Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Group Research Articles

Topographic and Surgical Risk Factors for Early Myopic Regression between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Laser In Situ Keratomileusis.

Our objective was to evaluate the topographic and surgical factors of early myopic regression between laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). A retrospective case-control study was conducted, and 368 and 92 eyes were enrolled in the LASIK and SMILE groups via propensity score matching (PSM). Visual acuity, refractive status, axial length, and topographic/surgical parameters were collected. Multiple linear regression was applied to the yield coefficient and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the parameters. The cumulative incidence of early myopic regression was higher in the LASIK group (p < 0.001). In the SMILE group, a lower central corneal thickness (CCT) thinnest value and a higher corneal cylinder associated with early myopic regression were observed; meanwhile, in the LASIK group, a lower CCT thinnest value, a higher steep corneal curvature, a larger optic zone, and a lower flap thickness related to early myopic regression were observed (all p < 0.05). In the SMILE group, a higher CCT difference correlated with early myopic regression was observed compared to the LASIK group (p = 0.030), and higher steep corneal curvature and lower cap/flap thickness (both p < 0.05) correlated with early myopic regression were observed in the LASIK group compared to the SMILE group. In conclusion, CCT differences significantly influence early myopic regression in the SMILE group; meanwhile, corneal curvature and flap thickness affect early myopic regression principally in the LASIK group.

Ocular surface changes following computer use in post-LASIK patients.

To assess the impact of computer use on the ocular surface of individuals after laser insitu keratomileusis (LASIK). The dry eye symptoms and ocular surface of 18 post-LASIK young individuals and 18 controls were evaluated before and after performing a 30-min task on a computer without (Visit 1) and with (Visit 2) initial instillation of artificial tears. Symptoms were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaire version two (SANDE II) and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q). The ocular surface was assessed by measuring corneal higher order aberrations, tear meniscus height (TMH), conjunctival redness, blink rate and incomplete blinking, lipid layer thickness (LLT) and non-invasive keratograph break-up time (NIKBUT). SANDE II scores were >0 after the computer task in both groups (p ≤ 0.01). SANDE II and CVS-Q scores did not differ between LASIK and controls (p ≥ 0.43). Greater bulbar-temporal conjunctival redness, TMH and LLT and shorter NIKBUT were found after computer use in the LASIK group (p ≤ 0.04), whereas no changes were observed in the controls (p ≥ 0.20). Lower SANDE II and CVS-Q scores were reported at Visit 2 compared with Visit 1 in both groups (p ≤ 0.01). Likewise, no worsening of dry eye signs was observed at Visit 2 (p ≥ 0.11). Ocular symptoms reported during computer use were comparable between the groups. However, a worsening of dry eye signs was mostly observed in post-LASIK individuals. The instillation of artificial tears was effective in preventing the effects of computer use on the ocular surface in post-LASIK patients.

Impact of removing soft contact lenses 1day versus 1month before surgery on the outcomes of microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis.

To compare the outcomes, safety, efficacy, and predictability of microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) 24h and one month or more after removing soft contact lenses. ULTRALASIK Eye Center, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. The patients were divided based on the time of discontinuation of the soft contact lenses before LASIK (Group 1 at 24h and Group 2 at one month or longer), and the two groups were well matched. Schirmer's testing, tear break-up time, corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, and infection rate were evaluated preoperatively and at one week, one month, and six months after treatment. Group 1 (G1) comprised 1025 eyes, and group 2 (G2) had 1052 eyes. The groups were comparable preoperatively. The overall-mentioned outcomes were comparable between groups with uncorrected distance visual acuity of - 0.084 ± 0.12 logMAR in G1 and - 0.078 ± 0.17 logMAR in the G2 at 6months (P = 0.322). Tear break-up time as well as Schirmer's testing results was also comparable with no evidence of increased risk of dry eyes or non-inflammatory complications in any of the groups on follow-up visits at 1week (P = 0.421), 1month (P = 0.101), and 6months (P = 0.399) postoperatively. Finally, no infectious complications were recorded in either of the groups. With the absence of corneal warpage, no statistical or clinical difference in microkeratome LASIK outcomes and safety was spotted between the groups despite the difference in SCL discontinuation time before the procedure.

Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations between Wavefront Optimized Photorefractive Keratectomy and Laser in situ Keratomileusis in Myopic Patients.

To compare the higher order aberrations (HOA) between wavefront optimized (WFO) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in myopic patients. Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from December 2021 to December 2022. Forty-four patients underwent wavefront optimized PRK and fifty-seven patients underwent wavefront optimized LASIK. All variables were recorded before the procedure and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), root mean square (RMS) of HOAs, spherical aberration (SA), and coma aberration (CA). A total of 101 eyes of 51 patients were considered in the final analysis. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A comprised of 44 (43.6%) eyes of 22 patients who underwent PRK while group B comprised of 57 (56.4%) eyes of 29 patients who underwent LASIK. UCVA significantly improved postoperatively at 3 and 6 months in both PRK and LASIK groups (p<0.001 for both groups). In this study, the increase in root mean square (RMS) of higher order aberrations from baseline value was 77% after PRK and 28% after LASIK, similar ratio was observed in spherical aberration (SA). The trend of rise in Coma aberrations was more in LASIK group 66.49%as compared to 46.2% in PRK group. Both Wavefront Optimized PRK and LASIK are safe and have elicited comparable results of post-procedure visual recovery. There was a marked increase in RMS of HOAs in PRK group as compared to WFO LASIK group while coma aberration increased more in LASIK as compared to PRK postoperatively. LASIK, PRK, RMSh, HOAs, Spherical aberration, Coma, Myopia.

Transient Light Sensitivity Syndrome (TLSS) Incidence Following Femtosecond LASIK for Myopic and Hyperopic Eyes and Femtosecond SMILE for Myopic Eyes.

To evaluate and compare the incidence of transient light sensitivity syndrome (TLSS) after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), hyperopic LASIK, and myopic small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). A retrospective analysis was performed of consecutive LASIK and myopic SMILE cases, performed with the VisuMax femtosecond laser and MEL 80 or MEL 90 excimer laser (both Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) between January 2010 and February 2021 at London Vision Clinic, London, United Kingdom. A chart review was performed to find cases of clinically significant TLSS, identified as patients prescribed anti-inflammatory medications between 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery to manage photophobia. The incidence of TLSS was calculated for three groups: myopic SMILE, myopic LASIK, and hyperopic LASIK. The incidence of TLSS was then calculated for three subgroups within each treatment type based on spherical equivalent refraction treated. For myopic SMILE and myopic LASIK, it was 0.00 to -4.00 diopters (D) (low), -4.01 to -8.00 D (moderate), and -8.01 to -14.00 D (high). For hyperopic LASIK, it was 0.00 to +2.00 D (low), +2.01 to +4.00 D (moderate), and +4.01 to +6.50 D (high). The range of treatment for myopia was similar between the LASIK and SMILE groups. The incidence of TLSS was 1.2% for the myopic SMILE group, 5.3% for the myopic LASIK group, and 9.0% for the hyperopic LASIK group. The difference was statistically significant between all groups (P < .001). For myopic SMILE, the incidence of TLSS was independent of spherical equivalent refraction for low (1.4%), moderate (1.0%), and high (1.1%) myopia (P > .05). Similarly, for hyperopic LASIK, the incidence was similar for low (9.4%), moderate (8.7%), and high (8.7%) hyperopia (P > .05). In contrast, for myopic LASIK, the incidence of TLSS was "dose-dependent" on refractive error treated, with an incidence of 4.7% for low, 5.8% for moderate, and 8.1% for high myopia (P < .001). The incidence of TLSS was higher after myopic LASIK than after myopic SMILE, higher after hyperopic than myopic LASIK, and "dose-dependent" for myopic LASIK but did not vary by correction in myopic SMILE. This is the first report describing the phenomenon of late TLSS occurring between 8 weeks and 6 months after surgery, [J Refract Surg. 2023:39(6):366-373.].

Is refractive enhancement a safer option for post laser in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction regression - How far we have come?

Is refractive enhancement a safer option for post laser in situ keratomileusis and small incision lenticule extraction regression - How far we have come?

Visual outcomes of early enhancement following small incision lenticule extraction versus laser in situ keratomileusis.

