ABSTRACT Since the emergence of Edward Said’s seminal book “Orientalism,” numerous studies have been conducted on various aspects of Orientalism, including those in the field of Islamic urban studies. A wave of critical review of orientalist’s widely accepted discourse on Islamic cities transpired. Most recent scholarship on Orientalism and its perception of Islamic cities tackled the issue from a physical or ideological standpoint. The epistemological and ontological essentials underpinning the Orientalist discourse of these built environments were hardly addressed. This paper attempts to examine the epistemological genealogy of the discourse of Islamic architecture and urbanism. It argues that contemporary discourse is dominated by two primary approaches, the Orientalist static approach, and the dynamic approach. The Orientalist approach embodied the key characteristics of Orientalism as a style of thought, as defined by Said. Influenced by the new human sciences developed in the West at the end of the19thcentury, Orientalists in their studies of Islamic cities adopted these Western epistemologies and methodologies. Since the late 1970s, a new paradigm has evolved, led by local scholars who examined Islamic architecture and cities through the lens of their own culture. Using textual and comparative analysis, the paper looks into the epistemic roots of both approaches
Read full abstract