Later Lines Of Therapy Research Articles

Effectiveness of third- or later-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: Results from an observational retrospective study in Japan.

277 Background: The real-world effectiveness of third- or later-line (3L+) therapies in patients (pts) with HER2-positive gastric cancer remains unknown. We report a multicenter, retrospective, observational study at 20 centers in Japan to investigate the outcomes of 3L+ therapy in pts with HER2-positive advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer previously receiving trastuzumab (UMIN000040853). Methods: Pts aged ≥20 years with HER2-positive advanced G/GEJ cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab and newly initiated on nivolumab, irinotecan, or trifluridine/tipiracil monotherapy as 3L+ therapy (Sep 2017 to Mar 2020) were evaluated for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), time to treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). An exploratory analysis for factors affecting OS was conducted using a multivariate Cox regression model, with HER2 status as a covariate. Results: The overall analysis population was 117 pts (median: age, 71 years; number of prior treatment lines, 2; days since the initiation of first-line treatment, 431 days). Median (95% confidence interval) OS, PFS, and TTF were 6.2 months (4.5–8.0), 1.9 months (1.5–2.3), and 1.8 months (1.5–2.2), respectively, at a median follow-up of 150 days. Outcomes by treatment groups are shown in the Table. ORR and DCR in 100 pts with evaluable target lesions were 9.0% and 32.0%, respectively, and median DOR was 8.4 months. A higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (≥2.540), Glasgow prognostic score (≥1), ECOG PS (≥2), and hepatic metastasis significantly impacted OS. Conclusions: The real-world effectiveness of 3L+ therapies was limited in this study. New HER2 treatment agent is expected to improve outcomes in pts with HER2-positive G/GEJ cancer.[Table: see text]

Treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in third-line and beyond systemic therapy: Real-world data from a setting with limited resources.

58 Background: Regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) are the only therapeutic options for patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with demonstrated benefit in overall survival (OS). However, they are not accessible worldwide. In Brazil, they have been recently approved, but they have not yet been provided by public health system or private health insurances. We aimed to describe the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of that population in a setting with limited access to those drugs. Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with mCRC who were treated at five Oncoclinicas centers in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. The median OS was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors were evaluated via multivariable Cox Regression, calculating the Hazard Ratio (HR) and the confidence interval (CI95%). Results: A total of 163 patients (33% of the overall population) received third-line and 73 (15%) fourth-line systemic therapy. Median age was 62 years, 59% were male. Tumors were right-sided in 19%, RAS mutated 44%, BRAF mutated 3%, and high-frequency microsatellite instability 3%. Metastasectomy prior to third-line was performed in 62% of the patients. From the start of third-line therapy, median follow-up was 9.0 months, with 67% of deaths, and median OS was 13.7 months (CI95% 11.8m–20.0m). Most adopted regimens in third-and fourth-line were (1) rechallenge with oxaliplatin-based therapy (39% and 26%, respectively); (2) rechallenge with irinotecan-based therapy (32% and 34%); (3) rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (20% and 29%); (4) regorafenib (13% and 25%); and (5) TAS-102 (2% and 4%). In multivariable model including clinical and molecular variables, prior metastasectomy was the only significant prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.51, CI95% 0.31–0.83, p=0.007). Conclusions: In real-world, a meaningful proportion of patients with mCRC are eligible for third and later lines of therapy. Rechallenge with chemotherapy and anti-EGFR agents is overused in a setting of limited access to therapies with demonstrated OS benefit, such as regorafenib and TAS-102. Barriers to drug access impair the adoption of the best evidence-based continuum of care and strategies to overcome them are urgently needed. Refractory patients in later lines of therapy derive survival benefit from prior metastasectomy.

Real-world persistence and adherence with oral trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib in patients with colorectal cancer.

