History has addressed the many wishful and often contradictory dreams within Nazi Germany’s polity pertaining to Europe’s future. Few survived the imperatives of war, but many of those that did caused devastating effects. The idea of a European New Order, central to this book—an ambiguous notion in the first place—crumbled as Adolf Hitler’s war fortunes disappeared.Various disciplines have brought value added to the historical understanding of the Nazi endeavors and visions, including architecture. Stratigakos’ book elaborates the character and purpose of Nazi physical aesthetics and the Nazi assumption that technology complemented nature. By focusing on Norway, Stratigakos successfully explicates the utopian dreams of a society holding a privileged position in the Nazi racial hierarchy.The short introduction neither assesses relevant scholarship nor raises an overall research question. Stratigakos describes the book’s purpose only indirectly—to show how “the physical conditions for a national socialist revolution in Norway would … involve developing novel forms and types of architecture in response to native landscapes and traditions” (8). The first chapter convincingly shows the romanticizing of Norway by the press and how it connected to Nazi racial prejudices. Each of the chapters that follow deals with construction plans and programs. The first chapter presents the general infrastructure program covering roads, bridges, railroads, and the highway project intended to connect Trondheim to the European network. The next chapter discusses a program for building soldiers’ homes. Chapter 3 deals with the ambition to shape urban landscapes when resurrecting bombed towns, and Chapter 4 details the plans for building a large new German city close to Trondheim.All four chapters, even the slightly out of place section on the Lebensborn interior in Chapter 2, impressively narrate how the expression of a magnificent Germanness, and the creation of a National Socialist community with and among the Norwegians, was supposed to unfold through construction and architecture. Grounded in scholarship and new sources, these chapters are all informative and convincing. The conclusion, however, is disappointing. A redundant narrative about legacies and impacts, it does not produce a synthesis from the material that precedes it, leaving an unresolved ambiguity and a failure to take account of methodological limitations.The chapters show wishful thinking and aborted plans. The highway to Trondheim, the polar railway to Kirkenes, and the new town near Trondheim never came to fruition. Given that few of the new buildings materialized and that the scheme for soldiers’ homes was only partly implemented, why does Stratigakos methodically treat the projects as though they left legacies and long-term impacts? An answer may lie in the following quotation: “The superhighway between Trondheim and Berlin may not have gotten off the drawing board, but many roads were built, especially in northern Norway and coastal areas” (230). The problem, however, is that Stratigakos does not discuss a wider road program. Be that as it may, the roads that the Nazis did manage to build reflected not a vision of German Autobahn aesthetics nor an idyll of future peacetime tourism but the practical wartime imperative of bearing the weight of heavy military vehicles. Similarly, the new town near Trondheim was planned as a heavy naval base because the Nazis envisioned the area as a bridgehead for the North Atlantic and the polar waters. Trondheim was the chosen destination for the projected new highway because the new naval installation nearby could have held 300,000 Germans. Arguably, the anticipated highway’s function would have matched that of the anticipated main Highway IV stretching from Poland through the Caucasus to reach the large German population supposed to be working the Soviet oilfields.Stratigakos’ focus on architectural aesthetics and design may not have been the best methodology for a study of the Nazis’ pipe dreams and harebrained schemes in Norway; it obscures the exigencies of war and existing resource constraints. She might have avoided the ambiguities in the book had she formulated a research design justified by the relevant historiography.
Read full abstract