To compare visual outcomes of early enhancement following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Retrospective analysis of eyes (patients operated in the setting of a tertiary eye care hospital between 2014 and 2020) requiring early enhancement (within one year of primary surgery) was conducted. Stability of refractive error, corneal tomography, and anterior segment Optical Coherence Tomography (AS-OCT) for epithelial thickness was performed. The correction post regression was done using photorefractive keratectomy and flap lift in eyes, wherein the primary procedure was SMILE and LASIK, respectively. Pre- and post enhancement corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA and UDVA), mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and cylinder were analyzed. IBM SPSS statistical software. In total, 6350 and 8176 eyes post SMILE and LASIK, respectively, were analyzed. Of these, 32 eyes of 26 patients (0.5%) post SMILE and 36 eyes of 32 patients (0.44%) post-LASIK required enhancement. Post enhancement (flap lift in LASIK, and PRK in SMILE group) UDVA was logMAR 0.02 ± 0.05 and 0.09 ± 0.16 (P = 0.009), respectively. There was no significant difference between the refractive sphere (P = 0.33) and MRSE (P = 0.09). In total, 62.5% of the eyes in the SMILE group and 80.5% in the LASIK group had a UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = 0.04). PRK post SMILE demonstrated comparable results to flap lift post LASIK and is a safe and effective approach for early enhancement post SMILE.

Alteration in corneal topography asymmetry indices following corneal refractive surgery

Purpose We aimed to follow up corneal refractive asymmetry index changes following refractive surgery for cornea after correction of low-grade myopia and to determine which technique causes marked affection of the indices. Patients and methods This prospective study conducted from October 2020 to December 2021 included two groups of patients, the photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) group and the laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) group. Every patient in each group had to follow a schedule of visits after surgery for the next day, 1 week, 1 month, and after 3 months. Patients who failed to follow this schedule were excluded from the study. Results The PRK group contained 42 eyes with a mean uncorrected visual acuity that improved significantly, corneal power (K-reading) and pupil center thickness reduced significantly. Surface variance index, central keratoconus index, and height decentration index did not change significantly. Vertical asymmetry index and minimum radius of curvature (Rmin) increased significantly while height asymmetry index decreased significantly. Our LASIK group contained 40 eyes that underwent changes similar to those in the PRK group regarding uncorrected visual acuity, the K-reading, and the pupil center thickness. The surface variance index, vertical asymmetry index, and height asymmetry index, height decentration index and Rmin increased significantly while the central keratoconus index decreased significantly. The keratoconus index reduced significantly in both groups. Conclusion The PRK is a more conservative technique than the LASIK technique regarding the affection of corneal asymmetry indices.

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus Artisan lens implantation in correcting ametropia after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus

PurposeTo compare the long-term safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation to correct refractive errors after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for keratoconus.MethodsThis retrospective comparative interventional case series included a total of 33 consecutive keratoconus eyes that had previous PK and received subsequent LASIK (n = 16) or Artisan lens implantation (n = 17) were included in this study. Outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive error, and complications.ResultsPostoperatively, the UDVA of ≥20/40 was achieved in none of the LASIK group compared to 62.5% of eyes in the Artisan group (P < 0.001); the respective values for CDVA of ≥20/40 were 87.5 and 94.1% (P = 0.51). Spherical equivalent refraction decreased from − 6.97 ± 1.50 D preoperatively to − 4.20 ± 2.05 D postoperatively in the LASIK group (P < 0.001) and from − 10.79 ± 2.15 D preoperatively to − 2.13 ± 1.23 D postoperatively in the Artisan group (P < 0.001). There was no significant change in the refractive astigmatism in LASIK group (P = 0.30) or Artisan group (P = 0.11). The efficacy and safety indices were significantly better for Artisan (0.82 ± 0.34 and 1.13 ± 0.30, respectively) than for LASIK (0.22 ± 0.17 and 0.85 ± 0.24, respectively, P ≤ 0.006 for both comparisons). While refractive error changed significantly from postoperative year 3 to the final visit in the LASIK group, it remained stable in the Artisan group through follow-up period. No significant complications were observed in any group.ConclusionArtisan lens implantation provided superior and stable visual outcomes compared to LASIK for the management of post PK refractive errors in keratoconus eyes.