49 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) and regorafenib are among the limited treatment options in later lines of therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). While these treatments have demonstrated similar efficacy, differences have been observed in tolerability and data on the impact of such differences on real-world outcomes are limited. To better understand the real world use of FTD/TPI and regorafenib in the US, we report data for adherence/persistence among patients with CRC initiating these therapies. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study among adults with CRC identified from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases, who initiated FTD/TPI or regorafenib (index) from October 2015-September 2019 and had 6 months of continuous enrollment before the index date. Follow-up was until disenrollment or end of study period. Treatment cohorts were propensity score 1:1 matched, adjusting for differences in socio-demographics, comorbidities, and other baseline characteristics. Adherence and persistence outcomes included time to discontinuation (medication gap of >45 days), medication possession ratio (MPR; number of treated days/ duration of treatment), proportion of days covered (PDC; number of treated days/ days in specified time period), and number of prescriptions received. Results: A total of 1477 patients were included: 892 initiating FTD/TPI (60%) and 585 regorafenib (40%). Demographics were similar prior to matching: mean age was 58 and 59 years, and 57% and 59% were male, in the FTD/TPI and regorafenib groups, respectively. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (excluding cancer) was 0.69 for FTD/TPI initiators and 0.62 for regorafenib initiators. For the matched cohorts (n=585 in each), measures of adherence and persistence (Table) showed longer time to discontinuation (2.5 vs. 2.0 months; p<0.01), and a higher MPR (0.90 vs. 0.87; p<0.01), PDC (at 3 months, 0.74 vs. 0.63; p<0.01), and proportion of patients receiving ≥2 prescriptions (76% vs. 63%; p<0.01) with FTD/TPI vs. regorafenib. Conclusions: Results of this real-world study suggest that patients with CRC initiating FTD/TPI have improved adherence and persistence with therapy compared with those initiating regorafenib. Reasons for this difference and potential impacts on health outcomes require further study. [Table: see text]

Circulating tumor DNA dynamics on front-line chemotherapy with bevacizumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: A biomarker analysis for acquired genomic alterations in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance) randomized trial.

193 Background: Enhanced understanding of the evolving clonal architecture under treatment stress is crucial to optimizing care and developing effective therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Emergence of genomic alterations (GAs) [mutations (muts) and amplifications (amps)] in RAS, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, and MET have been recognized as key resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR therapy in later lines in mCRC. Data regarding occurrence of these GAs under selective pressure in the first line setting is lacking. Methods: CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized trial of bevacizumab (bev) vs cetuximab (cet) in first line mCRC. Patients (pts) with paired plasma samples (pre-treatment and post-progression) available for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing were included in this substudy. Sequencing of ctDNA was performed by Guardant360 assay in a CLIA-certified environment to detect GAs in 73 genes. RAS/BRAF status [mut vs. wild type (wt)] was based on clonal muts [pre-defined cutoff of relative MAF (rMAF) ≥ 25%] in ctDNA. Only samples with ≥1 GA were analyzed to minimize false negatives. The primary objective was to determine and compare prevalence of acquired GAs between study arms: bev (anti-VEGF) and cet (anti-EGFR). Descriptive statistics and Fisher’s exact test were used. Results: Baseline characteristics of ctDNA cohort were similar to the 80405 population. Among 133 randomized RAS/BRAF wt pts, 11 (15.3%) and 5 (8.2%) developed acquired GAs (OR 2.0, P = 0.29), in bev and cet arm, respectively. Key comparative data for pts with regard to acquired pathogenic GAs are shown in the table. Conclusions: In this randomized mCRC cohort, the ctDNA profile of acquired GAs with front line anti-EGFR chemotherapy appears to be strikingly distinct from that seen with later lines of therapy. Acquisition of GAs, classically associated with EGFR resistance in later line, was not only rare with upfront cet-chemotherapy but also comparable to bev-containing (anti-VEGF) regimen. The mechanisms of acquired resistance appear to differ when anti-EGFR therapy is administered in combination with highly active first line chemotherapy. Our findings have critical translational relevance to the timing and value of ctDNA-guided anti-EGFR rechallenge in mCRC pts, especially in those treated with anti-EGFR therapy upfront.[Table: see text]

Effect of primary tumor location on second- or later-line treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A retrospective multicenter study.

