Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Research Articles

Case report: unusual posteromedial capsular lesion with posterior lateral meniscus root tear in two patients with constitutional genu recurvatum presenting after an acute ACL injury

Ramp lesions of the medial meniscus and posterior lateral meniscus root tears (LMPRT) can be present simultaneously in up to 8% of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The prevalence of these complex and highly unstable meniscal tears increases exponentially with the severity of the injury. The posteromedial capsule (PMC) has often been disregarded in the past when discussing ligamentous and meniscal injuries, but the recent interest in ramp lesions has drawn surgeons’ attention to the posteromedial structures of the ACL injured knee. While the meniscocapsular junction is commonly repaired in unstable ramp lesions, in the current literature there is no report regarding proximal PMC lesions, be they in isolation or associated with complex meniscal injuries.We report here two cases of proximal posteromedial capsular lesions associated with medial meniscus instability and posterior lateral root tears after ACL injury. The first case involves a meniscus ramp lesion associated with a proximal PMC tear and a posteromedial fluid collection in the muscle plane on magnetic resonance in a 22-year-old male soccer player. The second case involves a 21-year-old female soccer player who presented with a PMC lesion after hyperextension/valgus knee injury. The capsular lesions were repaired to restore capsular tension and improve medial meniscus posterior horn stability.

Controversial Treatment Choice to Manage Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tear: A Case Report

Introduction: Meniscus root tears are defined as radial tears within 1 cm of the meniscus insertion, or avulsions at the insertion of the meniscus. Based on tear morphology, there are 2 classification system for both medial and lateral posterior root tears. Lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) is usually traumatic in nature and has been reported to occur in 7-10% of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The most commonly utilized treatments for LMPRT include non-operative treatment, partial meniscectomy, or repair. However, studies evaluating the clinical success of partial meniscectomy for LMPRT are contradictory. Case Report: A 18 years old man came to the orthopaedic clinic with complaints of pain in the right knee, after 2 months excessive physical training to join the police academy. Physical examination of the right knee showed positive results on McMurray and Thesaly’s test. According the combination of the cleft, truncated triangle, and ghost signs on the patient’s MRI examination which showed there was a lateral meniscus posterior root tear of the right knee without ACL injury. Meniscus repair was performed for this patient at the beginning, but apparently the meniscus can not be repositioned. Therefore, we decided that Arthroscopy Partial Meniscectomy (APM) was the best option for this patient. Conclusion: Even though APM long term outcomes is still controversial, when repair is not possible, APM is preferred to get short term benefits after the surgery, such as shorter recovery time and less revision surgery rates.

Arthroscopic Repair of the “Tibial Avulsion Triad”—ACL Posterolateral Bundle, PCL, and Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root: The Triple Tunnel Technique

Tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) are rare injuries that can be fixed either via and open or arthroscopic approach to restore native knee biomechanics. The advantage of arthroscopic fixation is the ability to treat concomitant intra-articular pathologies that are otherwise difficult to identify and manage via an open approach, such as medial meniscal root tears and avulsions. This technical note describes an all-arthroscopic technique of treating a rare and previously undescribed injury pattern consisting of PCL tibial and lateral meniscus posterior root bony avulsions and ACL posterolateral bundle tibial peel-off, termed the “tibial avulsion triad”.

Transtibial Pullout Repair of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tear with Tissue Loss: A Case with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Medial Meniscus Tear

Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) is mainly caused by trauma, especially trauma associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although a transtibial pullout repair or a side-to-side repair is commonly performed for LMPRT, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical report of LMPRT with tissue loss using the pullout technique. Thus, the purpose of this report was to describe a clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcome after pullout repair for a case of LMPRT with a large defect with a chronic ACL tear and complex medial meniscus (MM) tears. A 31-year-old man complained of knee pain and restricted range of motion after twisting his knee when he stepped on an iron pipe. The patient had a football-related injury to his right knee 14 years before presentation, and since then, the patient's knee has given out more than 10 times but was left unassessed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed LMPRT with tissue loss, ACL tears, and complex MM tears. Transtibial pullout repair of the LMPRT with ACL reconstruction and MM repairs were performed. Following the pullout repair of the LMPRT, an approximately 6 mm gap remained between the LM posterior root and root insertion. However, magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively revealed meniscal healing, gap filling with some regeneration tissue, of the LM posterior root. Furthermore, the lateral meniscus extrusion in the coronal plane improved from 3.1 mm (preoperative) to 1.6 mm (1 year postoperatively). Transtibial pullout repair with the remaining gap could be a viable treatment option for LMPRT with tissue loss, combined with ACL reconstruction.

