Mandarin Voles Research Articles

Daily activity of the mandarin vole (Lasiopodomys mandarinus) under laboratory conditions

Daily activity of the mandarin vole (Lasiopodomys mandarinus) under laboratory conditions

Feeding rate of sibling vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis and mandarin vole Lasiopodomys mandarinus housed in cages and enclosures

Consumption of food of different nutritive value by sibling vole Microtus rossiaemeridionalis and mandarin vole Lasiopodomys mandarinus as a function of housing conditions—in cages or enclosures—was comparatively studied. Experimental groups included 8–14 adult non-reproducing animals of both sexes kept one per cage or enclosure. The rate of food consumption and digestibility were studied by standard methods and the obtained data were statistically analyzed using Statistica 6.0. Significant differences in the rate of food consumption by mandarin voles housed under different conditions as well as in the consumption and digestibility of food of different biochemical composition in both vole species have been revealed.

Cellular activation patterns of the main olfactory bulb and accessory olfactory bulb following exposure to beddings soiled by same- or opposite-sex conspecifics in Mandarin voles (Microtus mandarinus)

Using induction of Fos as an index, we studied cellular activation patterns in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) and main olfactory bulb (MOB) of Mandarin voles ( Microtus mandarinus (Milne-Edwards, 1871)) following their exposure to beddings soiled by different sexes. Male and female Mandarin voles that were exposed to beddings soiled by the opposite sex produced significantly more Fos-immunoreactive (Fos-ir) neurons in the anterior portion of the AOB and significantly fewer Fos-ir neurons in the posterior portion of the AOB than voles exposed to beddings soiled by the same sex. Furthermore, male and female Mandarin voles exposed to bedding soiled by different sex produced different numbers of Fos-ir cells in MOB. Mandarin voles exposed to beddings soiled by the opposite sex produced significantly more Fos-ir neurons in MOB than voles exposed to beddings soiled by the same sex. Our results establish that Mandarin voles of each sex showed different cellular activation patterns in AOB and MOB following exposures to sex-specific beddings. We suggest that both AOB and MOB were involved in sexual activities induced by chemosensory signals.

Numerical and structural variations of the X chromosomes and no. 2 autosomes in mandarin vole, Microtus mandarinus (Rodentia)

Here we describe our studies on Microtus mandarinus faeceus of Jiangyan in Jiangsu province of China. By karyotype and G-banding analysis we have found variation in chromosome number and polymorphisms of the X chromosome and the second pair of autosomes of the subspecies. Chromosome number of the subspecies is 2n=47-50. The subspecies has three kinds of chromosomal sex: XX, XO and XY, among which one of the X chromosomes is subtelocentric (X(ST)) and the other is metacentric (X(M)). After comparing karyotypes of different subspecies, we found the specific cytogenetic characteristics of Microtus mandarinus, that is they have three kinds of chromosomal sex: XX, XO and XY; X chromosomes are heteromorphic; the chromosome number of female individuals are one less than male individuals; chromosome number of XX individuals are equal to that of XO ones. We hypothesize that Robertsonian translocation is the main reason of the polymorphism of the second pair of autosomes and variety of chromosome number, and it also causes the chromosome number evolution in different subspecies of Microtus mandarinus.

Sexual dimorphism of the vomeronasal organ and the accessory olfactory bulb of the mandarin voleMicrotus mandarinus and the reed voleM. fortis

Sexual dimorphisms of the vomeronasal organ (VNO) and the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) of the mandarin voleMicrotus mandarinus Milne-Edwards, 1871 and reed voleM. fortis Büchner, 1889 are reported for the first time in the present work. The thickness and length of the vomeronasal epithelium (VE) and the nuclear size of the receptor cells, the width and length of the granule cell zone, the width and length of the mitral cell zone, and the density of the mitral cells were surveyed. The thickness and length of the vomeronasal epithelium (VE), the length of the granule cell zone and the mitral cell zone, and the densities of mitral cells were significantly different between male and female reed voles. Male and female mandarin voles had no significant differences in any of these parameters. Polygamous reed voles had a greater degree of sexual dimorphism in VNO and AOB than did monogamous mandarin voles. The present results provide evidence to the hypothesis that the degree of sexual dimorphism may be related to the mating system.

The origin of the genetical diversity of Microtus mandarinus chromosomes.