195 Background: Currently, there are no guideline recommendations of anti-EGFR Ab specific to tumor sidedness in subsequent-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We previously reported the effect of primary tumor location on subsequent-line treatment with anti-EGFR Ab from a single center. Here we presented the outcome from a multi-center study. Methods: Medical records of patients diagnosed with mCRC at 3 academic centers in Thailand (Siriraj, Chulalongkorn, and Ramathibodi hospital) between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with KRASwt mCRC who received anti-EGFR Ab in second- or later-line treatment were included. The impact of tumor sidedness on progression-free survival (PFS) was determined using Kaplan-Meier method, and those results were compared using log-rank test. Results: Among the 2,102 patients who had KRAS analysis data, 1,130 (54%) patients had KRASwt. Of those, 413 patients received anti-EGFR Ab in second- or later-line treatment. One hundred and sixty-two of 413 (39%) patients had extended RAS analysis. Seventy (17%) patients had right-sided tumors. Two hundred and thirty-eight (58%) patients received anti-EGFR Ab in the third line, and 132 (32%) patients and 43 (10%) patients were treated in the second and more than third line, respectively. Single-agent irinotecan was the most commonly used backbone chemotherapy (303/413, 73%). Patients with right-sided tumors had non-significantly inferior PFS compared to patients with left-sided tumors (median PFS: 5.7 months (mo), 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-7.5 vs. 7.5 mo, 95% CI 6.5-8.5; p =0.17). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in PFS when stratified by treatment lines. Patient with right-sided tumors had significantly inferior OS compared to patients with left-sided tumors (median OS: 23.3 mo vs. 29.9 mo; p =0.005). Conclusions: To date, this is the largest real world data of the effect of primary tumor location on anti-EGFR Ab which demonstrated that tumor sidedness has no significant impact on treatment outcomes in KRASwt mCRC patients receiving second- or later-line therapy. Our findings do not support the utility of tumor sidedness for treatment selection in these settings. We confirmed that patients with right-sided tumors had significantly worse survival.

A real-world analysis of nanoliposomal-irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as third- or later-line therapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Background:Nanoliposomal encapsulation of irinotecan (nal-IRI) with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) has shown a survival benefit for gemcitabine-pretreated patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nal-IRI with 5-FU/LV for use beyond second-line treatment after standard frontline therapy for mPAC.Method:This multicenter, retrospective, non-comparative observational study included mPAC patients who received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV as third- or later-line therapy after disease progression on first-line FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel.Results:In all, 128 patients who received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV beyond second-line treatment between October 2017 and July 2021 were analyzed. Most patients (82%) received nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV as a third-line treatment. The median overall survival (OS) was 4.9 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.4 months. Patients with better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status experienced significantly longer OS (ECOG 0, 8.7 months; ECOG 1, 4.8 months; ECOG 2, 2.9 months; p < 0.001) and PFS (3.9 months; 2.1 months; 1.5 months; p = 0.019). Patients who had not been previously treated with FFX or had a time to progression of 7 months or more on FFX experienced longer OS and PFS than those who did not (6.1 months and 5.6 versus 4.1 months, p = 0.053; 3.6 months and 2.4 versus 2.1 months, p = 0.002). The most common adverse events were neutropenia (56%) and anemia (51%).Conclusion:Our real-world data indicated that nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV can be effective not only as second-line therapy, but also as third-line or later-line treatment in selected patients. Nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV may be particularly beneficial for the survival of patients that maintain good general condition or those with favorable prior experience to irinotecan.

The efficacy of pyrotinib-based therapy in lapatinib-resistant metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer tends to metastasize and is associated with poor prognosis. Anti-HER2 treatment combined with chemotherapy or endocrine therapy is often used for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). For later lines of therapy in HER2-positive MBC, there is no standard treatment. We investigated the efficacy of pyrotinib, a new irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting epidermal growth factor receptor, HER2, and HER4, in lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive MBC patients. This is a retrospective observational study including lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive MBC patients who received pyrotinib-based treatment. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for the survival analyses. A total of 31 patients were included. Concurrent treatments included cytotoxic chemotherapy (29 patients, 93.6%), endocrine therapy (1 patient, 3.2%), and another targeted therapy (1 patient, 3.2%). The objective response rate (ORR) was 25.8% and the median progression-free survival in the study population was 4.5 months (95% CI: 3.1-5.9 months). The treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included diarrhea, neutropenia, vomiting, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Dose reduction to 320 mg was conducted in 19.4% of all cases due to severe AEs. Pyrotinib-based treatment was effective and generally well tolerated in lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive MBC for later line treatment.

