Late-replicating Chromatin Research Articles

DEK oncoprotein assemblies into sub-nuclear bodies at late-replicating chromatin regions

DEK oncoprotein is a non-histone chromatin architectural factor of great interest in the field of cancer research. Indeed, DEK has a pleiotropic mode of action, being involved in a variety of chromatin-related processes such as transcriptional activation and repression, chromatin stability, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Moreover, DEK is considered a potential cancer biomarker, since its dysregulation in expression is related to numerous forms of cancer. The aim of this work is to investigate, via 4D advanced fluorescence microscopy, the correlation between the sub-nuclear organization of the DEK protein and the local chromatin structure in MCF10A normal-like breast cell line.

High-resolution visualization of H3 variants during replication reveals their controlled recycling

DNA replication is a challenge for the faithful transmission of parental information to daughter cells, as both DNA and chromatin organization must be duplicated. Replication stress further complicates the safeguard of epigenome integrity. Here, we investigate the transmission of the histone variants H3.3 and H3.1 during replication. We follow their distribution relative to replication timing, first in the genome and, second, in 3D using super-resolution microscopy. We find that H3.3 and H3.1 mark early- and late-replicating chromatin, respectively. In the nucleus, H3.3 forms domains, which decrease in density throughout replication, while H3.1 domains increase in density. Hydroxyurea impairs local recycling of parental histones at replication sites. Similarly, depleting the histone chaperone ASF1 affects recycling, leading to an impaired histone variant landscape. We discuss how faithful transmission of histone variants involves ASF1 and can be impacted by replication stress, with ensuing consequences for cell fate and tumorigenesis.

Late Replication Domains Are Evolutionary Conserved in the Drosophila Genome

Drosophila chromosomes are organized into distinct domains differing in their predominant chromatin composition, replication timing and evolutionary conservation. We show on a genome-wide level that genes whose order has remained unaltered across 9 Drosophila species display late replication timing and frequently map to the regions of repressive chromatin. This observation is consistent with the existence of extensive domains of repressive chromatin that replicate extremely late and have conserved gene order in the Drosophila genome. We suggest that such repressive chromatin domains correspond to a handful of regions that complete replication at the very end of S phase. We further demonstrate that the order of genes in these regions is rarely altered in evolution. Substantial proportion of such regions significantly coincide with large synteny blocks. This indicates that there are evolutionary mechanisms maintaining the integrity of these late-replicating chromatin domains. The synteny blocks corresponding to the extremely late-replicating regions in the D. melanogaster genome consistently display two-fold lower gene density across different Drosophila species.

Compromised genomic integrity impedes muscle growth after Atrx inactivation

ATR-X syndrome is a severe intellectual disability disorder caused by mutations in the ATRX gene. Many ancillary clinical features are attributed to CNS deficiencies, yet most patients have muscle hypotonia, delayed ambulation, or kyphosis, pointing to an underlying skeletal muscle defect. Here, we identified a cell-intrinsic requirement for Atrx in postnatal muscle growth and regeneration in mice. Mice with skeletal muscle-specific Atrx conditional knockout (Atrx cKO mice) were viable, but by 3 weeks of age presented hallmarks of underdeveloped musculature, including kyphosis, 20% reduction in body mass, and 34% reduction in muscle fiber caliber. Atrx cKO mice also demonstrated a marked regeneration deficit that was not due to fewer resident satellite cells or their inability to terminally differentiate. However, activation of Atrx-null satellite cells from isolated muscle fibers resulted in a 9-fold reduction in myoblast expansion, caused by delayed progression through mid to late S phase. While in S phase, Atrx colocalized specifically to late-replicating chromatin, and its loss resulted in rampant signs of genomic instability. These observations support a model in which Atrx maintains chromatin integrity during the rapid developmental growth of a tissue.

Chromatin-interaction compartment switch at developmentally regulated chromosomal domains reveals an unusual principle of chromatin folding

Several 400- to 800-kb murine chromosome domains switch from early to late replication during loss of pluripotency, accompanied by a stable form of gene silencing that is resistant to reprogramming. We found that, whereas enhanced nuclease accessibility correlated with early replication genome-wide, domains that switch replication timing during differentiation were exceptionally inaccessible even when early-replicating. Nonetheless, two domains studied in detail exhibited substantial changes in transcriptional activity and higher-order chromatin unfolding confined to the region of replication timing change. Chromosome conformation capture (4C) data revealed that in the unfolded state in embryonic stem cells, these domains interacted preferentially with the early-replicating chromatin compartment, rarely interacting even with flanking late-replicating domains, whereas after differentiation, these same domains preferentially associated with late-replicating chromatin, including flanking domains. In both configurations they retained local boundaries of self-interaction, supporting the replication domain model of replication-timing regulation. Our results reveal a principle of developmentally regulated, large-scale chromosome folding involving a subnuclear compartment switch of inaccessible chromatin. This unusual level of regulation may underlie resistance to reprogramming in replication-timing switch regions.