Ipsilateral ACL injured patients with Segond fractures demonstrate increased posterior tibial slope

BackgroundThe anterolateral complex has been demonstrated to assist with rotational stability and prevention of anterior tibial translation during the pivot shift. In this study the Segond fracture is used as a surrogate for an anterolateral complex injury to determine if there is an association between Segond fracture and increased posterior tibial slope. MethodsPatients’ charts and radiographs were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of Segond fractures on injury radiographs. These patients, the Segond cohort, were then age and gender matched to a control cohort. Demographic as well MRI measurements of medial and lateral posterior tibial slope and lateral-to-medial slope asymmetry were collected for each cohort. Secondary outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure data was also collected. ResultsThe Segond group demonstrated a statistically significantly greater lateral posterior tibial slope (8.42° versus 6.55°, P = 0.003) as well as medial posterior tibial slope (6.57° versus 5.34° degrees, P = 0.045). There was no significant differences between lateral-to-medial asymmetry (2.18°versus 1.83°, P = 0.246). ConclusionPatients with Segond fractures at the time of anterior cruciate ligament injury have increased medial and lateral posterior tibial slope. This may relate to increased rotational and translational instability associated with anterolateral complex injuries. Surgeons treating these patient may use this information to counsel their patients on the risks of associated pathology at the time of arthroscopy such as lateral meniscal posterior root tears.

Shared ACL Bone Tunnel Technique for Repair of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Combined With ACL Reconstruction.

Background:Independent transtibial pullout repair is a common surgical technique for repairing lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs). The shared anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bone tunnel technique is an alternative technique for LMPRT repair combined with ACL reconstruction (ACLR) to avoid the establishment of additional bone tunnels.Purpose:To compare the clinical outcomes of the shared ACL bone tunnel versus the independent transtibial pullout techniques for LMPRT repair combined with ACLR.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:Between March 2014 and February 2018, a total of 48 patients were diagnosed with ACL injury with concomitant LMPRT; 22 patients underwent independent transtibial pullout repair (group T), and 26 patients underwent the shared ACL bone tunnel technique (group S). At a follow-up of >2 years, we compared knee functional recovery using the Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores and the pivot-shift test. Lateral meniscal extrusion, and cartilage degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were also compared. The healing status of the lateral meniscus posterior root was compared using second-look arthroscopy and MRI.Results:The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in group S compared with group T (98.3 ± 11.1 vs 127.9 ± 17.5 min; P = .001). At final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in knee functional scores, pivot shift, or grade of cartilage degeneration. Lateral meniscal extrusion was decreased in group S compared with group T (2.41 ± 0.61 vs 1.59 ± 1.35 mm; P = .014). Second-look arthroscopy revealed stable healing in 16 of 18 patients (88.9%) in group S and 10 of 15 patients (66.7%) in group T (P = .38).Conclusion:Both the shared ACL bone tunnel and the independent transtibial pullout techniques led to satisfactory clinical outcomes. The shared ACL bone tunnel technique is the simpler of the 2 procedures for combined LMPRT repair with ACLR.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Lateral Meniscus Root Tears in the Pediatric and Adolescent Knee: Is the Diagnosis Missed, Mentioned, or Made?

