Lateral Fixation Research Articles

A novel method of bladder neck fixation during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Background. Appearance of new surgical techniques are aimed to improve not only oncological, but also functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy. A good urinary continence after radical surgical treatment remains an important aspect with not only medical but also social significance, since it can significantly reduce the patient’s quality of life.Aim. To describe a new surgical technique of lateral fixation of the bladder neck using autotissue during robotic- assisted radical prostatectomy, to evaluate its effecacy and safety.Materials and methods. From February till November 2020, 20 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent radical robot-assisted prostatectomy. All operations were performed in one medical center, by one experienced robotic surgeon (more than 1000 operations). After the imposition of vesicourethral anastomosis the reconstruction of pelvis was performed by lateral fixation of the vesical cervix with auto-tissue flaps of the intrapelvic fascia. A prerequisite was the preservation of the puboprostatic ligaments, endopelvic fascia and puboperineal muscles. The duration of the operation (console time and time of reconstruction), the volume of intraoperative blood loss, perioperative complications according to Clavien–Dindo, the duration of urethral catheter and the patient’s length of hospital stay, oncological results (pT stage, presence/absence of a surgical margin), the presence of immediate continence, as well as continence 3 months postoperatively were assessed.Results. The mean operative time was 142 (115–168) minutes, mean console time – 64 (50–98) minutes. The mean duration of lateral fixation stage was 3,5 (2–5,5) minutes. Urethral catheter was removed at 7th day postoperatively. There were no Clavien–Dindo group III–V complications registered. Immediate continence rate – 75 % (15 patients), early continence rate – 25 % (5 patients).Conclusion. The use of a new technique of lateral reconstruction during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using endopelvic fascia flaps is safe and effective, it improves functional outcomes without affecting oncological results.

Three Medial All Suture Anchors Improves Contact Force Compared to Two Hard Body Anchors in a Biomechanical Two-Tendon Rotator Cuff Tear Model

PurposeTo biomechanically compare a knotless double-row construct with 3 medial all-suture (3AS) anchors with a standard 2 medial hard body (2HB) anchor construct.MethodsTwelve matched cadaveric shoulder specimens with a mean age of 57 years (range: 54-61 years) were randomized to receive a knotless double-row repair with either a 3AS or 2HB construct. In the 3AS construct, three 2.6-mm all-suture anchors were placed adjacent to the articular margin and secured laterally with two 4.75-mm knotless hard body anchors. In the 2HB construct, two 4.75-mm medial hard body anchors were placed medially, lateral fixation was identical to the 3AS construct. Creep, displacement, stiffness, and ultimate load were recorded for each sample. In addition, a SynDaver model was used to compare contact pressure between the 2 repair constructs.ResultsThere were no differences in cyclic displacement at 1, 30, and 100 cycles (P = .616, .497, .190, respectively), cyclic stiffness (.928), ultimate load (.445), or load to failure (P = .445) between the 2 constructs. The 3AS repair construct had improved contact pressure between tendon and bone when compared with the 2HB construct at loads of 20 N, 30 N, and 40 N (P = .01, .02, and .04, respectively).ConclusionsDisplacement and load to failure properties are similar between knotless constructs using either 2HB or 3AS for the medial row. However, contact force may improve with the use of 3 medial all-suture anchors.Clinical RelevanceAs all-suture anchors are smaller in size when compared with hard body anchors. For this reason, there is potential to place an additional all-suture medial anchor to improve contact force and potentially improve rotator cuff healing when compared with the use of hard body anchors.

Unilateral pectineal suspension - A new surgical approach for apical correction of pelvic organ prolapse.