Multiple Roles for Heterochromatin Protein 1 Genes inDrosophila

Heterochromatin is the gene-poor, transposon-rich, late-replicating chromatin compartment that was first cytologically defined more than 70 years ago. The identification of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) paved the way for a molecular dissection of this important component of complex eukaryotic genomes. Although initial studies revealed HP1's key role in heterochromatin maintenance and function, more recent studies have discovered a role for HP1 in numerous processes including, surprisingly, euchromatic gene expression. Drosophila genomes possess at least five HP1 paralogs that have significantly different roles, ranging from canonical heterochromatic function at pericentric and telomeric regions to exclusive localization and regulation of euchromatic genes. They also possess paralogs exclusively involved in defending the germline against mobile elements. Pursuing a survey of recent genetic and evolutionary findings, we highlight how Drosophila genomes represent the best opportunity to dissect the diversity and incredible versatility of HP1 proteins in organizing and protecting eukaryotic genomes.

The topology of early- and late-replicating chromatin in differentially decondensed chromosomes

In this study we used a novel technique to reveal both longitudinal and transverse differentiation within mammalian mitotic chromosomes. Structural changes in chromosomes that we term 'differential decondensation' were produced in cells that were first incubated in hypotonic medium (15% Hanks' solution), then adapted to normotonic conditions and thereafter exposed to a second short hypotonic shock. Such a double hypotonic treatment (DHT) is not critical for cell viability, but considerably elongates the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Giemsa staining of differentially decondensed chromosomes corresponds to standard G-banding, but does not need the standard post-fixation treatment. Using 'dynamic' BrdU banding, we show that such 'differential' staining is a result of differential resistance of the R- and G-bands to DHT. Thus, early-replicating foci, markers of R-bands, are localized in the peripheral chromatin halo, whereas late-replicating foci, corresponding to G-bands, remain associated with the axial regions of chromatids. Remarkably, despite these major changes in the structure of the chromosomal bands, the replication foci still preserve their discrete structure.

Matrix association of early- and late-replicating chromatin studied by single-cell electrophoresis

CHO-K1 cells were synchronized at the G 1/S border by mitotic shake-off and aphidicolin incubation. Pulse-labeling with tritium was done at 30 min, 2 or 5 h into the S-phase, with chase incubations for different times in non-radioactive medium. The cells were subjected to neutral microelectrophoresis to extend the DNA into “comets,” after which the label was visualized through autoradiography. At zero chase time, all label was positioned in the head. The displacement of label into the tails increased with time, reaching a maximum at about 5 h after the pulse. A lag phase of 2–3 h was observed for the early-labeled cells before the displacement started. Also, more label was released after overnight serum starvation, but this was reversed through a 3-h incubation at normal growth conditions. It was found that late-replicating chromatin is organized in larger domains than early-replicating chromatin, and DNA polymerase seems to be an important organizer. Early-replicating chromatin has other important attachments to the nuclear matrix, dependent on metabolic activity.

The Spatial Position and Replication Timing of Chromosomal Domains Are Both Established in Early G1 Phase

Mammalian chromosomal domains replicate at defined, developmentally regulated times during S phase. The positions of these domains in Chinese hamster nuclei were established within 1 hr after nuclear envelope formation and maintained thereafter. When G1 phase nuclei were incubated in Xenopus egg extracts, domains were replicated in the proper temporal order with nuclei isolated after spatial repositioning, but not with nuclei isolated prior to repositioning. Mcm2 was bound both to early- and late-replicating chromatin domains prior to this transition whereas specification of the dihydrofolate reductase replication origin took place several hours thereafter. These results identify an early G1 phase point at which replication timing is determined and demonstrate a provocative temporal coincidence between the establishment of nuclear position and replication timing.

Mcm2, but not RPA, is a component of the mammalian early G1-phase prereplication complex.