Background:Failure to address meniscus root tears may place undue loads on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery in the adult population. Because the intraoperative management of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) may diverge from standard meniscal work and requires specialty items, preoperative diagnosis may be advantageous.Purpose:To evaluate the reliability of radiologist interpretations of preoperative knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of lateral meniscus root pathology in a mixed pediatric and adolescent population.Study Design:Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.Methods:A retrospective review of medical records was performed to identify patients younger than 18 years with an arthroscopically confirmed LMPRT who underwent knee arthroscopy between March 1, 2010, and April 1, 2020. Arthroscopic findings were compared with the reading radiologist’s preoperative MRI interpretations, and patients were stratified into 2 groups: (1) LMPRT diagnosis made preoperatively or (2) diagnosis missed or only mentioned to describe pathology nonspecific to the root. Variables such as body mass index (BMI), open physes, time from injury to MRI, time from MRI to surgery, MRI magnet field strength, musculoskeletal radiologist designation, insurance type, and tear grade were assessed between groups.Results:Overall, 1116 knee arthroscopies were performed, with 49 LMPRTs found; all 49 LMRPTs were found concomitantly with ACL tears (49/535; 9.2%). The average patient age was 15.97 years (range, 11.52-17.97 years). There were 50 MRI scans for 49 patients. An LMPRT was diagnosed based on preoperative MRI scans in 12 of these 50 scans (24%) and mentioned or missed in 38 of the 50 scans (76%). No significant difference was seen between the diagnosis-made versus diagnosis-mentioned/missed groups in BMI, skeletal maturity, time from injury to MRI, time from MRI to surgery, MRI magnet strength, fellowship training of the reading radiologist, tear grade, or insurance type.Conclusion:In 76% of patients, a definitive diagnosis of LMPRT was not made on preoperative MRI scans. Notably, all LMPRTs found intraoperatively were found concomitantly with ACL tears.

Low reoperation rate following lateral meniscus root repair: clinical outcomes at 2years follow-up.

The aim of this study was to review the outcomes of lateral meniscus posterior root tears repair at the time of ACL reconstruction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Between March 2015 and August 2018, 2017 patients underwent primary ACL reconstruction and were considered for study eligibility. Lateral meniscus posterior root tears were identified arthroscopically, and repair was performed with a transtibial pull-out suture technique or a side-to-side suture technique. Clinical outcomes were recorded at the time of physical examination. At the end of the study period, patients were contacted to determine whether they had required reoperation. Lateral meniscus posterior root tears were identified in 153 out of the 2,017 primary ACL reconstructions (7.6%). Ninety-nine patients were included for analysis: 23 transtibial pull-out sutures and 76 side-to-side repairs. At a mean follow-up of 42 ± 10months, one patient (1%) had undergone reoperation for failure of the side-to-side repair. There were 11 reoperations in 10 patients (10.1%), including 6 cyclops syndrome, 1 graft rupture, 1 tibial bone cyst, 1 medial and 1 lateral meniscus repair failure, and 1 arthrolysis. Postoperatively, ninety (90.9%) patients were graded A for the IKDC objective score and 9 (9.1%) patients were graded B, with an IKDC subjective score of 86.9 ± 7.6, a Lysholm score of 90.7 ± 6.7 and a median Tegner Activity Scale of 6 (3-9). All of their objective and subjective evaluations improved after surgery (p < 0.001) except for the Tegner Activity Scale. Ten patients underwent second look arthroscopy (10.1%), lateral meniscus healing was observed in 9 out of 10 patients (90%). This study demonstrated that lateral meniscus posterior root tear repair is a safe procedure with a very low reoperation rate at a minimum follow-up of 2years. IV.

An anatomical study of the meniscal roots of the knee: landmarks for its surgical reconstruction and implications for knee surgeons.

The aim of this anatomical study was to describe the anatomy of the meniscal roots and their relationships with respect to the main adjacent structures in order to improve their surgical reconstruction. Fourteen knees were included. The mean age of the donors was 92years (range 89-96). We studied the general characteristics of the anterior and posterior roots of the medial meniscus and lateral meniscus by measuring their widths at their base and area. We investigated the relations between anterior and posterior roots of the medial and lateral menisci with respect to the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments (ACL and PCL). The mean width of the anterior root of the lateral meniscus was 10.5 ± 1.4mm. The mean width of the anterior root of the medial meniscus was 10 ± 1.5mm. The mean width of the posterior root of lateral meniscus was 11.4 ± 1.4mm. The mean width of the posterior root of medial meniscus was 10.5 ± 1.0mm. The mean distance between the anterior cruciate ligament and the anterior root of lateral meniscus was 9.8 ± 2.9mm, for the medial meniscus it was 15.9 ± 3.4mm. The mean distance between the posterior cruciate ligament and the posterior root of the lateral meniscus was 11.5 ± 2.7mm, for the medial meniscus, it was 11 ± 2.6mm. The anterior and posterior meniscal roots have precise landmarks, and this article contributes to define the location of the meniscal roots with respect to their adjacent anatomical structures: ACL, PCL and intercondylar tubercle. Having precise measures of the distances between the meniscus roots and these structures allows knee surgeons to perform ACL reconstruction, meniscal root repair and meniscal allograft transplantation.

