6 years were identified. There were three (0.8%) patients with bilateral talar fractures. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (MVA) (46.1%), followed by falls (43.3%), direct trauma (6.2%) and sport injuries (4.4%). About half of the patients injured in MVAs were motorcyclists. Isolated talar body fractures (21.9%) were more common than isolated talar neck (19.2%) or combined body & neck fractures (14.6%). Isolated lateral process fracture is the most frequent fractured process of the talus (14.3%). Hawkin type IIA (39.2%) was the most common type of talar neck, followed by Hawkin type III (22.3%), type I (21.5%), type IIB (14.6%) and type IV (2.3%). Medial malleolus, fibula and calcaneus were the most common associated fractures, respectively.ConclusionsThe population that is most affected by talar injury are active young men who are involved in motor vehicle accidents, especially motorcycle crashes, with fracture of body and/or neck of talus being the most common type.

Image Quiz: Lateral Process Fracture of the Talus

JBJS Journal of Orthopaedics for Physician Assistants: January-March 2021 - Volume 9 - Issue 1 - e20.00024 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.JOPA.20.00024

Technique for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Lateral Process Talus Fractures.

Lateral process fractures of the talus may occur either in isolation or in combination with a talar neck or body fracture. Screw fixation has been well described as a means of stabilization; however, many patients have multifragmentary fragments, unable to be controlled by isolated screw fixation alone. Plate fixation of the lateral process has been yet to be described in detail with presence of a clinical series. Here, we describe our technique of plate fixation for both isolated lateral process fractures and those that occur in conjunction with talar neck or body fracture.

Significance of Lateral Process Fractures Associated With Talar Neck and Body Fractures.

To determine whether fracture of the lateral process (LP) elevates the risk of development of radiographic subtalar arthrosis in patients with talar body and neck fractures. Retrospective review. Level 1 academic trauma center. Eighty-two patients with 43 talar neck and 43 talar body fractures treated over a 5-year period. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were evaluated for fracture of the LP of the talus and subsequent development of radiographic subtalar arthritis. Radiographic evidence of subtalar arthritis. Seventy-six percent of talar neck fractures with involvement of the LP went on to develop radiographic evidence of subtalar arthrosis compared with 36% of talar neck fractures without LP involvement (P = 0.035). Thirty of the fractures involving the LP had a separate LP fragment. Fifteen of the 30 fractures with a separate LP fragment that underwent reduction and fixation developed radiographic evidence of subtalar arthrosis, whereas all 13 fractures with an independent LP fragment that did not have fixation of the LP went on to develop radiographic evidence of subtalar arthritis (P = 0.001). Comminution of the inferior talar articular surface was found to significantly increase the risk of radiographic subtalar arthritis in both talar body and talar neck fractures (P = 0.0003). An anatomic reduction of both talar neck and body fractures was found to be associated with a lower incidence of radiographic subtalar arthritis (P = 0.00001). Comminution of the inferior articular surface of the talus elevates the risk of subtalar arthritis in patients with both talar neck and body fractures. Fracture of the LP is a marker for injury to the talar inferior articular surface and increases the risk for the radiographic finding of subtalar arthritis in patients with talar neck fractures. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Surgical treatment of lateral and posterior process fractures of the talus: Mid-term results of 15 cases after 7 years

BackgroundWe retrospectively evaluated the mid-term results of surgery for talar process fractures (lateral and posterior processes) and exploratively analyzed parameters that potentially impact treatment outcomes. MethodsFifteen patients who underwent internal fixation (January 2000 to December 2015) were examined for radiological and clinical functional outcomes. The independent parameters evaluated were age, sex, extent of general injury, soft-tissue damage, surgical latency, and fracture type. ResultsAll fractures healed completely. Three patients developed osteoarthritis. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle/Hindfoot Scale score was 79.5±18.6, the Functional Foot Index score was 31.1±31.4, and the physical and mental component summary scores of the Short Form 36, version 2, were 46.6±11.8 and 50.3±9.1, respectively. No influence on the above scores was determined. ConclusionsThe clinical outcomes of internal fixation of talar process fractures were good. Delayed surgical treatment (≥14days) did not significantly lead to poorer outcomes in our patients.

Fractures of the Lateral Process of the Talus With Associated Ankle Instability: A Report of 2 Cases

Level IV: Case report.

