Lateral Node Dissection Research Articles

Lateral pelvic lymph nodes dissection of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms: A prospective case-series and literature review

BackgroundRectal neuroendocrine neoplasms are relatively rare. Patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms undergoing radical surgery have a higher rate of lymph node metastases. Robust evidence on the status of lateral pelvic lymph node metastases and the role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in those patients is lacking. This case-series study aimed to explore and address these issues. MethodsThis single-center, prospective case series consecutively enrolled patients with biopsy-proven rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms in a tertiary referral hospital between June 2022 and January 2024. All eligible patients underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision surgery and bilateral lateral pelvic lymph node dissection under general anesthesia. The clinicopathologic features, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications were presented. The last follow-up was conducted in March 2024. ResultsA total of 11 patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms—3 female and 8 male—were enrolled. The average age was 60.0 years (range, 53.5–65.5 years), and the median tumor size was 2.0 cm (range, 1.6–2.5 cm). Tumors invaded the muscularis propria in 7 patients. There were 3 cases of neuroendocrine tumor G1, 6 cases of neuroendocrine tumor G2, and 2 cases of neuroendocrine carcinoma. Among these patients, 11 (100.0%) had lymph node metastases, and 6 (54.5%) had lateral pelvic lymph node metastases. In addition, in 2 patients, only lateral pelvic lymph node metastases were observed, without involvement of the mesenteric lymph nodes. Five patients had tumors located on the left wall of the rectum, and only left-sided lateral pelvic lymph node metastases were observed. The other patient had both sides of lateral pelvic lymph node metastases due to circumferential growth of the tumor around the rectum. Anal preservation was achieved in all patients. The median operating time was 235.0 minutes (range, 210.5–335.5 minutes), and the median estimated blood loss was 50.0 mL (range, 45.0–75.0 mL). Two patients experienced postoperative dysuria and recovered spontaneously within 2–4 months after surgery. ConclusionOn the basis of a prospective case series, we demonstrate, for the first time, the lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis status in patients with rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms requiring radical total mesorectal excision surgery. Simultaneous bilateral lateral pelvic lymph node dissection may be a feasible and beneficial procedure for preventing local recurrence in these patients due to the lack of definitive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy options.

The use of indocyanine green for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer: a novel fancy tool in the armamentarium with questionable benefits.

The use of indocyanine green for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer: a novel fancy tool in the armamentarium with questionable benefits.

The Role of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer (Stage II or III): A Literature Review.

Lateral lymph node dissection and its inclusion in the treatment of rectal cancer is a controversial issue, with great differences, especially between Eastern and Western countries. Studies try to highlight the superiority of resection of these lymph nodescompared to simple mesorectal resectionin terms of local recurrence of the disease, the overall survival of patients, and additional postoperative complications. In this study, the modern literature was reviewed, with the ultimate goal of clarifying the exact importance of lateral lymph node dissection, in terms of oncological outcome in patients with cancer of the middle and lower rectum, by studying the involvement of this lymph node dispersion in terms of local recurrence and overall survival of patients with rectal cancer. This review was carried out using electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE, with studies dating back to the last decade. Of the 31 studies that were eventually included in the final review, there is no statistically clear superiority and real benefit from lymph node resection beyond the lymph nodes of the mid-rectum. European guidelines are set against lateral lymph node dissection, except for lymph nodes that show suspicious features on preoperative imaging. In contrast, in Eastern countries, total mesorectal excision (TME) with extensive simultaneous resection of the lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs) is the protocol followed. Recent studies focus on the subcategory of patients with non-responsive to adjuvant therapy, lateral lymph nodes, in which the ultimate benefit of extensive lymph node dissection is explored. The decision to join the TME procedure for the removal of the LPLNs is a subject of intense research. There are no data on the criteria for determining these lymph nodes as an increased risk of metastatic outbreaks. Despite the great clinical and research interest worldwide nowadays, the resection of LPLNs remains a controversial issue of debate, with intense disagreements according to geographical area, while the existence of additional studies is necessary to come to final conclusions.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted comparative laparoscopic surgery in lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