An All-Inside Repair Technique for Unstable Type-IV Lateral Meniscal Posterior Root Tear

Lateral meniscal posterior root tears are defined as tears of meniscus within 9 mm from the bony root attachment. Unrepaired root tears significantly compromise the biomechanical functions of the meniscus, resulting in early and accelerated osteoarthritis. Several authors have described various techniques to reattach the posterior root of the lateral meniscus, and decent short-term results have been observed. Although most previous techniques are capable of repairing radial root tears, difficulties are encountered when repairing oblique type IV tears. In this technique note, the author describes an efficient side-to-side repair technique using the FAST-FIX system, which is practical in repairing the type IV tears of the lateral meniscus. This technique includes certain sequence of the stitches and skills of controlling the root remnant, which makes it easy to penetrate the meniscus and to achieve anatomic repair.

Arthroscopic Repair of Posterior Root Tears of the Lateral Meniscus with All-Suture Anchor

Meniscus root tears are increasingly being recognized and treated because of improved awareness and diagnostics. These injuries commonly occur in combination with knee ligament injuries. Untreated posterior meniscus root teats have been demonstrated to increase contact pressure and decrease contact area, ultimately leading to unfavorable joint loading and development of early osteoarthritis. Posterior lateral meniscus root tears (PLMRTs) also have been reported to increase anterior tibial translation and pivot shift in anterior cruciate ligament–deficient knees. Therefore, it is crucial to repair meniscal root tears when possible to restore knee joint loading and kinematics. Several techniques for repair of the PLMRT have been described. In this Technical Note, we describe our preferred technique for repair of PLMRT using an all-suture anchor. This technique is reproducible, does not need a tunnel, mitigates bungee effect of transtibial technique, and the anchor can easily be inserted on the footprint without a need for a guide.

Age, male sex, higher posterior tibial slope, deep sulcus sign, bone bruises on the lateral femoral condyle, and concomitant medial meniscal tears are risk factors for lateral meniscal posterior root tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) are commonly found in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. However, risk factors for LMPRTs are not well known. This study was designed to systematically review the available evidence regarding risk factors associated with LMPRTs. The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for papers containing the key words "lateral meniscus posterior root tears", "LMPRTs" and "risk factor". Inclusion screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the included articles were conducted independently by two authors. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for LMPRTs. Seventeen studies with a total sample size of 6, 589 patients were identified. The pooled prevalence of LMPRTs was 9.6% (range, 5.1-33.8%) for ACL injury. Significant risk factors included a patient age of < 30 [OR = 1.4, 95% CI (1.07, 1.84), p = 0.01], male sex [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.24,1.81), p = 0.01], higher body mass index (BMI) [MD = 0.45, 95% CI (0.13, 0.76), p < 0.01], higher lateral posterior tibial slope (LPTS) [MD = 2.22, 95% CI (1.37, 3.07), p < 0.01], deep sulcus sign [OR = 5.76, 95% CI (1.35, 24.52), p < 0.01] and bone bruises on lateral femoral condyle [OR = 4.88, 95% CI (1.27, 18.77), p < 0.01], lateral meniscal extrusion > 1mm [OR = 5.56, 95% CI (1.52, 20.29), p < 0.01] and > 3mm [OR = 12.91 95% CI (1.28, 130.01), p < 0.01], medial meniscal tears [OR = 1.40, 95% CI (1.12, 1.75), p < 0.01], and medial ramp lesions [OR = 2.29, 95% CI (1.35, 3.89), p < 0.01]. Age below 30, male, higher BMI, higher LPTS, deep sulcus sign, bone bruises on lateral femoral condyle, lateral meniscal extrusion, medial meniscal tear, and medial ramp lesion are risk factors for LMPRTs. Level IV.

A narrative review of lateral meniscus root tears and extrusion: techniques and outcomes.