Corneal Sensitivity and Patient-Reported Dry Eye Symptoms in a Prospective Randomized Contralateral-Eye Trial Comparing Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

To prospectively compare corneal sensation and patient-reported symptoms of dry eye in individuals undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Prospective randomized contralateral-eye clinical trial. 80 eyes of 40 patients with myopia at Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University were randomized to receive wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK in one eye and SMILE in the fellow eye. Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry was performed to assess corneal sensitivity preoperatively and at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. Participants also completed questionnaires at each visit to determine the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Eyes that underwent LASIK compared to SMILE demonstrated more corneal denervation at the postoperative 1-month (mean 2.1 vs 3.6 cm, P < .001), 3-month (3.5 vs 5.4 cm, P < .001), and 6-month (4.7 vs 5.7 cm, P < .001) visits. At the 12-month visit, both groups had returned to baseline corneal sensitivity (5.9 vs 5.9 cm, P=.908). There was no difference in OSDI between the 2 groups at any visit. Mean OSDI improved from the preoperative to the postoperative 12-month visit in both LASIK (15.3 to 8.6, P=.020) and SMILE (15.1 to 9.5, P=.029) groups. LASIK resulted in greater corneal denervation compared to SMILE in the early postoperative period, though this difference was no longer apparent after 12 months. Despite this, there was no difference in self-reported dry eye symptoms between the 2 groups. Patient-reported dry eye symptoms improved after both LASIK and SMILE procedures.

Comparison of Three Tonometers in Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Eyes That Underwent Myopic Laser in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.

ObjectiveTo compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), correcting applanation tonometer surface (CATS) and biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) of Corvis ST tonometer (CVS); and to determine the effects of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT) and mean corneal curvature (Km) on the IOP measurements of corneal refractive patients.MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study of 120 eyes of 64 patients from May 1, 2020 to June 1, 2021 who underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The level of agreement between the three tonometers was evaluated, and correlation between parameters was calculated using Pearson correlation.ResultsMean preoperative to postoperative IOP in LASIK and PRK was 15.1 ± 3 to 11.3 ± 2.1 and 14.4 ± 2.6 to 12.1 ± 3 using GAT, 16.4 ± 2.8 to 13.1 ± 2.3 and 15.9 ± 2.6 to 13.7 ± 3 using CATS and 14.8 ± 2.4 to 12.9 ± 1.5 and 14.2 ± 2.4 to 12.6 ± 1.9 using CVS-bIOP. Preoperative IOP correlation between each tonometer pair showed that the lowest mean difference was between GAT and CVS-bIOP (0.32 in LASIK, 0.15 in PRK). Preoperative to postoperative IOP correlation of each tonometer resulted in a difference of 3.77, 2.30 in GAT; 3.32, 2.28 in CATS and 1.88, 1.62 in CVS-bIOP in the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. Percentage change in CCT and Km was not correlated while change in MRSE had a weak relationship with percentage change in CVS-bIOP.ConclusionPreoperatively, GAT and CVS-bIOP had the best agreement in IOP measurements. CATS recorded the highest IOP preoperatively and postoperatively. IOP decreased in the three tonometers after LASIK and PRK with GAT having the largest decrease. CVS-bIOP had the lowest change between preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements. Only percentage change in MRSE was correlated with percentage change in CVS-bIOP in the LASIK group.

Comparison of accommodation and accommodative micro-fluctuation after implantable collamer lens and LASIK surgery for myopia

BackgroundTo longitudinally analyze and compare the accommodative micro-fluctuation (MFs) and accommodative function between myopic patients after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).MethodsPatients with good corrected visual acuity (20/20 or better) and underwent ICL (V4c) and LASIK for myopic-correction (ranging from − 3.50 to − 8.50 D) were recruited. Refraction, amplitude of accommodation (AMP), accommodative lag, higher-order aberration (HOA), and MFs were recorded before surgery and 1 and 3 months after surgery. The ACOMEREF automatic refractor was used to measure the high-frequency component (HFC) of the MFs, which suggested tension of the ciliary muscle.ResultsThe study comprised 120 eyes. At 3 months after surgery, the manifest refractive spherical equivalent of the ICL and LASIK groups were − 0.11 and − 0.09 D, respectively (p = 0.46). HFC values were significantly higher at 1 month (p = 0.03) and 3 months postoperatively (p = 0.03) in the ICL group compared to that in the LASIK group. The ocular HOA of the ICL group was 1.08 ± 0.43 μm, which was lower than the LASIK group 1.45 ± 0.54 μm (p = 0.01). No significant differences in AMP and accommodative lag between groups were noted at 3 months postoperatively. There was a positive correlation between HFC and vault of the ICL lens (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.005). There were no correlations between HFC and ocular HOA and postoperative MRSE in the two groups (all p>0.05).ConclusionsThe HFC increased significantly after an early period of ICL implantation compared to laser in situ keratomileusis for myopic correction, which indicated increased tension of the ciliary muscle, and had a positive correlation on the vault of the ICL lens; However, studies with longer follow-up time and more structural evaluation are needed.