A meta-analysis was conducted on the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer. There are few articles and reports on this topic, and a lack of high-quality research results in unreliable research conclusions. This study includes prospective and retrospective studies to obtain more reliable findings. Databases were searched, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The search was conducted from the time of database construction to March 2024. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the NOS scoring system. Meta-analysis was performed using R language software. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and sensitivity analysis was performed. Six relevant literatures that met the criteria were finally included, and 652 patients were included, including 316 (48.5%) in the robot-assisted lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer group (RLLND) and 336 (51.5%) in the laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer group (LLLND). Analysis of the results showed that compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group had less mean intraoperative blood loss (MD = -22, 95% CI -40.03 to -3.97, P < 0.05), longer operative time (MD = 51.57, 95%CI 7.69to95.45, P < 0.05), and a shorter mean hospital stay (MD = -1.25, 95%CI -2.46 to -0.05, P < 0.05), a low rate of urinary complications (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.23to0.64, P < 0.01), a low overall rate of postoperative complications (OR 0.6, 95%CI 0.42to0.87, P < 0.01), and a high number of lateral lymph node dissection (MD = 1.18, 95% CI 0.14to2.23, P < 0.05), and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative anastomotic leakage, postoperative intestinal obstruction, and total number of lymph nodes obtained (P > 0.05). Compared with laparoscopy, robotic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer reduces intraoperative blood loss, shortens the average length of hospital stay, reduces urologic complications, decreases overall postoperative complications, and collects more lateral lymph nodes. However, the surgical time is prolonged.

The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes.

Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Preliminary study of indocyanine green-guided laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer.

LLNM can occur in mid-low rectal cancer, but LLND in patients with rectal cancer presents certain challenges. Recent years have seen the progressive application of ICG fluorescence imaging technology in colorectal surgery. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of ICG-guided laparoscopic LLND for rectal cancer. We applied ICG-guided laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection in 11 patients diagnosed as rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis. All 11 patients in this group successfully completed ICG-guided laparoscopic LLND for rectal cancer with good lateral lymph node imaging. ICG-guided laparoscopic LLND for rectal cancer is safe and represents a feasible solution, thereby providing valuable guidance for intraoperative lymph node dissection.

Incidence and risk factors for perineal hernia after robotic abdominoperineal resection: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.

Perineal hernia (PH) is a late complication of abdominoperineal resection (APR) that may compromise a patient's quality of life. The frequency and risk factors for PH after robotic APR adopting recent rectal cancer treatment strategies remain unclear. Patients who underwent robotic APR for rectal cancer between December 2011 and June 2022 were retrospectively examined. From July 2020, pelvic reinforcement procedures, such as robotic closure of the pelvic peritoneum and levator ani muscles, were performed as prophylactic procedures for PH whenever feasible. PH was diagnosed in patients with or without symptoms using computed tomography 1 year after surgery. We examined the frequency of PH, compared characteristics between patients with PH (PH+) and without PH (PH-), and identified risk factors for PH. We evaluated 142 patients, including 53 PH+ (37.3%) and 89 PH- (62.6%). PH+ had a significantly higher rate of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (26.4% versus 10.1%, p = 0.017) and a significantly lower rate of undergoing pelvic reinforcement procedures (1.9% versus 14.0%, p = 0.017). PH+ had a lower rate of lateral lymph node dissection (47.2% versus 61.8%, p = 0.115) and a shorter operative time (340min versus 394min, p = 0.110). According to multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors for PH were preoperative chemoradiotherapy, not undergoing lateral lymph node dissection, and not undergoing a pelvic reinforcement procedure. PH after robotic APR for rectal cancer is not a rare complication under the recent treatment strategies for rectal cancer, and performing prophylactic procedures for PH should be considered.

The Learning Curve for Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A View from the West.