There are numerous vaginal and abdominal surgical approaches for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Even the standard techniques show great variability due to modifications depending on anatomy, available instruments and materials. Recently, the role of hysterectomy in prolapse surgery as well as the use of synthetic meshes have been questioned. Here, we present a standardised mesh-free minimally invasive pelvic floor reconstruction technique with uterus preservation. Unilateral pectineal suspension (UPS) is carried out in five defined steps with the use of the da Vinci Xi ® surgical system. The desired anatomical result is simulated by intraoperative uterus manipulation. The cranial part of the pectineal ligament is used for lateral fixation. A non-absorbable suture is placed between the pectineal ligament and the anterior cervix to suspend the uterus in its natural anatomical position. For outcome measurement, degree of prolapse was assessed pre- and postoperatively according to the POP-Q system. Unilateral pectineal suspension offers several advantages. Medial tension-free positioning of the uterus is achieved. The use of the cervix as fixation structure allows for excellent pelvic floor support and stable results. Normal pelvic floor mobility and natural axis of the vagina are restored. Unilateral pectineal suspension is an efficient minimal-invasive mesh-free procedure which allows uterus preservation and offers reliable level I support respecting the physiological pelvic anatomy. In addition, there is no need for ureteral dissection or bowel manipulation. The technique offers clinical standardization and can easily be integrated into the spectrum of modern surgical POP repair.

Expandable Lateral Lumbar Cages With Integrated Fixation: A Viable Option for Rostral Adjacent Segment Disease.

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) above a previous posterior lumbar instrumented fusion can be managed with minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Earlier procedures with stand-alone lateral cages risked nonunion, and lateral cages with separate lateral plates risked lumbar plexus injury and vertebral fracture. We investigated clinical and radiographic outcomes of an expandable lateral titanium interbody cage with an integrated lateral fixation (eLLIFp) device as a stand-alone treatment for symptomatic ASD above a previous posterior lumbar fusion and performed a comparative cost analysis of eLLIFp to alternative operations for ASD. In this prospective, observational study, patients with ASD above 1-, 2-, 3-, or 4-level instrumented posterior fusions underwent surgery with lateral expandable titanium cage(s) with an integrated lateral plate with single screws into each adjacent vertebra from August 2017 to August 2019. Multimodality intraoperative neural monitoring was performed. Patient-reported outcomes, computed tomography outcomes, and total costs were analyzed. A total of 33 patients received 35 eLLIFp cages. All clinical outcomes improved significantly. The eLLIFp cages added 2.2° segmental lordosis and 2.7 mm posterior disc height. Interbody fusion rate was 94% at 12 months. There were 2 neurologic complications (6%): 1 patient reported transient anterior thigh numbness and 1 had mild persistent L4 radiculopathy. No cage subsidence, cage migration, screw loosening, or vertebral fracture occurred. No revision lateral surgery, posterior decompression, or supplemental posterior fixation was required. The total eLLIFp cost (AU$19,715) was lower than the cost for all other procedures. eLLIFp provided a minimally invasive, low morbidity, cost-effective, and robust alternative to traditional posterior construct extension surgery for rostral lumbar ASD in selected patients with 1- to 2-level stenosis and minimal deformity. Traditional ASD treatment involves substantial risks and expense. eLLIFp should be considered a safe, effective, and lower cost alternative to posterior construct extension surgery.

Biomechanical study of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) augmented with different types of instrumentation: a finite element analysis

BackgroundTo explore the biomechanical differences in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) augmented by different types of instrumentation.MethodsA three-dimensional nonlinear finite element (FE) model of an intact L3-S1 lumbar spine was built and validated. The intact model was modified to develop five OLIF surgery models (Stand-alone OLIF; OLIF with lateral plate fixation [OLIF + LPF]; OLIF with unilateral pedicle screws fixation [OLIF + UPSF]; OLIF with bilateral pedicle screws fixation [OLIF + BPSF]; OLIF with translaminar facet joint fixation + unilateral pedicle screws fixation [OLIF + TFJF + UPSF]) in which the surgical segment was L4–L5. Under a follower load of 500 N, a 7.5-Nm moment was applied to all lumbar spine models to calculate the range of motion (ROM), equivalent stress peak of fixation instruments (ESPFI), equivalent stress peak of cage (ESPC), equivalent stress peak of cortical endplate (ESPCE), and equivalent stress average value of cancellous bone (ESAVCB).ResultsCompared with the intact model, the ROM of the L4–L5 segment in each OLIF surgery model decreased by > 80%. The ROM values of adjacent segments were not significantly different. The ESPFI, ESPC, and ESPCE values of the OLIF + BPSF model were smaller than those of the other OLIF surgery models. The ESAVCB value of the normal lumbar model was less than the ESAVCB values of all OLIF surgical models. In most postures, the ESPFI, ESPCE, and ESAVCB values of the OLIF + LPF model were the largest. The ESPC was higher in the Stand-alone OLIF model than in the other OLIF models. The stresses of several important components of the OLIF + UPSF and OLIF + TFJF + UPSF models were between those of the OLIF + LPF and OLIF + BPSF models.ConclusionsOur biomechanical FE analysis indicated the greater ability of OLIF + BPSF to retain lumbar stability, resist cage subsidence, and maintain disc height. Therefore, in the augmentation of OLIF, bilateral pedicle screws fixation may be the best approach.