Axial Length Evaluation before and after Myopic Corneal Refractive Surgery Using IOL Master

Purpose: To evaluate axial length before and after the photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Setting: Alhokama Eye Center, Riyadh Saudi Arabia. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: The study sample was comprised of 106 eyes of 54 patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they had photorefractive surgery (PRK group) or laser in situ keratomiluesis (LASIK group). The intra-group comparison was performed of the changes in axial length before and after surgery using IOLMaster. P P < 0.00001, both intra-group comparisons). Conclusion: There was a statically significant decrease in the axial length measurements after PRK or LASIK for myopia.

Comparison of Planned Versus Achieved Central Stromal Thickness Reduction in LASIK Versus SMILE: A Contralateral Eye Study.

To compare attempted versus achieved corneal stromal thickness reduction in a consecutive case series of patients undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in one eye and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in the other eye. This prospective, randomized, contralateral eye study included 22 consecutive patients (44 eyes), one eye randomized to have myopic LASIK and the contralateral eye to have SMILE. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively. For each of the treatment groups, the achieved maximum stromal thickness reduction was compared to the planned/attempted thickness. The deviation of planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction was then compared between the two groups. At 3 months postoperatively, LASIK had a lower difference between planned versus attempted stromal thickness reduction compared to SMILE (13.72 ± 14.45 vs 24.00 ± 19.45 µm, P = .03). Graphical analysis revealed this deviation to be exaggerated in higher myopic errors, when a higher maximum stromal reduction was planned. The mean stromal reduction thickness was 83.40 ± 29.52 µm achieved versus 97.13 ± 25.69 µm mean planned ablation depth in the LASIK group (P < .001) compared to 76.45 ± 29.69 µm achieved versus 100.45 ± 26.56 µm planned ablation depth in the SMILE group (P < .001). LASIK had a significantly lower difference between planned versus achieved stromal thickness reduction when compared to SMILE (P = .03). This difference was more apparent in higher myopic corrections. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(7):454-459.].

Comparison of effective corneal refractive centration to the visual axis: LASIK vs SMILE, a contralateral eye digitized comparison of the postoperative result.

To define and compare the centration of the ablation effect in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with the corresponding effect in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), in myopic laser vision correction to possibly explain the refractive performance differences noted between the two procedures in a contralateral eye study. Private ambulatory eye surgery unit. Prospective randomized contralateral eye study. In 22 consecutive patients (44 eyes), 1 eye was prospectively randomized to undergo myopic topography-guided LASIK treatment and the contralateral eye to undergo SMILE; digital image analysis of the achieved centration to the aimed corneal vertex was assessed for both procedures on perioperative Scheimpflug tangential curvature maps, using a proprietary digitized methodology. The radial displacement measured in micrometers in the above treated 44 eyes, between the attempted centration point on the corneal vertex vs the center of the measured effective anterior corneal curvature flattening was on average 130 ± 62 mm in the 22 eyes of LASIK group and 313 ± 144 mm in the 22 contralateral eyes of the SMILE group (P < .001). In this contralateral eye study, topography-guided myopic LASIK was found to achieve significantly better effective centration compared with myopic SMILE, in regard to digitally measured decentration of the effective refractive change achieved in the anterior corneal curvature from the corneal vertex. This may explain the previously reported superior visual outcomes in the LASIK group eyes when compared with the contralateral SMILE group eyes.

