Lateral Pelvic Recurrence Research Articles

Recurrence of rectal cancer on the pelvic sidewall after lateral lymph node dissection

PurposeAlthough lateral lymph node dissection has been performed to prevent lateral pelvic recurrence in locally advanced lower rectal cancer, the incidence of lateral pelvic recurrence after this procedure has not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, with a particular focus on recurrence patterns.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a single high-volume cancer center in Japan. A total of 493 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent lateral lymph node dissection between January 2005 and August 2022 were included. The primary outcome measures included patterns of recurrence, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Patterns of recurrence were categorized as lateral or central pelvic.ResultsAmong patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection, 18.1% had pathologically positive lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic recurrence occurred in 5.5% of patients after surgery. Multivariate analysis identified age > 75 years, lateral lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence. Evaluation of the recurrence rate by dissection area revealed approximately 1% of recurrences in each area after dissection.ConclusionWe demonstrated the prognostic outcome and limitations of lateral lymph node dissection for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer, focusing on the incidence of recurrence in the lateral area after the dissection. Our study emphasizes the clinical importance of lateral lymph node dissection, which is an essential technique that surgeons should acquire.

Stereotactic Navigation-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection of Challenging Low Pelvic Tumors: A Case Series.

(1) Introduction: The laparoscopic approach to low pelvic tumors is challenging and hindered by suboptimal tumor visualization and dissection, with possible oncological failure. Stereotactic navigation provides real-time image guidance that may optimize safety, accuracy, and precision when dissecting challenging low pelvic tumors. (2) Methods: Preoperative CT images were acquired with eight skin-fixed fiducials and loaded into a navigation system. A patient tracker was mounted on the bed side. Patient-to-image paired point registration was performed, and an instrument tracker was mounted on a laparoscopic instrument and calibrated for instrument tracking. Surgical operations were performed with real-time stereotactic navigation assistance. (3) Results: Three patients underwent stereotactic navigation surgery. Fiducial registration errors were good to optimal (±1.9, ±3.4, and ±3.4 mm). Lesions were easily identified and targeted with real-time navigation. Surgeries were uneventful. Histopathology examinations identified one retro-rectal schwannoma, one lateral pelvic recurrence from rectal adenocarcinoma, and one advanced anal canal carcinoma. No navigation-related complications, readmissions, or postoperative mortalities were observed. (4) Conclusions: The application of laparoscopic stereotactic navigation surgery to complex low pelvic tumors is feasible and could impact oncological surgical quality by enabling tumor targeting and ensuring resection margins. Further wider series are needed to confirm stereotactic navigation's impact on challenging low pelvic tumors.

Recurrence in the pelvic side wall after lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

49 Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer poses a persistent challenge due to the risk of local recurrence, which impacts patient outcomes and quality of life. To address this, lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) has emerged as a surgical approach to improve local control. However, comprehensive studies evaluating the outcomes and patterns of recurrence after LPND are limited. This retrospective study aimed to fill this gap and provide insights into the effectiveness of LPND. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 515 patients diagnosed with stage II-III lower rectal cancer who underwent TME and LPND between January 2005 and August 2022. Clinicopathological data were collected, and tumor staging followed the TNM classification system. Recurrence patterns, survival rates, and factors influencing lateral pelvic recurrence were assessed. Results: In our cohort, 18.8% of patients had pathologically positive lateral lymph nodes. Patients with lateral lymph node metastasis exhibited significantly lower 5-year relapse-free survival (31.6%) and overall survival (47.8%) rates compared to those without metastasis (69.5% and 84.7%, respectively). Local recurrence occurred in 20.1% of all patients, with 6.7% experiencing lateral pelvis recurrence (LPR) and 17.4% central pelvis recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified age over 75, lateral lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent risk factors for LPR. Conclusions: Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection remains a valuable tool in managing locally advanced rectal cancer. Our findings underscore the importance of surgeon expertise in performing LPND and the potential benefits of combining treatments to further reduce lateral recurrence. LPND should continue to be explored and refined to enhance patient outcomes in this challenging clinical scenario.