Suitability of 3.5-mm screw for the atlas in children: a retrospective computed tomography analysis.

The growth and development of the atlas in children has not been studied to date using a large sample size. To study whether a 3.5-mm screw is suitable for the atlas in children, to explore the anatomical size and development of the atlas in 0-14-year-old children, and to provide morphological basis for lateral mass screw internal fixation. A Computed Tomography (CT) morphometric analysis was performed on 420 pediatric atlases. In the atlas, D1, D2, D3, D4, and α of the atlas lateral mass were measured. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Students' t test. The least square method was used for the regression analysis of the change trend in anatomical structure. The curve with the greatest goodness of fit was used as the anatomic trend regression curve. D1, D2, D3, and D4 generally showed an increasing trend with age. The ranges of averages of D1, D2, D3, D4, and α in 0-14year-old children were as follows: 4.576-9.202mm, 9.560-25.100mm, 3.414-10.554mm, 11.150-27.895, and 12.41°-20.97°, respectively. The trends of the fitting curves of L1 and L3 were power functions, and those of L2 and L4 were logarithmic curves. CT examination could help in preoperative decision-making, and 3.5-mm screw was found to be suitable for lateral mass screw internal fixation in children aging 2years and older. D1-D4 increased with age. This provided a certain reference to perform posterior atlantoaxial fusion in children and is of great significance to design posterior atlantoaxial screw in children.

Colorectal intussusception as form of presentation of rectal cancer.

Background: Colorectal intususception is an uncommon form of presentation o rectal cancer. It occurs due to idiopathic causes (most frequent in women) especially related to por lateral fixation of the rectum or secundary to the presence of a neoplasm. The gold standard for diagnosis is the colonoscopy. However, a CT scan could be useful. The management of this pathology is related to its origin. In cases where repeated episodes occur, treatment consists of surgical intervention, either b correction of rectal prolapse or by oncological resection in the case of tumors.

A Novel Patient-specific Titanium Mesh Implant Design for Reconstruction of Complex Orbital Fracture.

Background:Complex orbital fractures, including orbital rims and walls, require precise reconstruction. A titanium-based patient-specific implant (PSI) benefits over other implants when challenged with narrow surgical space and designable implant fixation point.Methods:This is a prospective noncomparative case series to evaluate the effect of complex orbital reconstruction using the newly designed lateral fixation patient-specific implant. The PSI was individually fabricated by 3D reconstruction using the mirrored nonaffected orbit as a template. The fixation point was at maxillary or zygomatic bone, depending on the bony remnant. Outcomes were obtained from computed tomography scan to compare orbital tissue volume and exophthalmometry value by posterior clinoid method before and after the surgery and also between both orbits in each patient.Results:Sixteen patients with complex orbital fracture with inferior orbital rim defect were enrolled. Seven were previously repaired with other implants. Compared with the preoperative measurement, the postoperative mean difference of orbital volume and exophthalmometry value between both eyes was significantly decreased (reduction of the mean difference of 2904.40 mm3; P < 0.001 and 2.89 mm; P < 0.001, respectively). The mean orbital volume and exophthalmometry value between affected and unaffected eyes were not different after surgical correction (P = 0.57 and P = 0.28, respectively). There was one infected wound from retained foreign body and one unresolved vertical diplopia after the reconstruction.Conclusions:Reconstruction of complex orbital fractures using the novel designed-PSI had excellent outcomes. Appropriate implant design with caution of orbital anatomy and placement techniques are keys for successful results.

