Lateral Contact Area Research Articles

Effects of tibial rotations on patellar tracking and patello-femoral contact areas

The object of this study is to determine the effect of tibial rotations on the three-dimensional patello-femoral motions and contact areas during a physiological loading condition, the knee-extension exercise. A commercially available device, the 3-SPACE digitizer and tracker system, was used to collect the motion data, utilizing cadaveric human lower limbs as well as the geometric measurements describing the articular surfaces at the patello-femoral joint. It was found that tibial rotations caused statistically significant differences, at the 0.05 level, in patellar tilt, patellar rotation and patellar medial-lateral shift. It was also found that while the magnitude of the total contact area at a given knee flexion angle did not change significantly with tibial rotations, medial and lateral components of the total contact areas were affected by tibial rotations. Medial femoral contact areas increased with internal tibial rotations at all flexion angles; lateral femoral contact areas increased with external tibial rotations at all flexion angles. This correlates well with the kinematic data since it was found that the patella shifted medially with internal tibial rotations at all flexion angles, and tilted more medially near full-extension causing an increase in the medial contact areas and a decrease in the lateral contact areas.

Vocal fold vibrations in dysphonia: model vs. measurement

Several investigators have conjectured that the electroglottographic (EGG) waveform is inversely proportional to the lateral area of contact of the vocal folds. But this conjecture is essentially impossible to substantiate by observations. We have developed a simple model of the vocal folds that estimates the vocal fold lateral contact area as a function of time. The EGG waveform is directly calculated as the reciprocal of this lateral contact area function. We show how the model may be used to simulate EGG waveforms for normal male voices in model register and vocal fry and for predicting EGG waveforms for models of vibrating vocal folds that have a nodule or polyp on one fold.

Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 1. Functional anatomy of the patello-femoral joint

Cadaver knee joints were mounted so that life-like forces of weight-bearing were simulated. The patello-femoral contact areas were defined under load throughout the range of movement by the dye method. During movement from extension to 90 degrees of flexion a band of contact sweeps across the patella from inferior to superior pole, but the odd facet makes no contact. At about 135 degrees of flexion separate medial and lateral contact areas form, the medial one limited to the odd facet. From extension to 90 degrees of flexion the patella holds the quadriceps tendon away from the femur, but in further degrees of flexion an extensive "tendo-femoral" contact area forms. Between 90 degrees and 135 degrees of flexion the patella rotates and the ridge between the medial and odd facets engages the femoral condyle. The odd facet is shown to be a habitual non-contact area and the ridge to be subject to high load, observations which correlate with cartilage lesions described in Part 2 of the paper.

Tibiofemoral Contact Area-Determination and Implications

We have presented a roentgenographic method of determining the area of contact of the femur on the medial and lateral tibial plateaus. The area of contact on both tibial plateaus decreases throughout the first 35 degrees of flexion. The average area of contact on the medial plateau was 1.6 times greater than the area on the lateral plateau. This relationship remained constant through the first 35 degrees of flexion. The ratio of the medial and lateral contact areas is applicable to the study of clinical problems.

1582. Aminopyrine: Poor cow?

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint is a common disease accompanied by pain and impaired mobility. Despite some recent concerns on the lack of correlation between the medial load and the knee adduction moment (KAM), KAM is routinely considered as a surrogate measure of medial load and hence a marker where its reduction is the main focus of preventive and treatment interventions.Determine the relative sensitivity of the tibiofemoral medial-lateral contact load partitioning to changes in the knee adduction angle (KAA) versus KAM.Using a lower extremity hybrid musculoskeletal (MS) model driven by gait kinematics and kinetics, we compute here in asymptomatic subjects the sensitivity of the knee joint biomechanical response (muscle and ligament forces) in general and medial/lateral load partitioning in particular to the relative changes in the reported KAA versus changes in reported KAM (both by one standard deviation).As KAA increased (at constant KAM), so did the passive moment resistance of the knee joint which as a result and at all stance periods substantially reduced forces in lateral hamstrings while increasing those in medial hamstrings. At 25% and 75% stance as two highly loaded periods of gait, the drop in KAA (from + SD to –SD while at constant KAM) drastically reduced the medial contact force by 44% and 30% and the medial over lateral contact load and area ratios by 92% and 79% as well as 64% and 51%, respectively. In contrast, the equivalent alterations in KAM (by ± SD at constant KAA) had lower and less consistent effects (<7%) showing much smaller sensitivity to changes in KAM alone. Ligament forces altered at various stance periods with inconsistent trends; peak values of 418 N in the anterior cruciate ligament (90% carried by the posterolateral bundle) and 1056 N in the patellar tendon were computed both at 25% stance and minimum KAA.These findings indicate a poor correlation between KAM and tibiofemoral load distribution suggesting instead that KAA and knee alignment should be in focus as the primary marker of knee joint load partitioning and associated prevention and treatment interventions.

1565. Synergizing chlorofluorohydrocarbon toxicity?

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint is a common disease accompanied by pain and impaired mobility. Despite some recent concerns on the lack of correlation between the medial load and the knee adduction moment (KAM), KAM is routinely considered as a surrogate measure of medial load and hence a marker where its reduction is the main focus of preventive and treatment interventions.Determine the relative sensitivity of the tibiofemoral medial-lateral contact load partitioning to changes in the knee adduction angle (KAA) versus KAM.Using a lower extremity hybrid musculoskeletal (MS) model driven by gait kinematics and kinetics, we compute here in asymptomatic subjects the sensitivity of the knee joint biomechanical response (muscle and ligament forces) in general and medial/lateral load partitioning in particular to the relative changes in the reported KAA versus changes in reported KAM (both by one standard deviation).As KAA increased (at constant KAM), so did the passive moment resistance of the knee joint which as a result and at all stance periods substantially reduced forces in lateral hamstrings while increasing those in medial hamstrings. At 25% and 75% stance as two highly loaded periods of gait, the drop in KAA (from + SD to –SD while at constant KAM) drastically reduced the medial contact force by 44% and 30% and the medial over lateral contact load and area ratios by 92% and 79% as well as 64% and 51%, respectively. In contrast, the equivalent alterations in KAM (by ± SD at constant KAA) had lower and less consistent effects (<7%) showing much smaller sensitivity to changes in KAM alone. Ligament forces altered at various stance periods with inconsistent trends; peak values of 418 N in the anterior cruciate ligament (90% carried by the posterolateral bundle) and 1056 N in the patellar tendon were computed both at 25% stance and minimum KAA.These findings indicate a poor correlation between KAM and tibiofemoral load distribution suggesting instead that KAA and knee alignment should be in focus as the primary marker of knee joint load partitioning and associated prevention and treatment interventions.