Outcomes and Failure Patterns after Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) combined with positive lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLN) tends to present worse prognosis. However, for those patients it remains unclear whether other combination high-risk factors affect the prognosis. This study aimed to use propensity score matching (PSM) to examine long-term outcomes and failure patterns in patients with positive vs. negative LPLN. Patients with LARC were retrospectively divided into LPLN-positive and LPLN-negative groups. LPLN-positivity was defined as lymph node short diameter greater than or equal to 7 mm with specific morphological features. Clinical characteristics were compared between the groups using the chi-square test. PSM was applied to balance these differences. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and local-regional recurrence (LRR) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were compared between the groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Prior to PSM, a total of 651 LARC patients were included. The LPLN-positive group had higher rates of lower location (53.1% vs. 43.0%, P = 0.025), mesorectal fascia (MRF)-positive (53.9% vs. 35.4%, P<0.001) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI)-positive (51.2% vs. 27.2%, P<0.001) disease than the LPLN-negative group. After PSM, there were 114 patients for each group along with the balanced clinical factors, and both groups had comparable surgery, pathologic complete response (pCR), and ypN stage rates. The median follow-up time was 45.9 months, 3-year OS (88.3% vs. 92.1%, P = 0.276) and LRR (5.7% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.172) rates were comparable between LPLN-positive and LPLN-negative groups. Meanwhile, despite no statistical difference, 3-year PFS (78.8% vs. 85.9%, P = 0.065) and DM (20.4% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.061) rates slightly differed between the groups. Among 10 patients with LRR, seven (70.0%) had lateral pelvic recurrence, among them, five patients were LPLN-positive, and four (80.0%) of these patients did not receive simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB- IMRT).45 patients were diagnosed with DM, 11 (40.7%) LPLN-positive and 3 (17.6%) LPLN-negative patients were diagnosed with oligometastases (P = 0.109). Our study shows there is a tendency of worse PFS and DM in LPLN-positive than LPLN-negative patients, for LPLN-positive patients, oligometastases account for a large proportion of all distant metastases.

Clinical implication and management of rectal cancer with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: A radiation oncologist's perspective.

Rectal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide. With the introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT), intrapelvic local control has been remarkably improved. However, lateral pelvic recurrence remains problematic, especially in patients with clinically suspicious lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN). LPLN dissection has been applied for the management of LPLN metastasis, mainly in Japan and other Eastern countries, while the role of NCRT is more emphasized and LPLN dissection is performed in very limited cases in Western countries. However, the optimal management strategy for patients with rectal cancer with suspicious LPLN metastasis has not been determined. Herein, we review the latest studies on the optimal management of LPLN metastasis to suggest the most appropriate treatment policies according to current evidence and discuss future research directions.

Laparoscopic versus open lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: multicentre retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundLateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) is an option in the treatment of rectal cancer and may reduce local recurrence/improve disease-free survival. Advancements in minimally invasive technology have improved the ability to identify anatomy and neurovascular structures that may help in LPLND. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the technical feasibility and oncological safety of laparoscopic LPLND compared with the open LPLND.MethodBetween July 2010 and July 2019, patients from three tertiary referral hospitals who underwent LPLND with total mesorectal excision for primary rectal cancer were included. Baseline patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, pathologic results, recurrence, and survival were compared between the laparoscopic and open groups.ResultsThere were 126 and 70 patients in the laparoscopic and open groups respectively. The laparoscopic group had less estimated blood loss (100 ml versus 300 ml, P < 0.001) and lower transfusion rate (0.8 per cent versus 10.0 per cent; P = 0.003) but longer operating times (318 min versus 270 min, P = 0.004). The laparoscopic group had fewer wound infections (1.6 per cent versus 10.0 per cent, P = 0.011) and neuropathy (0 per cent versus 4.3 per cent, P = 0.044). Lateral pelvic recurrence rate was 7.6 per cent in the laparoscopic group and 19.6 per cent in the open group (P = 0.053). Recurrence-free survival (72.2 per cent versus 63.5 per cent; P = 0.190) and overall survival (93.3 per cent versus 85.0 per cent; P = 0.118) were not significantly different.ConclusionLaparoscopic LPLND was associated with improved perioperative outcomes and non-inferior oncological outcomes.