Weightbearing after combined medial and lateral plate fixation of AO/OTA 41-C2 bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study

BackgroundCombined medial and lateral plate fixation is recommended for complex tibial plateau fractures with medial fragments or no cortical bone contact. Although such fixation is adequate to resist forces during range of motion, it may be insufficient to support immediate postoperative weightbearing. Here, we analyzed displacement, stiffness, and fixation failure during simulated full weightbearing of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures treated with combined medial and lateral locking plate fixation.MethodsWe used 10 fresh-frozen adult human cadaveric tibias and mated femurs. Osteotomies were performed with an oscillating saw and cutting template to simulate an AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 41-C2 fracture (simple articular, multifragmentary metaphyseal fracture). Specimens were anatomically reduced and stabilized with combined medial and lateral locking plates (AxSOS, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ). Specimens were loaded axially to simulate 4 weeks of walking in a person weighing 70 kg. The specimens were cyclically loaded from 200 N to a maximum of 2800 N. Then, if no failure, loading continued for 200,000 cycles. We measured displacement of each bone fragment and defined fixation failure as ≥5 mm of displacement. Construct stiffness and load at failure were calculated. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using Chi-squared and unpaired t-tests, respectively.ResultsMean total displacement values after 10,000 loading cycles were as follows: lateral, 0.4 ± 0.8 mm; proximal medial, 0.3 ± 0.7 mm; distal medial, 0.3 ± 0.6 mm; and central 0.4 ± 0.5 mm. Mean stiffness of the construct was 562 ± 164 N/mm. Fixation failure occurred in 6 of 10 specimens that reached 5 mm of plastic deformation before test completion. In the failure group, the mean load at failure was 2467 ± 532 N, and the mean number of cycles before failure was 53,155. After test completion, the greatest displacement was found at the distal medial fracture site (2.3 ± 1.4 mm) and lateral fracture site (2.2 ± 1.7 mm).ConclusionsAlthough combined medial and lateral plate fixation of complex tibial plateau fractures provides adequate stability to allow early range of motion, immediate full weightbearing is not recommended.

Respective Correction Rates of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.

Background and Objectives: There are few reports describing the radiographic correction of vertebral slippage in lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. [Objectives] We evaluated the intraoperative surgical correction obtained by lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw procedures. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients were included in this study. According to the Meyerding classification, 35 cases were Grade 1 and 15 cases were Grade 2. Mean age was 64.7 ± 6.4 years old. Seventeen cases were male, and 33 cases were female. The mean preoperative % slip was 21.1 ± 7.0%. After lateral interbody fusion, vertebral slippage was corrected using reduction technique by percutaneous pedicle screw. Results: The slippage of vertebra was reduced to 11.5 ± 6.5% after lateral interbody fusion procedure and 4.0 ± 6.0% after percutaneous pedicle screw procedure. One year after surgery, the slippage of vertebra was 4.1 ± 6.6%. The correction rate of lateral interbody fusion was 47.7 ± 25.1%, and that of percutaneous pedicle screw was 33.8 ± 2.6%. The total correction rate was 81.5 ± 27.7%. There was no significant loss of correction one year after surgery. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score significantly improved from 14.7 ± 4.2 to 27.7 ± 1.7 points at final follow up. No vascular or organ injury was observed during surgery, and there were no postoperative surgical site infections or systemic complications. Conclusion: Compared with previous reports, the final correction rate and the correction rate of the percutaneous pedicle screw procedure were particularly high in this study. Lateral interbody fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw using reduction technique provide excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Analysis of the Effect of Posterior Lateral Malleolus Plate Fixation on the Curative Effect and Mechanical Stability of Complex Ankle Fractures.