Previous experiments in Xenopus egg extracts identified what appeared to be two independently assembled prereplication complexes (pre-RCs) for DNA replication: the stepwise assembly of ORC, Cdc6, and Mcm onto chromatin, and the FFA-1-mediated recruitment of RPA into foci on chromatin. We have investigated whether both of these pre-RCs can be detected in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Early- and late-replicating chromosomal domains were pulse-labeled with halogenated nucleotides and prelabeled cells were synchronized at various times during the following G1-phase. The recruitment of Mcm2 and RPA to these domains was examined in relation to the formation of a nuclear envelope, specification of the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) replication origin and entry into S-phase. Mcm2 was loaded gradually and cumulatively onto both early- and late-replicating chromatin from late telophase throughout G1-phase. During S-phase, detectable Mcm2 was rapidly excluded from PCNA-containing active replication forks. By contrast, detergent-resistant RPA foci were undetectable until the onset of S-phase, when RPA joined only the earliest-firing replicons. During S-phase, RPA was present with PCNA specifically at active replication forks. Together, our data are consistent with a role for Mcm proteins, but not RPA, in the formation of mammalian pre-RCs during early G1-phase.

Structure and dynamics of human interphase chromosome territories in vivo.

A new approach is presented which allows the in vivo visualization of individual chromosome territories in the nuclei of living human cells. The fluorescent thymidine analog Cy3-AP3-dUTP was microinjected into the nuclei of cultured human cells, such as human diploid fibroblasts, HeLa cells and neuroblastoma cells. The fluorescent analog was incorporated during S-phase into the replicating genomic DNA. Labelled cells were further cultivated for several cell cycles in normal medium. This well-known scheme yielded sister chromatid labelling. Random segregation of labelled and unlabelled chromatids into daughter nuclei resulted in nuclei exhibiting individual in vivo detectable chromatid territories. The territories were composed of subcompartments with diameters ranging between approximately 400 and 800 nm which we refer to as subchromosomal foci. Time-resolved in vivo studies demonstrated changes of positioning and shape of territories and subchromosomal foci. The hypothesis that subchromosomal foci persist as functionally distinct entities was supported by double labelling of chromatin with CldU and IdU, respectively, at early and late S-phase and subsequent cultivation of corresponding cells for 5-10 cell cycles before fixation and immunocytochemical detection. This scheme yielded segregated chromatid territories with distinctly separated subchromosomal foci composed of either early- or late-replicating chromatin. The size range of subchromosomal foci was similar after shorter (2 h) and longer (16 h) labelling periods and was observed in nuclei of both living and fixed cells, suggesting their structural identity. A possible functional relevance of chromosome territory compartmentalization into subchromosomal foci is discussed in the context of present models of interphase chromosome and nuclear architecture.

Differential effects of sulphur mustard on S-phase cells of primary fibroblast cultures from Syrian hamsters

Sulphur mustard (SM) (5 × 10 −8 M) given to primary Syrian hamster fibroblasts growing short-term in vitro products a very sharp peak of chromatid aberrations 12–16 h after treatment. The composition of this peak has been investigated in relation to the cell cycle using the facility to divide S-phase into 5 cytologically defined sub-phases on the basis of replication band patterns following bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. It is shown that: (1) Considerable delay and perturbation of the cycle is present. (2) A major contribution to the aberration peak comes from pre-S cells, and the highest aberration frequencies are observed in such cells. (3) The bulk of contribution from S-cells comes from the last subphase, SkV. (4) The majority of early S cells (sub-phases SkI–IV) fail to reach division within 36 h. Of the total S-cells scored, 54% are non-SkV controls but only 14% after SM. (5) Aberrations are localized to late-replicating regions in SkV but are random in pre-S. (6) No measurable perturbation of replication programme was found in chromosome arms synthesizing in late SkV after SM. (7) The rapid fall in aberration frequency at later sampling times is consistent with a quick and efficient repair of DNA lesions which is known to occur after SM alkylation. The preferential loss of early S cells seems most likely to result from selective lethality, though differential delay and perturbation may make a contribution. It is interesting to note that the subphases missing are just those where the euchromatin replicates (early replicating R and G bands). The late-replicating chromatin, some of which is known to be dispensable in Syrian hamster, is confined to SkV, the sub-phase which appears to survive this dose of SM.

Tolerance of autosomal imbalance by the Syrian hamster (<i>Mesocricetus auratu</i><i>s</i>)

Cytogenetic and transmission data are given for a number of radiation-induced and spontaneous chromosomal changes which show that the Syrian hamster (Mesocricetus auratus) can tolerate a considerable amount of autosomal imbalance without phenotypic effect. It is suggested that the reason for this may lie in the very large amount of late-replicating chromatin present in this species.