Lateral pelvic lymph-node dissection is performed for selected patients with rectal cancer with persistent lateral nodal disease after neoadjuvant therapy. This technique has been slow to be adopted in the West due to concerns regarding technical difficulty. This is the first report on the learning curve for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the US or Europe. The aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve associated with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Retrospective observational cohort. Tertiary academic cancer center. Consecutive patients from 2012 to 2021. All patients underwent robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The primary endpoints were the learning curves for maximum number of nodes retrieved and urinary retention which was evaluated with simple cumulative-sum and two-sided Bernoulli cumulative-sum charts. Fifty-four procedures were included. A single-surgeon (n = 35) and an institutional learning curve are presented in the analysis. In the single-surgeon learning curve, a turning point marking the end of a learning phase was detected at the 12th procedure for the number of retrieved nodes and at the 20th for urinary retention. In the institutional learning curve analysis, two turning points were identified at the 13th and 26th procedures indicating progressive improvements for the number of retrieved nodes and at the 27th for urinary retention. No sustained alarm signals were detected at any time point. The retrospective nature, small sample size and the referral center nature of the reporting institution that may limit generalizability. In a setting of institutional experience with robotic colorectal surgery including beyond TME resections, the learning curve for robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is acceptably short. Our results demonstrate feasibility of acquisition of this technique in a controlled setting, with sufficient case volume and proctoring can optimize the learning curve. See Video Abstract.

Risk factors and development of machine learning diagnostic models for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: multicentre study.

The diagnostic criteria for lateral lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer have not been established. This research aimed to investigate the risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis and develop machine learning models combining these risk factors to improve the diagnostic performance of standard imaging. This multicentre prospective study included patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection without preoperative treatment for rectal cancer between 2017 and 2019 in 15 Japanese institutions. First, preoperative clinicopathological factors and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated using multivariable analyses for their correlation with lateral lymph node metastasis. Next, machine learning diagnostic models for lateral lymph node metastasis were developed combining these risk factors. The models were tested in a training set and in an internal validation cohort and their diagnostic performance was tested using receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Of 212 rectal cancers, 122 patients were selected, including 232 lateral pelvic sides, 30 sides of which had pathological lateral lymph node metastasis. Multivariable analysis revealed that poorly differentiated/mucinous adenocarcinoma, extramural vascular invasion, tumour deposit and a short-axis diameter of lateral lymph node ≥ 6.0 mm were independent risk factors for lateral lymph node metastasis. Patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (139 sides) and a test cohort (93 sides) and machine learning models were computed on the basis of a combination of significant features (including: histological type, extramural vascular invasion, tumour deposit, short- and long-axis diameter of lateral lymph node, body mass index, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, cT, cN, cM, irregular border and mixed signal intensity). The top three models with the highest sensitivity in the training cohort were as follows: support vector machine (sensitivity, 1.000; specificity, 0.773), light gradient boosting machine (sensitivity, 0.950; specificity, 0.918) and ensemble learning (sensitivity, 0.950; specificity, 0.917). The diagnostic performances of these models in the test cohort were as follows: support vector machine (sensitivity, 0.750; specificity, 0.667), light gradient boosting machine (sensitivity, 0.500; specificity, 0.852) and ensemble learning (sensitivity, 0.667; specificity, 0.864). Machine learning models combining multiple risk factors can contribute to improving diagnostic performance of lateral lymph node metastasis.