Talar process fractures: An overview and update of the literature.

Fractures of the lateral and the posterior processes of the talus are uncommon and frequently missed because of a low level of suspicion and difficulty in interpretation on plain radiographs. Missed fractures can lead to persistent pain and reduced function.Lateral process fractures are usually a consequence of forced dorsiflexion and inversion of fixed pronated foot. These are also commonly known as snowboarder’s fractures.The posterior process of the talus is composed of medial and lateral tubercles, separated by the groove for the flexor hallucis longus tendon.The usual mechanism of injury is forced hyperplantarflexion and inversion causing direct compression of the posterior talus, or an avulsion fracture caused by the posterior talofibular ligament. CT scans are helpful in cases of high clinical suspicion.There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal management of these fractures; however, management depends on the size, location and displacement of the fragment, the degree of cartilage damage and instability of the subtalar joint. Non-operative treatment includes immobilization and protected weight-bearing for six weeks. Surgical treatment includes open reduction and internal fixation or excision of the fragments, depending on the size.Fractures of the lateral and the posterior processes of the talus are uncommon but important injuries that may result in significant disability in cases of missed diagnosis or delayed or inadequate treatment. Early diagnosis and timely management of these fractures help to avoid long-term complications, including malunion, nonunion or severe subtalar joint osteoarthritis.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:85-92. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170040

The V Sign in Lateral Talar Process Fractures

Category: Ankle, Hindfoot, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Lateral talar process fractures (LTPF) constitute 15% of ankle injuries in snowboarders. They are often misdiagnosed on conventional radiographs, which are also susceptible to rotational malpositioning due to pain. A positive V sign is an interruption of the contour of the lateral talar process. It has been suggested to be pathognomonic for LTPF. However, there are very few studies about this topic. The objectives were to study whether the V sign is useful in diagnosing LTPF. Methods: In an experimental study, two investigators evaluated lateral radiographs (n=108) of high resolution, solid foam, radiopaque distal foot and ankle models. Two other investigators, who obtained the radiographs, defined the gold standard. Four different models (no fracture, type A, B, or C fractures according to Hawkins) and three varying ankle joint positions (0°, 20°, and 40° of inversion, plantar flexion, and internal rotation) were the independent variables. The correct detection of a V sign on lateral radiographs (Figure 2 showing a positive V sign on a lateral radiograph in a type B LTPF) was the primary dependent variable and the detection of the fracture type and uncertainty in making this decision were the secondary dependent variables. The chosen study size surpassed the sample size calculation. The chi-squared test was used for categorical data. Results: There were fair interobserver agreements on the V sign and fracture types (kappa coefficient [k]=0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.53, p&lt;0.001 and k=0.37, 95% CI 0.26-0.48, p&lt;0.001). For the detection of the V sign, the mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, likelihood ratio, and mean uncertainty were 77% (95% CI 67-86%), 59% (95% CI 39-78%), 85% (95% CI 75-92%), 46% (95% CI 29-63%), 2, and 38%. Increased inversion and type B fractures were associated with better detection of the V sign (p=0.035 and p=0.011 as well as p=0.001 and p=0.013, for each investigator). Plantar flexion and internal rotation were not associated with the V sign (p=0.31 and 0.33 as well as 0.35 and 0.53, for each investigator). Conclusion: It is not recommended to exclusively use the V sign for the evaluation of LTPF. If negative, LTPF cannot be excluded. However, if positive, it may be a helpful surrogate parameter for the presence of LTPF, especially type B fractures. Inversion may lead to better visualization of the V sign. This knowledge about the V sign is a valuable asset for the diagnostic skillset of an orthopaedic surgeon. Future clinical studies may focus on validating these experimental findings. [Notes: Level of evidence is not applicable to this study. This abstract has also been submitted to the swiss orthopaedics congress 2017.]