Chinese Expert Consensus on Iodine125 Seed Implantation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer in 2021.

The treatment modality for recurrent cervical cancer (rCC) is limited, and the prognosis of these patients is poor. Seed implantation could be an important component of rCC management in the context of dose boost or salvage therapy after surgery or radiotherapy, which is characterized by a minimally invasive, high local dose, and rapidly does fall, sparing normal tissue. For patients with good performance status and lateral pelvic wall recurrence with an available puncture path, seed implantation was recommended, as well as for selected central pelvic recurrence and extra-pelvic recurrence. The combination of brachytherapy treatment planning system and CT guidance was needed, and three-dimensional printing templates could greatly improve the accuracy, efficiency, and quality of seed implantation to achieve a potential ablative effect and provide an efficient treatment for rCC. However, the recommendations of seed implantation were mainly based on retrospective articles and lack high-quality evidence, and multicenter prospective randomized studies are needed. In this consensus on iodine125 seed implantation for rCC, indication selection, technical process and requirements, dosimetry criteria, radiation protection, combined systemic therapy, and outcomes of seed implantation for rCC are discussed.

The Addition of Preoperative Radiation Is Insufficient for Lateral Pelvic Control in a Subgroup of Patients With Low Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

The local recurrence of rectal cancer has been improved by total mesorectal excision following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, in patients with low locally advanced rectal cancer, lateral pelvic recurrence remains to be addressed. This study aimed to determine the efficiency of neoadjuvant radiotherapy in addressing lateral pelvic recurrence and which subgroup of patients might be optimal to receive lateral lymph node dissection. The MRI/CT images were reassessed for lateral lymph node status. The lateral lymph nodes with short axis ≥5 mm and ≥4 mm were considered positive in pretreatment and restaging MRI/CT. This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial (FOWARC, NCT01211210). A total of 495 patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma were included in the original trial. According to the excluding criteria, the finally included population consists of 253 patients; of these, 195 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 94 received chemotherapy alone. The primary outcome was the 5-year lateral pelvic recurrence rate. Compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone, patients receiving additional radiotherapy had a marginal significance of lower lateral pelvic recurrence rate (6.6% vs 13.0%; p = 0.051). In the subset with pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes, patients had a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 22.6% and 45.1% after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy alone. Of note, 34.9% of the pretreatment positive lateral lymph nodes were persistent after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, culminating in a lateral pelvic recurrence rate of 63.3%. This is a post hoc analysis, and only the patients from the leading center were included, which limited the sample size. In addition, the lateral lymph node dissection was not performed in this cohort. The addition of radiotherapy in neoadjuvant regimens could not address lateral pelvic recurrence adequately. Some subgroups of patients might need additional dissection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613. ANTECEDENTES:La recurrencia local del cancer de recto ha disminuido al efectuar una excision mesorrectal total seguida de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante. No obstante, en pacientes con cancer de tercio inferior de recto avanzado localmente, aún está por controlarse la recurrencia pélvicaOBJETIVOS:Determinar la eficacia de la radioterapia neoadyuvante en el control de la recurrencia pélvica lateral y en que subgrupo de pacientes sería conveniente efecutar una excisión lateral de las cadenas ganglionares.DISEÑO:Se reevaluaron las imágenes tomográficas y de resonancia magnética del status de las cadenas ganglionares linfáticas laterales. Los ganglios linfáticos laterales con un eje-corto > 5 mm y ≥ 4 mm se consideraron como positivos previo al tratamiento y reestadificados con RM y TAC respectivamente.ESCENARIO:Es un análisis post hoc de un studio prospectivo randomizado controlado (FOWARC, NCT01211210).PACIENTESSe incluyeron un total de 495 pacientes en estdio II o III con adenomcarcinoma rectal en el estudio original. De acuerdo a los criterios de exclusión, la población final incluida consistió en 253 pacientes; de estos, 195 recibieron quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante y 94 quimioterapia sola.EVALUACION DE LOS RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES:El parámetro mas importante fue la tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral a cinco años.RESULTADOS:En comparación con los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia sola, aquellos que además fueron sometidos a radioterapia adicional presentaron un margen significativo de menor tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral (6.6% vs. 13.0%; p=0.051). En el grupo de pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos, los enfermos presentaron una tasa de recurrencia pélvica lateral de 22.6% y 45.1% después de quimioradiaterapia neoadyuvante en comparación con quimioterapia sola respectivamente. Cabe mencionar que el 34.9% de los pacientes con ganglios linfáticos laterales positivos antes del tratamiento persistieron después de la quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante, reportándose finalmente una recurrencia pélvica lateral de un 63.3%.LIMITACIONES:Se trata de un análisis posthoc y solo los pacientes del hospital fueron incluidos, lo que limita el tamaño de la muestra. Además, no se efectuó la disección de los ganglios linfáticos laterales en este grupo.CONCLUSIONES:La radioterapia en los esquemas de neoadyuvancia no logran controlar la recurrencia pélvica lateral en forma adecuada. Algunos subgrupos de pacientes podría requerir de disección adicional. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B613.