Iatrogenic Hypoparathyroidism Development After Thyroidectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Iatrogenic hypoparathyroidism is a common cause of postthyroidectomy hypocalcaemia. It has varying incidence rates after neck surgery in Saudi Arabia, ranging from 0.07% to 65.30%. Hypoparathyroidism can manifest with a spectrum of symptoms, ranging from mild to severe and life-threatening. This study aimed to assess the rate and predictors of iatrogenic hypoparathyroidism after thyroid surgery and its natural course. This retrospective cohort study used a data collection form to extract patient information from the electronic healthcare system (Best-Care) for patients treated from 2017 to 2022. Patients' demographics, surgical specifics and biochemical profiles were recorded for subsequent analysis. Among the 343 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, 130 (37.9%) developed hypoparathyroidism, primarily within the first day after surgery. Calcium or vitamin D supplementation before surgery did not significantly influence hypoparathyroidism development. Notably, extensive combined lymph node dissection was significantly associated with postoperative hypoparathyroidism development (p = 0.0004). More patients who underwent central and lateral lymph node dissection (n = 19, 79.17%) developed hypoparathyroidism than patients who underwent central (n = 18, 40.91%) or lateral (n = 8, 38.10%) dissection alone. Permanent hypoparathyroidism was observed in 40 patients (11.66%). This study revealed a high incidence of iatrogenic hypoparathyroidism and high rates of permanent hypoparathyroidism. Further research is warranted to better comprehend the risk factors and optimise management strategies for iatrogenic hypoparathyroidism. Overall, our findings emphasise the need for vigilant monitoring and effective management of patients undergoing thyroidectomy and the significance of postoperative replacement therapies.

Early-stage voiding function following uni- versus bilateral inferior vesical vessel resection during therapeutic lateral lymph node dissection with autonomic nerve sparing for advanced low rectal cancer (with video).

Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) has now been widely accepted as the optimal procedure to minimize lateral local recurrence (LLR) for selected cases with advanced lower rectal cancer in Asian countries. However, there is still controversy over the preservation or resection of the inferior vesical vessels (IVVs) during LLND due to concerns of impaired post-operative urinary function. Moreover, the standardized procedure for autonomic nerve preservation has not yet been established. To evaluate the early-stage postoperative voiding function in patients who underwent LLND with uni- versus bilateral resection of the IVVs and to introduce an autonomic nerve sparing technique with a fascial space priority approach (FSPA). LLND was performed in 106 consecutive patients with advanced low rectal cancer at Tianjin Union Medical Center from May 2017 to October 2022. Prospectively collected clinical data were retrospectively compared between patients who received uni-lateral and bilateral LLND. A video with narration was provided to introduce the stepwise procedure of autonomic nerve preservation during IVV resection. The unilateral lymph node dissection (LND) group and the bilateral LND group included 75 and 31 cases, respectively. All LLNDs were performed with FSPA with IVV resection as a standard procedure. No significant differences were observed in overall catheterization days (p = 0.336) and re-catheterization rate (p = 0.575) between groups. No patients in either group suffered from long-term (≥ 30 days) voiding dysfunction. Autonomic nerve sparing is achievable with resection of IVVs during LLND. Satisfactory early-stage voiding function could be obtained with IVV resection on both sides.

Survival analysis in rectal cancer patients after lateral lymph node dissection: Exploring the necessity of nCRT for suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether combining neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) with lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) improves survival in patients with rectal cancer suspected of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) compared with LLND alone. MethodsA retrospective analysis of clinical data from rectal cancer patients from January 2017 to November 2022 was conducted. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on patient clinical data, with a focus on identifying potential risk factors that affect disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into nCRT+LLND and LLND groups. K‒M survival curves and log-rank tests were used to analyze the survival outcomes of the different groups. ResultsThe study included 92 patients. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that intraoperative bleeding, pathological LLNM and histological type were associated with DFS. When these factors were included in multivariate Cox regression, pathological LLNM was identified as an independent risk factor for reduced DFS. There were no statistically significant differences between the nCRT+LLND and LLND groups when comparing survival curves for both DFS and OS. ConclusionIn rectal cancer patients with suspected LLNM, TME+LLND without nCRT may be a viable, yet to be validated, therapeutic strategy.

255P Survival analysis after lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer: Necessity of nCRT for suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

255P Survival analysis after lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer: Necessity of nCRT for suspected lateral lymph node metastasis

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI plus lateral lymph nodes dissection for the treatment of resectable rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis: A single-arm, investigator-initiated, phase II trial.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI plus lateral lymph nodes dissection for the treatment of resectable rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis: A single-arm, investigator-initiated, phase II trial.