In this review, we performed a literature search and described the surgical procedure for a lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRT) repair using a pull-out technique and an arthroscopic centralization for lateral meniscus (LM) extrusion. The menisci play a pivotal role in the shock-absorbing and load-dispersing functions of the knee joint. They also contribute to its stability. Meniscal root tears substantially affect meniscal hoop function and accelerate cartilage degeneration. Additionally, LMPRT have been shown to affect anterolateral knee laxity and tibiofemoral contact pressure in knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Therefore, appropriate management of LMPRT is essential for restoring knee function. Meniscus extrusion has attracted attention due to its association with early osteoarthritis (OA). Recently, an arthroscopic centralization technique has been proposed to reduce meniscal extrusion. During this procedure the capsule attached to the meniscus is sutured to the edge of the tibial plateau using suture anchors. A narrative review of LMPRT repair and arthroscopic centralization of lateral meniscal extrusion was performed through a PubMed search. Specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signs were useful for the diagnosis of LMPRT. Pull-out techniques can restore knee stability and load distribution function and result in favorable clinical outcomes. Arthroscopic centralization of the extruded LM caused by meniscectomy and lateral discoid meniscus achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes at the 2-year follow-up. Biomechanical studies demonstrated that this procedure reduced meniscus extrusion and had beneficial effects on load distribution and joint stability. In summary, to restore knee function, LMPRT should be repaired as much as possible. The centralization technique is a promising surgical treatment for extruded lateral menisci due to meniscectomy and discoid meniscus. However, due to the lack of high-level evidence studies such as randomized control trials (RCTs) in this field, it remains necessary to accumulate evidence to confirm the efficacy of LMPRT repair and the centralization technique.

Outcomes of Combined Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Repair and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background:Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) almost always occur in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Their repair is advocated to restore the stabilizing and load-sharing functions of the meniscus.Purpose:To study the functional outcomes of combined arthroscopic repair of LMPRTs and ACL reconstruction (ACLR).Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:The authors evaluated patients who underwent simultaneous arthroscopic ACLR and LMPRT repair. All patients had chronic injuries, with a mean time since ACL rupture of 7.9 months. Patient characteristics, Lachman and pivot-shift test results, type of LMPRT, associated injuries, and surgery details were documented. Pre- and postoperative functional status was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm score. An independent single-tunnel transtibial repair using 2 SutureTapes was performed for Forkel type 1 and 3 tear root avulsions, while side-to-side suture repair was performed for type 2 radial/oblique tears. The Wilcoxon signed rank test and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the IKDC score were used for statistical analysis.Results:Included were 25 patients with a mean age of 29.6 ± 6.5 years. Of these, 22 patients (88%; 95% CI, 73.1%-100%) had a high-grade (grade 2 or 3) preoperative pivot shift. Diagnosis of the LMPRT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was possible only in 5 patients (20%). At final evaluation, performed at 37.4 ± 7.1 months postoperatively, all functional scores had improved significantly from preoperatively: IKDC score, from 47.6 ± 9.5 to 81.8 ± 11.5; KOOS, from 45.5 ± 10.9 to 86.5 ± 10.3, and Lysholm score, from 49.0 ± 11.5 to 88.8 ± 7.6 (P < .001 for all). Twenty-four patients (96%) achieved the MCID for the IKDC score. All knees had a negative pivot shift at final analysis, and no patient underwent revision ACLR or LMPRT repair.Conclusion:LMPRT repair combined with ACLR led to good short-term clinical outcomes in this study. An LMPRT may frequently go undetected on preoperative MRI scans, but a high-grade pivot shift is present in a large majority of these patients.