Indications and oncological outcomes of selective dissection for clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer based on pretreatment imaging.

The aim of this study was to identify the indications and oncological outcomes of selective lateral lymph node dissection (sLLND) in rectal cancer patients. A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with rectal cancer who had standard total mesorectal excision and sLLND at our institution. Clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes were analyzed. We performed subgroup analysis and multivariate analysis based on patients with or without preoperative chemoradiotherapy to identify the related risk factors. A total of 77 consecutive patients with TME and sLLND were included. Twenty-two (28.6%) patients with pathological positive lateral lymph nodesmetastasis (LLNM) were identified. Forty-seven (61%) patients accepted neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The pretreatment maximum short-axis diameters of LLN (≥ 8mm) were the independent risk factors for LLNM among patients with LLN ≥ 5mm. Lymph nodemetastasis weresignificantly higher in patients with pretreatment LLN ≥ 8mm than in patients with LLN 5-8mm (63% vs. 10%, p < 0.001). The receiver operating curve analysis suggested that the optimal cutoff value of LLN short-axis diameter for predicting LLNM was 8mm. At amedian follow-up of 42 months (range 6-140 months) 3(3.9%) patients with lateral pelvic recurrence were observed. The 3-year cumulative overall survival in patients with LLNM and patients without LLNM was 76.7% and 89.8%, respectively (p = 0.01). The 3-year cumulative disease-free survival was 53.6% in patients with LLNM and 88.3% in patients without LLNM (p = 0.008). Patients with LLNM had a worse prognosis. The pretreatment maximum short-axis diameter of LLN (≥ 8mm) should be considered as an indication for sLLND.

A Modified Technique of Laparoscopic Lateral Lymph Node Dissection Combining Fascia-Oriented Dissection and Routine Upfront Distal Visceral Vessels Ligation for Mid- to Low-Lying Rectal Cancer.