Real-world experience with capmatinib in MET exon 14-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (RECAP): a retrospective analysis from an early access program.

Background:Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presenting with mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation have an unfavorable prognosis with standard treatments. Capmatinib is a selective MET inhibitor, which showed promising efficacy in this patient population in early trials.Methods:We performed a retrospective, international, multicenter efficacy and safety analysis in patients with NSCLC treated with capmatinib in an early access program between March 2019 and December 2021.Results:Data from 81 patients with advanced MET exon 14 mutated NSCLC treated with capmatinib in first- or later-line therapy were analyzed. Median age was 77 years (range, 48–91), 56% were women, 86% had stage IV disease, and 27% had brain metastases. For all patients, the objective response rate (ORR) to capmatinib was 58% (95% CI, 47–69), whereas it was 68% (95% CI, 50–82) in treatment-naïve and 50% (95% CI, 35–65) in pretreated patients. The median progression-free survival was 9.5 months (95% CI, 4.7–14.3), whereas it was 10.6 months (95% CI, 5.5–15.7) in first-line and 9.1 months (95% CI, 3.1–15.1) in pretreated patients. After a median follow-up of 11.0 months, the median overall survival was 18.2 months (95% CI, 13.2–23.1). In patients with measurable brain metastases (n = 11), the intracranial ORR was 46% (95% CI, 17–77). Capmatinib showed a manageable safety profile. Grade ⩾ 3 treatment-related adverse events included peripheral edema (13%), elevated creatinine (4%), and elevated liver enzymes (3%).Conclusion:In patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation, capmatinib showed durable systemic and intracranial efficacy and a manageable safety profile. This analysis confirms previously reported phase II data in a real-world setting.

Comparison of two regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: propensity score–matched analysis of real-world data

Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. A total of 140 patients were included. The median PFS and OS was 7.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.0-8.7] months and 22.5 (95% CI = 18.8-26.1) months, respectively. The toxicity of wGT was manageable. Among the patients, 90 (64.3%) received the 21-day regimen and 50 (35.7%) received the 28-day regimen. A higher number of younger patients and patients receiving later-line therapy received the 28-day regimen. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFS after propensity score matching, though subgroup analysis showed that patients with early relapse benefited more from the 28-day regimen. The ORR was numerically higher in 28-day regimen (37.8% versus 28.0%, p = 0.310). However, the 21-day regimen was better tolerated than the 28-day regimen. wGT administration showed efficacy and safety in patients with MBC. The efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated. 21-day regimen of wGT was well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. We found that the efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.

Real-world efficacy and safety of cabozantinib in Korean patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.

Background:Cabozantinib, a multiple kinase inhibitor, was recently approved for patients with previously treated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We investigated the real-world safety and efficacy profiles of cabozantinib.Methods:This multicenter retrospective study included 110 patients with uHCC who received cabozantinib after progression on other systemic treatments between October 2019 and May 2021.Results:The median age was 58 (range, 20–77) years, and 98 (89.1%) were male. Prior to cabozantinib, all patients were treated with other systemic therapies: sorafenib (n = 104, 94.5%) and regorafenib (n = 91, 82.7%) were the most commonly used agents. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were previously used in 93 patients (84.5%). Cabozantinib was used beyond the third-line of therapy in most patients (n = 90, 81.8%). With a median follow-up duration of 11.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.8–17.2], the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.7 months (95% CI, 3.1–4.9), and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (95% CI, 5.5–9.5). The disease control rate and overall response rate (ORR) were 66.3% and 3.6%, respectively. In the Child–Pugh A cohort (n = 88), the ORR was 4.5%, and the median PFS and OS were 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.6–5.8) and 9.0 months (95% CI, 7.5–11.7), respectively.Conclusion:Cabozantinib showed consistent efficacy outcomes with a prior phase III trial, although in this study, it was used as later-line therapy for patients who were refractory to multiple systemic treatments, including immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Targeting Ribonucleotide Reductase Induces Synthetic Lethality in PP2A-Deficient Uterine Serous Carcinoma.

A drug repurposing screen identifies synthetic lethal interactions in PP2A-deficient uterine serous carcinoma, providing potential therapeutic avenues for treating this deadly endometrial cancer.