Outcomes of lateral meniscus posterior root tear repair combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after at least two years of follow-up

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) repair at a minimum follow-up of two years. It was hypothesized that LMPRT repair would result in a low rate of surgical revision with good knee laxity control and satisfactory objective and subjective scores.Methods:This was a retrospective study analyzing prospectively collected data. All patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction from March 2015 to August 2018, performed by two surgeons (blinded), were considered for study eligibility. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6,12 and 24 months. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively with the objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation form, the Lysholm score and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Complications and revision surgeries were also recorded.Results:The final study population comprised 99 LMPRT repairs. Ten (10.1%) patients underwent ipsilateral revision surgery at a mean follow-up of 42 months, for a total of 11 procedures. There was one graft failure with concomitant LMPRT at 25 months follow-up due to a high-risk sport trauma in a professional athlete. Postoperative side-to-side laxity significantly decreased at the last follow-up with a mean of 0.6 ± 0.7 mm (p <0.0001). The mean preoperative subjective IKDC score was 56.2 ± 13.9 and increased to 86.9 ± 7.6 postoperatively (p <0.0001). The Lysholm score was 61.6 ± 13.1 before surgery and 90.7 ± 6.7 after surgery (p <0.0001). The mean preoperative TAS was 7.1 ± 1.1 and decreased to 6.6 ± 1.3 postoperatively (p <0.006). Arthroscopic healing was obtained for the ten patients who underwent revision surgery. Nine of these patients (90%) had arthroscopic proof of a fully healed LMPRT. One patient did not heal completely and required arthroscopic resection.Conclusion:LMPRT occurs concomitantly with ACL injury in 6 to 12% of the cases and repair should be routine. This is supported by excellent postoperative results after LMPRT repair at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Optimal Tibial Tunnel Placement for Medial and Lateral Meniscus Root Repair on the Anteromedial Tibia in the Setting of Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee

Background: Although the risk of tibial tunnel convergence in the setting of multiligamentous reconstruction has been reported in the literature, the risk of tunnel convergence in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and medial and lateral meniscus root repair has not been defined. Purpose: To examine the risk of tunnel convergence and to determine optimal tunnel placement for ACL and PCL reconstruction performed in conjunction with posterior medial and lateral meniscus root repairs on the anteromedial proximal tibia. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) tibial models were created using computed tomography scans of 20 cadaveric specimens. After determining optimal tunnel entry and exit points for ACL and PCL reconstructions, and medial and lateral meniscus root reattachment to the anatomic footprints, we used image processing software to create root tunnels over the anteromedial tibia on the tibial models. ACL and PCL tunnels were kept constant. The meniscus root repair tunnels were then reoriented to match the angle of the ACL tunnel, making both tunnels parallel in the sagittal plane. Tunnel convergence risk was analyzed by identifying the shortest 3D distance between tunnel axes and subtracting the radius of each tunnel from this distance for single- and double-tunnel repair techniques in both case scenarios. Results: All specimens demonstrated convergence between the ACL and lateral meniscus root tunnels when the root tunnel’s entry was created proximal to the ACL tunnel’s entry for single- and double-tunnel techniques, but no convergence was seen between these tunnels using the parallel orientation in the sagittal plane. There were no cases of convergence between the ACL and medial meniscus root tunnels in any of the configurations. The greatest distance between the ACL and medial meniscus root tunnels was achieved using the single-tunnel technique in parallel orientation (12.1 ± 2.8 mm). There were no cases of convergence between the PCL and medial meniscus root tunnels in the original orientation; however, 2 of 20 specimens demonstrated convergence using the parallel orientation with the double-tunnel technique, and there were no cases of convergence using the single-tunnel technique. The PCL and lateral meniscus root tunnels did not demonstrate convergence in any configuration. Conclusion: There was a high risk of convergence between ACL and posterior meniscus root tunnels when all the tunnels were created on the anteromedial tibia. Reorienting meniscus root tunnels parallel to ACL tunnels may help reduce this risk. There is increased risk of tunnel convergence with root repairs in cases of bicruciate reconstructions, and therefore a double-tunnel root repair technique should be used with caution. Clinical Relevance: To avoid tibial tunnel convergence when performing ACL and PCL reconstruction with medial and lateral meniscus root repair, surgeons should reorient the meniscus root repair tunnels to be parallel on the sagittal plane to the ACL tunnel to decrease the risk of convergence. In cases of bicruciate ligament reconstruction, use of the double-tunnel technique requires caution to avoid convergence risk with the PCL tunnel.

The Effects of Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root Tear and its Repair on Knee Stability of Internal Rotation and Forward Shift: A Biomechanical Kinematics Cadaver Study.