Lateral pelvic recurrence can be a cause of local failure after surgery for low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node dissection is often performed in East Asia for patients with enlarged lateral lymph nodes or because of the presence of risk factors. However, the outcomes of the conventional lateral lymph node dissection are unsatisfactory, with a considerably high local recurrence rate for patients with positive lateral nodes. Here, we introduce a modified technique to improve lateral nodes clearance. This modified technique has 4 key steps: 1) separation of the ureterohypogastric nerve fascia medially, 2) identification of the visceral pelvic fascia and dissection along the inferior vesical or vaginal veins down to the pelvic floor, 3) division of the distal ends of visceral vessels according to the orientation of ureterohypogastric nerve fascia and visceral pelvic fascia for better nerve preservation, and 4) en bloc dissection through a lateral approach over the surfaces of the sacral plexus and piriformis muscle to reveal the course of distal internal iliac vessels before the division of visceral veins. Twenty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection successively with no conversion. The median blood loss for each lateral procedure was 37.5 mL (range, 0-300.0 mL). Eleven lateral nodes (median; range, 1-22 lateral nodes) were harvested for each lateral side. There was no perioperative mortality, and 4 patients developed major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-IV). This modified technique characterized by the routine division of visceral vessels based on ureterohypogastric nerve fascia and visceral pelvic fascia is feasible and safe. It provides good lymph node harvest, autonomic nerve preservation, and improved bleeding control. Additional investigation is warranted to evaluate the safety, functional outcomes, and oncologic outcomes.

Is laparoscopic selective lateral lymph node dissection for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy safe?

This study aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) with selective lateral lymph node (LLN) dissection (sLLND) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and clinically suspected swollen LLNs treated with preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Consecutive patients with LARC and swollen LLNs who underwent laparoscopic TME and sLLND following nCRT between October 2012 and October 2018 were reviewed from the prospectively collected database. Patient demographics, operation safety, perioperative complications and oncological outcomes were analysed. A total of 43 patients were identified. All procedures were completed under laparoscopy without conversion to open surgery. The median operation time was 313 min (range 170-570 min). The median blood loss was 80 mL (range 30-450 mL). The median number of LLNs harvested was 11 (range 1-29). LLN metastasis was found in 12 patients (27.9%). Major post-operative complications were found in four patients (9.3%). The median hospital stay was 7 days (range 4-27 days). The median time to tolerance to liquid food was 72 h (range 36-120 h). The post-operative 30-day mortality rate was 0%. Over the median follow-up of 24 months, no lateral pelvic recurrence developed. For the whole group of patients, the 2-year cumulative overall survival and disease-free survival were 90.5% and 78.1%, respectively. With the advantages of a minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic TME and sLLND following preoperative nCRT in patients with LARC and swollen LLNs is safe and feasible. This procedure provides acceptable perioperative and oncological outcomes.

Lateral Lymph Node Dissection With the Focus on Indications, Functional Outcomes, and Minimally Invasive Surgery.

The lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is still a subject of great debate as to the appropriate treatment for patients with mid to low advanced rectal cancer. The guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum recommend a LLND for patients with T3/4 rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. However, in most Western countries, a routine LLND is not recommended unless a node or nodes are clinically suspicious for metastasis. Even after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), an 8% to 12% lateral pelvic recurrence was noted. The size of the lateral lymph node and responsiveness to preoperative CRT should be the main factors for selecting appropriate patients to undergo a LLND. In addition, from the recent literature, a laparoscopic LLND is safe and oncologically feasible and might have some advantages in short-term outcomes.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of multimodality treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer with curative intent.

Radical management of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) can lead to prolonged survival. This study aims to assess outcomes and identify prognostic factors for patients with LRRC treated using a multimodality treatment protocol. An analysis of a prospectively maintained institutional database of consecutive patients who underwent radical surgical resection for LRRC was performed. Potential prognostic factors were investigated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Ninety-eight patients were included in this study. A multimodality approach was taken in the majority, including preoperative chemoradiation (78%), intraoperative radiation therapy (47%) and adjuvant chemotherapy (41%). Extended resection was performed where required: bone resection (34%) and lateral pelvic sidewall dissection (31%). The rate of R0 resection was 66%. Estimated rates of 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 41.8% (95% CI 32.5-53.7) and 22.5% (95% CI 15.3-33.1). On multivariate analysis, stage III disease at initial primary surgery, a positive margin at initial primary surgery, synchronous or previously resected oligometastases, a lateral or sacral invasive-type pelvic recurrence and the requirement for IORT all predicted for inferior PFS (p < 0.05). Eleven percent of patients subsequently underwent further pelvic surgery for pelvic re-recurrence and had an estimated 5-year OS rate of 54.5% (95% CI 29.0-100.0) from repeat surgery. Radical multimodality management of LRRC leads to prolonged survival in approximately 40% of patients. Those with sacral or lateral invasive-type recurrence or oligometastatic disease have inferior outcomes and further research is needed to optimise treatment for these groups.