Here we describe our comparative studies on two types of X chromosomes, namely X(M) and X(SM,) of the mandarin vole (Microtus mandarinus). By chromosome G- and C-banding analysis, we have found that two different types of X chromosomes exist in mandarin voles. The two types of X chromosomes present two different G- and C-banding patterns: the X(M) chromosome is a longer metacentric X chromosome which is C-band negative; and the X(SM) is a shorter submetacentric X chromosome which has one C-band at the centromere and another one at the middle part of the short arm. The X(SM) has 6 G-bands including one on the kinetochore, one in the middle of the short arm, and four on the long arm. The X(M) has 7 G-bands including one on the kinetochore, two on the short arm, and four on the long arm. We have further found that female voles can be grouped into three types based on the composition of the X chromosome but the male voles have only one type. The three female groups are: (1) female voles (X(M)X(SM)), in which the two X chromosomes are different, the longer one is metacentric and the shorter is submetacentric; (2) female vole (X(SM)X(SM)), in which the two X chromosomes are both submetacentric; (3) female vole (X(M)O), in which there is only one X chromosome that is metacentric. Surprisingly, we have never found female voles with X(M)X(M), females with X(SM)O or males with X(M)Y. We hypothesize that the X(SM) chromosome is derived from the X(M) through its breakage and re-joining. The paper also discusses the formation of X(M)O females.

Parental care in the captive mandarin vole, Lasiopodomys mandarinus

Based on the social structure of free-living mandarin voles (Lasiopodomys mandarinus), high paternal investment might be expected for this species. This prediction was tested under laboratory conditions. We observed 10 pairs rearing their first litter. All pairs exhibited permanent nest cohabitation. Females never prevented males from entering the natal nest. Males exhibited all the patterns of direct care of young except nursing: huddling over, brooding with kyphosis, grooming, manipulating, and retrieving young. There were no sex differences in total time spent in the nest or in time spent alone. Females spent more time grooming pups than did males. There was no sex difference in nest-building activity. The frequency of bringing food or nest material into the nest, as well as in digging time, was significantly greater for males than for females. In L. mandarinus the biparental rearing system with a high level of direct paternal care and some division of labour between the parents seems to be associated with the subterranean mode of life. This pattern of parental care can be predicted for other specialized fossorial voles.

Does low fecundity reflect kin recognition and inbreeding avoidance in the mandarin vole (Microtus mandarinus)?

The effects of kin recognition on estrus and breeding in mandarin voles (Microtus mandarinus) were investigated in the laboratory using a cross-fostering method. Nonsiblings reared apart produced significantly more litters than siblings or nonsiblings reared together. These results may support the hypothesis that familiarity through association before weaning plays an important role in kin recognition. On the other hand, nonsiblings reared apart produced significantly more litters than siblings reared apart. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in number of litters between siblings reared apart and siblings reared together. These observations show that phenotype-matching mechanisms of kin recognition may operate in conjunction with familiarity in kin recognition in this species. Through observing the vaginal cytology of female mandarin voles paired with different males in different rearing conditions, it was found that females paired with familiar males (through association before weaning) produced significantly fewer estrous smears than females paired with unfamiliar males (reared by different parents before weaning), regardless of genetic relatedness. Thus, using vaginal cytology as an indicator of estrus, it was found that familiarity through association before weaning may retard the first estrus of female mandarin voles.

Inbreeding avoidance and mate choice in the mandarin vole (Microtus mandarinus)

Five experiments were conducted to test the performance of adult mandarin voles (Microtus mandarinus) in discriminating and preferring siblings versus nonsiblings raised in different conditions. The results indicate that adult males and estrous females displayed a significant preference for individuals raised by other parents over those raised by the same parent, regardless of genetic relatedness. The effect appears to depend on the presence of siblings during development. This shows that familiarity through association before weaning plays an important role in kin recognition. The preference of reproductively active mandarin voles for unfamiliar voles is interpreted as inbreeding avoidance. Although Wilcoxon's matched-pair tests showed no significant preferences of adult mandarin voles for siblings over nonsiblings raised by the same parents or by other parents, mean durations of visiting, mounting, and lying near nonsiblings were higher than those for siblings. This implies that genetic relatedness may have some effect on kin recognition, although familiarity is the main mechanism.