Target therapy of luminal HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with PIK3CA mutation: combination of alpelisib plus fulvestrant in real clinical practice

Introduction. Сombination of alpelisib plus fulvestrant is approved in patients with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC) after progression on hormonotherapy. Efficacy data of alpelisib in heavily pretreated patients with HR+/HER-2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer are limited, only results from phase I trial are available. Here we report our results of alpelisib efficacy in 19 heavily pretreated patients.Object: to evaluate efficacy and safety of combination alpelisib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer in initial and later lines of therapy in real clinical practice.Materials and methods. Combination of alpelisib plus fulvestrant was investigated in 19 patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CAmutated ABC, alpelisib at a dose of 300 mg per day plus fulvestrant at a dose of 500 mg i.m. every 28 days and once on day 15. Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.Results. From February 2021 19 patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer were treated with alpelisib plus fulvestrant. The data cut off is October 2021. Median lines of treatment in advanced disease was five, including 19 (100%) patients received CDK4/6, 14 (74%) – fulvestrant and/or everolimus and 15 (79%) – chemotherapy. 4 (21%) received alpelisib in a second line, 15 (79%) – in subsequent lines. Median progression-free survival was 7 months. The response was evaluated in 18 patients: partial response was achieved in 5 (28%) patients, stable disease – in 9 (50%), disease progression – 4 (22%). The most frequent adverse events were hyperglycemia – 74% (grade 3 – 22%), creatinine increased – 42% and rash – 37% (grade 3 – 22%). Only one patient has discontinued the treatment due to Quincke`s edema.Conclusions. Combination of alpelisib with fulvestrant is an effective option both in initial and later lines of therapy in patients with HR+/HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer including fulvestrant, CDK4/6 inhibitors and/or everolimus – pretreated patients.

Early cancer cachexia phenotype predicts survival of advanced urothelial cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab.

We aimed to explore the association between cancer cachexia phenotypes in the early phase of treatment induction and the prognosis of advanced urothelial cancer (aUC) patients receiving pembrolizumab. This retrospective study included 31 aUC patients treated with pembrolizumab as a second- or later-line therapy. Patients were categorized into three early cancer cachexia phenotypes by changes in skeletal muscle and total adipose indices calculated using computed tomography images taken immediately before and within 3months after the initiation of pembrolizumab: No Wasting (NW, 11 patients), Fat-Only Wasting (FW, 13), and Muscle and Fat Wasting (MFW, seven). Its association with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 5.7months. The median number of cycles of pembrolizumab was five. The ORR in NW/FW/MFW was 86%/38%/0%, respectively (p=0.001). The PFS and OS rates were the best in NW, followed in order by FW and MFW (PFS, 69%/45%/0% at 12months, p=0.008; OS, 100%/65%/0% at 12months, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis including posttherapeutic cachexia-associated parameters, cancer cachexia phenotype (MFW vs. FW/NW) was an independent predictor of poor OS (hazard ratio 8.59, p<0.001) along with an increase in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.028). Early cancer cachexia phenotypes were significantly associated with the survival of aUC patients treated with pembrolizumab. In contrast to the very early progression and poor prognosis in the MFW group, long-term survival can be expected in the NW/FW groups.

Real-World Multiple Myeloma Treatment Patterns By Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in the United States