This paper investigates the effect of lateral and posterior 1/3 tubular plate bone plate fixation on the curative effect, wound healing, and mechanical stability of complex ankle fracture. 80 patients with complex ankle fractures treated in our hospital from January 2018 to July 2020 are selected for the study, and 80 patients are randomly divided into posterior fixation group and lateral fixation group according to the number table method, with 40 patients in each group. Patients in the posterior malleolus fixation group are treated with posterior lateral malleolus plate fixation, and patients in the lateral malleolus fixation group are treated with lateral malleolus plate fixation. The differences in efficacy, mechanical stability, wound healing, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and American Association of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) ankle function are compared. The subjects are followed up for 6 months until January 2022. In patients with complex ankle fracture, 1/3 tubular plate osteoplate fixation in the posterior lateral malleolus can improve clinical efficacy and mechanical stability, which is helpful to promote incision healing and reduce the risk of complications. The 1/3 tubular plate osteoplate fixation in the posterior lateral malleolus is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Single-stage debridement via autogenous iliac bone graft through the OLIF corridor and lateral fixation in treating spontaneous single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of mini-open oblique debridement and lumbar interbody fusion combined with lateral screw fixation for treating single-level pyogenic spondylodiscitis.MethodsTwelve patients with single-level lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis underwent OLIF combined with lateral screw fixation were analyzed. Patients underwent follow-up for 12 to 24 months. The clinical characteristics, etiological examinations, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale score (VAS), postoperative complications, and the bony fusion rate were recorded.ResultsThe mean follow-up period of time was 14.8 months. The average operative time and intra-operative blood loss were 129.0 ± 19.76 min and 309.2 ± 92.96 mL, respectively. No severe intra-operative complications were observed during surgery, except in 1 case that develops abdominal pain and distension after surgery, 2 cases that develop left-sided transient thigh pain/numbness and 8 cases that complains of donor site (iliac crest) pain. All of these symptoms disappeared 8 weeks after surgery. Tissue sample cultures were obtained from all patients intraoperatively and four (33.3%) were positive, including 2 with Staphylococcus aureus, 1 with Staphylococcus epidermidis, and 1 with Escherichia coli. During an average of 22.5 ± 2.1 days (range, 14–29 days) after surgery, WBC, CPR, and ESR levels in all patients had returned to normal. All patients were pain free with no recurring infection. Solid bony fusions were observed in all cases within 6 months, including 10 with I grade fusion, 2 with II grade fusion according to the classification suggested by Burkus et al. No fixation failure was observed during follow up and solid bony fusions were observed in all 12 patients at finally follow-up. A significant postoperative increase was also observed in the mean segmental height and lordosis (P < 0.05), followed by a slight decrease of segmental height and lordosis at final follow-up. At the final follow up, the mean VAS (1.5 ± 0.6) and ODI (18.9 ± 7.6) were significantly lower than VAS (8.4 ± 2.7) and ODI (71.2 ± 16.5) before surgery (P < 0.01).ConclusionSingle-stage debridement with autogenous iliac bone graft through the OLIF corridor and lateral fixation was a feasible surgical approach in our consecutive 12 cases of pyogenic spondylitis.

Additional lateral plate fixation has no effect to prevent cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundFor lumbar degenerative diseases, cage subsidence is a serious complication and can result in the failure of indirect decompression in the oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedure. Whether additional lateral plate fixation was effective to improve clinical outcomes and prevent cage subsidence was still unknown. This study aimed to compare the incidence and degree of cage subsidence between stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion (SA-OLIF) and OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation (OLIF + LP) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases and to evaluate the effect of the lateral plate fixation.MethodsThis was a retrospective comparative study. 20 patients with 21 levels underwent SA-OLIF and 21 patients with 26 levels underwent OLIF + LP. We compared clinical and radiographic outcomes between two groups. Clinical evaluation included Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Radiographical evaluation included disc height (DH), segmental lordosis angle (SL), and subsidence rate on standing lateral radiographs. Cage subsidence was classified using Marchi’s criteria.ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 6.3 ± 2.4 months. There were no significant differences among perioperative data (operation time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, and complication), clinical outcome (VAS, ODI, and JOA) and radiological outcome (SH and SL). The subsidence rate was 19.0% (4/21) in SA-OLIF group and 19.2% (5/26) in OLIF + LP group. 81.0% in SA-OLIF group and 80.8% in OLIF + LP group had Grade 0 subsidence, 14.3% in SA-OLIF group and 15.4% in OLIF + LP group had Grade I subsidence, and 4.8% in SA-OLIF group and 3.8% in OLIF + LP group had Grade II subsidence (P = 0.984). One patient with severe cage subsidence and lateral plate migration underwent revision surgery.ConclusionsThe additional lateral plate fixation does not appear to be more effective to prevent cage subsidence in the oblique lumbar interbody fusion, compared with stand-alone technique. If severe cage subsidence occurs, it may result in lateral plate migration in OLIF combined with lateral plate fixation.

