RECENT CRITICISM HAS OFTEN PAIRED CHARLES LAMB'S complaint of Decay of Beggars in Metropolis, published in character of Elia in May 1822 issue of London Magazine, with John Smith and Francis Douce's Vagabondiana. Yet while Simon P. Hull and Gregory Dart only briefly evoke how Lamb's essay to owe to earlier work, a comparison between two publications merits a more sustained attention than hitherto available. (1) Under close analysis, sophistication of both works' engagement with pressing contemporary problem of how to represent--both politically and aesthetically--the urban poor, and beggars in particular, soon becomes apparent. While Vagabondiana mobilizes parliamentary rhetoric, techniques of both antiquarian and catalogue literature, and picturesque mode in an effort to reassure its readers, Lamb takes same approaches and pushes them to their extreme, revealing both their limits and, most disturbingly of all, those of his readership as well. Vagabondiana; or of Mendicant Wanderers through Streets of London; with Portraits of most Remarkable, Drawn from Life by John Thomas Smith, Keeper of Prints in British Museum was published in 1817. Its title begins work's careful engagement with its subject matter. The offer of Anecdotes of Mendicant Wanderers ... with Portraits of most Remarkable announces deliberate control over selected material, even as scrupulously refrains from using term beggar. The choice of wanderer over a word that makes a profession out of importunity, to mention emphasis on book containing only selected material, helps Smith and his collaborator, antiquarian Francis Douce, give a particularly charming turn to a normally grim aspect of contemporary life in capital. In 1817, two years after end of Napoleonic Wars and right in center of a post-war economic depression, government expenditure on poor relief was close to eight million pounds, (2) while streets of London were filled with destitute, (3) with as much as twenty percent of all outdoor poor in England to be found in capital. (4) The Vagabondiana responds to this context, and attendant interest in urban poor, yet this luxuriously presented book, as is clear from its full title, also aims to insulate its readership from harsher realities of situation. It seems to be a forerunner of a phenomenon Celina Fox finds in late nineteenth-century fiction, in which it was as if scenes of social distress could be tackled without allowing audience to feel a of reassuring emotions: of pathos, sympathy or charity, which left them feeling munificent rather than guilty. (5) The text of Vagabondiana concludes with a homily on charity, and its reassuring glow is all stronger for conceit with which work opens, one that might seem surprising in economic downturn of early nineteenth century: an announcement of imminent disappearance of its mendicant subject matter: Concluding, therefore, from reaction of that several curious characters would disappear by being either compelled to industry, or to partake in parochial rates, provided for them in their respective work-houses, occurred to author of present publication, that likenesses of most remarkable of them, with a few particulars of their habits, would be unamusing to those to whom they have been for several years. (6) Amidst reassuring talk of liberal parochial rates available in workhouses, crucial phrase here is double negative, not be unamusing, which recognizes potential for displeasure even as negates it. This phrase also defines reasoning behind title's insistence on only the most Remarkable subjects being included in work. The imminent vanishing of metropolitan beggars, repeated by Douce and Smith elsewhere, is part of same pattern: does deny existence of problem, but rather--through suggestion of their fast-approaching absence--opens up possibility of a change in attitudes from that which would consider them pests to something more benign, manifested in desire for artistic reproduction and preservation. …