Robotic versus laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

There are few available studies that compare the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of robotic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection compared to laparoscopic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection (LPLND) in advanced rectal cancer. This meta-analysis aims to compare perioperative outcomes between robotic and LPLND. We performed a systemic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Perioperative parameters were extracted and pooled for analysis. This meta-analysis provided an analysis of heterogeneity and prediction intervals. Five studies were included: 567 patients divided between 266 robotic and 301 LPLND. Overall operation time was longer in the robotic group than laparoscopic group (difference in means = 67.11, 95% CI [30.80, 103.42], p < 0.001) but the difference in the pelvic lateral lymph dissection time was not statistically significant (difference in means = - 1.212, 95% CI [ - 11.594, 9.171], p = 0.819). There were fewer overall complications in the robotic than in the laparoscopic group (OR = 1.589, 95% CI [1.009, 2.503], p = 0.046), especially with respect to urinary retention (OR = 2.23, 95% CI [1.277, 3.894], p = 0.005). More pelvic lateral lymph nodes were harvested by robotic surgery than by laparoscopy (differences in means = - 1.992, 95% CI [ - 2.421, 1.563], p < 0.001). In this meta-analysis, robotic pelvic lateral lymph node dissection was associated with more pelvic lateral lymph nodes harvested and lower overall complications, especially urinary retention when compared to LPLND. Further studies are needed to reinforce these findings.

Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) poses significant technical challenges. Despite the advent of robotic surgery, determining the optimal minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND (R-LPND) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with LPND (L-LPND). This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Utilizing the RevMan 5.3.5 statistical package from the Cochrane Collaboration, a random-effects model was employed. Six eligible studies involving 652 patients (316 and 336 in the R-LPND and L-LPND groups, respectively) were retrieved. The robotic approach demonstrated favourable outcomes compared with the laparoscopic approach, manifesting in lower morbidity rates, reduced urinary complications, shorter hospital stays, and a higher number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes. However, longer operative time was associated with the robotic approach. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding major complications, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal infection, neurological complications, LPND time, overall recurrence, and local recurrence. In summary, the robotic approach is a safe and feasible alternative for Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with LPND in advanced rectal cancer. Notably, it is associated with lower morbidity, particularly a reduction in urinary complications, a shorter hospital stay and increased number of harvested lateral pelvic nodes. The trade-off for these benefits is a longer operative time.

Recurrence of rectal cancer on the pelvic sidewall after lateral lymph node dissection

PurposeAlthough lateral lymph node dissection has been performed to prevent lateral pelvic recurrence in locally advanced lower rectal cancer, the incidence of lateral pelvic recurrence after this procedure has not been investigated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent lateral pelvic lymph node dissection, with a particular focus on recurrence patterns.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted at a single high-volume cancer center in Japan. A total of 493 consecutive patients with stage II-III rectal cancer who underwent lateral lymph node dissection between January 2005 and August 2022 were included. The primary outcome measures included patterns of recurrence, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Patterns of recurrence were categorized as lateral or central pelvic.ResultsAmong patients who underwent lateral lymph node dissection, 18.1% had pathologically positive lateral lymph node metastasis. Lateral pelvic recurrence occurred in 5.5% of patients after surgery. Multivariate analysis identified age > 75 years, lateral lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy as independent risk factors for lateral pelvic recurrence. Evaluation of the recurrence rate by dissection area revealed approximately 1% of recurrences in each area after dissection.ConclusionWe demonstrated the prognostic outcome and limitations of lateral lymph node dissection for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer, focusing on the incidence of recurrence in the lateral area after the dissection. Our study emphasizes the clinical importance of lateral lymph node dissection, which is an essential technique that surgeons should acquire.