Follow-up Evaluation of Medial Clear Space and Talar Tilt After Bimalleolar Equivalent Fracture Fixation Without Primary Deltoid Repair.

We sought first to determine the efficacy of lateral ankle fixation alone in maintenance of medial clear space and talar valgus in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures not receiving primary deltoid repair, and second to assess perceived outcomes via the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. To our knowledge, no study has quantified the reduction of medial clear space and talar valgus in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures receiving lateral ankle fixation alone. We compared preoperative, initial postoperative, and greater than 1-year follow-up radiographs of medial clear space and talar valgus in individuals who received lateral ankle fixation alone in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures. Subjective outcomes were measured via the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Thirty-seven patients participated in the study and showed a statistically significant reduction of medial clear space and restoration of talar position, and maintenance with this fixation method during follow-up in patients with bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures. Adjunctively, patients perceived their outcomes to be satisfactory, as demonstrated by the results of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. We aimed to assess the efficacy of lateral ankle fixation in the maintenance of medial clear space and talar valgus reduction at midterm follow-up. Although some authors contend that primary deltoid repair in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures is warranted, these midterm study results suggest that isolated lateral ankle fixation is adequate for medial ankle stabilization in bimalleolar equivalent fractures, and thus primary deltoid repair is not indicated.

Immediate weight-bearing is safe following lateral locked plate fixation of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures

PurposeThis study aimed to determine whether unrestricted weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) following lateral locking plate (LLP) fixation of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (PDFFs) is associated with increased failure and reoperation, compared with restricted weight-bearing (RWB).Materials and methodsIn a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with unilateral PDFFs undergoing LLP fixation, patients prescribed WBAT were compared with those prescribed 6 weeks of RWB. The primary outcome measure was reoperation. Kaplan–Meier and Cox multivariable analyses were performed.ResultsThere were 43 patients (mean age 80.9 ± 11.7 years, body mass index 26.8 ± 5.7 kg/m2 and 86.0% female): 28 WBAT and 15 RWB. There were more interprosthetic fractures in the RWB group (p = 0.040). Mean follow-up was 3.8 years (range 1.0–10.4). Eight patients (18.6%) underwent reoperation. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in 2-year survival between WBAT (80.6%, 95% CI 65.3–95.9) and RWB (83.3%, 95% CI 62.1–100.0; p = 0.54). Cox analysis showed increased reoperation risk with medial comminution (hazard ratio 10.7, 95% CI 1.5–80; p = 0.020) and decreased risk with anatomic reduction (hazard ratio 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–1.0; p = 0.046). Immediate weight-bearing did not significantly affect the risk of reoperation compared with RWB (relative risk 1.03, 95% CI 0.61–1.74; p = 0.91).ConclusionsLLP fixation failure was associated with medial comminution and non-anatomic reductions, not with postoperative weight-bearing. Medial comminution should be managed with additional fixation. Weight-bearing restrictions additional to this appear unnecessary and should be avoided.

Posterior fixation for paediatric and adolescent unstable hangman's fracture: evolution to C1 sparing techniques.