Effect of suction on the posterior segment after LASIK using Femtosecond Laser vs Microkeratome

Background: Creating a successful corneal flap is the first critical step during LASIK surgery. Two techniques are used to produce corneal flaps during LASIK surgery: a microkeratome or a femtosecond laser. Femtosecond laser has a significant impact on refractive surgery by enabling non-mechanical creation of corneal flaps during laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). During LASIK flap creation, intraocular pressure (IOP) increases to levels exceeding 65 mm Hg. Femtosecond laser flap creation exerts less extreme IOP fluctuations but requires more procedural time than when a microkeratome is used. This study was conducted upon 60 eyes of 38 patients to evaluate the effect of applied suction during LASIK procedures on the posterior segment of myopic eyes, whether the flap was created by Microkeratome or Femtosecond laser. The study subjects were equally divided into 2 groups: group F (30 eyes of 20 patients) underwent femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK surgery and group M (30 eyes of 18 patients) underwent microkeratome-assisted LASIK surgery using Moria M2 for the treatment of myopia. It was found that the central macular thickness and RNFL thickness were not changed significantly in both groups when measured 1 week after surgery. Regarding the incidence of PVD, there was a higher incidence in group F, it was detected in 8 eyes (26.7%) compared to group M, it was detected in 1 eye (3.3%). Conclusion: Slight localized changes of macular thickness and reduction of the RNFL thickness were caused by LASIK using the two major forms of flap creation, namely a microkeratome or a femtosecond laser. Regarding the incidence of PVD, it was found that femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK using Visumax femtosecond laser had a higher incidence than that after microkeratome-assisted LASIK with the Moria M2. So the surgery of LASIK is safe and efficient, but surgeons should choose effective and safe suction mode, shorten the suction time and exclude potential retinopathy and pre-existing glaucoma before surgery to improve the safety and efficacy of LASIK.

Corneal nerve repair and optical density in patients with high myopia after three kinds of corneal refractive surgery

Objective: To investigate the repair of subepithelial nerve fibers in different areas of the cornea and the difference of corneal transparency 12 months after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASEK) in high myopia. Methods: A cohort study. From June 2018 to October 2019, 30 patients with high myopia (60 eyes) were selected for corneal refractive surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, including 16 females (32 eyes) and 14 males (28 eyes). According to the mode of operation, the patients were divided into the SMILE group (n=10), FS-LASIK group (n=11) and LASEK group (n=9). The repair of subepithelial nerves in different areas of the cornea was observed by laser confocal microscopy 12 months after operation,and the morphological parameters were analyzed by ACCMetrics software. The parameters included corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber total branch density (CTBD) and corneal nerve fiber width. The Pentacam anterior segment analyzer was used to measure the optical density of the cornea in different diameters. The nerve fiber parameters and corneal optical density were compared by random block analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons were performed between groups by the Turkey test. Results: Twelve months after operation, there was no significant difference in the CNFD among the three groups(all P>0.05). The CNBD around the upper corneal incision in the SMILE group, FS-LASIK group and LASEK group was (7.81±7.93), (9.61±7.18) and (21.25±15.55) branches/mm2, respectively. The CTBD was (22.00±16.02), (24.44±11.42) and (54.37±22.13) branches/mm2, respectively. The values in the LASEK group significantly differed from the other two groups (HSD=2.823, -3.010, 3.053, -3.048, P<0.01). The CNFL was (9.19±3.25), (12.88±3.52) and (15.75±2.36) mm/mm2, respectively. The value in the SMILE group was significantly different (HSD=-3.151, -4.418; P<0.0l). The corneal optical density after SMILE was 13.16±0.72 in the 0-6 mm diameter area(HSD=-4.164, -4.489; P<0.01), 16.12±3.18 in the 6-12 mm diameter area(HSD=-3.918, -3.493;P<0.01) and 14.06±1.36 in the total diameter (HSD=-6.031, -5.519;P<0.01), which differed significantly from the other two groups. Conclusions: Twelve months after SMILE for high myopia, the nerve repair around the superior corneal incision is slightly worse than that after FS-LASIK and LASEK, but the nerve repair in other areas has some advantages, and the corneal transparency is better. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57:268-276).

LASIK versus PRK for high astigmatism.