Objective: Lateral meniscal posterior root (LMPR) is an important stabilizer for knee joint, providing the stability during tibia forward shifting and internal rotating. It is still controversial that whether the LMPR tear (LMPRT) should be repaired together with ACL reconstruction. This study aims to investigate the effects of LMPR on knee stability with intact ACL. Methods: Eight cadaver knees were used and performed the biomechanical kinematics tests in orders of: Group A: the LMPR was intact; Group B: the LMPR was cut off from its tibial end; Group C: the LMPRT has been repaired. 1) An internal rotation moment (5 Nm) was given to the tibia, then the internal rotation angle of the tibia was measured; 2) An forward shifting force (134 N) was given to the tibia, then the anterior displacement of the tibia was measured; 3) An internal rotation moment (5 Nm) and a valgus moment (10 Nm) were given to the tibia, then the internal rotation angle and the anterior displacement was measured. The stability was inferred from smaller rotation angle and displacement, and all of the angles and displacements were measured at knee flexion of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°, respectively. Results: Comparing to Group A, the internal rotation angle in Group B was increased significantly at knee flexion of 30° (p = 0.025), 60° (p = 0.041), 90° (p = 0.002); the anterior tibia displacement in Group B was increased significantly at knee flexion of 30° (p = 0.015), 60° (p = 0.024); at knee valgus, the internal rotation angle was also increased significantly at knee flexion of 60° (p = 0.011), 90° (p = 0.037). Comparing to Group B, the internal rotation angle in Group C was decreased significantly at knee flexion of 30° (p = 0.030), 60° (p = 0.019), 90° (p = 0.021); the anterior displacement in Group C was decreased significantly at knee flexion of 30° (p = 0.042), 60° (p = 0.037); at valgus, the internal rotation angle was also decreased significantly at knee flexion of 60° (p = 0.013), 90° (p = 0.045). Comparing to Group A, only the internal rotation angle (p = 0.047) and anterior displacement (p = 0.033) in Group C were increased at knee flexion of 30°. Conclusion: In simulated knee with intact ACL, LMPRT can still lead to the notable internal rotational instability at knee flexion from 30° to 90°, as well as the anterior shift instability at knee flexion from 30° to 60°. LMPRT repair help to improve the internal rotation stability at 30° and restore it at 60° to 90°, and improve the anterior shift stability at 30° and restore it at 60°.

Lateral meniscal posterior root tears experience acceptable healing status after transtibial repair technique

PurposeTo evaluate patient MRI results, demography and clinical outcome following transtibial repair of lateral and medial meniscal posterior root tears.MethodsPatients treated with transtibial repairs of posterior meniscal root tears from 2015 through 2018 performed pre- and postoperative MRI scans. Outcome measures were continuity/discontinuity of the meniscal root and change in meniscal extrusion on MRI. Other outcomes were KOOS, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale and the Global Rate of Change (GRoC) score for function and pain at follow-up.Study designRetrospective case-series.ResultsOf 41 patients, 36 attended follow-up at mean 26 (12–38) months postoperatively. At follow-up, 11 out of 18 lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) versus 5 out of 18 medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repairs were classified as healed. Meniscal extrusion decreased in LMPRTs from of 2.3 ± 1.5 mm to 1.4 ± 1.09 mm (p = 0.080) and increased in MMPRTs from 3.1 ± 1.6 mm to 4.8 ± 1.9 mm (p = 0.005) at FU (between-group difference, p < 0.001). LMPRT repairs were associated with ACL injury and additional meniscal injury and were younger and with lower BMI. No between-group differences were found for KOOS, Lysholm or GRoC Function scores. Tegner scale was higher and GRoC Pain score lower in the LMPRT group compared to the MMPRTs.ConclusionFollowing transtibial repair for meniscal posterior root repairs, the LMPRTs had a higher frequency of healing, whereas most MMPRTs continued to extrude, despite surgical intervention. The study confirmed that LMPRTs and MMPRTs differ in demography and associated injuries.

