Abstract

Objective: To investigate the repair of subepithelial nerve fibers in different areas of the cornea and the difference of corneal transparency 12 months after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASEK) in high myopia. Methods: A cohort study. From June 2018 to October 2019, 30 patients with high myopia (60 eyes) were selected for corneal refractive surgery in the Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, including 16 females (32 eyes) and 14 males (28 eyes). According to the mode of operation, the patients were divided into the SMILE group (n=10), FS-LASIK group (n=11) and LASEK group (n=9). The repair of subepithelial nerves in different areas of the cornea was observed by laser confocal microscopy 12 months after operation,and the morphological parameters were analyzed by ACCMetrics software. The parameters included corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL), corneal nerve fiber total branch density (CTBD) and corneal nerve fiber width. The Pentacam anterior segment analyzer was used to measure the optical density of the cornea in different diameters. The nerve fiber parameters and corneal optical density were compared by random block analysis of variance, and multiple comparisons were performed between groups by the Turkey test. Results: Twelve months after operation, there was no significant difference in the CNFD among the three groups(all P>0.05). The CNBD around the upper corneal incision in the SMILE group, FS-LASIK group and LASEK group was (7.81±7.93), (9.61±7.18) and (21.25±15.55) branches/mm2, respectively. The CTBD was (22.00±16.02), (24.44±11.42) and (54.37±22.13) branches/mm2, respectively. The values in the LASEK group significantly differed from the other two groups (HSD=2.823, -3.010, 3.053, -3.048, P<0.01). The CNFL was (9.19±3.25), (12.88±3.52) and (15.75±2.36) mm/mm2, respectively. The value in the SMILE group was significantly different (HSD=-3.151, -4.418; P<0.0l). The corneal optical density after SMILE was 13.16±0.72 in the 0-6 mm diameter area(HSD=-4.164, -4.489; P<0.01), 16.12±3.18 in the 6-12 mm diameter area(HSD=-3.918, -3.493;P<0.01) and 14.06±1.36 in the total diameter (HSD=-6.031, -5.519;P<0.01), which differed significantly from the other two groups. Conclusions: Twelve months after SMILE for high myopia, the nerve repair around the superior corneal incision is slightly worse than that after FS-LASIK and LASEK, but the nerve repair in other areas has some advantages, and the corneal transparency is better. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2021, 57:268-276).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call