The V sign in lateral talar process fractures: an experimental study using a foot and ankle model

BackgroundLateral talar process fractures (LTPF) are often missed on conventional radiographs. A positive V sign is an interruption of the contour of the LTP. It has been suggested, but not proven to be pathognomonic for LTPF. The objective was to study whether the V sign is pathognomonic for LTPF and if it can be properly assessed in different ankle positions and varying fracture types.MethodsAn experimental study was conducted. Two investigators assessed lateral radiographs (n = 108) of a foot and ankle model. The exposure variables were different ankle positions and fracture types. The primary outcome was the correct detection of a V sign. The secondary outcomes were the detection of the V sign depending on ankle position and fracture type as well as the uncertainty.ResultsThe interobserver agreement on the V sign and type of fracture were fair (κ = 0.35, 95% CI 0.18–0.53, p < 0.001 and κ = 0.37, 95% CI 0.26–0.48, p < 0.001). The mean sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and likelihood ratio for the detection of the V sign were 77% (95% CI 67–86%), 59% (95% CI 39–78%), 85% (95% CI 75–92%), 46% (95% CI 29–63%), and 2. The mean uncertainty in the V sign detection was 38%. The V sign identification stratified by ankle position and fracture type showed significant better results with increasing inversion (p = 0.035 and p = 0.011) and type B fractures (p = 0.001 and p = 0.013).ConclusionsThe V sign may not be pathognomonic and is not recommended as the only modality for the detection of LTPF. It is better visualized with inversion, but does not depend on plantar flexion or internal rotation. It is also better seen in type B fractures. It is difficult to detect and investigator-dependent. It may be helpful in a clinical setting to point into a direction, but a CT scan may be used if in doubt about a LTPF.

Common Foot and Ankle Injuries: What Not to Miss and How Best to Manage.

Injuries to the foot and ankle are commonly encountered, especially among athletes, and can lead to morbidity if not managed appropriately. Health care professionals must have a firm understanding of injury anatomy, diagnoses, and management. This article provides a review of lateral talus process fractures, os trigonum injuries, Lisfranc injuries, turf toe, navicular stress fractures, and syndesmotic injuries.

Le signe du V : un outil diagnostique dans les fractures du processus latéral du talus

The lateral process fracture of the talus occurs conventionally in snowboarding. Under other circumstances, it is however rare and the diagnosis is often delayed. The diagnosis is based on a body of evidence – anamnestic, clinical and radiographic. The anteroposterior radiographic exam may not be contributory and would not show any sign of fracture. We present here the case of a 40-year-old female patient, where the V sign on the lateral radiography led to the diagnosis.

Fracture of the Lateral Process of the Talus in Children: A Kind of Ankle Injury With Frequently Missed Diagnosis.

To analyze the clinical characteristics, the treatment, and the outcome of lateral process fracture of the talus in children. From March 2011 to October 2013, 12 children with lateral process fracture of the talus were treated in our hospital. The study contained 3 female and 9 male patients, including 8 patients affected on the left side and 4 on the right side. The age at the time of injury ranged from 8 to 13 years. Concomitant injuries included undisplaced calcaneus fractures in 1 case and distal fibula epiphysis injury in 1 case. The patients presented to our hospital from 2 hours to 2 months after injury. All cases were classified by the Hawkins fracture system. Treatment included immobilization and not bearing weight for 4 weeks for nondisplaced fractures or open reduction and fixation for significantly displaced fractures. Therapeutic effects were evaluated on the basis of the AOFAS (The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) Ankle Hindfoot Scale. Seven of the cases were initially diagnosed in our department, and the diagnosis was missed in 5 cases. The missed diagnosis rate was 42%. All patients were followed up for 18 months on an average. Follow-up radiographs did not show avascular necrosis of the talus, nonunion, and malunion in any patient. The mean AOFAS hindfoot score was 96 points. The clinical result was found to be excellent in 10 patients, good in 1 patient, and fair in 1 patient (the success rate was 92%). The lateral process of talus fracture is a frequently missed injury. The diagnosis must rely on thorough check-ups combined with standard radiographs and computed tomographic scan. Depending on the type and the displacement of the fracture, proper treatment options could be implemented for desirable clinical effects.