Résultats de la réparation des lésions de la racine postérieure du ménisque latéral combinée à une reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur après un suivi d’au moins deux ans

The purpose of this study was to review outcomes of lateral meniscus posterior root tear (LMPRT) repair at a minimum follow-up of two years. It was hypothesized that repairing LMPRT would result in low surgical revision rate with good control over knee laxity and satisfying objective and subjective scores. This was a retrospective study analysing prospectively collected data. All patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction from March 2015 to August 2018, performed by two surgeons (blinded), were considered for study eligibility. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6,12 and 24 months. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively with the objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation form, Lysholm score and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Complications and reinterventions were also recorded. The final study population comprised 99 LMPRT repair. Ten (10.1%) patients underwent ipsilateral reoperation at a mean follow-up of 42 months, for a total of 11 procedures. There was one graft failure with concomitant LMPRT at 25 months follow-up due to a high risk sport trauma in a professional athlete. Postoperative side-to-side laxity significantly decreased at last follow-up with a mean of 0.6 ± 0.7 mm (p < 0.0001). The mean preoperative IKDC subjective score was 56.2 ± 13.9 and increased to 86.9 ± 7.6 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Lysholm score was 61.6 ± 13.1 before surgery and 90.7 ± 6.7 after surgery (p < 0.0001). Preoperative mean TAS was 7.1 ± 1.1 and decreased to 6.6 ± 1.3 postoperatively (p < 0.006). Arthroscopic healing status was obtained for the ten patients who underwent reoperation. 9 of them (90%) had arthroscopic evidence of a fully healed LMPRT. One of them had not healed completely and required arthroscopic resection. LMPRT occurs concomitantly to ACL injury in 6 to 12% of cases and repair should be performed systematically. This is supported by excellent post-operative results after LMPRT repair at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Meniscal Root Repair in Pediatric Patients: Minimum 2-Year Outcomes (196)

Objectives:The medial and lateral menisci function to optimize force transmission across the knee by increasing contact area between the femur and tibia, absorbing shock, and transmitting loads. The anterior and posterior meniscus roots anchor the meniscus to bone. Injuries to the meniscus root attachments result in extrusion of the meniscus, impaired distribution of hoop stresses, and progressive degenerative articular wear. As a result of these deleterious effects, there has been increasing emphasis on repair of meniscus root injuries to restore structure and function. The purpose of this study is to describe meniscus root tears, associated injuries, and minimum 2-year treatment outcomes in a series of pediatric patients.Methods:A single-institution, IRB approved, retrospective review was performed of consecutive pediatric patients less than 19 years of age with a meniscus root tear treated with transosseous root repair over a 4-year period. All patients had minimum 24-month clinical follow-up. Partial root tears treated with partial meniscectomy or irreparable root tears were excluded. All meniscus root tears were classified arthroscopically based on the tear types described by LaPradeADDIN EN.CITE 9. The primary outcomes were revision meniscus surgery and patient reported outcome scores (PROs) (Lysholm, Patient Satisfaction, and Tegner activity).Results:Twenty-one patients, 11 males and 10 females with a mean age of 15 years (range 7 – 18 years), met inclusion criteria. There were 15 lateral meniscus root tears and 6 medial meniscus root tears. The tears occurred in the posterior root in 20 patients (95%). The most common injury pattern was a lateral meniscus posterior root tear (14 patients, 67%). 18 patients (86%) had an associated ligament tear: 13 ACL tears and 5 PCL tears. Two root tears occurred in isolation, and both were the posterior root of the medial meniscus. The majority of meniscus root tears (15 patients, 71%) were root avulsions (type 5). Mean follow-up was 42 months (range 25 – 71 months). Three patients had a second surgery on the affected knee. In two patients, one with revision ACL reconstruction and one treated with chondroplasty of the patella, the meniscus root repair was noted to be well healed. A third patient sustained a new injury to the knee 4 years following medial meniscus posterior root repair and underwent partial medial meniscectomy. At final follow-up, PROs were obtained for 17 patients (81%). Mean Lysholm score was 91 (range 51 – 100). Mean patient satisfaction score was 8.7 (range 5 – 10). Fourteen of 16 patients (88%) reported returning to the same or higher level of activity following surgery.Conclusions:Meniscus root tears occur in pediatric patients, most commonly as root avulsions of the posterior root of the lateral meniscus and in association with ACL tears. This is unique as compared to the adult population, in which the medial meniscus posterior root is often injured in isolation and radial tears adjacent the root are the most commonly described injury pattern. In our case series, transosseous root repair resulted in successful outcomes in the majority of patients with durable results at midterm follow-up.