To compare the refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopic astigmatism of 3 diopters (D) or more. Retrospective matched comparative study. This study include consecutive myopic patients (SE 0 to -10 D) undergoing LASIK or PRK between 2007 and 2016 with astigmatism of 3 to 6 D, and postoperative follow-up of at least 30days for LASIK and 60days for PRK, compared outcomes of LASIK and PRK eyes. The LASIK and PRK groups comprised 175 eyes of 175 patients each, with median follow-up of 39 and 139days, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean preoperative manifest astigmatism was -3.35 ± 0.46 and -3.42 ± 0.51 D (P = 0.92), postoperative SE was -0.43 ± 0.55 and -0.16 ± 0.64 D (P < 0.001), and arithmetic astigmatism was -0.59 ± 0.46 and -0.88 ± 0.60 D (P < 0.001), for the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. Fifty-seven and 64.0% eyes had postoperative SE within ± 0.5 D of emmetropia (P = 0.19), and 57.7 and 38.8% eyes were within 0.5 D of attempted astigmatic correction (P < 0.001) for the LASIK and PRK groups, respectively. More PRK eyes were overtreated regarding both SE and astigmatism than LASIK eyes (P < 0.001). The efficacy and safety indices were close to 1.0 in both groups. The surgically induced astigmatism, magnitude of error, index of success, correction index and flattening index were all better in the LASIK group. Both LASIK and PRK achieve good outcomes in high astigmatism. LASIK achieved mild superiority over PRK.

Higher-order aberrations following wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

Background: We aimed to evaluate higher-order aberrations (HOAs) following wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.&#x0D; Methods: This retrospective observational case-control study included patients who underwent wavefront-guided PRK (40 eyes of 20 patients) or LASIK (40 eyes of 20 patients) between August 2018 and November 2018 at the refractive surgery unit of Kayseri City Hospital Eye Clinic, Turkey. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, corneal topography, and HOAs were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in all patients.&#x0D; Results: The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 27.13 ± 5.54 years and 29.10 ± 4.38 years in the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively (P = 0.06). Both groups had a mean CDVA of 1.00. The mean ± SD of spherical and spherical equivalent values was -2.09 ± 1.56 diopter (D) and -3.03 ± 1.72 D in the PRK group and -2.23 ± 1.69 D and -3.35 ± 1.71 D in the LASIK group, respectively (P = 0.58). When the preoperative and postoperative HOAs and root mean square (RMS) values (for a 6-mm pupil diameter) were compared in the PRK group, a significant difference was found in vertical coma and total RMS values (P = 0.003 and P ˂ 0.001, respectively); in the LASIK group, there was a significant difference in preoperative and postoperative vertical coma and total RMS values (P = 0.0.001 and P ˂ 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative vertical coma values between the two groups (P = 0.735 and P = 0.583, respectively).&#x0D; Conclusions: In terms of HOAs, total RMS values decreased significantly and vertical coma values increased significantly at 3 months postoperatively in both PRK and LASIK groups. However, there were no differences between the two groups.

Incidence of Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Adverse Events in a Large Cohort of Consecutive Laser Vision Correction Treatments

To evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AE) following laser vision correction. Retrospective case series. Optical Express, UK. Patients/study population: patients who underwent laser insitu keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2016. Intervention/observation procedures: all AEs recorded in the electronic medical record were extracted and retrospectively reviewed. The total incidence of AE and serious adverse events (SAE) was calculated. Loss of 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was calculated for the entire cohort of patients that attended a minimum of 3months follow-up. AEs; Preoperative and last available postoperative clinical data. A total of 31,921 (61,833 eyes) were included in the study for LASIK and 5,016 (9,467 eyes) for PRK. The total number of AE was 850 for LASIK (occurring in 783 eyes of 657 patients; incidence of 1.3% or 1:79 eyes) and 227 for PRK (occurring in 218 eyes of 170 patients; incidence of 2.3% or 1:43 eyes). In the LASIK group, there were 287 SAEs (271 eyes of 226 patients; incidence of 0.4% or 1:228 eyes), and the number of SAEs in PRK group was 65 (65 eyes of 39 patients; incidence 0.7% or 1:146 eyes). Combining LASIK and PRK data, the loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA was recorded in 0.37% of eyes. Contemporary LASIK and PRK are safe procedures with a low incidence of serious adverse events.