Introduction: Despite numerous therapies approved for multiple myeloma (MM) in the past decade, the disease remains largely incurable. As a result, patients (pts) typically require successive lines of therapy, comprised of various combinations of drugs, to treat relapsed disease. As the treatment landscape evolves, continued real-world (RW) studies provide additional understanding of the treatment patterns of MM pts outside of clinical trials, particularly for those with unmet medical need and/or high-risk disease. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we examined RW treatment patterns among MM pts overall and within patient subgroups classified by age, race/ethnicity, renal impairment (RI), cytogenetic risk, and 1q21 amplification, as well as patient outcomes.Methods: This study used the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database of MM pts treated in the United States. During the study period, January 1, 2016 to April 30, 2021, pts who had ≥1 line of therapy or whose first-line treatment was initiated after the study start were included. Treatment class regimens (lines 1-4) were classified as: proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based, immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based, PI + IMiD-based, chemotherapy-based, antibody-based, or other treatments. We examined patient characteristics as well as treatment patterns overall and in patient subgroups. We also assessed real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), defined as the time from start of line therapy to the date of progression or death, by treatment regimen received.Results: At the time of data cutoff, 5465 pts received ≥1 line of therapy; 45.3% of pts were female, 57.4% were white, median age at the start of first-line therapy was 70 years (interquartile range 62-77), and 88.7% received care at community practices. A total of 14.6% had high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, 21.0% had 1q21 amplification, 20.7% had International Staging System stage III at diagnosis and 33.2% had RI (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2) at the start of first-line therapy. The most common first-line regimens were PI + IMiD-based (53.4%), whereas 12.8% received PI-based, 11.5% IMiD-based, 13.4% chemotherapy-based, 2.8% antibody-based, and 6.1% had other treatments (Figure 1). Although uncommon in first-line therapy, antibody-based treatments were more commonly used in later lines of therapy (second-line: 21.0%; third-line: 33.7%; fourth-line: 40.0%). In first-line, pts aged ≥75 years were less likely to receive PI + IMiD-based regimens than those aged <75 years (40.4% vs 60.1%) (Figure 2). Similarly, RI pts received PI + IMiD-based regimens less frequently in first-line than those without impairment (47.8% vs 65.0%). In first-line, 18.9% of pts had evidence of undergoing a transplant. Both older pts and those with RI were also less likely to receive a transplant as part of their first-line treatment (1.7% vs 27.7% and 13.9% vs 24.2% respectively). Treatment differences were less pronounced in later lines as well as by race/ethnicity, cytogenetic risk, and 1q21 amplification. In first-line therapy, rwPFS was longer for pts treated with PI + IMiD-based regimens (median [95% confidence interval], 29.5 months [27.3-31.9]). In later lines of therapy, pts treated with IMiD-based regimens had longer median rwPFS (second-line: 22.7 months [18.5-30.4]; third-line: 19.7 months [14.2-37.0]; fourth-line: 16.1 months [6.4-26.7]). Additional analyses examining newer treatment regimens will be presented.Conclusions: PI + IMiD combination therapy was the most common first-line therapy. Although not commonly used in first-line therapy, antibody-based regimens are increasingly used in later lines of therapy. Older pts as well as pts with RI were less likely to receive PI + IMiD regimens or transplant in first-line therapy. Pts receiving PI + IMiD regimens in first-line therapy had longer rwPFS. Pts receiving IMiD-based regimens had longer rwPFS in later lines. Analyses of newer treatment regimens to be presented within this dataset will provide additional insight into changes in RW treatment patterns in the era of novel agents. [Display omitted] DisclosuresRichter: BMS, Karyopharm, Antengene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive biotechnologies: Speakers Bureau; Janssen, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Tisch Cancer Institute: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: Current Employment. Singh: Sanofi: Current Employment. Rice: Sanofi: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Black and White Patients with Multiple Myeloma Initiating Daratumumab: A Real-World Chart Review Study

Patient Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Black and White Patients with Multiple Myeloma Initiating Daratumumab: A Real-World Chart Review Study

Treatment Patterns in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase in the Third Line of TKI Therapy and Beyond Based on Real-World Evidence

Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the standard of care for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). The advent of TKIs has led to improvements in survival, with a life expectancy nearly matching that of the general population. However, TKI failure rates increase with subsequent lines of therapy, leading to worse overall survival in patients in later lines of therapy. There are 5 approved TKIs (imatinib [IMA], bosutinib [BOS], dasatinib [DAS], nilotinib [NIL], and ponatinib [PON]) that may be used based on patient characteristics. IMA is frequently used in first-line (1L) therapy. Second-generation TKIs (BOS, DAS, and NIL) can be used in the 1L or second line (2L) depending on choice of 1L therapy. Use of PON is reserved mostly for patients with T315I mutations due to its adverse event profile. However, little guidance exists concerning which TKI to use in the third line and beyond (3L+). Here we present the results of a real-world evidence study of treatment patterns of TKIs in patients with CML-CP initiating 3L+ TKI therapy.Methods: This is a noninterventional, descriptive cohort study based on secondary use of data from 3 existing CML registries (Czech INFINITY, Dutch PHAROS, and Swedish CML). The observation period was from January 1, 2008, until the last available date of follow-up for each registry (6-12 years depending on the registry). Patients aged ≥18 years with CML-CP initiating a 3L TKI after registry enrollment were included in this analysis. Exposure was defined by TKI treatment with IMA, DAS, NIL, BOS, and PON. Descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics and treatment duration. Alluvial diagrams were used to describe and represent all treatment patterns.Results: Of those patients that had started a 2L TKI in the INFINITY, PHAROS, and Swedish CML registries, 109 (28.1%), 51 (35.7%), and 182 (12.8%) patients began 3L TKI therapy, with 105, 48, and 172 eligible patients, respectively, included in this study. Median age at diagnosis was 54.0, 61.0, and 59.6 years, respectively (Table 1). There were more men than women across all 3 registries (51.4%, 58.3%, and 50.6% vs 48.6%, 41.7%, and 49.4%, respectively). No agreement in treatment sequencing was seen across the 3 registries. However, across all 3 registries, the most frequently prescribed TKI in the 3L+ setting was NIL (52.4%, 59.6%, and 45.4%, respectively), followed by DAS (38.1%, 17.0%, and 32.6%, respectively). BOS (11.4%, 0%, and 27.9%, respectively), and PON (13.3%, 17.0%, and 11.1%, respectively), which were prescribed at varying frequencies across the registries. The alluvial plot in the Figure presents the sequence of TKI treatments for patients starting a 2L TKI. Median treatment duration in the 3L was longest for patients receiving NIL (27.5, 13.1, and 45.0 months, respectively) and DAS (26.6, 10.0,9.9 and 40.9 months, respectively), except in PHAROS, in which PON resulted in a longer treatment duration than DAS (6.0, 11.4, and 7.2 months, respectively).In INFINITY, rates of resistance (R) and intolerance (I) in patients discontinuing therapy with BOS, DAS, and NIL were 28.6% and 42.9%, 61.1% and 38.9%, and 48.0% and 36.0%, respectively. In PHAROS, 100.0% of patients discontinued DAS and IMA in the 3L due to I, while R and I were reasons for discontinuation in 16.7% and 83.3% of patients discontinuing NIL and 66.7% and 33.3% of patients discontinuing PON, respectively. The Swedish CML register reported that 15.8%, 9.1%, and 33.3% of patients discontinued DAS, NIL, and PON, respectively, in the 3L+ due to I (Table 2).Conclusions: Based on these real-world treatment patterns (which may provide insights into TKI access in various settings), patients in the 3L were most frequently treated with the second-generation TKIs NIL and DAS, with a smaller proportion treated with BOS and PON. However, no common agreement in sequencing of TKI treatment was seen across the 3 registries. Duration of treatment was longest in patients receiving NIL and DAS. Treatment discontinuation occurred frequently due to both R to and I of the 3L TKI used. Between 12.8% and 35.7% of patients that started a 2L TKI required 3L+ therapy, and therefore additional treatment options that are efficacious and well tolerated are needed for these patients.This study was a research collaboration between Novartis and the 3 registries and was funded by Novartis. [Display omitted] DisclosuresDahlen: Novartis: Research Funding. Ferreira: Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; MerckGroup: Consultancy; Research institute for the study of genetic and malignant disorders in children.: Consultancy. Westerweel: Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS / Celgene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Mayer: Principia: Research Funding. Sahmoud: Novartis: Current Employment; H3 Biomedicine: Consultancy; Context Therapeutics: Consultancy. Wormser: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Žácková: Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Angelini: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Outcome with Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination in Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Outcome with Hypomethylating Agent and Venetoclax Combination in Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Single Centre, Retrospective Analysis of Extracorporeal Photopheresis (ECP) Therapy in the Patients Who Are Heavily Pre-Treated for Steroid Resistant Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