MRI navigation surgery, including lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following chemoradiotherapy, improves local control and functional preservation of the middle to low rectal cancer

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the appropriateness of MRI navigation surgery following chemoradiotherapy (CRT), including lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) for middle to low rectal cancer. MethodsForty-three consecutive patients with cT2-4b rectal cancer within 10 cm from the anal verge who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery following CRT (45–50.4Gy + S1 80mg/m2) from January 2014 and February 2020 were analyzed. We decided on the operative procedure, including LLND, based on the restaging MRI. We examined the rates of 3-year postoperative local pelvic recurrence, permanent stoma, and recurrent risk factors (Group S). We also compared the results to that of the fourteen patients who enrolled in the previous phase II trial and underwent laparoscopic radical surgery following CRT (40Gy + S-1 (80mg/m2) or UFT (300 mg/m2)) for consecutive cT2-4b rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. The operative procedure was decided at the initial MRI diagnosis, and the LLND was not performed (Group P). ResultsWe had no local pelvic recurrence in Group S, and the three-year local pelvic recurrence-free survival was significantly better in Group S than P (100 % in S 85.1 % in P, p < 0.05). The permanent stoma rate was not different between the Groups, irrespective of the significantly high rate of cCRM(+) in Group S. The Cox proportional hazards model for significant factors of recurrence on the univariate analysis revealed that ycM and ycEMVI scores were independently significant (p < 0.001). ConclusionMRI navigation surgery, including LLND for rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy, improves local control and functional preservation.

Predictive Value of Jugulo-omohyoid Lymph Nodes in Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer

BackgroundJugulo-omohyoid lymph nodes (JOHLN) metastasis has proven to be associated with lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). This study aimed to reveal the clinical features and evaluate the predictive value of JOHLN in PTC to guide the extent of surgery.MethodsA total of 550 patients pathologically diagnosed with PTC between October 2015 and January 2020, all of whom underwent thyroidectomy and lateral lymph node dissection, were included in this study.ResultsThyroiditis, tumor location, tumor size, extra-thyroidal extension, extra-nodal extension, central lymph node metastasis (CLNM), and LLMM were associated with JOHLN. Male, upper lobe tumor, multifocality, extra-nodal extension, CLNM, and JOHLN metastasis were independent risk factors from LLNM. A nomogram based on predictors performed well. Nerve invasion contributed the most to the prediction model, followed by JOHLN metastasis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.855, and the p-value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was 0.18. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram was clinically helpful.ConclusionJOLHN metastasis could be a clinically sensitive predictor of further LLM. A high-performance nomogram was established, which can provide an individual risk assessment of LNM and guide treatment decisions for patients.

Impact of thyroid carcinoma invasion of recurrent laryngeal nerve on cervical lymph node metastasis.

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) has a favorable prognosis. However, involvement of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) significantly increases the risk of recurrence. RLN invasion was an important factor in determining the extent of thyroid surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare clinicopathologic features and characterize risk factors of central and lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) of RLN invasion in patients with PTC. A retrospective review was conducted of 130 patients with PTCs who had exclusive tumor involvement of the RLN at our institution between January 2014 and February 2019. All patients underwent total thyroidectomy and high-dose radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy. The clinicopathologic factors and prognostic outcomes of the patients with solitary and multiple RLN involvements were compared. Kaplan-Meier method was performed to compare the outcomes of tumor recurrence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with LLNM. The invasion of the RLN was similar on both sides, with 58.5% on the right, 40.0% on the left, and 1.5% on both sides. Significant differences were observed in tumor size (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis classification (p = 0.002), RLN resection (p < 0.001), and thyroglobulin (p = 0.010) in the solitary and multiple groups. During the median follow-up of 67 months, 9 (6.9%) patients developed recurrence. There were no statistical differences in recurrence for age, tumor size, gender, multifocality, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and RLN resection. According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, a cut-off of tumor size > 1.7 cm was identified as the most sensitive and specific predictor of RLN with multiple involvements or LNM invasion. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) and RLN invasion by LNM can serve as independent risk factors for LLNM (p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). Our results indicate that recurrence was comparable in patients with solitary and multiple RLN involvements. Multiple RLN involvement was associated with pathological features such as larger tumors, RLN resection, and LLNM. The presence of LNM invading RLN and multiple nerve involvement increases the risk of intraoperative RLN resection. A higher risk of multiple invasion or LNM invasion should be considered when tumor size > 1.7 cm. The presence of CLNM and RLN invaded by LNM were independent predictors for LLNM, which could aid surgeons in deciding on lateral lymph node dissection.