Neglected lateral process of talus fracture presenting as a loose body in tarsal canal

Lateral process fractures of talus are rare injuries with a potential to cause significant morbidity if misdiagnosed. The appropriate management of these fractures is still controversial and only a few reports are avai- lable on this subject. We presented a case of a 37-year-old male with neglected fracture on the lateral process of talus which was misdiagnosed at the time of injury. The patient presented to 7 months after misdiagnosis with a chronic ankle pain. Our case is unique in the sense that it is a rare case of neglected fracture on the lateral process of talus which presented as a loose body in sinus tarsi. However, a surgery with an excision of the loose body presented a satis- factory outcome along with 2 years' follow-up. To our knowledge, it ought to be the first case reported in the English literature. Through this case report, we highlight the importance of high index of suspicion for such rare bony injuries while evaluating trauma to the lateral side of ankle and discuss the principles of management of these fractures.

Talar Fractures and Dislocations: A Radiologist’s Guide to Timely Diagnosis and Classification

The talus, the second largest tarsal bone, has distinctive imaging characteristics and injury patterns. The predominantly extraosseous vascular supply of the talus predisposes it to significant injury in the setting of trauma. In addition, the lack of muscular attachments and absence of a secondary blood supply can lead to subsequent osteonecrosis. Although talar fractures account for less than 1% of all fractures, they commonly result from high-energy trauma and may lead to complications and long-term morbidity if not recognized and managed appropriately. While initial evaluation is with foot and ankle radiographs, computed tomography (CT) is often performed to evaluate the extent of the fracture, displacement, comminution, intra-articular extension, and associated injuries. Talar fractures are divided by anatomic region: head, neck, and body. Talar head fractures can be treated conservatively if nondisplaced, warranting careful radiographic and CT evaluation to assess rotation, displacement, and extension into the neck. The modified Hawkins-Canale classification of talar neck fractures is most commonly used due to its simplicity, usefulness in guiding treatment, and prognostic value, as it correlates associated malalignment with risk of subsequent osteonecrosis. Isolated talar body fractures may be more common than previously thought. The Sneppen classification further divides talar body fractures into osteochondral talar dome, lateral and posterior process, and shear and crush comminuted central body fractures. Crush comminuted central body fractures carry a poor prognosis due to nonanatomic reduction, bone loss, and subsequent osteonecrosis. Lateral process fractures can be radiographically occult and require a higher index of suspicion for successful diagnosis. Subtalar dislocations are often accompanied by fractures, necessitating postreduction CT. Familiarity with the unique talar anatomy and injury patterns is essential for radiologists to facilitate appropriate and timely management.

Peroneus Tendon Dislocation Associated with Fracture of Lateral Process of Talus: A Case Report

Peroneus Tendon Dislocation Associated with Fracture of Lateral Process of Talus: A Case Report

Fractures of the sustentaculum tali

Anatomical reconstruction of displaced sustentaculum tali fractures via a direct medial approach. Displaced fractures of the sustentaculum tali with incongruity or depression of the medial facet of the subtalar joint, entrapment of the flexor hallucis longus or flexor digitorum longus tendons, fracture line extending into the posterior facet of the subtalar joint. Infected or grossly contaminated soft tissue, severely restricted vascular supply to the foot, high perioperative risk. Direct medial approach over the sustentaculum tali, retraction of the tendons, joint exploration, fracture reduction using the medial facet and cortical outline as guidelines, fracture fixation with two small fragment screws from medial to lateral directed slightly plantarly and posteriorly. Fractures with depression of the medial facet as a whole can alternatively be reduced and fixed percutaneously. Lower leg splint for 5-7 days, partial weight-bearing with 20 kg for 6-8 weeks (until radiographic signs of consolidation) in the patient's own shoewear, early range of motion exercises of the ankle, subtalar and mid-tarsal joints. Over a course of 15 years, 31 patients were treated operatively for sustentacular fractures. In all, 27 patients (87%) had additional fractures to the same foot and ankle. Eighteen patients with a mean age of 41 years treated at our institution with screw fixation for a unilateral fracture of the sustentaculum tali could be followed for a mean of 80 months (range 15-151 months). No wound healing problems or infections were seen with the medial approach. At the time of follow-up, 15 sustentaculum tali fractures had an average Foot Function Index of 21.6 and an average AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score of 83.6. Patients with isolated fractures of the sustentaculum tali had significantly better scores than those with additional injuries. In 1 patient, an additional lateral process fracture of the talus required subtalar fusion due to persistent pain. Care must be taken not to overlook these atypical calcaneal fractures and accompanying injuries to the mid-tarsal joint and the lateral talar process as seen in 45% and 23%, respectively, in the present series.