*DB and DK contributed to the work equally.BackgroundExtracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a recommended second or later line of therapy for chronic GVHD (cGVHD), and is beneficial not only because of increased response but also for its lack of adverse effects, specifically systemic immune suppression, mainly from steroids. In this single centre study, we attempted to evaluate not only therapeutic efficacy of ECP, but also its steroid-sparing effect by regularly analyzing steroid dose per body weight. We also attempted to identify any predictors of response or survival after ECP, which was not well defined before.Patients and methodsA total of 75 cGVHD patients (pts) who received ECP for cGVHD from 2007 to 2021 at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre were included and evaluated retrospectively. Patients and disease characteristics are as follows: median age 48.5 years (range 17-70); male 42/75 (56%); organ involvement at the time of ECP: skin (93%), oral (53%), eye (51%), gastrointestinal (25%), liver (49%), lung (57%), and musculoskeletal (n=50, 67%). Sixty-eight (91%) and 7 pts (9%) had severe and moderate grade cGVHD, respectively. Sixty-eight pts (91%) received ECP as 4 th line or beyond. They were heavily pretreated with prednisone (98%), cyclosporine (57%), tacrolimus (24%), mycophenolate mofetil (64%), azathioprine (65%), rituximab (7%), imatinib (8%), ibrunitib (3%) and ruxolitinib (1%).ECP was started twice weekly for the first 12 weeks, then twice every 2 weeks in 2012-2021, while the schedule was twice every 2 weeks from 2007-2012. If there was no response or clinical benefit noted in first 24 treatments, then ECP was discontinued. In general, we attempted to provide up to around 60 sessions based on the clinicians' discretion.The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit (CB) were assessed at months 3, 6 and 12 after staring ECP. As part of standard clinical practice, NIH consensus criteria were used for grading and response assessment. CB was assessed considering clinical response as well as steroid dose reduction. Treatment failure was defined as 1) resistance to ECP requiring treatment switch, 2) non-relapse mortality (NRM), 3) relapse, 4) intolerance to ECP. Failure free survival (FFS) and overall survival (OS)were calculated from the day of ECP initiation until the endpoints of failure or death, respectively.ResultsECP was started a median of 28 months (range 1-125) after development of cGVHD. ECP was performed a median of 35 times (range 6-174) with a median duration of 11 months (range 1-53). Out of 75 pts, 48 completed planned ECP successfully and 27 stopped due to no response or benefit including, of whom 14 required additional therapy, 1 stopped due to line infection, and 1 stopped due to relapse of AML.With a median 72 months of follow-up, ORR was attained in 21% (16/75), 57% (36/63) and 70% (32/46) at month 3, 6 and 12, respectively. At 6 months, ORR was observed in 47-64% across all organs assessed. No difference in ORR was noted according to the cGVHD grade; at 6 months, severe cGVHD showed similar ORR (57%) to those with moderate cGVHD (60%) (p=0.893). CB was noted in 23% (17/75), 62% (39/63), and 76% (35/46) at month 3, 6 and 12, respectively.A total of 27/75 failures (36%) and 20/75 death (27%) occurred, due to the following: ECP resistance requiring switch to other therapy (n=14, 19%), NRM (n=11, 15%), relapse of primary disease (n=1, 1%) or ECP-related complication (n=1, 1%, line infection). In the overall cohort, FFS and OS at 12 months were 68.3% and 85.9%, respectively (Figure 1).More than a half of pts stopped steroids completely within 12 months after starting ECP. The proportion of pts off steroids was 16%, 17%, 32%, and 64% at month 0, 3, 6 and 12 after starting ECP, respectively (Figure 2).Risk factor analysis did not show any predictive markers for ORR at 6 months, while prognostic factor analysis suggested the development of musculoskeletal involvement as favorable prognostic factor for FFS (p=0.003, HR 0.315 [0.147, 0.673]) even with multivariate analysis.ConclusionOur study showed that: 1) ECP is a very effective treatment for heavily pre-treated cGVHD pts who have failed other therapies; 2) More than a half of pts can stop steroids completely within 12 months after starting ECP, thus avoiding long-term toxicity risk. Further study is warranted comparing ECP with other cGVHD treatment modalities. [Display omitted] DisclosuresPatriquin: BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Law: Novartis: Consultancy; Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Lipton: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ariad, Pfizer, Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Mattsson: MattssonAB medical: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Kim: Paladin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Meier Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Cost of Disease Progression after Frontline (1L) R-CHOP in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Cost of Disease Progression after Frontline (1L) R-CHOP in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Receiving 3 or More Lines of Therapy

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma Receiving 3 or More Lines of Therapy