1. IntroductionIn 1974, the American Economic Association sponsored a Summer Minority Program (hereafter AEASMP). An impetus for the AEASMP was the underrepresentation of racial minorities among the ranks of Ph.D. economists, in addition to the possible shortfalls in academic preparation that, if not addressed, would reduce the likelihood of minorities successfully completing doctoral programs in economics. Thus, from the start and continuing up to the present, the AEASMP provides participants with a curriculum that introduces, and perhaps remediates, core quantitative skills and, in recent years, research skills, essential for completing doctoral programs in economics.1Given the severe underrepresentation of black Ph.D. economists in the profession, as an intervention, it is conceivable that the AEASMP could have an effect of increasing the likelihood of black participants earning economics doctorates and securing employment as economics faculty.2 This seems especially plausible if the AEASMP enhances the capabilities of participants and/or cultivates a serious interest in becoming a Ph.D. economist. Notwithstanding such possibilities, nothing is known on the extent to which the AEASMP has causal effects.As an intervention, it is of interest to know if the AEASMP has causal effects on outcomes deemed favorable for minority economists. Many outcomes associated with the training of Ph.D. economists are those outcomes associated with placement in tenure-track faculty positions in particular types of academic institutions. Successfully obtaining tenure is also associated with factors such as scholarly productivity, success in securing research resources, and in the prestige associated with scholarly society affiliation. If indeed the AEASMP has causal effects that enhance participants' labor market prospects as academic economists, the AEASMP can be viewed as a successful labor-market intervention.This article examines the causal effects of AEASMP participation for minority Ph.D. economists. Methodologically, the treatment effect is identified with an extension of Rubin's (1974) potential outcomes approach. In this framework, there are two outcomes: a treatment state and a control state, and the causal effect of the treatment is simply the difference between the two potential outcomes. Given the nonrandomized nature of the data, differences in attributes between AEASMP participants and nonparticipants could lead to biased estimates of the causal effect of participation.Possible bias in estimated treatment effects attributed to differing attributes is, of course, the sample-selection problem. A conventional approach assumes that selection into the treatment is conditioned on both observable and unobservable characteristics, and the treatment effect is estimated with latent variable selection models (Heckman 1979). However, the influential analysis of Lalonde (1986) has cast doubts on the accuracy of such models in estimating treatment effects. In contrast, when selection into the treatment is assumed to be conditioned only on observable characteristics, propensity scoring methods have been demonstrated to replicate experimental benchmarks reasonably well (Dehejia and Wahba, 1998). Below, we use both propensity-score weighted and Heckit estimators to identify and estimate the treatment effects of AEASMP participation. Our estimates of the treatment effects reveal that AEASMP participation has causal and positive effects on research productivity and on the ability to obtain research resources. We find similar effects for both propensity-score weighted and Heckit estimates.The remainder of this article is organized as follows. A historical overview of the AEASMP is provided in section 2. Section 3 discusses the data. In section 4, we discuss our methodology--the potential outcomes approach to identifying treatment effects. Given selection on observable characteristics, unobservable characteristics, or both, we motivate the use of propensity-score weighted and Heckit estimators of the treatment effects attributed to AEASMP participation. …
Read full abstract