Patterns of Local Recurrence and Oncologic Outcomes in T3 Low Rectal Cancer (≤5cm from the Anal Verge) Treated With Short-Course Radiotherapy With Delayed Surgery : Outcomes in T3 Low Rectal Cancer Treated With Short-Course Radiotherapy With Delayed Surgery.

Short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery (SRT-delay) is still under clinical investigation for its efficacy in treating low rectal cancer (≤5cm from the anal verge). This study was designed to assess the pattern of local recurrence and oncologic outcomes in T3 low rectal cancer treated with SRT-delay. This study enrolled T3 low rectal cancer patients without distant metastasis between 2003 and 2015. All patients received total mesorectal excision following SRT-delay (25Gy/10 fractions/5days+S-1 radiosensitizer with a 4-week delay of surgery). The median follow-up period was 69 (range 1-149) months. A total 119 consecutive patients had low rectal cancer; 104 (87.4%) underwent intersphincteric resection (ISR), and 15 (12.6%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). Fifty-six patients (47.1%) were ypT-downstaged, 86 (72.2%) were ypN0, and 10 (8.4%) had circumferential resection margin involvement. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were 93.0, 76.2, and 80.5%, respectively. Nine patients experienced local recurrence: lateral pelvic recurrence in six patients (5.0%) and central pelvic recurrence in three (2.5%). A total of 87.4% of sphincter-preserving surgeries were performed for T3 low rectal cancer following SRT-delay. Pathological tumor downstaging, circumferential resection margin involvement, local recurrence, and oncologic outcomes were acceptable; therefore, the SRT-delay regimen may be an option for treating T3 low rectal cancer.

側方領域再発切除後急激に骨・肝再発した直腸SM癌の1例

側方領域再発切除後急激に骨・肝再発した直腸SM癌の1例

Factors associated with lateral pelvic recurrence after curative resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients

This study aims to determine the risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence (LPR) in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative surgery. Four hundred forty-three patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and curative surgery from October 1999 through June 2009 were analyzed. All patients underwent total mesorectal resection without lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) dissection. Recurrence patterns and lateral pelvic recurrence-free survival (LPFS) were evaluated relative to clinicopathologic parameters including pelvic LN status. Median follow-up was 52months, with locoregional recurrence in 53 patients (11.9%). Of the 53 patients, 28 (52.8%) developed LPR, of which eight had both central and lateral PR. Multivariate analysis showed a significant relationship between LPFS and the number of lateral pelvic LN (p = 0.010) as well as the ratio of the number of positive LN/number of dissected LN (p = 0.038). The relationship between LPFS and LPLN size had a marginal trend (p = 0.085). Logistic regression analysis showed positive relationships between LPR probability and the number of LPLN (odds ratio [OR] 1.507; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.177-1.929; p = 0.001) as well as LPLN size (OR 1.124; CI 1.029-1.227, p = 0.009). LPLN ≥ 2 and a ratio of the number of positive LN/number of dissected LN > 0.3 were prognostic of poor LPFS. The prediction curve of LPR according to the number and size of LPLN could be useful for determining the benefit of additional lateral pelvic treatment.

Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is helpful in the management of patients with low rectal cancer. With the advent of this technique, the need for performance of abdominoperineal resection seems to have decreased in patients with very low rectal tumors. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility, the functional outcome, and the short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic ISR for low rectal adenocarcinoma at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the data of 111 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic ISR for low rectal adenocarcinoma between July 2005 and December 2009. Demographic status, surgical outcomes, functional outcome data, and oncologic outcome data were collected. The mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was 3.4 cm (range: 1-5 cm). The mean operative time was 214.7 min (range, 150-450 min). The mean distal resection margin was 1.3 ± 1.1 cm. Morbidity occurred in 24 patients (21.6%), including anastomotic leakage in 2 patients (1.8%). The mean Wexner continence score after stoma repair was 7.5 ± 2.7 (range: 2 ~ 19), and 9.8 in total ISR, 7.3 in partial ISR (P = 0.071). The 3-year overall survival rate was 92.8%, and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 73.0%. Local recurrence was noted in 6 of the 111 patients with TNM stage I to III (5.4%). The patients with lesions at 2 cm to the dentate line had a 7.07-fold greater risk of local recurrence, including a 13.42-fold greater risk of lateral pelvic wall recurrence and perineal recurrence (95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.141-158.006; P = 0.009) than in those who had lesions more than 2 cm from the anal verge (95% CI, 1.290-38.832; P = 0.011). Laparoscopic ISR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation can be recommended as a technically feasible, minimally invasive, and a sphincter-saving procedure with acceptable functional and short-term oncologic outcomes in patients with very low rectal cancer.

Pelvic Exenteration with En Bloc Iliac Vessel Resection for Lateral Pelvic Wall Involvement

Lateral pelvic recurrence is considered a poor prognostic variable and a relative contraindication to surgery because of the difficulty in achieving clear margins. The aim of this study was to outline our surgical approach to lateral pelvic sidewall involvement and assess the oncologic and long-term outcomes. A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed. Patient demographics, cancer and operative details, intent, margins, lymph node status, rerecurrence at resection site, follow-up, living and death details were assessed. En bloc lateral pelvic wall dissection and vascular resection with pelvic exenteration was performed in 36 patients of 107 exenterations. All patients underwent surgery with curative intent. Negative margins were achieved in 19 patients (53%). Ten patients (28%) developed recurrence at the site of resection compared with 26 patients (72%) who remained disease free at the site of surgery. Sixteen patients (46%) are disease-free with the average disease-free interval of 30 months. Twenty-five patients (69%) are alive with a mean follow-up of 19 months. No mortalities occurred in this cohort of patients. Despite the complexity of this technique, it is safe and feasible. Careful preoperative radiologic assessment and a multidisciplinary approach are paramount to achieving clear margins.

Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis Is a Major Cause of Locoregional Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Resection

In rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative resection, we evaluated the effect of clinical parameters on lateral pelvic recurrence and made an attempt to identify a risk factor for lateral pelvic recurrence. The study involved 366 patients who underwent preoperative CRT and curative resection between October 2001 and December 2005. Clinical parameters such as gender, age, tumor size, histologic type, cT and cN classification, ypT and ypN classification, circumferential resection margin, tumor regression grade, chemotherapeutic regimen, and lateral lymph node size were analyzed to identify risk factors associated with lateral pelvic recurrence. Of the 366 patients, 29 patients (7.9%) had locoregional recurrence: 6 (20.7%) with central pelvic recurrence and 24 (82.7%) had lateral pelvic recurrence, of which 1 had simultaneous central and lateral pelvic recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that ypN classification and lateral lymph node size were significantly associated with lateral pelvic recurrence (P < .001). Of 250 ypN0 patients, lateral pelvic recurrence developed in 1.4%, 2.9%, and 50% of patients with lateral lymph node sizes of < 5, 5-9.9, and > or = 10 mm, respectively (P < .001). Of 116 ypN+ patients, lateral pelvic recurrence developed in 4.3%, 35.7%, and 87.5% of patients with lateral lymph node sizes of < 5, 5-9.9, and > or = 10 mm, respectively (P < .001). In our study, lateral pelvic recurrence was a major cause of locoregional recurrence, and ypN+ and lateral lymph node size were risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence.

Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis Is a Major Cause of Locoregional Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Resection

Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis Is a Major Cause of Locoregional Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Resection