The aim was to study surgical outcomes in hangman's fractures in paediatric and adolescent patients and to demonstrate evolution in posterior surgery from C1-C2-C3 fusion to C1 sparing techniques. Patients (aged ≤ 18 years) operated at a tertiary level centre between September 2011 to February 2018 with more than 1 year of follow-up were included. Neurological status, type of fracture, operating time, blood loss, follow-up, and complications were assessed. Nine patients were included, with mean age mean of 16.45 years, with a mean follow-up of 42.78 months. Six patients having neurological deficit showed improvement. Two patients, one having undergone C1-C3 lateral mass screw rod fixation (LMSF) and other had C2 pedicle screw with C3 LMSF, developed kyphosis for which fixation was further extended caudally. One patient with an old hangman's fracture with reabsorbed axis pedicle underwent C2 body screw along with C3-C4 pedicle screw rod fixation and C2 pedicle reconstruction. All patients showed evidence of postoperative fusion. Hangman's fractures in young patients can be successfully managed via posterior fixation. In our centre, we have evolved in the direction of motion preservation at C1 C2 joint, along with 3 column stable fixation of the C2 pedicle. C2 pedicle reformation has allowed motion preserving surgery in complex fracture types. Extension of construct till C4 in selected cases is important to prevent postoperative kyphosis.

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Tacks in Mesh Fixation for Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran 2) is a synthetic adhesive mesh fixation material. Its utility is being evaluated in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair (IHR). A multicentre randomized controlled trial was performed comparing Glubran 2 to standard of care absorbable tacks, particularly assessing chronic postoperative inguinal pain and its effects. Patients undergoing elective TEP IHR at 2 centers from 2017 to 2019 were randomly assigned to Glubran 2 or absorbable tack mesh fixation, and followed for 6 months. All other aspects of surgery and aftercare remained the same. Surgeons documented operative and fixation time, and the placement of fixation on standardized diagrams. Via a questionnaire, aspects of inguinal pain were evaluated before surgery, and at various time-points postoperatively over 6 months. Postoperative clinical factors were also collected. A total of 106 operative sides were randomized to either glue (51) or tack (55) mesh fixation over a 14-month period. Similar median operative times between tack (83.0 min) and glue fixation (75.0 min) were observed. There were no significant surgical complications or observed hernia recurrences in either group. There was no significant difference in pain scores between the 2 groups at all time-points after analysis through mixed effects modeling. Temporal pain profiles over time were also similar. Totally, 55% of patients in the glue group had returned to work within 2 weeks of surgery. There was no increase in complications or pain scores despite regular lateral fixation of glue in these patients. Adding to known data, we observed no significant difference in postoperative pain, demonstrating that cyanoacrylate glue is a viable and safe alternative fixation method to absorbable tacks in laparoscopic TEP IHR. As secondary outcomes, cyanoacrylate glue permits some patients to return to work early, and we observed regular lateral mesh glue fixation without increased pain or complications.

A novel surgical approach and technique and short-term clinical efficacy for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with the combined use of medial anatomical locking plate fixation and minimally invasive lateral locking plate fixation

Background and hypothesisThe typical anterolateral approach is widely used to treat proximal humerus fractures with lateral locking fixation. However, lateral fixation cannot completely avoid medial reduction loss and varus deformity especially in the cases of an unstable medial column. We present a novel medial surgical approach and technique together with a minimally invasive lateral locking plate to fix proximal humerus fractures with an unstable medial column.Materials and methodsWe performed an anatomical study and reported 8 cases of proximal humerus fractures with unstable medial columns treated with plate fixation through a minimally invasive anterolateral approach and medial approach. All surgeries were performed by the same single surgeon. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.ResultsThere was a safe region located at the medial part of the proximal humerus just beneath the articular surface. An anatomical medial locking proximal humerus plate could be placed in the medial column and did not affect the axillary nerve, blood supply of the humeral head, or stability of the shoulder joint. Successful fracture healing was achieved in all 8 cases. The function and range of motion of the shoulder joint were satisfactory 24 months postoperatively, with an average Constant score (CS) of 82.8. No reduction loss (≥ 10° in any direction), screw cutout, nonunion, or deep infection occurred.ConclusionsThe combined application of medial anatomical locking plate fixation and minimally invasive lateral locking plate fixation is effective in maintaining operative reduction and preventing varus collapse and implant failure in proximal humerus fractures with an unstable medial column.

Clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion technique.

BackgroundOblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) is a minimally invasive technique performed through the antero-oblique trajectory to address a wide range of lumbar pathologies. However, it can lead to complications. We reviewed the results of OLIF and discussed the effective methods to avoid such complications.MethodsSeventy-nine consecutive patients who underwent OLIF between May 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into three groups: stand-alone, posterior, and lateral fixation, according to whether they were followed up with auxiliary internal fixation as well as the fixation methods. Preoperative and last follow-up visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were used to assess the improvement in the lower back and leg pain as well as neurological conditions. We analyzed intervertebral disc height (DH), segmental lumbar lordotic angle (SLL), lumbar lordotic angle (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, and the cross-section area (CSA) on axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image in different groups. Complications, including thigh symptoms, cage subsidence, neurological injury, and vascular injury, were also noted.ResultsSeventy-nine patients were followed up postoperatively for 23.2±11.5 (range, 12–48) months. Forty-eight (61%) patients underwent stand-alone surgery (without fixation), 15 (19%) patients underwent supplemental percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (posterior fixation), and 16 (20%) patients underwent lateral vertebral instrumentation (lateral fixation). In all three groups, the VAS score and the ODI score had significantly decreased at the final follow-up compared to pre-operation. The DH, SLL, LL, CSA, PT, and PI-LL mismatch had also improved by final follow-up. The most common approach-related complication was thigh symptoms. Of the 79 patients, ipsilateral transient psoas paresis occurred in 9 (11.4%), ipsilateral transient quadriceps weakness in 2 (2.5%), and groin/thigh numbness and pain in 17 (21.5%). Cage subsidence occurred in 8 (10.1%) patients, including five cases of grade 0, one of grade I, and two of grade II. Three (3.8%) patients in this study had a vascular injury.ConclusionsOLIF is a minimally invasive and effective technique for dealing with degenerative lumbar diseases. However, it should also be noted that this approach carries risks of complications.

“DOUBLE X” FIXATION FOR RARE AND PARTICULAR PEDIATRIC SUPRACONDYLAR HUMERUS FRACTURES

Background Context. The presence of special, rare and various forms which we can encounter when treating supracondylar humeral fractures (SHF) in children, call into question what therapeutic methods can be used to increase the effectiveness of the treatment applied. The aim of this paper is to present the results obtained by using double cross-fixation, "in double X", by closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating rare and particular forms. Comments and opinions on "double X" method and other cross or side configurations are presented. Patient Sample. All patients with rare and particular forms presented in this article, were operated during 2001-2020 in state and private hospitals. Fixation in "double X" was used either by CRPP and ORIF. The epitrochlear approach (EA) was performed in cases where stability by CRPP could not be ensured or when there were clear signs of ulnar nerve damage. The minimal medial-approach (mMA) highlights the epitrochlea and the fracture of the medial pylon; it has the role of anatomically reducing the medial pylon, thinner and very unstable in rare and particular forms. During 1982-2020 we consulted, treated and evaluated patients with SHF to whom all known treatment methods were applied: orthopedic reduction and immobilization in plaster cast, CRPP, ORIF, minimal-open reduction and internal fixation (mORIF) by mMA and external fixator. Internal fixation was done by the techniques of Judet, San Antonio, San Diego, Dorgan, in “X” and “double X”. In 2001, I introduced "double X" fixation to better stabilize anatomical reductions that showed signs of instability during intraoperative verification. All indications given in the study protocol have been made in accordance with the regulations mentioned in the experimental program. Results. All SHFs operated by CRPP and ORIF by “double X” were cured and satisfactory and good results were obtained in the neglected types operated between 14 and 60 days and good and excellent results were obtained in the rare forms. Conclusions. “Double X” fixation gives the best stabilization and postoperatively there is no need for immobilization in a plaster cast. Recovery may begin the day after surgery. Keywords: supracondylar fractures, child elbow pathology, cross-fixation, lateral fixation, healing and recovery after 30-45 days.